Mondaq Europe: Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Soteris Pittas & Co LLC
The well-known aspect of independence and objectivity in expert witness has once again been confirmed in the recent case of EXP v Barker together with the importance of full and frank disclosure...
Wolf Theiss
Welcome to the 7th edition of the DRInsider, the quarterly Newsletter of the Wolf Theiss Dispute Resolution Practice Group. We are happy to again provide you with interesting news covering the various CEE/SEE jurisdictions in which we practice.
Schoenherr Attorneys at Law
The Hungarian Parliament recently passed new legislation on arbitration (Act LX of 2017 on Arbitration, the "2017 Act") that will reform Hungarian arbitration law as of 1 January 2018.
Dillon Eustace
The High Court in Cantrell has recently determined a number of preliminary issues involving the circumstances that will bar a plaintiff's claim under the Statute of Limitations.
Dillon Eustace
The plaintiff in this case was the collector general for the Revenue Commissioners who was claiming €184,545.68 from the defendants.
Dillon Eustace
Negligent misstatement occurs where there is a representation of fact, which is incorrect, which is carelessly made, and is relied on by another party to their disadvantage.
On 1 June 2017 a set of amendments to the Royal Court Rules (the Rules), together with 11 new Practice Directions, came into force in Jersey.
The process of making a planning appeal in Jersey can be complex and the deadlines are strict, so early instruction of your consultants and lawyers is essential.
De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek N.V.
Daan Beenders, Andries Polkerman and Wouter Hofstee have written an article, published in "Maandblad voor Vermogensrecht", focusing on an issue that can be relevant in settlement discussions; ...
K&L Gates LLP
The development of international arbitration in recent years has led to a significant multiplication of arbitration institutions around the world.
Wozniak Legal
An interesting decision issued in February 2017 by the Paris Court of Appeal (Cour d'Appel) may have an important impact on arbitral practice.
Rihm Attorneys
The Swiss Supreme Court dismissed on June 29, 2017, a complaint by Michel Platini against a decision of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) in Lausanne.
Ozgur Asik Law Offices
The adoption of Turkish International Arbitration Law 4686 in 2001 replaced the principle of reciprocity for a more all encompassing principle of "foreign element", ...
Moroğlu Arseven
The Civil Procedure Code requires parties to specify the facts which they rely on for their claims.
Clyde & Co
Following instructions from NHS Resolution, Clyde & Co have successfully defended a claim involving an alleged negligently performed shoulder operation.
Gowling WLG
In its judgment in Globalia Business Travel S.A.U. (formerly TravelPlan S.A.U) of Spain (Respondent) v Fulton Shipping Inc of Panama (Appellant) [2017] UKSC 43, the Supreme Court considered...
Clyde & Co
The Court of Appeal has reversed a judgment of the Commercial Court which had worrying implications for banks concluding international transactions using standard form ISDA documentation.
Clyde & Co
Following recent developments in the funding market and Nick's professional career, Ben took the opportunity to catch up with Nick and share thoughts on the current state-of-play.
Withers LLP
This week's corporate law news roundup includes discussions of the US Supreme Court's recent decision relating to where a corporation resides for purpose of venue in patent infringement cases...
Latest Video
Most Popular Recent Articles
The appointment of a provisional liquidator is not often pursued as the practical implications are draconian: directors lose the ability to control and manage the company's affairs.
Mayer Brown
The president's signing is the last step required for a law to come into force after it has already passed both legislative chambers in Germany.
Erdem & Erdem Law
Both in the Turkish Code of Obligations ("TCO") and the Swiss Code of Obligations ("SCO"), the notion of unlikely debt repayment is regulated under two different parts.
Gowling WLG
Contra proferentem is a legal principle which, broadly speaking, means that where there is ambiguity in a contract, a clause will be construed against the party who put it forward and seeks to rely upon it.
TLT Solicitors
In the recent case of Astor Management AG v Atalaya Mining plc [2017], the High Court disagreed with previous observations that an endeavours obligation is only enforceable if its object...
TLT Solicitors
The Supreme Court has unanimously held that damages should only be awarded where the breach of the procurement rules is "sufficiently serious".
TLT Solicitors
It also highlights the importance of identifying potential areas of risk under a contract and considering how these should be covered by insurance.
Onlangs heeft het Hof Den Bosch arrest gewezen omtrent een erfdienstbaarheid met een actieve verplichting.
In a recent decision, the Royal Court of Guernsey considered whether to set aside a distribution on the grounds of equitable mistake where that mistake led to adverse UK tax consequences.
In March the Munich offices of international law firm Jones Day, were raided by prosecutors in the VW emissions investigation. This breach of the law firm citadel has shone a bright light on the confidentiality of documentation and the importance of legal privilege.
Article Search Using Filters
Related Topics
Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Popular Authors
Popular Contributors
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter