Cyprus: The Law Against Penalties In Cyprus As Against The UK's Revised Law

Last Updated: 26 May 2017
Article by Alexandros Economou and Chryso Antoniou


The Contract Law, Cap. 149 (the "Law"), regulates the contract relations between parties in Cyprus since 1960 and it is identical to the Indian Contract Act 1872; essentially it reproduces the English applicable contract law principles as at 1960. While Cyprus in other aspects has begun to introduce its own legal principles (largely based on English law), the Law, including the law against penalties, remains almost unchanged since its adoption in 1960. The little development occurred in respect of penalties is limited to case law, where the Cypriot courts invoked relevant English case law.

On the other hand, in the UK, one hundred years after the decision which initially established the law against penalties, the Supreme Court reconsidered and revised the rule in one of its recent cases. The interesting aspect of this development is that the English courts considered the changing social and commercial landscape.

Penalty and Liquidated Damages Clauses under Cyprus law

Under the Law

Section 74 (1) of the Law states that:

"when a contract has been broken, if a sum named in the contract as the amount to be paid in case of such breach, or if the contract contains any other stipulation by way of penalty, the party complaining of the breach is entitled, whether or not actual damage or loss is proved to have been caused thereby, to receive from the party who has broken the contract reasonable compensation not exceeding the amount so named or, as the case may be, the penalty stipulated for. A stipulation for increased interest from the date of default may be a stipulation by way of penalty".

Under Case Law

Cyprus case law defined penalty clauses as a contractual term which seeks to intimidate through a stipulated amount of compensation which has to be paid in case of non-compliance with contractual obligations. It may take the form of a promise made by one contractual party to the other that in case that it does not fulfil or does not fulfil properly their contractual obligations will then be required to pay to the other (innocent) party, a particular amount of money, in the form of punishment.

Otherwise, a clause is held to be liquidated damages if it provides for a predetermined amount of damages that can be awarded to the innocent party upon breach of the contract and constitutes a genuine pre-estimate of loss. These clauses are absolutely valid and enforceable. The rule only applies where there has been an actual breach of contract and will not be relevant if the trigger event is not a breach.

It is settled case law that although sometimes the word 'penalty' is used in an agreement, the court may decide that the amount constitutes damages instead. The same is the case when an agreement contains the word 'damages' but the court may rule that in essence it is penalty. Consequently, the language is not the decisive factor but rather the intention of the parties is.

The following rules were applied by Cypriot courts by invoking the well-established English case Dunlop (below) in order to provide the test between the distinction of the penalty and the liquidated damages clauses:

(a) If the amount is regarded as too excessive and irrational in relation to the maximum amount of damage that may result this will amount into a penalty.

(b) If the amount specified in an agreement is related to the non-payment of a specified amount and the agreed amount is greater than the amount which was supposed to be paid, then that amount is a penalty.

(c) If there is the same agreed amount which will be payable in the case of a violation of one and/ or more and/or all violations occur of which some are substantial and some minor, this amount will be regarded as penalty.

(d) When a contract contains more than one term and the amount of damages that may result from the violation of each term cannot be estimated, then the amount which is decided will be regarded as special damages. Still, it will be a penalty if it is too excessive and irrational.

(e) The question whether a stipulated sum is penalty or liquidated damages is a question of construction of the clause and is to be decided upon the terms and inherent circumstances of each particular contract, judged of as at the time of the making of the contract and not as the time of the breach.

It follows from the above that the pre-estimate of the loss in case of breach of contract is not binding. It only delimitates the amount of the compensation that can be awarded. Whether a clause is liquidated damages or penalty, the court in either case is precluded from awarding damages beyond and in excess of the amount named in the contract. In Cyprus the distinction between the two types of clauses has no essential value as the court maintains in both circumstances its discretion to award reasonable compensation which can be lowered but in any case cannot exceed the amount designated in the contract. The above constitutes the substantial difference between (the previous) English and Cyprus law. In this way, Cyprus law gets rid of the tendency and confusion that (previous) English case law brought, by treating the penalty and liquidated damages clauses equally.

Penalty and Liquidated Damages Clauses under English law

Previous Position - the Dunlop test

The general understanding on the law against penalties derived from the English case Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage and Motor Co Ltd [1915] AC 79. The main principles of the Dunlop Case are as illustrated above without considerable changes in both English and Cyprus law.

However, as stated above, English and Cyprus law differentiated in terms of damages. If an English court concluded that a clause in question was not a penalty clause and therefore valid it would give full effect to the provisions of the clause which meant that the innocent party would be relieved from the burden to prove its actual loss in order to recover any damages and it would simply recover the amount provided by the clause irrespective of the fact that its actual loss was less or more.

The Dunlop principles brought about much uncertainty when the courts started emphasising on the overall commercial purpose of a clause. Especially in respect of complex commercial contracts stipulated between sophisticated parties, the classification of a clause could not be easily appreciated by the commercial parties. The risk involved in such contracts led the drafters to carry out great efforts to balance the strong remedies against defaulting parties and the need to ensure provisions are enforceable. The then upcoming decision of the Supreme Court of the UK brought some hope to these parties that the law against penalties may be revoked.

Current Position under Cavendish test

The Supreme Court of the UK in Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi [2015] UKSC 67 refused to abolish the rule against penalties and instead provided clarifications as to the circumstances in which the law on penalties will apply, and thus in which cases a clause will be unenforceable. The true test was held to be:

"whether the impugned provision is a secondary obligation which imposes a detriment on the contract-breaker out of all proportion to any legitimate interest of the innocent party in the enforcement of the primary obligation. The innocent party can have no proper interest in simply punishing the defaulter. His interest is in performance or in some appropriate alternative to performance".

As an illustration, the following points were applied by the court in order to determine whether a clause is a penalty:

(a) The penalty rule applies only to secondary obligations, which seek solely to define the measure of compensation payable by a party in the event of breach of a primary obligation. Simply because a term only becomes effective upon breach of another obligation does not mean that it is a secondary obligation. A clause might be a "conditional primary obligation" which it simply provides that if a party does not perform, he will pay the other party a specified sum. In this case, there is no obligation to perform the act. For instance, in Cavendish case, the relevant clauses were held to be primary obligations and thus the rule against penalties did not apply.

(b) The test whether a stipulated remedy represents a "genuine pre-estimate of damage" is not enough. Simply punishing the defaulting party is not to be regarded as a legitimate commercial purpose. The court must assess whether the innocent party's legitimate interest in performance of the contract goes beyond payment of damages. For instance, in ParkingEye Limited v Beavis [2015] UKSC 67, a charge of £85 in case of exceeding the time limit of two

hours in the car park was not extravagant and justified a legitimate interest by ParkingEye Limited. They had to ensure the efficient use of parking spaces in the car park, the respect of parking rights by customers and to ensure a good turnover of customers in the retail outlets. The approach taken of charging those who overstayed was common practice in the UK.

(c) If the clause is exorbitant or unconscionable in comparison with the legitimate interest pursued, then it will be held to be unenforceable as a penalty clause.

(d) There is a strong presumption that where a contract is negotiated between properly advised parties of comparable bargaining power, 'the parties themselves are the best judges of what is a legitimate provision dealing with the consequences of breach'.

This judgment gives more discretion to commercial parties negotiating contracts to decide what the consequence of the breach should be and more certainty in terms of enforceability. The flexibility of this test gives more freedom to the parties to set out the consequences of a breach without the need to adjust the remedy in order to be a genuine pre-estimate of the loss. In addition, the parties are in a much more comforting position when structuring a clause which stipulates compliance as a condition which must be met in order for a payment to be made (primary obligation) rather than withholding of the payment being a consequence of a breach of an obligation (secondary obligation). Henceforth, it will be more difficult for the parties to argue that a clause is penalty.

Impact of UK changes in Cyprus

To date, Cyprus courts have cited Dunlop as the leading authority on liquidated damages clauses and penalty clauses. As Dunlop is no longer the leading case in the UK, there is now a possibility for courts to revise the law in Cyprus accordingly. Since (as aforementioned) Cyprus derives its jurisprudence from England, English decisions, even though not binding upon the courts, are authorities of high persuasive value. In this respect, the UK changes may influence Cyprus courts to reform the common law in a similar manner for commercial contracts.

February 2016

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions