China: New Rules For Singapore Arbitration

Last Updated: 27 June 2007
Article by Michael Evan Jaffe and Meg Utterback

Companies throughout Asia Pacific grapple with choice of law and choice of forum issues in every contract. The prevailing view in China is that a foreign company is best served to move arbitration off-shore in hopes of a more level playing ground than might be found under the traditional Chinese arbitration body, the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC), or some of the newer PRC local arbitration commissions. The preferred venues for arbitration currently are Singapore and Hong Kong. Thus, it is important for companies to be aware of changes to the Singapore International Arbitration Commission (SIAC) Rules and how those changes might influence the decision on venue in drafting the next contractual dispute resolution provision.

The SIAC has published its new, third edition Arbitration Rules (New Rules), effective July 1, 2007. The New Rules replace the second edition Arbitration Rules issued in 1997 (Old Rules). The New Rules revise the procedures for the appointment and challenge of arbitrators, add written submissions during the pre-hearing phase, and initiate a new fee structure. The New Rules also shift powers previously held by the Arbitral Tribunal and the Appointing Authority to the SIAC Registrar, giving the Registrar greater control over the administration of arbitration proceedings. In most instances, the changes tend to bring the SIAC Rules in closer accord with the widely recognized ICC Rules of Arbitration (ICC Rules). The New Rules aim to improve efficiency by employing the best practices available for resolving international commercial disputes.

Revised Procedure for Appointing and Selecting the Number of Arbitrators

The New Rules change the procedure for determining the number of arbitrators in an arbitration proceeding. Under the Old Rules, a sole arbitrator presided over the arbitration unless the parties agreed otherwise (Old Rule 6). The New Rules also provide for a default sole arbitrator, but afford the Registrar discretion to increase the size of the Tribunal to three arbitrators when warranted, based on quantum in dispute, complexity of subject matter, proposals by the parties and other circumstances (New Rule 5.1). This New Rule is very similar to Article Eight of the ICC Rules governing the number of arbitrators, which creates a default sole arbitrator, but provides that the ICC Court may increase the size of the Tribunal based on the circumstances of the case (see ICC Rules, Art. 8, sec. 2).

The New Rules also change the manner in which arbitrators are appointed. Under the Old Rules, in a sole arbitrator proceeding, both parties were encouraged to agree on an arbitrator, and if the parties failed to agree, the arbitrator would be appointed by an "Appointing Authority" selected by the parties (Old Rule 7). In three-arbitrator panel proceedings, each party appointed their own arbitrator, who, in turn, selected the Presiding Arbitrator (Old Rule 8.1). If either of the parties failed to appoint an arbitrator, or the first two appointed arbitrators failed to agree upon a Presiding Arbitrator, the Appointing Authority would appoint the Chair. (Old Rule 8.3).

The New Rules eliminate the role of the Appointing Authority. Under the New Rules, parties do not appoint, but rather "nominate" arbitrators; the nominations are subject to confirmation by the Chairman of the SIAC (New Rule 5.3, 6.1, and 7.1). An arbitrator is not empanelled until the SIAC Chairman confirms the party’s nomination (New Rule 5.5). This "nominate and confirm" procedure tracks the "nominate and confirm" procedure provided in Article Nine of the ICC Rules. The New Rule reduces the number of participants in the appointment process and formally recognizes the Chairman as the final authority on the Tribunal’s composition, resulting in a more streamlined and definitive system.

One way in which the New Rules depart from both the Old Rules and the ICC Rules is with respect to the nationality of the arbitrators. The Old Rules provide that the SIAC Chairman shall consider the nationality of the arbitrators in relation to the nationality of the parties (Old Rule 11.1). Similarly, Article Nine of the ICC Rules contains several provisions that instruct the General Secretary to consider the nationality of arbitrators in making appointment decisions. The New SIAC Rules have deleted the nationality provision entirely. Generally, parties still believe that nationality of the arbitrators may have some influence over the process and the outcome. Certainly arbitrators trained in a civil versus common law jurisdictions have differing views on the presentation of evidence. Further, an Asian arbitrator may have a differing view on a contractual dispute than might his equally learned colleague from Europe. This New Rule may be ahead of its time in assuming that disputes are sufficiently globalized that nationality has become irrelevant.

Revised Procedure for Challenging Arbitrators

The Old Rules required that upon a party’s challenge of an arbitrator, the Registrar automatically suspend the arbitration while the Chairman decided the merits of the challenge (Old Rule 13.2). Under the New Rules governing challenges, the Registrar has discretion to suspend the proceedings. Absent an exercise of that discretion, the arbitration may proceed while the SIAC Chairman decides the merits of the challenge. Similarly, the ICC challenge provisions do not require suspension of the arbitration upon challenge of an arbitrator. The deletion of an automatic suspension provision ensures that parties cannot unilaterally invoke the challenge procedure and thereby halt the progress of the arbitration proceeding.

Under the New Rules, if the SIAC Chairman upholds the challenge (or if the arbitrator is otherwise dismissed), the parties must proceed to the "nominate and confirm" procedure under the revised selection procedures (See New Rules 10-12). The New Rules also give the SIAC Chairman exclusive authority to fix costs associated with challenges (New Rule 12).

Revised Procedures for Filing Written Documents

The New Rules add to the information that parties must include in the Notice of Arbitration. In addition to the parties’ names and addresses, the Notice must now include phone numbers, fax numbers, and electronic mail addresses (New Rule 3.1). The Notice of Arbitration must also include a quantification of the amount in dispute (if known), comments regarding the language of the arbitration, and confirmation that the other party has been served and the filing fee has been paid (New Rule 3.1). The new requirements for additional information – and particularly the requirement that the Notice state the amount in dispute – bring the SIAC’s Notice of Arbitration in close conformity to an ICC Request for Arbitration (ICC Rules Art. 3, sec. 4). The amount in dispute requirement will facilitate establishing arbitration fees and costs, as these amounts are in proportion to the amount at issue.

The New Rules require that the Respondent submit a Response to the Notice of Arbitration (New Rule 4.1). This response was permissive, but not mandatory, under Old Rule 4. The New Rules also provide alternative time limits for Respondent’s Statement of Defense. Respondent may submit the statement within 30 days of receipt of claimant’s statement or within 30 days of the notice that the Tribunal has been formed (New Rule 16.4).

The most significant change introduced by the New Rules is the addition of a "Memorandum of Issues" to the pre-hearing phase of the proceeding. Under Rule 17, within 45 days following the completion of the submission of written statements, the Tribunal must consult with the parties and prepare a memorandum of issues to be decided in the arbitration. If any party refuses to participate in drawing up the Memorandum of Issues, the Tribunal must still submit that document to the Registrar for approval (New Rule 17.3). The Memorandum of Issues closely resembles the "Terms of Reference" assembled jointly by the Tribunal and the parties during the pre-hearing phase of an ICC proceeding (see ICC Rules, Art. 18). Most practitioners will view this addition as a positive step, allowing the parties and the Tribunal to well-define the issues early on, with the goal of streamlining the issues and expediting the process.

SIAC Scrutiny of the Tribunal’s Award

Under the Old Rules, the Tribunal issued its award to the parties directly (Old Rule 28.1). Under the New Rules, the Tribunal must submit a draft award for the Registrar’s review (New Rule 27.1). The Registrar may suggest modifications as to the form of the award, and, without affecting the Tribunal’s liberty of decision, may also draw its attention to points of substance. The Rule states that no award shall be issued by the Tribunal until it has been approved as to form. The language of the New SIAC scrutiny provision replicates the language of the ICC provision for scrutiny of draft awards (see ICC Rules, Art. 27). This scrutiny provision promotes integrity in the Tribunal’s decision making and ensures uniformity as to all users regarding form.

Revised Fee Structure

Under the Old Rules, the Tribunal, in consultation with the Registrar, fixed the fees and costs of arbitration and included those amounts in the award (Old Rule 30.1). The Tribunal enjoyed considerable discretion in setting its fees, provided the fees were reasonable, considering such factors as the amount in dispute, time spent, diligence of the arbitrators, and complexity of the subject matter (Old Rule 31.1). The New Rules have removed this discretionary system and introduced a structure that sets fees based on a sliding scale in accordance with the amount in controversy (New Rule 30.1). In exceptional circumstances the Registrar may raise or lower the costs of arbitration (New Rule 30.1). This new fee structure is similar to the fee provisions in the ICC Rules (see ICC Rules, Art. 31). The new fee structure may result in somewhat higher fees in larger and more complex cases. In this regard, parties will monitor the way the Registrar exercises the fee setting discretion afforded under the New Rules.

Increased Role of SIAC Practice Notes in Administering Arbitration Proceedings

The Old Rules made no mention of the Centre’s "practice notes" rulings issued by the Registrar, which provide guidance on administration of arbitrations. The New Rules explicitly refer to practice notes: New Rule 5.4 states that the Registrar shall fix the Arbitrators’ fees in accordance with the practice notes, and New Rule 30.2 states the Tribunal’s out-of-pocket expenses shall be charged to the parties in accordance with the practice notes. Further, New Rule 35.4 vests in the Registrar the power to issue practice notes as needed. This is consistent with the ICC’s Internal Rules, which vest in the Secretariat the power to issue practice notes as necessary to the proper conduct of the proceedings (ICC Internal Rules, Art. 5, section 2).

Increased Control by the SIAC Registrar Over Arbitration Proceedings

The New Rules delegate to the Registrar many of the duties that were previously the province of the Tribunal or the Appointing Authority. Rule 5.1 vests in the Registrar the power to determine whether to use three arbitrators in certain cases. Rule 17.2 and 28.4 give the Registrar the power to extend time limits on the Memorandum of Issues and on the Tribunal’s corrected award. Rule 17.1 vests in the Registrar the power to scrutinize the draft awards of the Tribunal. Rule 18.1 gives the Registrar the power to change the seat of arbitration from Singapore in certain circumstances. Rule 35.4 vests in the Registrar the power to issue practice notes to assist in the administration of arbitral proceedings.

Changes to the Powers Afforded the Tribunal

The New Rules generally afford the same powers to the Tribunal that it had under the Old Rules. The Old Rules, however, made the powers of the Tribunal subject to modification by agreement between the parties (Old Rule 25), whereas the New Rules do not provide for any such modification (see New Rule 24). The New Rules also designate the Tribunal’s power to extend or abbreviate certain time limits (see, for example, New Rule 17.2; 27.1; 28.4). The Tribunal also enjoys less discretion in setting the fees and costs of arbitration due to the revised fee structure, described in section VI, above).


In adopting these rules, SIAC may be recognizing its natural move from a regional player to an international player. Thelen has tried ICC matters at the SIAC facility in Singapore. The staff is well organized and experienced in dealing with international parties. The adoption of the New Rules, while resulting in potentially higher fees, may also provide greater infrastructure and oversight of the proceedings, lending greater confidence in the institution and the outcome.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.