China: Admissibility Of We Chat Messages In Overtime Pay Disputes (I)

Last Updated: 8 January 2018
Article by Sam Tang

Taiwan's United Daily News reported on 12 March 2017 on the first arbitration case in Taiwan (New Taipei City) involving social media messages. In this case, the employer sent messages after working hours to an employee, assigning work duties to him via Line (an interactive social media platform used widely in Taiwan, similar to WeChat in China). 

In these messages, the employer: (a) required the employee to forward a notice to other employees; and (b) assigned rather complicated tasks to the employee to handle. The employee claimed for overtime pay. 

The arbitration commission heard the case, and held that: (a) for each time the message was forwarded, 1 minute of overtime work will be calculated; and (b) as the employee presented a complete evidentiary record proving that the employer assigned complicated tasks to him after working hours (and the employer recognized the same), the duration of the employee's overtime work started from the moment he received the message until he replied stating that the work has been completed. Based on this calculation formula, the total overtime work covering both items mentioned above came up to 1,365 minutes, and the arbitrator thus ordered the employer to pay the corresponding overtime wages to the employee.  

In the same month, the Shanghai Jing'an District People's Court also adjudicated a labor dispute case involving a similar situation. In this case, the employee Xu claimed overtime pay from the employer and presented WeChat screenshots supporting his claim. The court ultimately admitted such WeChat messages as evidence and supported Xu's claim for 83 hours of overtime work. The court ordered the employer to pay overtime wages to Xu totaling RMB 5,724, calculated based on his base monthly salary of RMB 8,000. 

In recent years, various instant messaging platforms have emerged with the advancement of mobile Internet technology, offering increased convenience to inter-personal communications and exchanges. These platforms have also enabled employers to manage their employees in more diverse and flexible ways. Many employers have become accustomed to assigning work duties to their employees via WeChat and other instant messaging platforms. However, if employers neglect the legal risks with means of communication, they could find themselves in a very passive position if and when disputes arise. 

In order to provide a useful reference to our clients for managing legal risks, we retrieved from China Judgments Online 60 labor dispute judgments nationwide involving the admission of WeChat messages as evidence, and distilled the following principles regarding the admissibility of such evidence.

I.     Examination of the relevance of WeChat messages

When examining evidence, courts must assess the relevance of the WeChat messages in the overtime work claim. China adopts a unique requirement in labor dispute cases, whereby employers must bear most of the – if not the entire – burden of proof. 

With respect to the burden of proof in disputes involving overtime pay, Article 9 of the Interpretations of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Applicability of the Law in Labor Dispute Cases (III)1 stipulates that "... if the employee claims for overtime pay, he shall bear the burden of proof to prove his overtime work; however, if the employer possesses evidence that could prove the employee's overtime work but refuses to provide it, the employer shall bear all potential adverse consequences arising as a result thereof". In this connection, if an employee claims that his employer has underpaid or failed to pay for his overtime work, he will assume the prima facie burden of proof to prove such work.  

1.     Time of receipt of the WeChat messages

If an employee claims for overtime pay covering a certain time period, he is obligated to provide prima facie evidence proving his overtime work during such time period. If the WeChat messages were received earlier or later than the said period, it is less likely that the employee's claim for overtime pay would be supported by the court. 

In the case (2016) Suzhou 0106 First Instance Civil Case No. 3923, the employee Lan provided a WeChat message to prove the employer's request to work overtime until 9 pm. However, the WeChat message was only received on 19 January 2016 while Lan claimed overtime pay for the entire year of 2015. The court held that the WeChat message allegedly proving his overtime work has no retrospective effect, and thus could not be admitted as evidence to prove his claim for overtime work for the whole of 2015. 

2.     The WeChat messages must describe the overtime work

(1)     The courts are less likely to recognize ad hoc work-related talks by the employer with the employee after working hours as overtime work. In this connection, we suggest that employers pay careful attention to the time and wording when sending WeChat messages to their employees, in addition to having well-established overtime work approval policies. 

In the case (2015) Shenzhen Futian District People's Court 4th Civil Division First Instance Civil Case No. 1123, the court held that, where an employee claims for overtime pay, he bears the burden of proof to prove his overtime work. However, the WeChat messages adduced by the employee – which merely showed that both sides talked outside of working hours about work reports and work arrangements – could not be admitted as evidence to prove his overtime work. The employee did not submit any evidence proving that the employer adopted an attendance record system. In other words, he was unable to prove that the employer possessed, but declined to produce, the proof of his overtime work. As the employee failed to submit solid evidence to support his claim for overtime work, he was thus obligated to bear the adverse consequences. The court ultimately dismissed his claim for overtime pay. 

In the case (2015) Xuzhou 5th Civil Division First Instance Civil Case No. 91, the parties agreed in the employment contract that, if Zhao requests to work overtime, he is required to first submit a written application and obtain the employer's prior written approval; otherwise, such work would not be regarded as overtime work. However, Zhao failed to provide such written application or approval, and the WeChat messages he provided merely showed work-related communications and exchanges with the employer's legal representative. The court held that such messages were inadmissible as evidence to support his claim for overtime pay. Therefore, the court ultimately ruled that Zhao's claim for overtime pay – calculated based on the WeChat messages and the sent/receipt time of emails – lacked legal basis, and was not supported. 

In the case (2016) Inner Mongolia 0203 First Instance Civil Case No. 2123, the employee Nie provided WeChat messages of his conversations with, among others, the HR Manager on 9 May 2015, the General Manager on August 29, the Engineering Department Manager on September 5 and 6, Manager Liu on March 22 and 28, the Property Manager on October 25, and with Manager Liu again on May 10, May 31, June 7, June 13, June 14, June 20, June 27, September 3, September 5 and September 10. However, the court held that such messages could not be recognized as direct evidence proving his overtime work. In addition, Nie failed to provide solid evidence proving that the employer possessed evidence that could prove his overtime work. Nie's claim for overtime pay was ultimately rejected by the court. 

In the case (2016) Beijing 0108 First Instance Civil Case No. 3537, the court held that QQ messages, WeChat messages and other evidence provided by Deng could only prove the fact that the communications were work-related. However, they did not prove that Deng worked on weekends and statutory holidays. As such, his claim for overtime pay was not supported by the court due to a lack of factual basis.

(2)     If the WeChat messages show that the employer's person in charge or department head required an employee to work overtime, the employee will be deemed to have fulfilled the prima facie burden of proof.

In the case (2016) Beijing 01 Final Civil Case No. 6762, the court held that, according to the WeChat messages submitted by Yang, it was the person in charge of the employer who requested Yang to work overtime and such evidence could be used to prove his overtime work. Based on the evidence provided by Yang, the court found that Yang had discharged the prima facie burden of proof to support the overtime pay claim. On the contrary, while the employer should possess Yang's attendance record, it failed to provide any evidence of Yang's attendance or the existence of overtime work, and was required to assume the adverse consequences. The employer did not provide any evidence of its actual implementation of the internal rule that an employee must file an application to work overtime or sufficient evidence to overturn Yang's assertion of having worked overtime. As such, the employer's defense was not supported by the court.

It is vital for employers to establish an attendance system, record their employees' attendance in writing, and verify such records with them on a monthly basis (and have the employees sign off on such records). In the case (2016) Suzhou 0106 First Instance Civil Case No. 3015, the attendance record submitted by the employer did not contain the employee's signature. Consequently, the court did not admit the attendance record as evidence. The WeChat message sent by the employee to the shop manager (as provided by the employee) read "Manager, I worked overtime for 10.5 hours today, 2.5 hours more than expected". It was sent on New Year's Day (1 January 2016), which was quite timely and persuasive. Although the manager did not reply on the same day, the court still held that it was sufficient to prove that the employee worked overtime for 10.5 hours based on a high probability. As such, the overtime worked undertaken by the employee on that day was held to be 10.5 hours.

3. If the WeChat messages do not identify the person who requested the employee to work overtime, it would be difficult to ascertain the existence of such overtime work.

In the case (2015) Shenzhen Futian District People's Court 4th Civil Division First Instance Civil Case No. 1123, the court held that the employee claiming for overtime pay should bear the burden of proof regarding the existence of such overtime work. The audio-recording and WeChat messages submitted by the employee could not prove that the counterparty in the dialogue was his supervisor, and thus his claim was not supported.

In the case (2016) Beijing 0112 First Instance Civil Case No. 34767, the employee claimed for overtime pay for work performed after working hours on working days as well as on weekends and statutory holidays. However, the employee only provided copies of the relevant evidence and WeChat messages, but not the originals. Moreover, the person who communicated with the employee could not be identified from the WeChat messages. The alleged overtime work could not be ascertained merely from the WeChat messages; in other words, the employee failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove the existence of overtime work and thus should bear the legal consequences arising from the failure to discharge the burden of proof. As such, the employee's claim against the employer for overtime pay was not supported by the court due to a lack of factual basis.

In the case (2015) Pudong 1st Civil Division First Instance Civil Case No. 11474, the employee provided some WeChat screenshots from a WeChat group to prove overtime work on working days and weekends. However, the employer denied this and asserted that it had never set up any official WeChat group. The employer also denied the identity of the persons in the WeChat messages as alleged by the employee. Such WeChat messages were not corroborated by any other evidence submitted by the employee, and were thus not admitted as evidence by the court.

(To be continued)


1     Effective as of 14 September 2010. 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions