The German Federal Cartel Office ("BKartA") has yet
again fined a distributor for committing an infringement of
competition law relating to resale price maintenance
("RPM"). Following its decisions in Microsoft
(software package), CIBA Vision (contact lenses) and Phonak
(hearing aids), the BKartA has fined Garmin Deutschland GmbH
("Garmin") (a producer of portable navigation systems)
and a Garmin employee, €2.5 million for operating a
prohibited resale price maintenance system.
Garmin contacted the BKartA in October 2009 and reported a
system of "kickback" payments it once had in place.
Although the conduct had ceased by the time Garmin contacted the
BKartA, Garmin had in the past charged specialist retailers, who
had their own internet sales platform and sold Garmin's
navigation systems at relatively cheaper prices over the internet,
a higher price for its portable navigation systems than other
retailers. If these specialist retailers raised the price of
the relevant navigational systems to a fixed minimum price, Garmin
retrospectively awarded them with a bonus, taking into account the
loss the retailers had made through the adoption of the fixed
minimum pricing level.
In setting the fine, the BKartA took into account the profit
Garmin made during the retrospective "kickback" program
in Germany for specialist vendors. Rather than contesting the
fine or arguing for a possible reduction in the German courts, both
Garmin and the employee in question, have agreed to a settlement
with the BKartA, thereby accepting the fine.
This decision has been issued not long after the fines issued by
the BKartA in 2009, including those on Microsoft (fine of
€9 million for an RPM infringement in relation to its
software package "Office Home & Student 2007" in
April 2009), CIBA Vision (fine of €11.5 million for an
infringement relating to recommended RPM for contact lenses in
September 2009) and Phonak (fine of €4.2 million in
relation to the RPM for hearing aids in October 2009).
Of late, vertical relationships have been the subject of intense
scrutiny by the BKartA. Although the European Commission in
its new Vertical Guidelines outlines certain exceptional
circumstances in which RPM can be justified, the BKartA's
enforcement activity clearly shows that the German authority views
any kind of RPM extremely critically. Companies are therefore
well advised not to influence the prices of their distributors
To view Community Week, Issue 478; 2 July 2010 in full,
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
By 27 December 2016, the Croatian Parliament needs to implement the Directive 2014/104/EU on antitrust damages actions, which is expected to streamline the procedure for private individuals and businesses to sue for damages...
The European Commission recently published its preliminary report on the E-commerce Sector Inquiry, identifying potential competition concerns in cross-border e-commerce of digital content and consumer goods.
The German government has recently published a bill that would significantly amend the criteria for determining whether an M&A transaction is subject to German merger control.
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).