France: How To Determine The True Inventor

Last Updated: 2 October 2008
Article by Isabelle Mendelsohn and Franck Tetaz

Which employer, licensing, IP or R&D department of a company has never been faced with the difficult task of designating the inventors when filing a patent application?

An invention to be exploited is generally the fruit of a collaboration chain in which each participant has made his/her own contribution to the final work.

Distinguishing between them comes down to separating the different participants in this value chain, and is directly related to human resource management in the corporation.

Basically, according to article L611–6 of the intellectual property code (IPC), "the right to the industrial property title belongs to the inventor or his/her successor in right".

Determining the true inventor/s is therefore an essential part of ensuring property of the invention. This measure is essential to ensure that the inventor or any successor in right will be properly identified as such in the patent application and, as applicable, can claim his rights within the context of a collaboration contract. Otherwise, article L. 611–8 IPC allows the true inventor or successor in right to claim ownership of the patent.

The designation of the inventor is mandatory, article L611–9 CPI stating in this respect that "the inventor, an employee or otherwise, shall be mentioned as such in the patent". Such a designation, in the case of employed inventors, gives rise to the obligation to pay an additional remuneration or a fair price (article L611–7 CPI), which is a potential source of dispute between employer and employee.

An invention is above all an intellectual conception which is the fruit of the reflexion of one or several individuals. It is therefore a question of facts in respect of the role of each individual in the conception of the invention, and of his/her intellectual and technical contribution.

This question of facts cannot be pre-defined by law or contract.

Thus, in France, there is no legal definition of an "inventor".

Nevertheless, an inventor designated as such in a patent application is legally presumed to be the true inventor. The burden of the proof to reverse such a presumption is particularly heavy, and will be even more difficult when the presumed inventor has also been designated as such in other patent applications such as, for example, in the United States.

It is therefore essential have a "canvas" available from the start, which will allow decision makers to distinguish inventors from other participants in developing and giving value to an invention and, as applicable, to settle the issue.

Most collective agreements containing provisions relating to the rights of inventors remain silent as to what the paternity of an invention exactly means.

Some of them, including the collective agreement for the chemical industries, provide four indices making it possible to assess the employed inventor's right to remuneration, i.e.:

  • The general framework of the invention;
  • The difficulties involved when reducing the invention to practice;
  • The personal and original contribution of the employee;
  • The commercial interest of the invention

However, the concept of personal contribution is vague. It involves analysing the framework of the research in order to understand the personal role of the employee when making the invention.

Only the case law provides more precise indicators as to the concept of inventor.

Firstly, the inventor is a physical person and not a corporate body as an invention is the fruit of an intellectual activity. It was thus confirmed by the Paris Court of Appeals on 18 June 2004 that an inventor may only be a person who actively participated in making the invention (GRAIRE v/ POL SCARPE SPORTIVE).

Also, the presence of an inventive step is necessary for being qualified as inventor, and any party who claims inventorship must himself provide evidence of his/her inventive step.

However, this concept of inventive step should be distinguished from the corresponding patentability criterion pursuant to article L 611–14 CPI.

Any person may provide this evidence, and his/her position in the company does not presume his/her capacity as inventor. The courts in fact analyze the personal contribution to the conception and, as applicable, to the reduction to practice of the invention, and examine whether this contribution exceeds the framework of mere execution.

One of the evidentiary means most favourably looked on by the courts is the participation of the alleged inventor in the drafting of the patent application, with the help of the patent attorney. The other evidentiary means which can be used are the usual ones such as meeting minutes indicating participants and their position, scientific publications, summary notes or other internal notes concerning the invention, the driving or follow up of industrial tests, testimonies, and of course laboratory notebooks.

Claims of inventive step may nevertheless be disputed, and the courts may assess the technical or professional abilities of alleged inventors to conceive the invention, as well as their position within the company.

Certain categories of employees will generally be considered as mere executors and not inventors. This is the case in general with a technician, foreman, maintenance engineer, lab preparator, manager, company official, secretary, chairman of the executive board, director, chairman of the board of directors, etc.

Others will be more readily admitted as inventors. These are most commonly researchers having an inventive mission.

In general, any person who participated in making the invention by analyzing the problem to be solved and the technical solution to be provided will be considered as an inventor.

Case law has thus laid down to the indicators which prove or not the contribution of the alleged inventor.

An invention is often the fruit of a team and not a single individual.

In this case, the person from whom the invention and the inventive step originated, on the one hand, and the persons who contributed to its technical and industrial reduction to practice on the other hand, will be deemed inventors. The Paris Court thus ruled that a co–inventor to be designated could be the employee who has provided the technical and marketing ideas of the invention but not its technical feasibility, and that paternity of the invention would then be shared between him and the R&D team to which the feasibility and achievement of the project was entrusted (THIBIERGE v/ ARJO WIGGINS Co., TGI Paris, 16 October 2001)

Further, the lack of a precise description of the contribution of each team member may favour the alleged inventor. Thus the Paris Court has also recognized a person as inventor by acknowledging that the reduction to practice has been carried out by a team to whom he belongs, although it could not affirm that he had a determinant role within the team. (BRINON v/ VYGON, TGI Paris, 14 September 2005)

Persons who have been involved it the reduction to practice and/or industrialization are not automatically considered as co–inventors, and the courts must also consider the nature of the contribution of each of them to distinguish inventors from non-inventors:

  • The mere provision of resources or advice within a team is insufficient to become qualified as co–inventor.
  • The mere lending of equipment is insufficient to acquire inventorship.
  • Self-financing the studies leading to an invention does not provide the quality of inventor to the financer.
  • The mere formulation of a problem to be solved or the drafting of technical specifications is generally insufficient to confer the quality of inventor or co–inventor.
  • The mere exchange of ideas with regard to the interest of the invention is insufficient to assign any ownership to the patent.
  • Participation in an invention which solely pertains to the area of abstract ideas may not in itself provide inventorship. It is therefore on this basis that public and private bodies must draw up clear internal guidelines to designate inventors. This would undoubtedly make it possible to avoid the majority of disputes in this area.

It is therefore on this basis that public and private bodies must draw up clear internal guidelines to designate inventors. This would undoubtedly make it possible to avoid the majority of disputes in this area.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions