Cyprus: European application of UNCITRAL Model Law on Arbitration, Cyprus (Law 101 of 1987)

1. Introduction

Arbitration as a means of settling commercial disputes between parties of different nationalities has been a popular and successful alternative to national courts for decades. Parties entering into economic agreements often include arbitration clauses in their contracts to ensure that any disputes can be solved without recourse to expensive and time-consuming litigation. Moreover, arbitration allows parties to avoid having disputes judged in the national courts of the opposing party. It is not surprising, therefore, that the rise in international commerce and investment in recent years has brought an increased use of arbitration to resolve disputes.

The reasons for choosing arbitration as a means of dispute resolution are obvious. The parties may select a convenient seat for their arbitration in a "neutral" country. If a dispute arises between them, they may choose an arbitrator or several arbitrators who are independent and impartial and have the technical and legal expertise and language skills to resolve their particular dispute. The parties expect these arbitrators to take into account not only legal aspects but also their fair and reasonable commercial expectations while deciding the dispute. Furthermore, arbitration is a secret procedure. Finally, the 1958 New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, which Cyprus has ratified through the Law 84 of 1979, ensures that arbitral awards are enforced in more than 150 jurisdictions all over the world, thus providing a powerful incentive for any party to perform an arbitral award voluntarily. The most important difference between litigation before domestic courts and arbitration, however, is the consensual character of the arbitral process.

2. The International Commercial Arbitration Law of Cyprus

This Law was brought as a draft law before the House of Representatives in Cyprus on 21 May 1987. Its aim was to regulate matters of international commercial arbitration in accordance with the Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration drafted by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), following the example of many other, mostly European, countries. The draft law respected and maintained all the essential provisions of the Model Law. It deviates only in terms of pattern in the first articles from the Model Law, due to respect for the common pattern of laws in Cyprus, as well as by regulating the matter of time limitation, to which I will refer later.

It is probably superfluous to say that this is a practical example of the "internationally useful construction" of domestic law. The concept allows a new era of dynamic statutory interpretation, i.e. an interpretation of domestic law in the light of transnational commercial law. Due to this fact it is our right and duty to interpret the International Arbitration Law of Cyprus from an international point of view, bearing in mind case law and literature of the countries that did embrace the Model Law, and not limit ourselves to the area of Cyprus.

However, the International Arbitration Law of 1987 did deviate from the Model Law and adopt a clause regarding the period of limitation, contrary to the prevailing view of the drafters of the Model Law, according to which such a provision was not to be included in the Model Law, although it was recognised that the problem existed and that a unified solution of the problem would be welcome. Such a provision touched upon issues regarded by many legal systems as matters of substantive law and might therefore be considered to be outside the scope of the Model Law. It was also considered to be anomalous and a source of confusion to have a special rule for the effects on the limitation period arising out of the commencement of an international commercial arbitration. It was agreed, however, that the attention of states should be drawn to that problem of considerable practical importance with a view to inviting consideration of enacting provisions which, in harmony with the principles and norms of the given legal system, would place arbitral proceedings on an equal footing with court proceedings in that respect.

The time limitation provision reads as follows:

"21. (2) Commencement of the arbitral proceedings shall cause suspension of the period of limitation in accordance with the provisions of the following sub-section.

(3) The limitation period in relation to any claims which are referred to arbitration in accordance with the provisions of this Law shall be governed, subject to the provisions of this Law, by the provisions of sub-sections (1), (2), (5), (6) and (7) of section 24 of the Arbitration Law.

(4) The words "is absent from the Republic" in the fifth line of section 8 of the Limitation of Actions Law shall not apply in the case of claims which are referred to arbitration in accordance with the provisions of this Law.

(5) The Limitation of Actions (Suspension) Law shall not apply in relation to claims which are referred to arbitration in accordance with the provisions of this Law."

The above mentioned provisions of the Arbitration Law Chapter 4, read as follows:

"24. (1) The laws on time limitation for actions apply to arbitral proceedings as they apply to court proceedings.

(2) Regardless of the existence of any condition in an agreement, which states that no statement of claim shall emerge regarding any matter, which according to the agreement is to be referred to arbitration, until the arbitration, which is foreseen in this agreement, is held, a statement of claim is considered to emerge at the time that it would emerge, should no such clause in the agreement exist for the purposes of the laws on time limitation, as they were initially instituted or as they are applied to arbitration proceedings.

(5) Should the clause for committal of any future disputes to arbitration foresee that any demands, which are subject to the agreement, are excluded, and a dispute to which this agreement applies appears, the court, if it agrees that under the circumstances of the case another regulation would cause disproportionate damage and despite the fact that the set time limit has expired, may under the conditions that the right of the case requires, if any, and without affecting the previous paragraphs of this article, prolong the period, according to its perception of rightness. This may not take place if directions for the appointment of an arbitrator are given or an arbitrator is appointed or any other actions for the opening of the arbitral proceedings are taken in the period determined in the agreement.

(6)If the court orders an award to be set aside or orders, after the beginning of the arbitral proceedings, the nullity of the arbitral agreement regarding the filed dispute, the court may further order that the period from the beginning of the arbitration until the date of the court decision be exempt from the calculation of time that is set under the laws on time limitation for the beginning of the procedure (including arbitration) regarding the filed dispute.

(7)For the scope of this article, the laws on time limitation include any law or administrative act, which sets the time during which any procedure may start."

It seems ,however, that the Cypriot legislators intended by this regulation to provide parties to the arbitration with more freedom and to avoid any potential complications, due to the fact that the arbitration would take place in Cyprus.

3. Scope of application of the Model Law in Cyprus (Article 1 in Model Law)

According to Cyprus legislation different regimes apply to domestic and international arbitrations. The International Arbitration Law, 1987 (No. 101 of 1987) applies to international arbitrations and the Arbitration Law Chapter 4 of the Laws of Cyprus applies to domestic arbitrations.

The main and self-evident difference between the two regimes is their applicability. Even if matters regarding international commercial arbitration arise, for which no special arrangement has been made, the applicability of the two regimes remains strictly separate and no analogous application is to be accepted.

The procedural difference is that Chapter 4 allows the national courts to become involved in the arbitration proceedings, resulting in a significant delay in the issue of the award. The trend in favour of limiting court involvement in arbitration is not followed in domestic arbitration.

Law 101 of 1987 is limited to commercial arbitrations. However, following the spirit and the scope of the Model Law, although the notion of commercial arbitration is in fact defined in the text of the law, the term "commercial" is given a wide interpretation. The suggestion of the Model Law is adopted in the text of 101 of 1987, that is:

2. (4) "Commercial" is an arbitration if it refers to matters arising from relationships of a commercial nature, whether contractual or not.

2. (5) The term "relationships of a commercial nature" includes, but is not limited to, the following transactions: any trade transaction for the supply or exchange of goods or services; distribution agreement; commercial representation or agency; leasing; construction of works; consulting; engineering; licensing; investment; financing; banking; insurance; exploitation agreement or concession; joint venture and other forms of industrial or business co-operation; carriage of goods or passengers by air, sea, rail or road.

4. Form of the Arbitration Agreement (Article 7 in Model Law)

The relevant article of 101 of 1987 is also a true adoption of the Model Law, except for a slight difference in the structure of the article, that is:

7. (1)" "Arbitration agreement" is an agreement by the parties to submit to arbitration all or certain disputes which have arisen or which may arise between them in respect of a defined legal relationship , whether contractual or not. An arbitration agreement may be in the form of an arbitration clause in a contract or in the form of a separate agreement.

(2) The arbitration agreement shall be in writing.

(3) An agreement is in writing if it is contained in a document signed by the parties or in an exchange of letters, telefax, telegrams or other means of telecommunication which provide a record of the agreement, or in an exchange of statements of claim and defence in which the existence of an agreement is alleged by one party and not denied by another. The reference in a contract to a document containing an arbitration clause constitutes an arbitration agreement provided that the contract is in writing and the reference is such as to make that clause part of the contract."

5. a. Validity of the arbitration agreement by reference to other documents, in particular standard business conditions.

In the context of Cyprus’ accession the European Union, the European legislation has been adopted and acknowledged. On 5 April 1993 the Council of Europe issued Directive 93/13/EEC on unfair terms in consumer contracts. The Directive’s essential provisions are set out in Article 3. In so far as relevant, this article reads as follows:

"1. A contractual term which has not been individually negotiated shall be regarded as unfair if, contrary to the requirement of good faith, it causes a significant imbalance in the parties’ rights and obligations arising under the contract, to the detriment of the consumer.

3. The Annex shall contain an indicative and non-exhaustive list of the terms which may be regarded as unfair."

As Cyprus’ legislation is, through Law 93(1) of 1996, in harmony with European principles, the key notions of ability of negotiation, bona fidae and a balance of the rights and obligations of the parties are required for a contract and its clauses to be valid. The answer to the question of what type of terms should cause a significant imbalance has been left to the national authorities. Since the legislation does not foresee a concrete definition, the courts bear this responsibility. Unfortunately, they do not so far provide us with an absolutely clear picture of the answer. It has however been judged that the fairness of a contractual term should be assessed by taking into account all the circumstances attending the conclusion of the contract, as Article 4 of the Directive provides. It is stressed that the main criterion is the meaning which an average logical person attributes to this part of the contract.

The principles that can be extracted from the case law are the following:

(a) Contractual clauses that exclude the responsibility of a party for not complying or violating contractual obligations should, in case of doubt, be interpreted against the party who pleads them.

(b) A provision that foresees the exemption of a party from its vital contractual obligation is void to exempt it from liability for violation

(c) Exemption clauses do not include acts of negligence.

The next step is to wonder if this collection of laws, directives, principles and case law can provide us with an answer to the question of the validity of an arbitration clause made by reference in standard business conditions. Considering the nature, the scope and the role of arbitration I should mention here the case of Agros Trading Spolka Z.O.O. v. Dalimpex Ltd. in the Ontario Court of Appeal in Canada, where the basic principle of arbitration is set out: "in cases where it is not clear, it may be preferable to leave any issue related to the existence or validity of the arbitration agreement for the arbitral tribunal to determine in the first instance under article 16".

5. b. Validity of the arbitration agreement made through electronic means of communication.

In the text of 101 of 1987, a broad meaning is attributed to the notion of document. The reference to "other means of telecommunication" seems to encourage this breadth, allowing arbitrators to accept that an agreement has been signed by electronic means of communication. It is universally accepted that in the everyday practice of international economic transactions, contracts are frequently negotiated under heavy time pressure and concluded over long distances through electronic communication media. It would have been contradictory to enact a law on international commercial arbitration and refuse the usage of electronic communication media. Worldwide laws leave room for arbitration agreements concluded through other modern means of telecommunication and data transmission such as "EDIFACT", "Teletex", "Btx", "electronic courier", data transmission via satellite and other means of electronic data inter-change (EDI) which might still be unknown today. These means of communication may establish a formally valid arbitration agreement, if they help to record the body of the agreement for future proceedings and make the parties aware of the fact that they oust the jurisdiction of domestic courts. However, only those agreements that appear on a computer screen and are then saved in the memory of the computer terminals should be included. Only in these cases are the text of the arbitration agreement and the conditions known to the parties at the time of its conclusion and also the agreement can be reproduced in written form later.

6. Arbitral tribunal (Chapter III in Model Law)

According to the provisions of the Model Law the parties are free to determine the number of arbitrators. Should such determination fail, the number of arbitrators shall be three.

We need to consider whether the courts may remove arbitrators during the course of the arbitral proceedings for alleged bias, or may that matter be considered only after the award is made?

At this point there are three questions to be answered. Firstly, do the national courts have the authority to remove arbitrators? Secondly, is that possible during the arbitral proceedings? Thirdly, can the ground of challenge be that of alleged bias? The Cypriot legislation respecting the Model Law has adopted fully the proposed provisions. It should be stressed, that the national courts do not have the power to remove arbitrators, neither during the course of the arbitral proceedings, nor after the award is made. Nevertheless, the parties are free to agree on a procedure for challenging an arbitrator, and should such agreement fail, the specified provisions come into force. Thus, a party who intends to challenge an arbitrator shall, within fifteen days after becoming aware of any circumstances that give rise to justifiable doubts as to his impartiality or independence or if he does not possess the qualifications agreed to by the parties, send a statement of the reasons for the challenge to the arbitral tribunal. Unless the challenged arbitrator withdraws from his office or the other party agrees to the challenge, the arbitral tribunal shall decide on the challenge.

It is evident from the above that arbitrators may be removed only by the arbitral tribunal, and only during the arbitral proceedings. Justifiable doubts may be grounds for a challenge; however, circumstances giving rise to those should exist.

After a successful challenge the need for the appointment of a substitute arbitrator arises, so that the proceedings may continue. The relevant provision foresees exactly the same procedure for appointing a substitute arbitrator as for appointing an arbitrator, and in fact refers to article 11 of Law 101 of 1987, where the relevant procedure is described.

7. "Compétence – Compétence" (Articles 8 and 16 in Model Law)

The Supreme Court of Cyprus has repeatedly agreed with the principle of referring the parties to arbitration, when an action is brought before it in a matter which is the subject of an arbitration agreement. It has found for the arbitral jurisdiction in two cases where the parties did refuse the validity of the agreements with the arbitration clause and as a result did not recognise the authority of the arbitral tribunal. The Court made express reference to Law 101 of 1987, article 8, and stressed the lack of its jurisdiction due to the arbitration clause.

No recourse against an interim award on jurisdiction is possible during the arbitration proceedings. The acceptance of any recourse would breach the trend in favour of limiting the court’s involvement in international commercial arbitration. The parties to an arbitration agreement make a conscious decision to exclude court jurisdiction and prefer expediency and finality to protracted battles in court. It would also breach the universally accepted principle that the arbitral tribunal may rule on its own jurisdiction, including any objections with respect to the existence or validity of the arbitration agreement. Those principles were embraced by the Supreme Court of Cyprus on 16 December 2003 while giving judgement in the case of Open Joint Stock Company "Novokuznetsk Aluminium Plant" v. Base Metal Trading Ltd and others.

8. Interim Measures of Protection (Article 17 in Model Law)

The article is fully adopted in Cyprus, but there is no case law yet.

As already noted, the article does not deal with enforcement of interim measures ordered by arbitrators; any State adopting the Model Law would be free to provide court assistance in this regard. In Cyprus no special rules for the enforceability of the interim measures were foreseen. It must not, however, be assumed from this that the provided rights should remain inactive. The Civil Procedure Rules may apply in an analogous manner regarding this issue as they offer the proper mechanism. In brief section 32 of the Courts of Justice Law 14/60 confers power on a court to grant an injunction "in all cases in which it appears to the Court just and convenient so to do". However, the justice and convenience of the case is not the sole consideration to which the Court should pay heed in the case of an interlocutory injunction, and no such injunction should be granted, unless the following considerations are justified: (a) A serious question arises to be tried in the hearing, (b) There appears to be a visible probability that the plaintiff is entitled to relief and (c) It would be difficult or impossible to do complete justice at a later stage without granting an interlocutory injunction.

9. Conduct of Arbitral Proceedings (Chapter V in Model Law)

In line with the approach taken in articles of the Model Law the Cypriot legislators adopted the fundamental rights of a party as the basic principle, that the parties should be treated with equality and each party should be given a full opportunity to present his case. All articles of chapter V in the Model Law are adopted in Law 101 of 1987 and among them article 27, which foresees court assistance in taking evidence. Unfortunately no case law is available and no special law has been enacted. Nevertheless the rights provided through Law 101 of 1987 will not remain inactive and via an analogous applicability of the Civil Procedure Rules of Cyprus a solution may be found. Cyprus follows the English tradition on Procedural matters, among others. The trial system in Cyprus is adversarial. Common Law rules of evidence, modified by various statutes, apply. After a recent amendment hearsay evidence is now admissible. Under Cypriot law, the facts open to proof or disproof are facts in issue, relevant facts and collateral facts. Facts in issue in civil proceedings should be identifiable from the pleadings, the whole point of which is to set out the parties’ allegations, admissions, and denials. Relevant facts are those from which it is possible to infer the existence or non-existence of a fact in issue. Evidence of such facts is often referred to as circumstantial evidence. In general the types of evidence by which facts are open to proof or disproof are known collectively as judicial evidence. The types of judicial evidence are as follows: oral testimony, documentary evidence, and real evidence. It should be noted that in order for a document to be admissible in court it has to be recognised or be produced by the person who drafted it.

10. Making of an award (Chapter VI in Model Law)

Article 28(2) is adopted as can be seen from the English translation of the Cypriot text.

"28. (2) Failing any designation by the parties, the arbitral tribunal shall apply the law determined by the conflict of laws which it considers applicable."

Following the example of the Model Law under the International Commercial Arbitration Law of 1987 the parties may authorise the arbitral tribunal to decide the dispute ex aequo et bono or as amiables compositeurs. No specific regulation is enacted in Cyprus. Therefore, failing any special clause in the arbitration agreement, the universal understanding of the notion of these phrases governs the standards, the scope and the spirit of the Model Law to be adopted.

There is no deadline for making an award. The Law on International Commercial Arbitration of 1987 is silent and invites the potential arbitral parties to regulate this aspect in their arbitral agreement, providing them with full freedom.

We must once more repeat ourselves and indicate that the law does not foresee anything regarding this thematic and unfortunately, the case law does not provide us with any answer. Should the parties not meet any agreement, then as evident the Civil Procedure Rules of Cyprus are to apply analogous.

The law does not provide that the arbitrators are required to decide in their award on the costs and legal fees. Should the fees be arranged in the agreement, then they are undisputed, even if they are to be determined by setting a higher and a lower amount.

No provision for the Arbitrators’ right to express in writing a dissenting opinion is to be found in the Law 101 of 1987 and since the awards are published only in order to be executed, no case law is available.

11. Recourse Against Arbitral Award (Article 34 in M.L.)

In general the Courts are reluctant to set aside awards. It is no exaggeration to say that Cypriot case law provides us with paradigms of "evolutive" notion of the public interest for not setting aside awards. To be more specific, it has been agreed that the notion of "public interest" incorporates the fundamental values, that a society at any given time period places on the transactions and the expressions of the lives of its members and the set legal order. In this context it must be judged if any antithesis to the public interest exists in the quoted case. The appellant claimed that the arbitral decision not to consider the counter claim was opposed to the public interest of Cyprus. The Court did not share the same opinion and said that since the appellant did not deposit the required sum of money to cover the fees of arbitration, as requested by the procedural laws governing the arbitration (Arbitration Rules of ICC), the arbitral tribunal could and should reject the counter claim. In another case, it was decided that the court’s research regarding the question of setting aside an award for reasons of public interest is supervisory, has a procedural character and although the content of the award is reviewed, this review should be limited only to the question of public interest and the essence is not to be disputed.

The Cypriot legislators once more respected the Model Law and embraced unchanged its provisions, regarding suspension of the setting aside proceedings and resumption of the arbitral proceedings in view of remedying the award (Art. 34 para). The purpose was to give priority to the arbitral tribunal and respect the parties’ wish to solve their dispute through arbitration, even in the case of a violation of the public interest, the main ground for setting aside an award. It is difficult to determine how this provision developed in practice, as no case law is available.

12. Confidentiality

The confidentiality of documents produced in the arbitral proceedings is absolutely respected in Cyprus and awards are not published. The right to obtain documents on the court file of proceedings to which the applicant is not a party came under the spotlight again recently in Glidepath BV and others v. Thompson and Others. It was held that arbitration proceedings and material produced in the course of them are confidential to the parties and the arbitrator, subject to certain exceptions, including where disclosure is reasonably necessary to protect or establish the legal rights of a party to the arbitration against a third party, or otherwise in the interests of justice. There is no authority for any person to have access to materials in an arbitration to which it is not a party so it can use them as evidence in other proceedings to which it is a party. Arbitrators and those parties who chose arbitration clauses should be encouraged by the line taken by the Court in this case in protecting the arbitrating parties’ confidentiality from someone who was not a party to the agreement.

13. Conclusion

Cyprus has adopted the Model Law of UNCITRAL and has determined provisions about time limitation to achieve a flexible system of regulations that can adjust to the most demanding parties and provide them with satisfying solutions. This is a fact and should not be disputed. However the lack of case law has raised some logical questions.

Could the absolute freedom be equal to absolute limitation? Could it be that too much freedom generates uncertainty and due to this parties are reluctant to choose arbitration in Cyprus? Or should we seek the causes for this absence in another areas? Could the rootes of this absence lie in the domestic legal system and in particular in the procedural one? Which is a desirable legal system for the parties that choose arbitration?

The most certain way to discover the answers is by setting the right questions. This is why I chose to close my speech with questions, which either way seem to have their own voice and speak through the text.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.