Mondaq Canada: Government, Public Sector
Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
In P.G.v. Groupe Restaurant Imvescor Restaurant Group Inc. o/a Baton Rouge Restaurant ("Groupe"), the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario ("HRTO") awarded $12,000 in damages against a franchise restaurant ...
McMillan LLP
A recent successful claim by a person with obsessive compulsive disorder and germaphobia confirms that the scope of the legal obligation under Canadian law to accommodate persons with disabilities continues to expand.
Willms & Shier Environmental Lawyers LLP
On April 14, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Daniels v Canada (Indian Affairs and Northern Development).
Bull, Housser & Tupper LLP
Local Governments routinely deal with informal requests to access property and licensing files at the "counter" as well as more formal freedom of information requests.
McMillan LLP
The recent Supreme Court of Canada decision in Daniels represents a powerful form of judicial activism.
Gowling WLG
Service concessions became subject to the EU procurement regime for the first time in domestic law on 18 April 2016.
Bull, Housser & Tupper LLP
On April 14, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada issued its decision in the highly anticipated case of Daniels v Canada (Indian Affairs and Northern Development) ("Daniels") following years of litigation.
Bull, Housser & Tupper LLP
There are obviously some perks that come with power and influence.
Dentons (Canada)
On April 14, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) rendered its decision in Daniels v. Canada (Indian Affairs and Northern Development), 2016 SCC 12.
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
Under the previous federal and provincial Conservative governments, we saw a proliferation of the use of the public-private partnership (P3) structure for large public infrastructure projects.
Clark Wilson LLP
On April 14, 2016, the government introduced Bill C-14 that would legalize medical assistance in dying if it comes into force.
Torys LLP
The Supreme Court of Canada's unanimous decision in Daniels v. Canada is important in a number of respects.
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
Although the SCC's finding does not create a duty to legislate, it puts an end to a longstanding jurisdictional dispute that has perpetuated the disadvantages faced by Aboriginal peoples in Canada.
Gowling WLG
On February 25, 2016, Bill 173 was introduced into the Ontario Legislature.
Bennett Jones LLP
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of Canada issued a unanimous decision in Daniels v Canada (Indian Affairs and Northern Development), 2016 SCC 12 declaring that non-status Indians and Métis are "Indians" under s 91(24) of the Constitution Act, 1867.
Alexander Holburn Beaudin + Lang LLP
Métis and non-status Indians are now under federal jurisdiction and may assert Aboriginal rights. This was confirmed by the Supreme Court of Canada in Daniels v. Canada.
Lawson Lundell LLP
The Supreme Court's decision resolves a question of constitutional responsibility for Aboriginal peoples other than First Nations and Inuit.
Bennett Jones LLP
Public Works, which administers the Integrity Regime, states that the new amendments are to clarify existing processes in response to feedback received from stakeholders in the procurement community.
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
On April 4, 2016, the Ontario Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, the Hon. Ted McMeeken introduced Bill 181, the Municipal Elections Modernization Act, 2016 which proposes changes to the Municipal Elections Act, 1996, S.O. 1996, c. 32, Sched.
Lawson Lundell LLP
The Métis consultation process is closely modeled after the current First Nations consultation policy and guidelines which came into effect in 2013.
Latest Video
Most Popular Recent Articles
Goldman Hine
In the landmark 2013 decision of Canada v Bedford, the Supreme Court of Canada declared that certain provisions of the Criminal Code violated section 7 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Grant Thornton
The new Liberal government's first federal budget focuses on growing the middle class and strengthening the economy through both tax measures and non-tax measures...
McMillan LLP
The bail-in regime aims to protect Canadians in the event of big bank failure.
Lawson Lundell LLP
There were two interesting developments in Ontario this month in employment and human rights law.
Alexander Holburn Beaudin + Lang LLP
The following represents a quick review of certain legal principles and case law associated with competitive bidding and procurement in Canada.
McCarthy Tétrault LLP
Earlier this month, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) granted leave to appeal in three cases that concern important aspects of the Crown's duty to consult and accommodate Aboriginal peoples.
Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
In my blog post of April 14th, I discussed what I referred to as the curious case of the penalty that Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC) had imposed on a bank.
McLennan Ross LLP
On March 10, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada granted leave to appeal in the matters of Hamlet of Clyde River v. TGS-NOPEC Geophysical Company ASA (TGS) and Chippewas of the Thames First Nation v. Enbridge Pipelines Inc.
Aird & Berlis LLP
Two decisions were released by the Federal Court of Appeal in the latter half of 2015 that came to seemingly opposite conclusions regarding the role of the National Energy Board...
McCarthy Tétrault LLP
In 2015, Canada's new federal government committed to implementing the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (Declaration).
Article Search Using Filters
Related Topics
Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Popular Authors
Popular Contributors
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
Partners
In association with