Mondaq USA: Employment and HR > Employment Litigation/ Tribunals
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The SJC issued two important decisions in April and early May.
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The Department of Justice filed an appeal from the District Court's decision on May 3.
Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
In a positive development for employers, the California Court of Appeals affirmed summary judgment for an employer in a class action alleging willful violations of the Federal Fair Credit
Ford & Harrison LLP
Executive Summary: On May 3, 2019, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) confirmed that employers will be required to submit Component 2 pay data for years 2017 and 2018
McLane Middleton, Professional Association
The SJC, Massachusetts' highest court, issued its long awaited decision in Sullivan v. Sleepy's LLC, SJC-12542 on May 8, 2019.
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Everything was smooth sailing with your latest greatest arbitration agreement, but then an employee refused to get on board.
BakerHostetler
On May 2, the Ninth Circuit expanded the application of the "ABC" test, adopted by the Supreme Court of California in Dynamex Ops. W. Inc. v. Superior Court.
Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart
Employers frequently wonder when to pay bonuses to employees on leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA).
Fisher Phillips LLP
The Kentucky Court of Appeals just held that non-lawyers may no longer represent employers in unemployment proceedings, ruling that such a practice is unconstitutional.
Mintz
Our colleague Gil Samberg offers analysis of the U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision in Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela, which held that neither silence nor ambiguity in an arbitration agreement
Fisher Phillips LLP
For the past several years, there has been a steep increase in litigation in the hospitality industry brought under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, and now a new twist is on the rise.
Fisher Phillips LLP
There's no way to sugarcoat this one. Today the 9th Circuit handed a big loss to gig economy companies by concluding that last year's Dynamex decision from the California Supreme Court
Stites & Harbison PLLC
In 1984, the Kentucky Legislature enacted KRS 341.407(3), permitting employers, including corporations and partnerships, to represent themselves or be represented by counsel in administrative
Dentons
On April 24, 2019, the US Supreme Court ruled on the question of whether the Federal Arbitration Act (the "FAA") "bars an order requiring
BakerHostetler
Sometimes being right is not a virtue, especially when it comes to the Federal Arbitration Act § 1 exemption. We predicted uncertainty after the New Prime v. Oliveira decision and got it.
Fisher Phillips LLP
A federal court announced today that employers have until September 30, 2019 to turn over pay data as part of your revised EEO-1 reporting obligations.
Squire Patton Boggs LLP
As we previously reported here, on April 3, 2019, the White House Office of Management and Budget ("OMB")
Littler Mendelson
On April 25, 2019, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ordered the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to collect detailed data.
Ford & Harrison LLP
Executive Summary: Approximately one year ago, in Epic Systems Corp., the United States Supreme Court upheld the enforceability of mandatory arbitration agreements that prohibit employees from
Holland & Knight
The U.S. Supreme Court handed down its decision in Lamps Plus, Inc., et al. v. Varela, No. 17-988, on April 24, 2019.
Latest Video
Most Popular Recent Articles
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Seyfarth Synopsis: Today the Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision in the Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela class action arbitration case.
Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
We recently highlighted DOL opinion letter 2018-27, which rescinded the 80/20 rule and was a welcome change for employers in the restaurant industry.
Dentons
On April 24, 2019, the US Supreme Court ruled on the question of whether the Federal Arbitration Act (the "FAA") "bars an order requiring
Davis & Gilbert
On March 14, 2019, a federal court in Pennsylvania issued a noteworthy decision that should remind employers to ask if an employee's unexplained absences may be due to medical reasons.
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Everything was smooth sailing with your latest greatest arbitration agreement, but then an employee refused to get on board.
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Seyfarth Synopsis: A federal district court in Arkansas recently denied an employer's motion for summary judgment on two EEOC-initiated ADA claims – in EEOC v. Crain Automotive Holdings LLC,
Littler Mendelson
On April 15, 2019, a California Court of Appeal affirmed summary judgment for the employer in an action alleging class-wide violations of the hyper-technical provisions of the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).
Fisher Phillips LLP
For the past several years, there has been a steep increase in litigation in the hospitality industry brought under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, and now a new twist is on the rise.
Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart
Under the policy, the claimant was required to provide satisfactory proof of his disability on an ongoing basis.
Ford & Harrison LLP
Executive Summary: Approximately one year ago, in Epic Systems Corp., the United States Supreme Court upheld the enforceability of mandatory arbitration agreements that prohibit employees from
Article Search Using Filters
Related Topics
Mondaq Advice Center (MACs)
Popular Authors
Popular Contributors
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
Partners
In association with