Mondaq Canada: Intellectual Property
Bennett Jones LLP
The British Columbia Supreme Court has decided that the use of a competitor's trademarks in Google AdWords does not constitute infringement.
Bereskin & Parr LLP
On August 13, 2015, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held en banc that Limelight Networks Inc. ("Limelight") was liable for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,108,703 (the "'703 patent").
Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
P.K. Subban devrait-t-il avoir des droits dans l'un de ses spin-o-ramas ou encore le légendaire entraîneur Jacques Lemaire dans le système de la « trappe » en zone neutre?
McCarthy Tétrault LLP
WIPO is a United Nations agency that provides a global forum for intellectual property services, information, and cooperation.
McCarthy Tétrault LLP
Individuals or businesses may find themselves in a dispute over a domain name, whether as a complainant or the registered owner of the domain name.
Smart & Biggar/Fetherstonhaugh
The recent decision of the Supreme Court of British Columbia in Vancouver Community College v Vancouver Career College (Burnaby) Inc, 2015 BCSC 1470, addresses an interesting trademark issue in the context of online advertising.
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
ABB Technology AG, ABB Inc. v. Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd., 2015 FCA 181 - ABB has appealed two earlier judgments of the Federal Court: first, ABB's loss on the merits of a patent infringement action and the declaration that its two patents are invalid ..
McCarthy Tétrault LLP
Copyright law offers up a panoply of interesting questions, which often verge on the philosophical.
Bereskin & Parr LLP
The United States Patent and Trademarks Office has released an updated set of Eligibility Examination Guidelines to provide guidance to examiners on when to reject claimed inventions as ineligible abstract ideas.
Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
La Loi sur les brevets stipule que le titulaire d'un brevet n'a droit qu'à un brevet pour « une seule invention ». Ce principe d'apparence simple a mené à l'élaboration d'une doctrine complexe dite du « double brevet ».
Smart & Biggar/Fetherstonhaugh
As in most jurisdictions around the world, a registered trademark in Canada is vulnerable to cancellation if it is no longer in use.
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Bombardier brought a motion for leave to amend its Statement of Defence and Counterclaim to expand the list of prior art and include a new ground of invalidity (ambiguity).
Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
Nous vous présentons aujourd'hui un article préparé par Robert Greenberg, stagiaire à notre bureau de Montréal...
McCarthy Tétrault LLP
The new "Google Patents" search tool focuses on the improvement and expansion of prior-art searches.
Smart & Biggar/Fetherstonhaugh
On July 23, 2015, the Federal Court of Appeal held that the availability of a non-infringing alternative may be a relevant consideration when assessing damages for patent infringement ..
Bereskin & Parr LLP
These guidelines give a sense of what computer-implemented subject matter the USPTO considers to be ineligible for patent protection.
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Merck was successful in a patent infringement action. A separate damages reference was held where the Judge awarded lost profits and a reasonable royalty, for a total of $119,054,327 plus interest.
Goudreau Gage Dubuc
Last December, the Federal Court of Canada overturned a decision of the Commissioner of Patents to refuse a patent claiming a fixed dosage regimen for the drug Humira® (Adalimunab) used in rheumatoid arthritis.
Bereskin & Parr LLP
A new judicial test has likely established a new commercial standard for determining RAND royalty rates.
McCarthy Tétrault LLP
On appeal, the key dispute was whether a non-infringing alternative is a relevant factor to be considered in assessing patent infringement damages.
Latest Video
Most Popular Recent Articles
McCarthy Tétrault LLP
On appeal, the key dispute was whether a non-infringing alternative is a relevant factor to be considered in assessing patent infringement damages.
McCarthy Tétrault LLP
On January 7, 2015, Justice de Montigny of the Federal Court released his judgment and reasons in Eli Lilly Canada Inc. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals ULC, 2015 FC 17.
McCarthy Tétrault LLP
The new "Google Patents" search tool focuses on the improvement and expansion of prior-art searches.
McCarthy Tétrault LLP
Copyright law offers up a panoply of interesting questions, which often verge on the philosophical.
Smart & Biggar/Fetherstonhaugh
As in most jurisdictions around the world, a registered trademark in Canada is vulnerable to cancellation if it is no longer in use.
Goudreau Gage Dubuc
Last December, the Federal Court of Canada overturned a decision of the Commissioner of Patents to refuse a patent claiming a fixed dosage regimen for the drug Humira® (Adalimunab) used in rheumatoid arthritis.
Smart & Biggar/Fetherstonhaugh
The recent decision of the Supreme Court of British Columbia in Vancouver Community College v Vancouver Career College (Burnaby) Inc, 2015 BCSC 1470, addresses an interesting trademark issue in the context of online advertising.
Bennett Jones LLP
The Federal Court of Appeal observed that the balance at the heart of the Patent Act demands "perfect compensation".
Blaney McMurtry LLP
The Copyright Modernization Act, which amended Canada’s Copyright Act, received Royal Assent on June 29, 2012.
Bereskin & Parr LLP
Paul Horbal writes for Canadian Electronics discussing recent developments in the law that could make it difficult for IoT developers to patent their inventions.
Article Search Using Filters
Related Topics
Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Popular Authors
Popular Contributors
Tools
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
Partners