China: The New PRC Legislation Law: The Emperor's New Clothes?

Last Updated: 12 June 2000

by Peter Corne, Consultant, Simmons and Simmons, Shanghai1

The PRC legal system has come a long way in a short period of time. Multifarious laws and regulations at different levels now plug many of the gaps that use to create so much uncertainty. The crucial issues today centre around inconsistencies in legislation and its interpretation, not least derived from the general vagueness that permeates central legislation which allows administrative bodies with relatively broad powers to reinterpret law in the form of rules, regulations and ad hoc interpretations.

The Legislation Law of the PRC, adopted on March 15 at this year’s latest session of the National People's Congress (the "Legislation Law") attempts to formalise the structure of the PRC legal system. It represents, on the one hand, a step forward by delineating the scope of lawmaking and rulemaking authority of legislative and administrative organs, and on the other formalises legislative process, particularly of the laws passed by the NPC and its standing committee. It also contains some useful provisions such as Article 84 which rules out the retrospective force of law unless special provision is made to this effect - vital, for example, in determining the extent of application of the new PRC Contract Law promulgated in 1999.

The Law is divided into six chapters which cover the following subjects:

a) Scope of Lawmaking Authority;

b) Legislative Process of the NPC;

c) Legislative Process of the NPC Standing Committee;

d) Interpretation of National Law;

e) Scope of Application and Filing; and

f) Other Provisions.

The Legislation Law is not as ambitious as the 1997 draft that was submitted for consideration by legal scholars. Not too surprisingly, it represents, in effect, a consolidation of previous practice without attempting to address the real structural deficiencies plaguing the PRC legal system. As in the case of many other laws that are the result of a process of negotiation between powerful interested parties, it represents a non-controversial compromise of sorts - and a victory for the status quo.

This article will briefly assess to what extent the Legislation Law addresses some of the issues that consistently threaten to undermine the integrity and legitimacy of the PRC legal system.

1. Dealing With Conflicts Between Enactments, and Illegality

The Legislation Law shares with many of its predecessors the problem of being long on substance and short on procedure. One of the proposals in the 1997 draft (see China Law and Practice, June 1997) - The creation of committees at various levels of people's congress and in the State Council, and the granting to citizens, social and party institutions, enterprises and other units of the right to apply to such committee for the invalidation or amendments of legislation – would have solved some of the procedural inadequacies. However, this provision was not included in the final version of the Law. In regard to the principles of review of inconsistent enactments, the Legislation Law generally restates what has already been introduced in other legislation. To an extent this is helpful, as for example, principles on what type of enactment prevails over another have been stated with some degree of certainty, as have the relevant body responsible for review of inconsistency or illegality. For example, in the case of inconsistency between a local regulation issued by a local people's congress ("local regulation") and an administrative rule issued by a State Council department ("departmental rule"), the Legislation Law clearly states that the State Council is responsible for formulating an opinion, and where it deems the departmental rule should apply, it should request the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress to make a ruling. Or, where a departmental rule conflicts with a law, the National People’s Congress is empowered with the right to cancel or amend the offending rule according to the Legislation Law. An example is the provision in the State Administration of Industry and Commerce Certain Provisions Concerning the Prohibition Against the Infringement of Trade Secrets enacted in 1995 which seems to illegally expand the application of the provisions of the PRC Anti Unfair Competition Law of 1993 on commercial secret protection from "business operators" to employees, according to the Legislation Law. A further example is the State Council Supplementary Notice on Issues Concerning the Trial Implementation in Several Cities of State Owned Enterprise Bankruptcy and Merger and Reemployment of Staff and Workers of March 2 1997 which claims to override the priorities and rights of creditors expressed in the Civil Procedure Law of 1991, PRC Enterprise Bankruptcy Law of 1988 and PRC Security Law of 1995.2

No mechanism for application and no provision for the creation of a dedicated body within the National People’s Congress, State Council or any other body is however mentioned. One can only hope that the Legislation Law will provide the impetus for implementing legislation providing for the creation of such bodies in the near future. Otherwise, in practice, there will be no mechanism by which the principles on legislative consistency can be implemented by way of formal application. This situation is already acute because the people's courts lack the power to formally strike down inconsistent or illegal enactments. The best that they can do is to refrain from applying inappropriate departmental rules or rules issued by local people's governments pursuant to Article 52 of the Administrative Litigation Law of 1989. Administrative review bodies are in a slightly better position in this regard than the courts, as pursuant to Article 27 of the Administrative Review Law of 1999, they may, in the course of administrative reconsideration of a specific administrative act, ask the appropriate body to repeal an "Illegal" abstract administrative act which it has detected and on which the specific act is based. Repeal by way of application by an actual party to reconsideration is limited however to "other normative documents" below "rule" status according to Article 7 of the Administrative Review Law.

2. When is a Rule Not a Rule?

The threshold question of what constitutes 'law' in a broad sense in the PRC is a basic issue that the Legislation Law goes some way towards addressing, but not quite far enough. One of the most vexing questions is what constitutes a State Council departmental rule, or a local people's government rule. This is important as such rules can be referred to in court judgments according to Article 52 of the Administrative Litigation Law of 1989, and are thus the threshold of "law" in a broad sense. Article 62 of the Explanation of Various Issues Concerning the Implementation of the Administrative Litigation Law, issued by the Supreme People's Court in 08 March 2000 confusingly provides that courts can in addition to rules also cite legally valid "other normative documents" in their judgments. Where relevant law is vague, government documents that do not even constitute 'rules' (hereafter referred to as "other normative documents") are often relied upon by people's courts. Such 'other normative documents' are to this day indiscriminately issued by government departments and are applied with impunity as if they are law by the relevant government entity despite lacking legal status.

Articles 76 and 77 state that administrative rules shall be promulgated by an order signed by the person in charge of the agency and local rules by way of order signed by the provincial governor, autonomous region chairman, or city mayor. In addition, Articles 76 and 77 provide that administrative rules should be published in the State Council Bulletin and nationally circulated newspapers, and local rules shall be published on the bulletin of the local people's government and newspapers circulated in the local jurisdiction.

This is a step forward in that it does establish a basis for distinguishing rules from 'other normative documents' of lower status. Actual procedures for enactment of rules are however left to the State Council. This will further assist in distinguishing when an enactment has "legal" effect according to the Administrative Litigation Law.

The democratisation of rulemaking process would have been greatly assisted by a requirement that regulations and rules must be tabled before the relevant people's congress for approval before coming into effect. In this respect, the only opportunity for congresses to check upon local rules is submission post-promulgation to the relevant congress standing committee pursuant to Article 89. In the case of administrative rules, the only filing requirement is to the State Council and not to the NPC Standing Committee. An obligation in Article 58 for the State Council to consult relevant interest groups in the drafting of administrative regulations, incorporated by reference to any future drafting procedures issued by the State Council for departmental or local rules, also represents a step forward for the opening up and legitimisation of rulemaking procedures.

3. So Who is Responsible for Interpreting Law?

Rather sketchy provisions appear in Chapter 4 on NPC Standing Committee Interpretations of National Law. Such statutory interpretations have only been issued seven times since 1982, the most well known being the interpretation issued last year on the Hong Kong Basic Law. In fact, the Supreme People’s Court through its Gazette has unofficially assumed the role of interpreting national law.3 In the 1997 draft, the Supreme Court was limited to the role that was originally set out in the 1981 Resolution on the Interpretation of Law ("the Resolution") of only providing interpretations arising from application of the law to concrete cases. Apparently, the Supreme People’s Court wished to eliminate the right of interpretation granted to the Supreme People’s Procuratorate in the 1981 Resolution and avoid the situation of conflicting interpretations emanating from both bodies in respect of the Criminal Procedure Law. The Procuratorate countered with accusations that the Supreme People’s Court frequently exceeded its power of interpretation anyway. The result was a stalemate, the dropping of the article on judicial interpretation and the retention of the status quo.

4. Conclusion

As time slips by, the rectification of the fundamental weaknesses in the PRC legal system becomes increasingly more difficult. The Legislation Law represented a chance to address some of these structural defects, but ultimately merely endorsed the system that preceded it. As such it again demonstrated the triumph of compromise and of the status quo, and can be considered, by and large, as merely the "emperor’s new clothes."


1.This article also appears in the May edition of "China Law and Practice".

Peter Corne is author of an upcoming chapter in Juris Publishers’ loose lease series, "Doing Business in China" entitled "Creation and Application of Law", and authored the book "Foreign Investment in China: the Administrative Legal System" published by Hong Kong University Press.

2 See Donald Clarke, "State Council Notice Nullifies Statutory Rights of Creditors", East Asian Executive Reports, April 15, 1997.

3 See Nanping Liu, Judicial Interpretation in China, Sweet and Maxwell, 1997.

For further information, please contact us.

This article contains general information on the subject matter and shall not be relied upon for a specific case. Specialist advice should be sought with respect to any specific circumstances.

SIMMONS & SIMMONS - An International law firm

Hong Kong - London - Paris - Brussels - Lisbon - Milan - Rome - Abu Dhabi

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.