Mondaq USA: Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration > Trials & Appeals & Compensation
Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP
On Sept. 29, Hughes Hubbard led Vyera Pharmaceuticals to a big win when a Manhattan federal judge ruled that Impax Laboratories Inc. could not collect $43 million from Vyera, ...
Jones Day
With institution rates of IPR petitions continuing to slide, and with district courts determining (depending on narrow or broad readings of the Shaw case) how estoppel may or may not apply in district court...
Jones Day
In a recent order, Administrative Law Judge Bullock granted Respondents Fujifilm Holdings Corporation, Fujifilm Corporation, Fujifilm Holdings America Corporation, and Fujifilm Recording Media U.S.A. ...
Foley Hoag LLP
On January 8, 2018, the en banc Federal Circuit, in Wi-Fi One, LLC v. Broadcom Corp., held that a PTAB decision upon institution as to whether a petition for inter partes review is timely ...
Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP
The Ninth Circuit's views on both of these Circuit splits will have ramifications on CERCLA litigants both in and outside of the Ninth Circuit.
Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP
The Delaware Supreme Court has refined Delaware law regarding shareholder ratification of director self-compensation plans for the first time in more than 60 years.
Jones Day
On January 10, 2018, the PTAB designated two decisions weighing on 35 U.S.C. § 315(b) as informative:
Reed Smith
Jurisdiction is hardly the spiciest of topics we discuss on this blog and yet it definitely qualifies for frequent-blogging status.
Carlton Fields
This matter involved appeals by appellant Best Made Floors Inc. ("Best Made") from a December 22, 2016 corrected judgment of a district court confirming two arbitration awards in favor of appellees, and from the district court's denial of its motion to vacate a third arbitration award in favor of the appellees
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
In Wi-Fi One, LLC v. Broadcom Corp., No. 2015-1944 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 8, 2018), the Federal Circuit, en banc, held that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)'s time-bar determination under § 315(b)...
Reed Smith
"[I]f inaccurate information falls into a government database, does it make a sound?" Partly affirming summary judgment for the defendant in Owner-Operator Indep.
Holland & Knight
A decision by the U.S. Court of Federal Claims on Jan. 5, 2018, has important implications for breach of trust claims involving tribal trust funds.
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
On January 10, the en banc Federal Circuit held in Wi-Fi One, LLC v. Broadcom Corp. that inter partes review time bar determinations under 35 U.S.C. § 315(b) are appealable ...
Proskauer Rose LLP
A team of Proskauer attorneys, on behalf of 12 leading non-profit organizations specializing in advocacy for victims of domestic violence, drafted an amicus brief in support of a mother seeking...
Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
A key safeguard of citizens' rights in the criminal justice system is the adversarial nature of the criminal trial, where the defense and prosecution each advocates for its own interests
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
This proceeding began with an opposition filed on October 14, 2014.
Brooks Kushman
The PTAB recently designated two decisions as informative that concern the time bar to filing an inter partes review (IPR).
Duane Morris LLP
Last month, on December 11, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court denied the petition for certiorari in Evans v. Georgia Regional Hospital et al., a high-profile case asking the Justices to decide whether the prohibition in ...
Jones Day
In Microsoft Corp. v. Biscotti, Inc., Nos. 2016-2080, -2082, -2083, 2017 WL 6613262 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 28, 2017)...
Ropes & Gray LLP
The Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) has designated the following decisions, which involve 35 U.S.C. § 315(b), as informative.
Latest Video
Most Popular Recent Articles
Ropes & Gray LLP
Scott McKeown, Ropes & Gray IP litigation partner and chair of the firm's Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) group, discusses potential impacts of pending Supreme Court PTAB cases...
Proskauer Rose LLP
Law firms are slowly but steadily moving to the cloud. According to an American Bar Association report, 37.5% of lawyers reported the use of web-based software services or solutions in 2016...
RPX Corporation
F2VS Technologies, Inc. has added two cases to the campaign that it began this past June, suing Acuity Brands (Acuity Brands Lighting) (1:17-cv-04774) and Daintree Networks (1:17-cv-01713).
Ropes & Gray LLP
Patent prosecutors navigate complex USPTO rules and seemingly esoteric examinational requirements to procure patent rights.
Reed Smith
And make no mistake about it, there's plenty to celebrate this year.
RPX Corporation
Computer Protection IP, LLC (CPIP) has filed its first affirmative lawsuit, accusing New Dream Network (DreamHost) (2:17-cv-08858) of infringing a single server security patent.
RPX Corporation
A patent infringement suit brought against Google by Personal Audio, LLC has been transferred from the Eastern District of Texas (1:15-cv-00350) to the District of Delaware (1:17-cv-01751) due to improper venue.
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
Succeeding in obtaining a ruling in an inter partes review petition at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board that issued patent claims are unpatentable, may not be enough to modify ...
Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP
The Court nonetheless reversed the refusal to register "FUCT."
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
The Federal Circuit held that the "immoral or scandalous" clause of Lanham Act § 2(a), which prohibits registration of a trademark that "consists of or comprises immoral or scandalous matter," ...
Article Search Using Filters
Related Topics
Mondaq Advice Center (MACs)
Popular Authors
Popular Contributors
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
Partners
In association with