China: Looking Beyond The "Three-Step Approach" --Assessment Of Inventiveness In China

Last Updated: 9 January 2018
Article by Baohai Sun and Wenjie Liu

Inventive step, or non-obviousness, is a general requirement present in most patent laws, according to which an invention shall be sufficiently inventive. The sufficient inventiveness, in essence, is a proper balance between the inventiveness for encouraging innovation and the temporary monopolies conferred by the patent system. In China, to assess the inventiveness, a problem-solution analysis is conducted by applying a three-step approach1 . This article provides some practical insights with respect to how to rebut a lack-of-inventiveness rejection by looking beyond the three-step analysis.

The Rejections

In principle, it is desirable to set up an objective standard to evaluate the inventiveness of an invention, but in practice, subjective factors are always involved in the assessment of inventive step2. It may have a significant effect on the Examiner for granting a patent right if the applicants can grasp the key point of the invention and pertinently prepare a response to the office action focused thereon.

Inventive step of an invention means that, as compared with the prior art, the invention has prominent substantive features and represents notable progress3. To determine whether an invention has prominent substantive features is to determine, to the person skilled in the art, whether the claimed invention is non-obvious as compared with the prior art4. Regarding the criterion to assess the inventive step of an invention, the "three-step approach" must be mentioned.

In an office action, in most cases the Examiner is found to evaluate the inventive step of the claims, at least formally, in accordance with the logic of "three-step approach". However, applicants feel it's difficult to reply to it under the framework of "three-step approach". One of the main reasons lies in that: after the closest prior art is determined and the distinguishing features of the invention is determined as compared with the closest prior art, some examiners determine the technical problem actually solved by the invention on the basis of the distinguishing features instead of their technical effect and function5.

Consequently, they tend to simply consider the distinguishing features as common technical knowledge, or customary technical means, believe there is a technical motivation in the prior art, and finally reach a decision that the claimed invention does not involve an inventive step. The logic of evaluating inventive step by the "three-step approach" is substantially "backward reasoning." In other words, the Examiner first presumes that "the person skilled in the art" can be aware of the technical problem to be solved and has access to all the technical means existing before the filing date to solve the technical problem, and then determines the obviousness of the claimed invention, which trends to underestimate the inventiveness of the invention. Under such circumstances, a dispute about whether a distinguishing technical feature is a common technical knowledge or customary technical means may lead to the deadlock of both applicants and the Examiner, if applicants are confined within the framework of the "three-step approach". The most likely result is that the Examiner cannot be convinced and issues a decision of rejection.

Therefore, an experienced patent attorney must not only grasp "three-step approach" but also evaluate the inventive step of the invention as a whole beyond "three-step approach" when he drafts response to the office action related to inventive step.

How to do it

On receipt of an office action, the patent attorney should first study the office action, the invention and the reference files cited in the office action carefully, try to outline differences between the invention and the reference files, and re-determine the key point of the invention referring to the closest prior art cited by the Examiner.

If the patent attorney can objectively deduce contradictions and logical errors in the office action starting from the point of view of the Examiner, more effective communications with the Examiner can be achieved and the opinion of the patent attorney shall be more easily understood and accepted by the Examiner.

In the following, we will refer to an example to explain the above mentioned analyzing approach.

An example invention application relates to mobile communication techniques, and particularly to a method for monitoring synchronized channels (SCH) of neighboring cells (NCell). The background of this invention recites that a mobile terminal (MS) needs to keep monitoring SCHs of NCells so that the MS can handover between cells. In the prior art, there is one idle frame in every 26 TDMA frames and every idle frame contains 8 time slots, and the MS reads out carrier frequencies of the NCells from idle frames, wherein the MS can read out one carrier frequency in every one idle frame. It will be readily understood that when there are too many NCells required to be read, the MS may not be able to read out the carrier frequencies of all NCells in time and thus may result in handoff failures.

To overcome the above issue in the prior art, the example application provides a method as follows.

"1. A method for monitoring SCHs of NCells, characterized in comprising:

reading SCH signals of more than two NCells in more than two time slots of one TDMA frame; and

demodulating the SCH signals of the more than two NCells that have been read."

In the office action, the Examiner cites a reference. In order to solve the problem that the SCH bit pattern can only be read within a first time slot (slot 0) of each SCH frame in the prior art, the reference proposes to include the SCH bit pattern in each time slot of each SCH frame. Thus, the SCH bit pattern can be read in any one time slot of a frame. It can be seen from the above content of the reference that the SCH bit pattern can be read in any one time slot of one frame, but not to read more than two SCH bit patterns in more than two time slots of one frame. Besides that, the reference is silent about any "neighboring cell (NCell)".

The Examiner asserts that the reference has disclosed "reading SCH signals of more than two NCells in more than two time slots" as defined by claim 1, and he believes that the difference between the reference and the present application is: reading SCH signals in one "TDMA" frame. Then the Examiner concludes that the technical problem to be solved by the above differential feature is to improve the communication quality. The Examiner further asserts that reading SCH signals in one TDMA frame belongs to common knowledge in the art, and thus rejects claim 1 for lack of inventiveness.

Now, let's try the above-mentioned analyzing approach. Firstly, we determine distinguishing technical features in view of the closest prior art; secondly, we analyze the relationships of the distinguishing technical features as well as respective functions of those technical features, so as to determine the technical problems, technical solutions and technical effects of the present application; and finally, we determine the key point of the present invention.

By comparing the whole solution of claim 1 and that of the reference, we have understood that the reference fails to disclose the feature of reading SCH signals of more than two NCells in more than two time slots of one TDMA frame. Next, based on the above feature, it can be determined that the technical problem to be solved should be: how to improve the efficiency of reading SCH signals, and consequently, as technical effects of the present application, the SCH signals of NCells can be read more efficiently. Based on the above analysis, we can confirm that the key point of the invention has been defined in the original claim 1, and therefore, it is unnecessary to amend the claims.

Based on the key point of the invention, we get back to the office action to see whether the Examiner's opinions about the correspondences of features are correct or not. On one hand, it is correct that the "SCH bit pattern" corresponds to "SCH signal" because the "SCH bit pattern" in the reference and the "SCH signal" in the present application have the same effect in their respective technical solutions and they are different terms that represent the same concept. On the other hand, however, the Examiner's opinion about reading more than two SCH bit patterns in more than two time slots of one frame is not so reasonable. This is because, although the reference discloses that the SCH bit pattern is included in each time slot of one or more frames, the SCH bit pattern still has to be read in any one time slot of one frame, which cannot be equivalent to reading more than two SCH bit patterns in more than two time slots of one frame. In fact, the reference does not disclose the above distinguishing technical feature throughout the specification at all.

In this way, we come to a conclusion that the distinguishing technical feature determined by the Examiner is inaccurate, and accordingly the alleged technical problem solved by the present invention, which is determined based on the above distinguishing technical feature, is inaccurate, too.

Now, we have been clear what is wrong in the Examiner's opinions. Next, we will analyze the Examiner's reasoning logics, and try to find the weakness in the reasoning so as to determine what should be emphasized in our arguments. By analyzing, we find that the intrinsic logic of the Examiner is likely that even if the reference fails to disclose the SCH signals of two or more neighboring cells are read in two or more time slots of the same frame, those skilled in the art can readily conceive to read SCH signals of multiple neighboring cells in multiple time slots of one frame since the reference discloses reading one SCH signal in any one time slot of one frame.

Based on the above analysis, we argued in the response that the distinguishing technical feature determined by the Examiner is inaccurate, and we emphasized that in the prior art, only one SCH signal can be read in one frame, which is also true for the reference because the SCH signal still can only be read in one time slot of one frame, although said one time slot can be any one slot in one frame, not limited to the first slot. Therefore, the reference fails to disclose "reading SCH signals of more than two NCells in more than two time slots of one TDMA frame" as defined by claim 1, and the above distinguishing technical feature does not belong to the common knowledge in the art either. The Examiner accepted our arguments and the application was granted a patent right.

Conclusion

In conclusion, practically, how to determine whether an application is inventive because of the subjective factors involved in the judgment of inventive step has always been a difficult point. For a patent attorney, it is far from enough to remember the provisions and steps of the "three-step approach". The patent attorney shall always keep in mind that the technical solution should be considered as a whole to determine the inventive step of the invention, which is really in conformity with the provisions and spirits of the Patent Law and the Guidelines for Patent Examination.

Footnotes

1. The approach consists of (1)determining the closest prior art;(2)determining the distinguishing features of the invention and the technical problem actually solved by the invention;(3)determining whether or not the claimed invention is obvious to a person skilled in the art. See the Guidelines for Patent Examination (the "Guidelines").

2. Yin Xintian, "Introduction to the Patent Law of China" [M]. Beijing:Intellectual Property Publishing House,2011

3. Patent Law of the People's Republic of China, 2009 [M]. Beijing:Intellectual Property Publishing House,2010

4. State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China. Guidelines for Patent Examination 2010 [M]. Beijing:Intellectual Property Publishing House,2010:Section 2.2, Chapter 4, Part 2

5. Yu Ping, "determining the technical problem actually solved during the evaluation of the inventive step" [N]. China Intellectual Property News,2013-12-20(11)

Originally published July 2017

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions