Australia: The Australian Financial Review - Martyn Taylor - Harper Competition Review
Last Updated: 9 October 2014

Martyn Taylor explains why Australia could be well positioned for decades to come if the best of the Harper Review into competition policy is adopted.

This article was originally published by The Australian Financial Review and is reproduced with permission.

Harper review a chance for economic leadership

The Harper competition review provides a unique opportunity.

The draft recommendations released in September are well reasoned, progressive and pragmatic. If implemented, they will position Australia well for the coming decades.

As head of the G20, we have a once-in-a-generation opportunity to "walk the talk" and demonstrate real global economic leadership.

Australia leads the world's G20 economies at a critical stage in the evolution of the world economy. We have been the envy of the world, surviving the global financial crisis largely unscathed. Yet there are economic storm clouds on the horizon. If we are to maintain prosperity we must take immediate steps to bolster our flagging productivity. That is the critical context to the Harper review.

So what is so special about the review?It has been 20 years since our competition policy was last reviewed. The Hilmer review had a profound impact on the Australian economy. In 2006, we were one of the most deregulated economies in the Western world. Our competition policy reforms led the world and delivered some of the strongest growth rates in the OECD.

Harper review a blueprint

The Harper review provides a blueprint for the next wave of deregulation and structural reform. There are 52 recommendations touching on three general themes.

First, it recommends institutional reforms. Australia's competition policy institutions need reinvigoration. The draft report proposes a high-powered policy review and development entity, the Australian council for competition policy, which could have real influence, overseeing a new regime of commonwealth-state competition payments.

It may also provide policy leadership, including via independent market studies and annual reviews. The review also recommends that competition access and pricing functions be migrated to a new specialist regulator that will subsume the National Competition Council. Fixes to important processes are recommended, including a merging of the much-criticised "formal merger review" process with merger authorisations. The report also suggests refining governance of the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission – although the commission structure works well and has been integral to the ACCC's independence.

Competition policy reforms

The review also recommends competition policy reforms. Several sectors are targeted, including health and education, road transport, shipping, taxis and pharmacies. Deregulating parallel importing and relaxing planning legislation are contemplated. The review proposes focusing on national harmonised regulation, including completing reforms of the electricity, gas and water sectors.

Finally, the review recommends refining competition laws. While some have joked that these rival our tax legislation for their arcane complexity, they are some of the best in the world. The review rather focuses on reforming provisions that regularly attract criticism.

Some notable proposed amendments include repealing the Birdsville amendments which relate to below-cost pricing, streamlining the treatment of joint ventures and relaxing the prohibitions against third-line forcing. The complexity of our criminal cartel provisions and "exclusive dealing" provisions may be simplified. Our prohibition against exclusionary provisions could be repealed.Some more surprising recommendations include a more expansive approach to extra-territoriality, repealing an intellectual property exemption and adopting an "effects test" for the misuse of market power prohibition (albeit qualified by a new defence, perhaps borrowed from Europe).

If these recommendations are not taken seriously by Canberra the alternative is a "low-growth scenario" for Australia, Productivity Commission chairman Peter Harris says. Submissions close on November 17.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Press Releases from this Firm
Recent Content from this Firm
By Frances Drummond, Sophie Lees
By David Cross, Norah Chafardet
By Claudine Salameh, Candy Lau
By Abigail McGregor, David Cross, Jacob Smit
By Dylan McKimmie, Tatiana Gotvig
By Frances Drummond, Rebecca Brenikov
By Michael French
By Elisa de Wit
By Abigail McGregor, Jehan-Philippe Wood, Greg Vickery
By Abigail McGregor
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels