Cyprus: International Comparative Legal Guide To Shipping Law 2016 - Fourth Edition - Cyprus

1 Marine Casualty

1.1 In the event of a collision, grounding or other major casualty, what are the key provisions that will impact upon the liability and response of interested parties? In particular, the relevant law / conventions in force in relation to:

(i) Collision

Cyprus has adopted, by way of succession, the International Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules of Law with Respect to Collision Between Vessels and Protocol of Signature, Brussels, of 23 September 1910 (the 1910 Collision Convention). The UK law ratifying the Convention, the Maritime Conventions Act of 1911, will also apply (Danish Kingdom v Mystic Isle Navigation Company Ltd (1990) 1 CLR 850).

The International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea of 1972 apply to all Cyprus registered ships and to all other ships within the territorial waters of Cyprus in Cyprus by virtue of Law 18 of 1980 ratifying the relevant Convention of 1972 (for their application, see The Ship NAWAL a.o. v The Ship BAYONNE (1994) 1 CLR 54 and Constantinos Sklavos a.o. v the Ship NATALEMAR (1999) 1B CLR 1079).

The Cyprus courts have jurisdiction to hear any claim for damage done to a ship and damage received by a ship in rem. A necessary condition for invoking the in rem jurisdiction is the physical presence of the res within the territorial jurisdiction of the Cyprus courts to enable service of the writ of summons. Service out of jurisdiction is not available for in rem proceedings.

Alternatively, proceedings may be filed against the owners of the vessel if they have their residence or place of business in Cyprus. Where the owners are not Cyprus residents, in personam proceedings are subject to the rules of court relating to service out of jurisdiction. Leave of the court is granted where the cause of action arose within the jurisdiction or a related action is before the Cyprus courts or where the owners have submitted to the jurisdiction.

(ii) Pollution

Cyprus is a party to and has ratified the following conventions:

  • the International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage of 1969 ("CLC") and its Protocols of 1976 and 1992 and Amendments of 2000;
  • the International Convention for the Establishment of an International Fund for Compensation for Oil Pollution Damage of 1971 and its Protocols of 1976 and 1992 and subsequent amendments; and
  • the Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment and the Coastal Region of the Mediterranean and its Protocols and amendments ("Barcelona Convention").

Cyprus is also a contracting party to:

  • the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships of 1973 as modified by the Protocol of 1978 ("MARPOL 73/78") and its Amendments;
  • the Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matters of 1972, as amended ("LDC 1972");
  • the International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage of 2001 ("BUNKERS"); and
  • the International Convention on the Control of Harmful Anti-Fouling Systems on Ships of 2001 ("AFS").

(iii) Salvage / general average

Cyprus has adopted, by way of succession, the Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules of Law Relating to Assistance and Salvage at Sea and Protocol of Signature, Brussels, of 23 September 1910 (extended to Cyprus on 1 February 1913).

Where a salvage contract exists, the Cyprus courts will enforce it (L&M Seamasters Limited v 1. The Tug Boat ZOHARA, Israeli Flag, 2. The Fishing Trawler Black Tiger (2007) 1A CLR 303). Where the salvage contract is silent as to an aspect of the salvage operations or where there is no salvage contract in place, the Wrecks Law, Cap. 298, Part III Salvage, and the Brussels Convention will apply. Article 34 of the Wrecks Law provides for the method of defining the salvage remuneration (which is a codification of article 8 of the Brussels Convention). In assessing a salvage operation, the court will have regard to the common law principles on salvage (Yusra Shipping Co. Ltd v The Ship "Yamama" and her Cargo and Freight (1985) 1 C.L.R. 328, Branco Salvage Ltd v The ship "DIMITRIOS" and her Cargo and Freight (1968) 1 C.L.R. 252, Cyprus Ports Authority v the Ship "Zinovia" and her Cargo ao (1990) 1 Α.Α.Δ. 655).

Any contractual provisions dealing with general average will be followed and the courts will respect the choice of the contracting parties. The York-Antwerp Rules have no statutory force in Cyprus and the set of rules to apply is a matter of agreement between the parties.

(iv) Wreck removal

Cyprus is a party to and has ratified the Nairobi International Convention on the Removal of Wrecks of 2007. The Convention entered into force for the Republic of Cyprus on 22 October 2015 in accordance with article 18(2) of the Convention.

The Wrecks Law, Cap. 298 regulates wrecks. Responsibility for the removal of wrecks in the territory of Cyprus lies with the Receiver, unless the owner of the ship is present, in which case the Receiver cannot be involved. The owner must immediately notify the Receiver of the existence of a wreck in Cyprus, and all third parties are also bound to notify the Receiver of the existence of a wreck in Cyprus or, where they come in possession of a wreck, surrender it to the Receiver.

(v) Limitation of liability

Cyprus is a party to and has ratified the Convention on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims of 1976 and its Protocol of 1996, which were ratified by Law 20(III)/2005. The Merchant Shipping (Shipowners' Insurance for Maritime Claims) Law of 2012 ("Law 14(I)/2012") transposed Directive 2009/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on insurance against maritime claims subject to the limitations of the LLMC.

The Athens Convention Relating to the Carriage of Passengers and their Luggage by Sea of 2002 ("Athens Convention"), on which the EU Passenger Liability Regulation (392/2009) is based, sets out limits of liability for death or personal injury or for loss or damage to luggage and vehicles.

(vi) The limitation fund

Under the EU Passenger Liability Regulation (392/2009), operators of ships licensed to carry more than 12 passengers are required to maintain compulsory insurance or other financial security of no fewer than 250,000 special drawing rights (approximately €289,000) per passenger per incident to cover liability under the Athens Convention, in respect of death of and personal injury to passengers. Ships must obtain a certificate from their flag state confirming that insurance or other financial security is in force.

1.2 What are the authorities' powers of investigation / casualty response in the event of a collision, grounding or other major casualty?

The Marine Accidents Investigation Committee ("MAIC") is responsible for investigating marine accidents and incidents of Cyprus flagged ships all over the world and accidents and incidents of foreign flagged ships in the territorial waters of Cyprus under the Marine Casualties and Incidents Investigation Law of 2012, which implemented EU Directive 2009/18/EC.

The Marine Casualties and Incidents Law and EU Directive 2009/18/EC give the MAIC extensive powers, including access to any relevant area or casualty site and to any evidence or witnesses. The owner or manager, master and the crew of any vessel concerned are required to cooperate fully and provide any information and evidence requested, including statements. They are also required to preserve all relevant evidence and information, including information from charts, log books, electronic and magnetic recording and videotapes, relating to the period preceding, during and after an accident.

2 Cargo Claims

2.1 What are the international conventions and national laws relevant to marine cargo claims?

Cyprus has ratified the Hague Rules by means of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Law, Cap. 263 ("Cap. 263") and has adopted, by way of succession, the International Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules of Law Relating to Bills of Lading and Protocol of Signature, Brussels, of 25 August 1924 (extended to Cyprus on 2 June 1931). Cyprus has not ratified either the Hamburg Rules or the Rotterdam Rules.

The Hague Rules are applicable to charterparties only if they are expressly incorporated and if there is an express statement to this effect in the bill of lading (article 4 of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Law, Cap. 263, The Ship Dama and another v TH. D. Georghiades S.A. (1980) 1 CLR 386, Kounnas and Sons Ltd v Zim (1966) 1 CLR 181, Said Hamade v Anthimos Demetriou Ltd a.o. (1994) 1 Α.Α.Δ.

443). Subject to this, they only apply for shipments from a port of Cyprus abroad or to another port of Cyprus (article 2 of Cap. 263). However, if a general paramount clause is incorporated in the bill of lading, the Hague Rules apply notwithstanding article 2 of Cap. 263 (Company Loizos Louca & Sons Ltd v The Company Batsi Shipping Ltd and another (1992) 1B CLR 979).

2.2 What are the key principles applicable to cargo claims brought against the carrier?

The English Bills of Lading Act of 1855, which applies in Cyprus by virtue of articles 19 and 29 of The Courts of Justice Law, Law 14 of 1960 (Stavros Georgiou & Son (Scrap Metals) Ltd v The Ship LIPA (2001) 1B CLR 1220) regulates the transfer of rights under a contract of carriage. Any party to a contract of carriage can sue for damages against the carrier, as well as consignees of goods named in a bill of lading and endorsees of a bill of lading, having acquired full proprietary rights upon or by reason of such consignment or endorsement.

Ownership of the cargo will also depend on the way the parties deal with each other, and such dealings may or may not include the transfer of the bill of lading (Andreas Orthodoxou Limited v Dimitriou Tilliri Limited (2007) 1B CLR 1247; Standard Fruit Company (Bermuda) Limited ao v Gold Seal Shipping Company Ltd (1997) 1 CLR 464).

Such transfer extinguishes the rights of the original shipper or any intermediary, but in respect of matters for which the shipper still remained at risk, may entitle him to sue.

The courts have not been called upon to consider whether the original shipper remains liable once title has passed.

The court will consider all the facts and, where appropriate in the circumstances, will treat a person as being a carrier even where the carriage was not performed by him (Andreas Orthodoxou Ltd v Dimitriou Tilliri Ltd (2007) 1B CLR 1247). Furthermore, given the decision in Andreas Orthodoxou Limited, a demise clause or identity of carrier clause is likely to be recognised as binding and, in view of the decision of the House of Lords in "The Starsin" [2003] 1 Lloyd's Rep 571, the objective approach in the construction of a bill of lading is likely to be followed.

2.3 In what circumstances may the carrier establish claims against the shipper relating to misdeclaration of cargo?

Where the Hague Rules apply, for example if they are expressly incorporated in the bill of lading or other document of title, the shipper is under a duty to properly declare cargo, and failure to do so would result in the shipper being liable to the carrier for damage to the ship, under strict liability. The shipper may also be liable for damage to other cargo where hazardous cargo has not been declared or has been misdeclared.

3 Passenger Claims

3.1 What are the key provisions applicable to the resolution of maritime passenger claims?

Regulation (EC) No. 392/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the liability of carriers of passengers by sea in the event of accidents ("the Regulation") is fully applicable in Cyprus as an EU Member State. The Regulation lays down a harmonised regime of liability and insurance for the carriage of passengers by sea, based on the Athens Convention and the International Maritime Organisation guidelines for implementation of the Athens Convention, adopted in 2006.

Operators of ships licensed to carry more than 12 passengers are required to maintain compulsory insurance or other financial security of no fewer than 250,000 special drawing rights (approximately €289,000) per passenger per incident to cover liability under the Athens Convention, in respect of death of and personal injury to passengers. Ships must obtain a certificate from their flag state confirming that insurance or other financial security is in force.

The definition of 'passenger' in article 1 of this convention encompasses anyone who is carried on a ship under a contract of carriage, or who (with the consent of the carrier) is accompanying a vehicle or live animals that are covered by a contract of carriage of goods not governed by the Athens Convention. This definition also encompasses the drivers of vehicles carried on board roll-on/ roll-off cargo vessels; consequently, the Cyprus authorities consider that cargo vessels which carry more than 12 such persons are also subject to the Athens Convention and the Regulation. Such vessels must therefore have the necessary compulsory insurance in place and submit evidence of insurance cover in order to obtain the requisite certificate from the Cyprus authorities.

International carriage is defined under the Regulation as any carriage in which, according to the contract of carriage, the place of departure and the place of destination are situated in two different States, or in a single State if, according to the contract of carriage or the scheduled itinerary, there is an intermediate port of call in another State.

4 Arrest and Security

4.1 What are the options available to a party seeking to obtain security for a maritime claim against a vessel owner and the applicable procedure?

Cyprus is not itself a party to the International Convention Relating to the Arrest of Sea-Going Ships of 1952 (the "1952 Arrest Convention"). However, by virtue of articles 19 and 29 of the Courts of Justice Law, Law 14 of 1960, the English Administration of Justice Act of 1956, which ratifies the 1952 Arrest Convention, applies to Cyprus and the Cyprus courts will consider it (Montegrillo Di Navigazione SNC a.o. v RO/RO "IVA" of the Port of Rigeka, Yugoslavia now Lying at the Port of Limassol (1989) 1 CLR 473). The main categories of claims in respect of which Cyprus law recognises and upholds maritime liens are bottomry, salvage, crew wages, master's wages, master's disbursements and liabilities and damage done by a ship. Arrest is not available on the basis of a claim under a Memorandum of Agreement. Claims in rem for ship repair and ship construction contracts may fall under Section 1(1) (m) of The Administration of Justice Act of 1956 as a claim in respect of the construction, repair or equipment of a ship. Maritime liens enjoy priority over other claims. Next in line will rank claims relating to mortgages over the vessel (with priority determined according to the order of registration), followed by claims that give rise to a statutory lien (such as necessaries). Statutory liens have no priority over mortgages because they do not attach to the vessel until the institution of an action in rem. Last in line will rank all other claims, including any cargo claims (Nordic Bank Plc. of Nordic Bank House v The Ship "Seagull" Now Lying at Limassol Port (1989) 1 CLR 420).

The issuance of an arrest warrant (and the requirement for the filing of a writ of summons for the initiation of the arrest proceedings) is deemed to be a substantial step, and once arrest is effected, the jurisdiction of the Cyprus courts is established. This is subject to challenge on the basis of an arbitration clause or where the forum conveniens is successfully pleaded, in which case the Cyprus courts may order a stay of the proceedings. If, however, the ship is arrested or bailed out in one of the contracting States to the 1952 Arrest Convention, then it cannot be arrested for the second time for the same maritime lien in another contracting State (this does not apply if the first arrest was effected in a non-contracting State (Montegrillo Di Navigazione SNC a.o. v RO/RO "IVA" of the Port of Rigeka, Yugoslavia now Lying at the Port of Limassol (1989) 1 CLR 473)).

The arrest of a sister ship is possible by virtue of Section 3(4) of the English Administration of Justice Act of 1956, applicable in Cyprus by virtue of articles 19 and 29 of the Courts of Justice Law, Law 14 of 1960, allowing the filing of an action in rem against any other ship which, at the time when the action is brought, is beneficially owned by that person who would otherwise be liable in an action in personam.

Under the Cyprus Admiralty Jurisdiction Order of 1893 (Rule 65), a person desiring to prevent the arrest of any property may file a caveat against the issue of an arrest warrant. It will usually require the lodging of sufficient security under such terms and conditions as the court decides. The arresting party may apply for a specific form of security or bail but it is at the court's discretion to determine its nature. The usual practice is to require a guarantee issued by a local bank.

Where arrest is not possible, a litigant can apply for a freezing order under article 32 of the Courts of Justice Law of 1960.

4.2 Is it possible for a bunker supplier (whether physical and/or contractual) to arrest a vessel for a claim relating to bunkers supplied by them to that vessel?

Yes. See, for example, admiralty case number 32/2014 (1) Interbunker Management Ltd, and (2) Novoil Ltd v m/v "BARIS", in which an arrest warrant against the vessel, which was in the port of Larnaca, was issued following an ex parte application at the Supreme Court of Cyprus.

4.3 Where security is sought from a party other than the vessel owner (or demise charterer) for a maritime claim, including exercise of liens over cargo, what options are available?

A contractual lien can be exercised against cargo, sub-freight or sub-charter hire where a lien clause is expressly included in a charterparty. A common law lien may arise against goods for freight due, general average contributions and expenses incurred by the owner for the purpose of preserving the goods.

A shipowner may exercise a lien on cargo under common law only for the recovery of a general average contribution due from the cargo, for expenses incurred by the shipowner to protect the cargo and to recover freight charges due on delivery of the cargo under the bill of lading or the charter. A common law lien cannot be invoked for deadfreight, demurrage charges or shipper's liabilities in respect of the cargo. Where a contractual lien on sub-freights is given to the owners by a charterer incorporated in Cyprus, it must be registered as a charge against the charterer or else it will be void against the liquidator and any creditor of the company.

Where the time-charterer is the cargo owner, the owner has the right to exercise a lien over the cargo, if the charterparty provides for this. However, the lien cannot be extended as against third parties holding bills of lading, unless expressly provided in the bill of lading. A bill of lading stamped 'freight prepaid' will defeat any owner's lien on the cargo, either at common law or ex contractu (Grade One Shipping Ltd, Owners of the Cyprus Ship 'CRIOS II' v The Cargo on Board the Ship 'CRIOS II' (No. 2) (1979) 1 CLR 350).

Finally, any claims of the Republic of Cyprus for fees, dues, or tonnage taxes chargeable and assessable under the Merchant Shipping (Fees and Taxing Provisions) Law of 1992 constitute a lien on the ship.

4.4 In relation to maritime claims, what form of security is acceptable; for example, bank guarantee, P&I letter of undertaking.

The courts very rarely depart from their usual practice of requiring a guarantee issued by a local bank.

5 Evidence

5.1 What steps can be taken (and when) to preserve or obtain access to evidence in relation to maritime claims including any available procedures for the preservation of physical evidence, examination of witnesses or pre-action disclosure?

Article 32 of the Courts of Justice Law 14 of 1960 empowers courts in Cyprus to grant interlocutory injunctions on such terms and conditions as the court considers appropriate where it appears just and convenient to do so. These include "Anton Piller" orders, a bundle of interlocutory orders designed to enable a plaintiff to secure the preservation of relevant evidence that might be otherwise destroyed or concealed by the defendant. It is also possible to obtain "Norwich Pharmacal" orders for the disclosure of information.

Article 30 of the Merchant Shipping (Registration of Ships, Sales and Mortgages) Law (which is identical to the English Merchant Shipping Act of 1894) provides for a special type of order prohibiting for a specified time any dealing with a ship, provided that the applicant for the order is an 'interested person'. An interested person will not include mere creditors or persons claiming damages against the owners of the ship, but only persons having an interest in the ship itself such as legatees, shareholders, heirs or creditors (Compania Portuguesa De Transportes Maritime of Lisbon v Sponsalia Shipping Company Ltd (1987) 1 CLR 11; Pastella Marine Co Ltd v National Iranian Tanker Co Ltd (1987) 1 CLR 583; Constantinos Athanasiou Gerasakis v Waft Shipping Company Ltd (1989) 1E CLR 10).

5.2 What are the general disclosure obligations in court proceedings?

Any party may apply to the court for an order of discovery on oath and/or for inspection of documents that are or have been in the other party's possession or power as regards any matter relating to such documents. If a party ordered to produce documents in a discovery proceeding fails to do so, he or she may not subsequently enter any document as evidence on his or her behalf that he or she failed to disclose or declined to allow to be inspected, unless the court is satisfied that he or she had sufficient excuse. If the documents that are the subject of the discovery or inspection are confidential, selfincriminating, or privileged, a claim for privilege may be raised.

6 Procedure

6.1 Describe the typical procedure and time-scale applicable to maritime claims conducted through: i) national courts (including any specialised maritime or commercial courts); ii) arbitration (including specialist arbitral bodies); and iii) mediation / alternative dispute resolution.

Admiralty actions must be brought before the Supreme Court of Cyprus in its admiralty jurisdiction. The district courts have limited jurisdiction to try certain admiralty actions, but only on referral by the Supreme Court. Actions commence with the issue of a writ of summons, which must identify all parties and state the nature of the claim and the relief sought. In an action in rem, the writ of summons must be served at least 21 days before the date specified for the parties to appear before the court, and in an action in personam, the writ must be served at least 10 days before the appearance date.

Arbitration is not yet widely used in Cyprus to resolve shipping claims, despite the existence of a well-established legal framework for international arbitration based on the International Commercial Arbitration Law of 1987. The courts will recognise arbitration and jurisdiction clauses in contracts and documents incorporated into contracts.

6.2 Highlight any notable pros and cons related to your jurisdiction that any potential party should bear in mind?

Cyprus has a host of advantages as a shipping centre. Strategically located where three continents meet, it is a member of the EU and the Eurozone, with a high quality of life founded on a free economy, free movement of capital and a well-established, reliable legal system. It has a modern, low-tax regime and double tax agreements with more than 50 countries. The shipping taxation regime is particularly favourable, with an EU-approved tonnage tax regime for owners, charterers and ship managers giving complete income tax exemption on dividends paid to shareholders, on interest earned on working capital and on any profit made from the sale of a qualifying ship. There are no succession taxes, no income tax on the emoluments of officers and crew on board Cyprus ships and no stamp duty on ship mortgage deeds or other security documents.

Cyprus is a fully-serviced and long-established shipping centre, and one of the world's largest third party ship management centres. It has low set-up and operating costs for companies, and a worldclass business infrastructure, including excellent transport links and telecommunications, world-class professional and financial services and highly-educated, English speaking people. It is a party to numerous international maritime conventions and has bilateral merchant shipping agreements with 23 countries.

7 Foreign Judgments and Awards

7.1 Summarise the key provisions and applicable procedures affecting the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments.

The available mechanisms are as follows:

  • EU Regulations 44/2001 and 1215/2012 ("the Brussels I Regulation") and 805/2004;
  • Common Law;
  • Statute; and
  • Bilateral Treaties and Multilateral Conventions.

The EU Regulations apply to all judgments given in civil and commercial matters (but not revenue, customs or administrative matters) by the courts of Member States except Denmark.

Judgments in civil and commercial matters that originate in other jurisdictions may be enforced under statute or a bilateral treaty, if one exists, or under common law.

The grounds on which a courts may decline to recognise an overseas judgment are very limited, and are principally where:

  • the judgment is contrary to the public policy of Cyprus;
  • where the judgment was given in default of appearance, the defendant had not been not served with the proceedings in good time or in a manner as to enable him to prepare his defence himself;
  • where the judgment is inconsistent with an earlier judgment of the Cyprus courts between the same parties; or
  • if recognition is inconsistent with an earlier judgment between the same parties regarding the same cause of action given elsewhere.

Pending the formal recognition, registration and enforcement of the foreign judgment, the judgment creditor may apply for interim relief.

7.2 Summarise the key provisions and applicable procedures affecting the recognition and enforcement of arbitration awards.

Arbitration awards are enforceable on the basis of the Law on International Arbitration and the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of the United Nations of 1958 (the "New York Convention"). As a contracting party to the New York Convention, Cyprus is bound to enforce awards made in other contracting States.

The Law on International Arbitration minimises court intervention. Following delivery of an award, the court may set aside an award or refuse recognition or enforcement only on the following grounds:

  • incapacity of the parties;
  • invalidity of the arbitration agreement;
  • lack of proper notice or denial of a party's right to present his case;
  • lack of jurisdiction of the tribunal;
  • the subject matter of the dispute not being capable of settlement by arbitration under the law of Cyprus; and
  • incompatibility of the award with public policy in Cyprus.

8 Updates and Developments

8.1 Describe any other issues not considered above that may be worthy of note, together with any current trends or likely future developments that may be of interest.

The Department of Merchant Shipping is committed to constant improvement of the technical, administrative, legal and financial infrastructure of Cyprus in the maritime sector, to further improvement of the quality of the ships registered in Cyprus and the crew employed on them and to improvement of safety standards and conditions of living and work of seamen on board Cyprus ships in accordance with international conventions currently in force, as well as to the establishment of economic and other incentives to develop the sector in Cyprus.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Michael Kyprianou & Co LLC
Genshape Management Limited
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Michael Kyprianou & Co LLC
Genshape Management Limited
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions