Cyprus: Online Contracts-Controlled By Lawyers Or Technologists?

The traditional proposition which remains generally true is that "a contract is an agreement giving rise to obligations which are enforced or recognized by law".1 It can be formed by a variety of methods which includes also the internet. Indeed, online contracts are now part of our every day life and are growing exponentially. However, valid contract formation over the internet is fundamentally important to electronic commerce and its further development. It appears that the courts and the majority of legal commentators2 agree that online contracts are valid, legally binding and enforceable provided that they meet all of the essential requirements of a valid contract formation those being offer and acceptance, consideration, intention to create legal relations upon certain agreed terms .

There is no doubt that the internet raises complex technological issues which may render difficult any attempt to establish that a valid contract has been formed especially when analyzing the issues of "offer" and "acceptance".

We now have to deal with new concepts such as the "virtual goods" or "intangible goods", until recently, unknown to the traditional business transactions. Legal concepts which are based on the existence of a tangible medium such as "instrument", "document", "original", "signature", must adapt to accommodate contracts that are now made over the internet. Legal concepts such as "delivery", "receipt", "dispatch", need to adapt to the fact of borderless electronic commerce and internet's speedy and automated transactions.3 But while technology makes business quicker and easier to transact, at the same time the lack of written physical documents exchange, makes it particularly difficult to analyse such transactions by applying the existing legal rules. The certainty and predictability of remedies afforded by a paper contract are complicated by the new technology and techniques and as a result commercial parties may be reluctant to contract electronically.

Consequently, there is an urgent need that international legal frameworks adapt to establish the same certainty and predictability for electronic contracts as for paper contracts by making laws and procedures compatible, "if the market is actually to operate by electronic means in the context of globalization."4 Legislatures around the world are evaluating traditional contract law requirements in light of these technological changes.

There are three main types of electronic contracting5:

  1. contracts for physical goods-goods are ordered over the internet with payment via the internet but delivery occurs in the usual way,
  2. contracts for services, such as electronic banking services, financial advise or consumer advise, and
  3. contracts for electronic or digitized products, such as software, music etc which can be ordered, paid for and delivered online.

In any of the above case the contract may be formed either through an exchange of email or by completion of a document on an internet website which is submitted to another party electronically6. Therefore, a distinction can be drawn between contracts made via emails and contracts made through the websites. Contracts concluded via websites are commonly referred to as click-wrap contracts.

In both cases, it is legally and also commercially important to be able to specify whether7, how, when and where such contracts are formed over the internet.8 Legislatures seem to have agreed that, existing legal requirements of contract formation, with certain adaptations may be used to make such an analysis with success.

Therefore, based on the traditional analysis of contract formation as indicated above, the process can be analyzed into the following two stages: the offer, when one party sets out the terms on which he is prepared to contract and the acceptance when the other party, unconditionally, agrees to these terms. However, in case there is a dispute between the parties regarding whether a contract has actually been formed, or regarding the specific terms of the contract or the time and place of the contract's formation, a lawyer must be able to analyse each party's messages or acts of submission of website documents or forms and decide about the exact time that those messages took effect.9 It is important, however, to be able to distinguish between an offer and an invitation to treat. The test that is applied in order to distinguish between an offer and a mere invitation to treat over the internet is that of the intention of the parties- whether the seller intended to be bound by the customer's response or not and whether the customer had also intention to be bound when he communicated his acceptance. Most probably the parties are unlikely to have had prior dealings and therefore in the absence of an express statement or actual knowledge by the recipient that the maker does not intent to be bound, the test of intention will be an objective analysis. However, considering the resemblance of web shop display of goods in a normal shop which is based on the rational that a shop owner should not be bound to an unforeseeable number of acceptances, the pure display of goods is likely to be treated as an invitation to treat. Christensen suggests that in addition to the intention of the parties, the interactivity or non-interactivity of the website may also be relevant.10

The contract is formed when and where acceptance takes place with the exception of the "postal rule". According to that rule if the offer contemplates acceptance by post the acceptance is effective once posted. The rule is designed to remove uncertainty from the contract formation process. But a question arises as to whether the postal rule applies to contracts made via email acceptances and website contracts.

It could be argued that, if email contracting is similar to contracting by post, then the postal rule should be applied to email acceptances as well. There are indeed methods of communication such as telex that do no benefit from the postal rule as they are not considered to be instantaneous. It is therefore crucial whether email can be characterized as an instantaneous means of communication or not.11 One could argue that email is not an instantaneous form of communication because there can be gap in time between dispatch and deemed receipt. Indeed, the mere possibility of delays, incorrect addresses or technological failures may not be sufficient to create a strict rule that an email acceptance is effective at a time other than communication. Furthermore, as pointed out by Reed12, as opposed to ordinary post, there is no identifiable third party to whom the message is entrusted. If, however, email contracting can be considered as a non instantaneous communication then a questions arises as to the point of time that it should be deemed to have been sent. Shall we consider that receipt occurred at the point at which an email arrived at the service provider's server or at the point at which the email is downloaded to the recipient's computer system? Some commentators assume that the email is considered to be received at the time when it enters the offerror's ISP13, while others consider that email is received at the time the email entered the mailbox of the offeror even if he does not log into it and read the email. In any case, however, it is crucial to determine the exact point of time the offeror could access the message and download it to his computer system.

In respect of website acceptances, however, it could be argued that since there is no actual space in time between the sending and the acceptance of the offer, unlike emails, are instantaneous. Reed14 points out that, contract formation through websites is an automated process controlled by the website software. It follows therefore that email acceptances and website acceptances will not receive the same treatment. There is therefore, much greater clarity in applying the postal rule to website acceptances rather than to email acceptances. Murray, goes further to suggest that, website acceptances demonstrate the characteristics of a telephone conversation rather that a mail message and as the sender is in position to be able to determine whether their message has been successfully received the postal rule will not apply because it does not need to.15 Murray further attempts the formulation of a new rule stating that "where an offer contemplates acceptance by a non-immediate form of communication, that acceptance is effective from the time it leaves the acceptor's control." Others who suggest that this distinction between instantaneous and non-instantaneous means of communication should not be made at all.16

In any case, a suggestion is that, if the contract is classified as one where the postal rule applies, then the place of conclusion of the contract would be the place where the acceptor commits his acceptance and if the contract is classified as one to which receipt rules would apply, then the place where the contract would be formed would be the place where the offeror receives acceptance.

As a legal respond to the complex issue of when and where electronic messages are received, both, the Australian Electronic Communications Act 199917 and the US Uniform Electronic Transactions Act 199918 set out certain legal presumptions: time of receipt is the entry of the message into the system of the recipient but the place of sending and receipt is presumed to be the sender's and the recipient's respective business addresses.19

An alternative would be to allow the parties to agree in advance the time and place that their messages shall take legal effect. 20It is therefore possible for an online seller to indicate in his website how and when a customer will be contractually bound.

There have been several attempts to respond to the various legal issues raised by the emerging phenomenon of online contracting or to lay down a workable legal framework to generally facilidate ecommerce, include, among others, the following:

The UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce originated to further progress and harmonize internal trade by including electronic transactions within the scope of international contracts, to accommodate increasing use. It is intended to facilitate the use of modern means of communications and storage of information. It is based on the establishment of a functional equivalent in electronic media for paper-based concepts such as "writing", "signature", and "original" by providing standards by which the legal value of electronic messages can be assessed and plays a significant role in enhancing the use of paperless communication.21 Furthermore, it allows for future technological developments to be accommodated and does not discriminate between different forms of technology ( EDI, email, internet, telegram, telex, fax etc)

The Model Law, in article 11 states that, "An offer and acceptance may be expressed by means of data messages". Furthermore, Article 14, provides that "where the originator has stated that the data message is conditional on receipt of the acknowledgement, the data message is treated as though it has never been sent". The provision in Article 15 provides some solution in cases where the parties haven't agreed upon the time of receipt of a message by stating that and it states particularly that, "unless otherwise agreed between the originator and the addressee, the time of receipt of a data message is determined as follows: (i) if the addressee has designated an information system for the purpose of receiving data messages receipt occurs either at the time when the data message enters the designated information system, or, if the data message is sent to an information system of the addressee that is not the designated information system, at the time when the data message is retrieved by the addressee, and (ii) if the addressee has not designated an information system, receipt occurs when the data message enters an information system of the addressee.

The EU has created a coherent regulatory framework for electronic commerce and provided in particular for online contracts. The E-Commerce Directive is designed to facilitate the provision of electronic commerce services. Articles 9, 10 and 11, deal with electronic contracts in business-to-consumer ("B2C") transactions although they do not address the full process of how a contract may be concluded by electronic means. Article 9, in particular, requires Member States to ensure that electronic contracts are rendered valid and to remove any prohibition or restriction on the use of electronic contracts, with certain permitted exceptions. Article 11 imposes an additional duty upon the online seller to send an acknowledgement of receipt upon a communication made by the consumer. The E-Commerce Directive adopts a minimalist approach, requiring a service provider to set out all the necessary steps so that consumers can have no doubt as to the point at which they are committed to an electronic contract. Article 2(b) of the Directive defines a service provider as "any natural or legal person providing an information service. Electronic contracts are just as legal and enforceable as traditional paper contracts that are signed in ink within the EU.

The Uniform Electronic Transaction Act (UETA) is an important US Legislation applicable to electronic contracts. UETA as expressly defined in Articles 3 and 4, only applies to transactions related to business, commercial and government matters and to transactions conducted by electronic means. UETA plays a similar role to the E-Commerce Directive in that it seeks to "remove barriers to electronic commerce." Unlike the E-Commerce Directive, however, UETA is "not a general contracting statute" and it does not require the recognition of electronic contracts.24 Instead, it approaches its goal "by validating and effectuating electronic records and signatures" on which contracts may be based. UETA provides:

(a) A record or signature may not be denied legal effect or enforceability solely because it is in electronic form.

(b) A contract may not be denied legal effect or enforceability solely because an electronic record was used in its formation

It seems that, while internet may have provided businesses and consumers with plethora of technologies and techniques and while contracting online by using these technologies and techniques (websites using forms technology to conclude a contract, websites using click-wrap, shrink-wrap and browser-wrap agreements, websites using Java or ActiveX technology, websites using the shopping mall technologies) may leads to uncertainty with regard to the traditional legal requirements and consumer protection, the law is responding by adapting to their emerging. The law, in order to safeguard consumers' interests when contracting online and enabling electronic contracts formation, have set out certain pre-contractual, contractual, settlement and post-contractual conditions that have to be met. Law is trying to control online transactions and face the legal problems that inevitably are involved by enabling the assessment of current legal requirements.

It is true that technology innovations run and it is difficult to keep up the pace with the changes. However, neither the lawyers nor the technologists have full control of online contract formation. They are in need of each others if e-commerce is to develop further. Technologists, driven by powerful competitive market forces, provide the technological mechanisms but unless lawyers do provide consumers with the required certainty, security and predictability inn using them, they will be in hesitant to do it. It is important that the underlying principles and structures remain valid when dealing with online contracting. There is no doubt, however, that new technologies will emerge, new systems and techniques for negotiating and forming contracts online will come into use. Consequently, new legal issues will be raised and lawyers will be faced with new challenges. Whether law shall find the appropriate legal mechanisms to respond to these challenges depends on the very nature of the technology that will be involved. I'm confident that it will. At least this is what Law History has showed us.

Footnotes

1. G.H. Treitel, The Law of Contract, eighth edition, 1991, Introduction

2. See Chris Reed and John Angel, Computer Law, 6th edition p.202 where Reed observes that "tht basic principles of contract formation are still the same,........so that the existence of a contract and its terms are discovered by identifying the offer and then determining whether that offer has been accepted."

3. United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL): Raising confidence in E-Commerce: the legal framework. UNCITRAL Secretariat, Vienna, Austria.

4. Council Directive 2000/31, Directive on Electronic Commerce (hereinafter the "E Commercial Directive), preamble 61. See also Christina Hultmark Ramberg, The Ecommerce Directive and formation of contract in a comparative perspective, European Law Review, 2001

5. Sharon Christensen, Formation of Contracts by Email – Is it Just the same as the post? [2001] QUTLJJ 3

6. Sharon Christensen, Formation of Contracts by Email – Is it Just the same as the post? [2001] QUTLJJ 3

7. It is already indicated above that, courts recognise such contracts.

8. Andrew D. Murray: Entering into contracts electronically: The real WWW

9. Chris Reed and John Angel, Computer Law, 6th edition p.202

10. Sharon Christensen, Formation of Contracts by Email – Is it Just the same as the post? [2001] QUTLJJ 3. The author suggests that a non-interactive site which in fact only provides information that can be confirmed by phone or delivery of goods, as opposed to an interactive site, "will convey through it's non interactive nature the implied intention on the part of the seller to negotiate the terms of any contract".

11. In Christensen's words "to consider a classification of email as either instantaneous or ono-instantaneous may lead to the application of postal rule in inappropriate situations".

12. Queen Mary University of London, Notes on Online Contracting-Unit 2, E-Commerce Law

13. Dickie 1998

14. Chris Reed and John Angel, Computer Law, 6th edition, p.204

15. Andrew D. Murray: Entering into contracts electronically: The real W.W.W in Edwards & Waelde (eds), Law & the Internet: A Framework for Electronic Commerce (2nd Edition, Hart, Oxford 2000)

16. ibid, footnote 11

17. Section 14

18. Section 15

19. Chris Reed and John Angel, Computer Law, 6th edition, p.202

20. According to Holwell Securities Ltd v. Hughes [1974] 1 WLR 155, it is permissible for the parties to stipulate what acts will constitute acceptance.

21. Article 5: "Legal recognition of data messages information shall not be denied legal effect, validity or enforceability solely on the grounds that it is in the form of a data message".

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions