China: Patent Evaluation Report And Legitimacy Of Patent Right

Last Updated: 10 November 2016
Article by Xiangong Meng

As provided in the current Chinese Patent Law, a patentee of a utility model patent or a design patent usually is required to furnish a patent evaluation report to the relevant authority, i.e. a court of law or an administrative office, to assert its patent right. The relevant provisions were included in the current Chinese Patent Law for various reasons, among which the absence of substantive examination on utility model and design applications and the potential abuse of these unexamined patented rights.

A patent evaluation report shall be made with respect to a utility model patent or design patent by the State Intellectual Property Office of China (hereinafter referred to as "SIPO") at the request of the patentee or the interested party, by conducting a search with respect to the utility model patent or design patent, and analyzing and evaluating whether the patent is in conformity with the granting conditions provided in the Chinese Patent Law and its Implementing Regulations. A patent evaluation report is a relatively authoritative evaluation report of patent quality from the authorities. In disputes over patent infringement in mainland China, before instituting litigation for the purpose of protecting rights, the patentee often requests the SIPO to make a patent evaluation report with respect to the relevant patent right he/it owns, in order to evaluate in advance the stability of the patent right. Besides, when the People's Court or the administrative authority for patent affairs judges and deals with disputes over patent infringement, where the infringing party files a request for invalidation of the patent concerned, the People's Court or the administrative authority for patent affairs may determine whether it is necessary to suspend relevant procedures based on the patent evaluation report. A patent evaluation report is, in substance, a form of evidence or a certifying document, and can be used as preliminary evidence for the stability of a patent right, and is not an administrative decision or a valid legal document.

Recently, regarding the request for invalidation of the utility model patent No. ZL201420786681.4 (hereinafter referred to as "patent concerned") entitled "Transmission Device of Roller Type Dust Adhering Machine", and owned by Shenzhen Fangtai Equipment Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Fangtai Company"), the Patent Reexamination Board made an examination decision on request for invalidation to maintain the validity of the patent right concerned. In this invalidation case, the difficulty for the patentee lies in that, before the request for invalidation of the patent concerned was filed, a patent evaluation report with respect thereto had been made by the SIPO, in which evaluation report the examiner, based on the evidence obtained by search, draws a conclusion that all of the claims of the patent concerned possess no inventiveness, and that, after the patent evaluation report was reviewed, said conclusion had been upheld. Under the circumstances, once the petitioner for invalidation requests to invalidate the whole of the patent concerned based on the evidence and the evaluation opinion set forth in the evaluation report, it would be quite difficult for the patentee to obtain the result of the validity the patent right of the patent concerned being maintained.

The patent in question, a utility model patent granted on May 6, 2015, includes 10 claims, of which the independent claim 1 is as below: "A transmission device of a roller type dust adhering machine, characterized by comprising a cleaning roller and a driving shaft, the cleaning roller and the driving shaft being connected via a coupling."

Fangtai Company, after putting the patented products on the market, found that a company in Shenzhen was suspected of infringing its patent right, and then instituted civil litigation before the People's Court to protect its patent right. After the litigation was instituted, the defendant, the above-mentioned company in Shenzhen, filed a request for invalidation of the patent concerned, attempting to suspend the litigation and invalidate this patent so as to avoid the accusation of infringement. After the defendant filed the request for invalidation of the patent concerned, Fangtai Company as the patentee made argument against the invalidation.

The conclusion set forth in the evaluation report with respect to the patent concerned is that, claim 1 has the distinguishing technical feature of "the cleaning roller and the driving shaft being connected via a coupling" as compared with evidence 1, the means of achieving connection via a coupling belongs to common knowledge in the art, and thus it is obvious to those skilled in the art to combine the means of using a coupling with the evidence 1 and arrive at the technical solution claimed in claim 1, and hence claim 1 possesses no inventiveness. The petitioner has presented the same opinion in the request for invalidation.

In the situation as stated above, the patentee formulated a detailed responding strategy on the basis of conducting a careful analysis and search and grasping the prior arts in the technical field to which the patent concerned relates. The patentee has presented the following opinion: for the patent concerned, connecting the cleaning roller and the driving shaft that are separately provided via the coupling can achieve the technical effect of quickly detaching the cleaning roller from the dust adhering machine, while the cleaning roller disclosed in the evidence 1 is an integral shaft; although in the mechanical field a coupling is a connector commonly used between shafts or between a shaft and a rotating member, in the prior arts there is no motivation that would prompt a person skilled in the art to separate an integral shaft into two separate parts, i.e. a driving shaft and a cleaning roller, and then connect the two parts with a coupling, so as to solve the technical problem of detaching an integral cleaning roller in the form of a shaft being not easy.

After taking oral proceedings, the panel has accepted the opinion of the patentee, and hold that, no sufficient ground or corresponding evidence shows that solving the technical problem of detaching a cleaning roller from a dust adhering machine being not easy by using said distinguishing technical feature is conventional technical means or common knowledge in the art, and that by using this distinguishing technical feature, it is possible to conveniently detach the cleaning roller from the dust adhering machine, thereby improving the working efficiency and reducing the labor cost. Therefore, the panel has concluded that claim 1 possesses inventiveness over combination of the evidence 1 and common knowledge.

Accordingly, the Patent Reexamination Board has made the examination decision on request for invalidation as indicated above, in which the following decision points are set forth: if a technical solution claimed in a claim has a distinguishing technical feature over a prior art, and there is no motivation in the prior arts to use the distinguishing technical feature for solving the relevant technical problem while the distinguishing technical feature does not belong to common knowledge in the art, and moreover the distinguishing technical feature brings about a beneficial technical effect for the technical solution claimed in this claim, the technical solution claimed in this claim is inventive.

Due to the authority of the SIPO, a patent evaluation report made by the SIPO is usually used as evidence of the stability of the patent right of a patent involved in disputes over patent infringement; and, if the conclusion set forth in the patent evaluation report is that the patent does not meet the requirements for being granted a patent right, the patentee will tend to give up taking action to protect his/its patent right without careful analysis. However, in the invalidation case discussed above, in the situation where the patent concerned has been considered to lack inventiveness in the patent evaluation report, the patentee carefully analyzed the facts of the case, and on this basis, by determining the distinguishing technical feature starting from the closest prior art and then determining the corresponding technical problem actually solved, came to a conclusion that there was no relevant motivation in the prior arts, and finally acquired the result of the validity of the patent right being maintained. This indicates that, the stability of the patent concerned should be judged from the viewpoint of a person skilled in the art based on the reference evidence and pursuant to relevant provisions, and the legitimacy of the patent right of the patent concerned should not be simply denied based on the negative conclusion set forth in the relevant patent evaluation report.

This article was originally published in The Patent Lawyer Magazine of CTC Legal, July/August 2016 issue, Page 41-43.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Practice Guides
by Mondaq AdviceCentre
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Sign Up
Gain free access to lawyers expertise from more than 250 countries.
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Newsalert
Select Topics
Select Regions
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions