China: The Supreme People's Court Interpretation On Several Issues Concerning The Application Of Law In Adjudication Of Patent Infringement Dispute Cases (II)

Fa Shi [2016] No.1

(Approved in the 1676th meeting session of the Adjudication Committee of the Supreme People's Court on January 25th, 2016, and implemented as of April 1st, 2016) 

To properly adjudicate patent infringement dispute cases, this Court has formulated this judicial interpretation in accordance with the provisions of the Patent Law of the People's Republic of China, the Torts Liability Law of the People's Republic of China, the Civil Procedures Law of the People's Republic of China and other relevant laws, as well as judicial practice.

Article 1 Where a patent has two or more claims, the right holder of the patent shall specify in his complaint the claim(s) based on which his patent is allegedly infringed by the infringer. If the claim(s) is not stated or not stated clearly in the complaint, the People's Court shall request the right holder for clarification. If, after the court's request and explanation, the right holder still does not clarify it, the People's Court may rule to dismiss the right holder's complaint.

Article 2 Where a claim asserted by the right holder in a patent infringement litigation is declared invalid by the Patent Re-examination Board (the "PRB"), the People's Court hearing the patent infringement dispute case may rule to dismiss the right holder's complaint based on the invalid claim.

If there is evidence to prove that an effective administrative judgment has vacated the invalidation decision, the right holder may file another lawsuit..

When the right holder files another lawsuit, the statute of limitations is counted from the date on which the administrative judgment mentioned in paragraph 2 of this Article has been served.

Article 3 Where a patent is requested for invalidation for obvious violation of Article 26(3) and 26(4) of the Patent Law, as a consequence of which the specification cannot be used to explain the claim, and the situation does not fall into that of Article 4 of this Interpretation, the People's Court hearing the patent infringement dispute case shall, as a general rule, suspend the proceedings. If no request is filed for invalidating the patent right within a reasonable period of time, the People's Court may determine the protection scope of the patent right according to what is recorded in the claim.

Article 4 When there is ambiguity in the grammar, text, punctuation, graphics or symbols in the claims, specification or drawings, but a person having ordinary skill in the art can reach only one possible understanding by reading the claims, specification and drawings, the People's Court shall make a finding in accordance with such understanding.

Article 5 When the People's Court determines the protection scope of a patent, all technical features recited in the preamble and the features portion of an independent claim and the referencing and limiting portion of a dependent claim shall have limiting effect.

Article 6 The People's Court may use other patents having divisional relationship with the patent in dispute, the patent examination files, effective judgments or rulings on patent validity, to interpret the claim(s) of the patent in dispute.

The patent examination files include the written materials submitted by the patent applicant or patentee during patent examination, re-examination and invalidation proceedings. Office actions, meeting minutes, oral hearing transcripts, effective patent re-examination decisions and effective patent invalidation decisions made by the patent administrative department of the State Council and the Patent Re-examination Board.

Article 7 Where the allegedly infringing technical solution has added technical features on the basis of all technical features of a close-ended claim for a composition, the People's Court shall find that the allegedly infringing technical solution does not fall within the protection scope of the patent right, unless the additional technical features are inevitable impurities of normal quantity.

The close-ended claim for a composition in the preceding paragraph generally speaking does not include claim for traditional Chinese medicine composition.

Article 8 A functional feature refers to a technical feature defined by its function or effect in an innovation-creation through structure, composition, step, condition or their inter-relationship, unless a person having ordinary skill in the art, after only reading the claim, can directly and specifically determine the embodiments to achieve such function or effect.

Compared with technical feature as recorded in the specification and drawings which are indispensable to realize the function or effect referred in the preceding paragraph, if the corresponding technical feature of the allegedly infringing technical solution has used substantially the same means to realize the same function and achieve the same effect, and a person having ordinary skill in the art may conceive such solution without creative labor when the alleged infringement occurs, the People's Court shall find such corresponding technical feature as identical or equivalent to the functional feature.

Article 9 Where an allegedly infringing technical solution cannot be adapted for use in the environment as defined by environmental features in the claim, the People's Court shall find that the allegedly infringing technical solution does not fall within the protection scope of the patent.

Article 10 In a claim, if the technical feature of a product is defined by preparation method, while the preparation method of the allegedly infringing product is neither the same as nor equivalent to it, the People's Court shall find that the allegedly infringing technical solution does not fall within the protection scope of the patent.

Article 11 Where a method claim does not specifically record the sequence of the technical steps, but a person skilled in the art, after reading the claim, specification and drawings, can directly and clearly think out of the steps that should be implemented in a certain order, the People's Court shall find that the sequence of steps plays a limiting role on the protection scope of the patent.

Article 12 Where a claim adopts terms such as "at least", "no more than" to define a numerical feature, and a person skilled in the art, after reading the claims, specification and drawings, thinks that the patented technical solution has specially highlighted the limiting effect of the terms on the technical feature, if the right holder alleges that a different technical feature is an equivalent feature, the People's Court shall not support such allegation.

Article 13 Where the right holder proves that the amendments or statement made by the applicant or patentee to limit the claims, specification or drawings during the examination or validity proceedings have been explicitly denied, the People's Court shall find that the amendments or statement has not resulted in abandonment of the technical solution.

Article 14 In determining the average consumer's level of knowledge and cognitive capability of a design, the People's Court shall consider the design freedom of products identical with or similar to that of the patented design when the alleged infringement occurs. If broader design freedom exists, the People's Court may find that the average consumer may feel difficult to notice the minor differences among different designs. If narrow design freedom exists, the People's Court may find that usually it is easier for an average consumer to notice the minor differences among different designs.

Article 15 In a design patent for a set of products, if the allegedly infringing design is identical with or similar to one of the designs, the People's Court shall find that the allegedly infringing design falls within the protection scope of the patent.

Article 16 When the design patent for an assembled product has only one way of assembly, if the allegedly infringing design is identical with or similar to the design in the assembled state, the People's Court shall find that the allegedly infringing design falls within the protection scope of the patent.

If, in a design patent, the components have no assembling relationship, or the components have more than one way of assembly, while the allegedly infringing design is identical with or similar to the design of each individual component, the People's Court shall find that the allegedly infringing design falls within the protection scope of the patent. If the allegedly infringing design lacks the design of an individual component, or is neither identical with nor similar to the design of an individual component, the People's Court shall find that the allegedly infringing design does not fall within the protection scope of the patent.

Article 17 In a design patent for a product of variable states, if an allegedly infringing design is identical with or similar to the design in all the various states of use as illustrated in the various state views, the People's Court shall find that the allegedly infringing design falls within the protection scope of the patent. If the allegedly infringing design lacks the design of one state of use, or is neither identical with nor similar to the design in one state of use, the People's Court shall find that the allegedly infringing design does not fall within the protection scope of the patent.

Article 18 Where a right holder, according to Article 13 of the Patent Law, requests an entity or individual to pay appropriate fees for implementing his invention during the period between the date on which the invention patent application has been published and the date on which the patent has been granted, the People's Court may determine reasonable fees by referring to relevant patent royalties.

Where the protection scope claimed by the applicant in a published invention patent application differs from the protection scope of the granted invention patent, if the sued technical solution falls within both scopes, the People's Court shall find that the defendant has implemented the invention during the aforesaid period. If the sued technical solution falls within only one of the scopes, the People's Court shall find that the defendant has not implemented the invention during the aforesaid period.

After the grant of an invention patent is announced, if a person, without authorization of the patentee and for production and business purpose, uses, offers for sale, or sells the product that has been manufactured, sold or imported by another person during the aforesaid period, and if that person has paid or has undertaken in writing to pay the appropriate fee as provided by Article 13 of the

Patent Law, the People's Court shall not support the right holder's claim that such use, offer for sale or sale infringes his patent.

Article 19 Where a product sales contract has been formulated in accordance with the law, the People's Court shall find that it constitutes "sale" as provided in Article 11 of the Patent Law.

Article 20 Where a subsequent product obtained by further processing or treating of the products made directly from a patented process are further processed or treated, the People's Court shall find that such re-processing or re- treatment does not belong to "use of product directly obtained from the patented process" as provided in Article 11 of the Patent Law.

Article 21 Where one clearly knows that a product is the raw material, equipment, part, or intermediate material exclusively for the implementation of a patent and, without authorization from the patentee and for production or business purpose, supplies such product to another person who has infringed the patent, if the right holder claims that the supplier's act belongs to "assisting other's tortious act" as prescribed under Article 9 of the Torts Liability Law, the People's Court shall support his claim.

Where one clearly knows that a patent has been granted on a product or method and, without authorization from the patentee and for production or business purpose, actively induces another person to have implemented the act of infringing the patent, if the right holder claims that the inducer's act belongs to "abetting other's tortious act" as prescribed under Article 9 of the Torts Liability Law, the People's Court shall support his claim.

Article 22 In a prior art defense or prior design defense raised by the alleged infringer, the People's Court shall define the prior art or prior design in accordance with the Patent Law effective at the application date of the patent.

Article 23 Where the allegedly infringing technical solution or design falls within the protection scope of the prior patent in dispute, if the alleged infringer raises non-infringement defense on the ground that his technical solution or design has been granted a patent, the People's Court shall not support this defense.

Article 24 Where the recommended national, industrial or local standard has explicitly indicated information of an essential patent, if an alleged infringer raises non-infringement defense on the ground that implementing such standard does not need license from the patentee, the People's Court generally shall not support his defense.

Where the recommended national, industrial or local standard has explicitly indicated information of an essential patent, when the patentee and an alleged infringer negotiate terms for license of the patent, if the patentee willfully violates the fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory licensing obligations he has undertaken during the formulation of the standard, which results in failure to reach agreement for a patent license, and if the accused infringer has no obvious fault in the negotiation, the People's Court generally shall not support the patentee's request for stopping the implementation of the standard.

The licensing terms referred in the second paragraph of this Article shall be determined by negotiation between the patentee and the alleged infringer. If the parties fail to reach an agreement after sufficient negotiation, they can request the People's Court to determine the license terms. In determining the license terms, the People's Court shall, in accordance with the fair, reasonable and non- discriminatory principle, comprehensively consider such factors as the innovation level of the patent, its effect in the standard, the technical field of the standard, nature of the standard, the implementation scope of the standard, and relevant license terms.

Where laws or administrative regulations have other stipulations on the implementation of patents in a standard, such provisions shall prevail.

Article 25 Where one uses, offers for sale or sells any infringing product for production or business purpose without knowing that the product has been made and sold without authorization from the patentee, and he has provided evidence to prove the legitimate source of the product, if the right holder seeks injunction against such use, offer for sale or sale, the People's Court shall support it, unless the user of the allegedly infringing product provides evidence to prove that he has already paid reasonable consideration for the product.

"Without knowing" as stated in the first paragraph of this Article means both "actually not knowing" and "should not know".

"Legitimate source" as stated in the first paragraph of this Article means that the product has been acquired by means of normal commercial manner such as lawful sales channel and usual purchase and sale contracts. To prove "legitimate source", the person who uses, offers for sale or sell the product should provide relevant evidence in consistence with transaction norms.

Article 26 Where the defendant commits patent infringement and the patentee requests the court for an injunction, the People's Court shall support his claim, but the court may, in light of national interests or public interests, not grant the injunction against the defendant, and order the defendant to pay reasonable fees instead.

Article 27 Where it is difficult to determine the actual loss suffered by the right holder due to infringement, the People's Court shall ask the right holder to provide evidence on the profit gained by the infringer from the infringement according to Article 65(1) of the Patent Law. Where the right holder has provided preliminary evidence on profit gained by the infringer, and the account books and documents on the patent infringement are mainly held by the infringer, the People's Court may order the infringer to provide such books and documents. If the infringer refuses to provide those books and documents without justification or provides false books and documents, the People's Court may determine the profit gained by the infringer from the infringement according to the right holder's claim and evidence provided by the right holder.

Article 28 Where a right holder and an infringer have agreed on the amount of damages or the ways of calculating damages according to law, and in a patent infringement lawsuit, it is requested to determine the amount of damages based on the agreement, the People's Court shall support the request.

Article 29 After a decision for declaring the patent invalid has been made, if a party files a petition for retrial according to law based on the invalidation decision and requests to revoke the infringement judgment or mediation document that was made by the People's Court before the invalidation decision but has not yet been enforced, the People's Court may rule to suspend the retrial examination, and rule to suspend the enforcement of the original judgment or mediation document.

Where the patentee provides a sufficient and valid guarantee with the People's Court and requests to continue to enforce the judgment or mediation documents mentioned in the preceding paragraph, the People's Court shall continue to enforce; where the infringer provides a sufficient and valid counter guarantee with the People's Court and requests to suspend the enforcement, the people's court shall approve. Where an effective judgment of the People's Court has not withdrawn the decision for declaring invalidity of a patent right, the patentee shall compensate the losses caused to the other party due to continuation of enforcement; where the decision for declaring invalidity of a patent right has been withdrawn by the effective judgment of the People's Court and the patent right is still valid, the People's Court may directly enforce the above counter guaranteed properties according to the judgment or mediation documents mentioned in the preceding paragraph.

Article 30 Where no action is filed with the People's Court against an invalidation decision within the legally prescribed time limit, or where an action has been filed but the effective judgment does not revoke the invalidation decision, if a party files a petition for retrial according to the law and requests to revoke the infringement judgment or mediation document made by the People's Court before the invalidation decision but has not been enforced, the People's Court shall grant the retrial. If a party requests to terminate the enforcement of the infringement judgment or mediation document made by the People's Court before the invalidation decision but has not been enforced, the People's Court shall rule to terminate the enforcement.

Article 31 This interpretation shall take effect on April 1st, 2016. In case of any inconsistency between relevant judicial interpretations previously released by the Supreme People's Court and this Interpretation, this Interpretation shall prevail.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
CCPIT Patent & Trademark Law Office
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
CCPIT Patent & Trademark Law Office
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions