France: Bidding UK law ‘adieu’?

Last Updated: 29 October 2003

Article by Philippe Desprès and Sébastien Le Coeur

Foreign employees posted to France often successfully claim that French law governs their employment contracts. Philippe Desprès and Sébastien Le Coeur of Gide Loyrette Nouel examine the issues for UK employers.

In spite of increasing convergence in the employment laws of the EU member states, and growth in employees’ international mobility, significant disparity persists in the treatment of employees in different European countries. In this respect, the law governing the employment relationship in accordance with the EC Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations (the Rome Convention) continues to raise practical problems.

Although, in accordance with the Rome Convention, the parties to an employment contract are free to choose the governing law, we shall see that French law strictly limits this choice. In practice, employees posted to France under an employment contract governed by a foreign law often successfully claim that French law governs the employment relationship, especially in the event of dismissal, in order to benefit from provisions that are frequently more favourable.

Under French law, in the event of dismissal, employees benefit in particular from:

  • a strictly regulated dismissal procedure involving a formal preliminary meeting and notification;
  • a notice period and severance pay which are due except in the event of gross misconduct;
  • damages for unfair dismissal amounting to at least six months’ gross salary (where the employee has at least two years’ service in a company employing more than ten employees); and
  • specific redeployment and training measures for employees faced with redundancy.

'Posting’ is the term used in EU legislation rather than ‘assignment’ or ‘secondment’, and is different from ‘transferring’ an employee. In the event of a posting, the employee is supposed to work for a limited period of time and on a specific assignment in France. In the event of a transfer, the employment contract with the English company is terminated or suspended and a new employment contract is entered into with the French company.

This article reviews the basic principle applying to conflicts of law and discusses the limits of this principle.

Freedom of choice

French courts apply the Rome Convention to resolve conflicts of laws relating to contractual obligations. Under Article 10, the law applying to a contract shall, in particular, govern interpretation, performance, damages and termination.

The basic rule set forth by the Rome Convention is that ‘a contract shall be governed by the law chosen by the parties’ (Article 3). The choice of law must be expressed or demonstrated with reasonable certainty by the terms of the contract or the circumstances of the case. The parties can select the law which applies to all or a part of the employment contract (dépeçage).

Therefore, when an English company posts an employee to France, it should ensure that English law expressly governs the whole employment contract and not only, for instance, termination. It is also advisable to subject other important obligations, such as non-compete, confidentiality or working time clauses, to English law.

If the employment contract does not state that English law applies, the letter of assignment - which sets out the terms and conditions of the posting - should stipulate that the entire employment contract is governed by English law, even during the posting to France.

There are, however, limits on this freedom of choice, which are provided in Article 6 of the Rome Convention and French case law.

Habitual place of work

Under Article 6, a choice of law made by the parties in a contract of employment shall not have the result of depriving the employees of the protection afforded to them by the mandatory rules of the law that would apply in the absence of choice. An employment contract shall, in the absence of choice, be governed by the law of the country in which the employees habitually carry out their work in performance of the contract, even if they are temporarily employed in another country.

In other words, the employees are covered by the mandatory rules of the law of the country where they habitually carry out their work. This concept of the habitual place of work is a traditional tool used to resolve conflicts of jurisdictions and laws.

If the employees do not habitually carry out their work in any one country, their employment contracts shall be governed by the law of the country of the company which appointed them. This provision is designed to apply to employees, generally in sales-related positions, who work in several countries at the same time. This would not be the case for an English employee posted to France, who would work consecutively in two countries.

Article 5 of the Brussels Convention on jurisdiction (as replaced by Article 19 of Regulation 44/2001/EC) contains a similar provision to the Rome Convention, stating that an employer domiciled in a member state may be sued before the courts in the place where the employees habitually carry out their work. This test was added to the Brussels Convention in 1989. When drafting the amendment, the view was taken that disputes should as far as possible be brought before the courts of the state governing the contract in line with the case law of the European Court of Justice (Report on the Convention on the Accession of Spain and the Portuguese Republic to the Brussels Convention, OJ 1990 C 189, p 35, at paragraph 23).

Since courts determine firstly whether they are competent and subsequently which law applies, case law on the habitual place of work is generally based on Article 5 of the Brussels Convention.

The place where the employee has worked the longest

The employment law section of the Supreme Court has ruled that:

  • Portuguese law applied where the employee had worked in Portugal for 30 years and in France during the four years prior to his dismissal (Gasalho v Tap Air Portugal [2000]);
  • US law applied where the employee had worked in Amsterdam for six years, in Singapore for four years, and in New York during the six years prior to his dismissal (Ferwerda v BNP [1999]);
  • French law applied where the employee had worked in Argentina for 14 years and in France during the 15 years prior to his dismissal (Carlos Olivia Campos v Banco de la Nacion Argentina [2001]); and
  • French law applied where the employee had worked in France for the last ten years out of 15 (Trans Mediterranean Airways v Raphaël [1996]).

Applicable test

Pursuant to case law, the place of performance is the location where the employees actually perform the work covered by the contracts with their employer – or, in other words, the location which is the centre of their professional activities.

The ECJ sets out the applicable test in Weber v Universal Ogden Services Ltd [2002]:

Where an employee performs his contract of employment in several member states the place where he habitually works is the place where, or from which, taking account of all the circumstances of the case, he in fact performs the essential part of his duties vis-à-vis his employer.

In the case of a contract of employment under which an employee performs for his employer the same activities in more than one member state, it is necessary, in principle, to take account of the whole of the duration of the employment relationship in order to identify the place where the employee habitually works.

Failing other criteria, that will be the place where the employee has worked the longest.

Therefore, where the employees carry out their work consecutively in two countries, as would be the case for an employee posted by an English company to France, the court will choose the location where the employee has worked the longest.

This test has been applied by the French Supreme Court (Cour de Cassation) in a number of cases. Obviously, if the employees have performed their work in only one country, the law of that country will apply (see Steinman v Société Générale [1999], Paris Court of Appeal).

Mandatory rules

Under French law, the concept of law further to the Rome Convention covers the aggregate of legislation, regulations, judicial decisions and accepted legal principles. It also covers sector-wide collective bargaining agreements. However, it does not apply to the common practices for a particular industry sector or company.

Pursuant to Article 3.3 of the Rome Convention, mandatory rules are the rules which cannot be derogated from by contract. Under French employment law, it is almost always possible to derogate by contract from rules set forth by statutes, regulations or collective bargaining agreements.

However, it is only possible to derogate from rules to the employee’s advantage. Therefore, in any given situation, the rules of the law chosen by the parties will not apply if they are less favourable than the rules of French law.

Although case law covers rules relating to dismissals and their direct consequences, this rationale would apply to any other rules (such as leave of absence, compensation and working time).

Does English or French law apply?

To determine whether English or French law governs the employment relationship, the employer should firstly consider whether it is possible to derogate from the French rule of law by contract. This is almost always possible, provided that the derogation is in favour of the employee.

Secondly, it should compare the French and English rules of law relating to the same matter to determine which is more favourable to the employee. If the matter is not covered by English law, the French provisions will be deemed more favourable and, therefore, applied.

If the employee has already received payments under English law, the courts will offset them from the payments due under French law if they relate to the same matter (for example, the notice period).

Examples of mandatory rules

In the case of Institut Culturel Autrichien v Maria Marceglia [2002], the employment section of the French Supreme Court characterised a number of French rules as mandatory rules in accordance with the Rome Convention. It found that the French rules governing the preliminary meeting in the event of dismissal, and those governing damages for dismissal without cause, were more favourable than Austrian law. It also found that state-funded measures for employees faced with redundancy, which do not exist under Austrian law, were more favourable under the French rules.

In the case of Air Afrique v Maillard [1992], the Supreme Court ruled that French rules on redundancy were more favourable than the law of the Ivory Coast.

Management and supervision

Where a French company acts as if it were the posted employee’s employer, a court would be likely to rule that it is the actual employer, even if the English company continues to manage and supervise the employee during the posting. To avoid French law governing the employment relationship with one of its posted workers, an English employer should ensure that:

  • it determines the terms and conditions of the posting, and the French company does not enter into an employment contract with the posted employee (see, for example, Sethurman v Mandataire Liquidateur de la BCCI [1996]);
  • the French company does not carry out an appraisal for the employee or give him instructions;
  • the management of the French company does not take disciplinary action or dismiss the employee (see BP France v Panetier [2001]);
  • the employee’s remuneration is not paid by the French company and is not dependent on the French company’s performance – nor must the employee be included on the French payroll (see Jego-Quéré v Beauséjour [1998]);
  • the management of the French company does not inform the employee of the upcoming termination of his posting (see International Harvester v Klaus Helkov [1988]);
  • the French company carries out none of the above measures ‘on behalf’ of the English company (see Barrat v Angelloz-Nicoud [1998]);
  • the French immigration services consider that the employee is posted and not engaged in France (see International Harvester v Klaus Helkov);
  • the employee is posted in accordance with Articles 14 et seq of Regulation 1408/71/EC – in other words, his English social security cover should be maintained during the posting and the French company should not pay social security contributions to the French authorities for him (see Jego-Quéré v Beauséjour); and
  • the letter of assignment specifies that the employee will be reinstated in a similar position upon his return to England.

Practical guidelines

In light of the above, English companies wishing to post employees to France under an employment contract governed by English law should:

  • expressly state in the employment contract that English law applies;
  • avoid posting a newly appointed employee to France, since French law will apply if the employee has worked longer in France; and
  • continue to manage and supervise the employee, and give the French company clear instructions not to act as the posted employee’s employer.

Moreover, since the courts assess the applicable law on a case-by-case basis, English employers should seek specialist legal advice before terminating the employment contract of an employee posted to France whose employment contract provides for the application of a foreign law.

Philippe Desprès is a Partner (with effect from 1 January 2004) and Sébastien Le Coeur an associate at Gide Loyrette Nouel, Paris.

Article initially published in Employment Law Journal – April 2003

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions