Current filters:  
Germany
Litigation
Germany
Bardehle Pagenberg
The decision has to take grounds of fairness and all relevant circumstances into account, Art. 49(5) UPCA. Decisive are the respective interests at stake.
Bardehle Pagenberg
A member of the public who requests access to the Register pursuant to R.262.1(b) RoP is a "Party" pursuant to R.8.1 RoP and, thus, must be represented before the UPC by an authorised representative (pursuant to Art. 48 UPCA)
Bardehle Pagenberg
The plaintiff filed a claim for damages subsequent to a German patent infringement case in which the defendant had been found to infringe the German part of EP 1 740 740 B1.
Bardehle Pagenberg
With(in) the R. 262A workflow, the UPC Case Management System (CMS) provides for a step-by-step procedure for the protection of confidential information, comprehensively taking...
Bardehle Pagenberg
In proceedings before the Court of Appeal, which do not involve technical issues, the Court of Appeal can decide without technically qualified judges ...
Bardehle Pagenberg
Procedural Court order allowing the parties to comment on several procedural aspects, in particular whether Rule 8 RoP applies.
Bardehle Pagenberg
With this decision the LD Düsseldorf applied Rule 37.2 RoP and determined prior to the closure of the written procedure to proceed with both the action for infringement...
Bardehle Pagenberg
The original version of a claim of an European patent and any amendments made thereto during the grant proceedings can be used as aid for interpreting the claim.
Bardehle Pagenberg
A concurrence of the deadlines for the reply to the Statement of defense and the Defense to a Counterclaim for revocation...
Bardehle Pagenberg
A notification by the judge-rapporteur under Rule 20.2 RoP that a preliminary objection is to be dealt in the main...
Mayer Brown
Mit dem Jahreswechsel ist das Gesetz zur Modernisierung des Personengesellschaftsrechts (kurz „MoPeG") in Kraft getreten und hat erhebliche Änderungen insbesondere für die Gesellschaften bürgerlichen
Norton Rose Fulbright
In Germany, lawyers are largely prohibited from offering litigation funding and agreeing on a performance-based fee. Legal tech providers who are not lawyers, on the other hand...
Mayer Brown
Großbauprojekte sind mit komplexen technischen, finanziellen und rechtlichen Fragen verbunden, die regelmäßig zu Streitigkeiten zwischen den Parteien führen. Um zumindest die sehr kostspieligen...
Oppenhoff & Partner
On 18 April 2023, the German Federal Ministry of Justice [Bundesministerium der Justiz, BMJ] published the key issues paper on the modernisation of German arbitration law.
Bardehle Pagenberg
This appeal concerns the decision of the Opposition Division rejecting the opposition against European patent EP 2 626 911. Its claim 1 specifies a material that is suitable for encapsulating a solar
Herbert Smith Freehills
Das Bundesjustizministerium hat mit dem „Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Einführung eines Leitentscheidungsverfahren beim Bundesgerichtshof" vom 14.
European Union
Herbert Smith Freehills
The German Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof – "BGH") recently allowed the enforcement of an arbitral award rendered in Deutsche Telekom v. India – an investor-State...
Herbert Smith Freehills
We are pleased to share with you the details of the upcoming Conference of the European Federation for Investment Law and Arbitration (EFILA), taking place in Frankfurt on Thursday 25 April 2024.
Herbert Smith Freehills
The Consumer Rights Enforcement Act (Verbraucherrechtedurchsetzungsgesetz) (VDuG) came into force in Germany on 13 October 2023, completing the long overdue implementation...
Herbert Smith Freehills
On 27 July 2023, the German Federal Court of Justice ("BGH") ruled on applications by Germany and the Netherlands to declare two pending ICSID arbitrations inadmissible.
FREE News Alerts
Sign Up for our free News Alerts - All the latest articles on your chosen topics condensed into a free bi-weekly email.
Popular Contributors
Upcoming Events
Mondaq Social Media