Mondaq USA: Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Fox Rothschild LLP
Determining how far beyond those core legislative functions official acts may still lie, therefore, remains open to question.
Every year, The Sedona Conference Institute keeps us ahead of the e-discovery curve with panels such as the famous Case Law Update and Judicial Roundtable.
Fox Rothschild LLP
Gerald E. Arth was featured in the Business Insurance article, "Ruling Maps Out Class Action Defense Plan: Plaintiffs Win, but Court Exposes Weak Points."
Fox Rothschild LLP
Superior Court Administrative Directive 2016-1, provides the Court's civil and criminal judicial assignments for 2016.
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Our colleagues Michael Arnold and Gauri Punjabi recently discussed the U.S. Supreme Court's rejection of the Federal Rule 68 "pick off" strategy on Mintz Levin's Employment Matters Blog.
Womble Carlyle
A new opinion from Judge Kiser involving salacious accusations against the Patrick Henry Community College women's basketball team and athletic director is anything but boring.
Mayer Brown
A couple of months ago, we reported on a $10 million punitive verdict in the first hip implant case to go to trial against Wright Medical Technology.
Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Despite broad familiarity with the litigation-related duty to preserve relevant evidence, including electronically stored information (ESI)...
Smith Gambrell & Russell LLP
The Court of Appeals finished 2015, and the Lippman era as Chief Judge, deciding an assortment of legal questions.
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
This Opinion was issued in one of the opt-out actions filed against BP stemming from the 2010 Deepwater Horizons oil spill.
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton
On January 20, 2016, the United States Supreme Court rejected a strategy recently used by some defendants to defeat class actions in their infancy.
Fox Rothschild LLP
The way things have gone lately, I thought it was time to reprise this blog post, originally published in April of 2014.
Jones Day
The Supreme Court in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez, No. 14-587 (Jan. 20, 2016), held that a defendant's unaccepted offer to fully satisfy the plaintiff's claim does not moot the plaintiff's case.
Womble Carlyle
This contract dispute involved ant-infested wooden pallets manufactured by plaintiff and sold to defendant.
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
E-Discovery counsel Samantha V. Ettari's article "Rule 37(e) and Spoliation Sanctions Under the Amended Rules," appeared in the February 1, 2016, issue of the New York Law Journal.
Horvitz & Levy LLP
It turns out that Justice Goodwin Liu's statement dissenting from the denial of a petition for review two weeks ago wasn't the first one ever in California Supreme Court history, as we theorized at the time.
Kaye Scholer LLP
Welcome to our fourth year of "And Now a Word from the Panel," a bimonthly column that "rides the circuit" with the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation as it meets at venues around the country.
Every year, The Sedona Conference Institute keeps us ahead of the e-discovery curve with panels such as the famous Case Law Update and Judicial Roundtable.
Jones Day
Global Legal Update Newsletter January 2016を発行いたしました。
Jones Day
Global Legal Update Newsletter February 2016を発行いたしました。
Latest Video
Most Popular Recent Articles
Foley Hoag LLP
Around this time last year, I started worrying about what would happen if someone at a Super Bowl party asked me to explain an NFL-related lawsuit, particularly one of those IP-ish lawsuits...
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
In Pfizer v. Lee (No. 2015-1265, January 22, 2016), the Federal Circuit upheld the USPTO's determination that the toll period for A-type patent term adjustment delay stops upon the mailing of a deficient USPTO paper.
Holland & Knight
When an online user violates copyright law, the copyright owner will frequently turn to the user's internet service provider (ISP) for relief.
Fox Rothschild LLP
Judge Lorna Schofield has agreed to stay a Fair Credit Reporting Act case until the U.S. Supreme Court issues its highly anticipated ruling in Robbins v. Spokeo, Inc.
In Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Capital One Financial Corp., Intellectual Ventures I brought a patent infringement suit in the United States District Court of Maryland alleging that Capital One infringed four patents in its portfolio.
Troutman Sanders LLP
A multinational consumer health care products company and its staffing agency are the latest companies to be hit with a putative class action accusing them of violating the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
Duane Morris LLP
In Universal Health Services Inc. v. U.S. et al. ex rel. Escobar et al., case number 15-7, the U.S. Supreme Court will decide the viability and scope of the "implied certification" theory of liability under the False Claims Act.
WilmerHale compiles lists of precedential and informative opinions that raise copyright and trademark law issues.
Morrison & Foerster LLP
In order to provide an overview for busy in-house counsel and compliance professionals, we summarize below some of the most important international anti-corruption developments in the past month...
Arnall, Golden & Gregory LLP
Beginning in earnest in 2013, the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") began to exert pressure on the payments industry...
Article Search Using Filters
Related Topics
Mondaq Advice Center (MACs)
Popular Authors
Popular Contributors
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
In association with