China: Limitation Of Usage Environment Feature On Protection Scope Of Claims Shimano Inc. V. Ningbo Sunrun Industry & Trade Co., Ltd. (Article No. 13 From "China Patent Case Review 2015" By Beijing East IP Ltd.)

Rear Derailleur Bracket

Shimano Inc. v. Ningbo Sunrun Industry & Trade Co., Ltd. - Limitation of Usage Environment Feature on Protection Scope of Claims (Civil Judgment (2012) Min Ti Zi No.1 by the Supreme People's Court on December 11,2012)

The usage environment feature refers to a technical feature for describing the environment or conditions under which an invention is applied. The usage environment feature included in a claim is a part of the essential technical features of the claim, contributes to define the protection scope of the claim, and thus shall be considered when determining the protection scope of the claim.

Shimano Inc. ("Shimano" hereinafter) is the patentee of the invention patent No. ZL94102612.4 (hereinafter "the '612 Patent"), titled "Rear Derailleur Bracket". The allowed claim 1 of the '612 Patent is as follows:

"1. A bicycle rear derailleur bracket for connecting a rear derailleur (100) to a bicycle frame (50), wherein the rear derailleur is provided with a bracket member (5), a supporting member (4) for supporting a chain guide device (3), and a pair of links (6 and 7) for connecting the bracketing member (4) with the bracket member (5), the bicycle frame is provided with a connection structure (14a) which is formed on a derailleur mounting extension (14) of a rear fork end (51) of the bicycle frame, and the rear derailleur bracket comprises a bracket body (8) which is formed by an approximately L-shaped plate, a first connection structure (8a) which is arranged adjacent one end of the bracket body (8) for connecting the bracket member (5) of the rear derailleur (100) to the bracket body (8), and which is capable of pivoting around a first axis (91), a second connection structure (8b) which is arranged adjacent the other end of the bracket body (8) for connecting the bracket body (8) to the connection structure (14a) of the bicycle frame (50), and a positioning structure (8c) for contacting the derailleur mounting extension (14) to place the rear derailleur (100) in a predetermined posture relative to the rear fork end (51), the bicycle rear derailleur bracket characterized in that the first connection structure (8a) and the second connection structure (8b) are arranged so that a connection point provided by the first connection structure (8a) is positioned below and rearward of a connection point provided by the second connection structure (8b) when the bracket body (8) is mounted on the rear fork end (51)."

Shimano sued Ningbo Sunrun Industry & Trade Co., Ltd. ("Sunrun" hereinafter) over the dispute that the bicycle rear derailleurs of types No. RD-HG-30A and RD-HG-40A manufactured and sold by Sunrun infringed the '612 Patent. The court of the first instance ruled that the rear derailleur bracket of the '612 Patent can be mounted on the bicycle frames of other structures, and the allegedly infringing products have not been mounted on bicycles yet, thus it is unclear whether the bicycles intended to mount the allegedly infringing products comprise the essential technical features that "the bicycle frame is provided with a connection structure (14a) formed on a derailleur mounting extension (14) of a rear fork end (51) of the bicycle frame" and whether the manner of mounting the allegedly infringing products to the bicycles is the same as that defined by the claims of the '612 Patent. Therefore, the court of the first instance did not support the argument of Shimano on the infringement of the '612 Patent.

Shimano was not satisfied with the judgment of the court of first instance and appealed to the court of the second instance. The court of the second instance held that the main technical features of the '612 Patent can be categorized to the structural features and the mounting features. The focus of the dispute is whether the allegedly infringing products have the same mounting features as those defined by the asserted patent, that is: "the bicycle frame is provided with a connection structure (14a) formed on a derailleur mounting extension (14) of a rear fork end (51) of the bicycle frame", and "the first connection structure (8a) and the second connection structure (8b) are arranged so that a connection point provided by the first connection structure (8a) is under and behind a connection point provided by the second connection structure (8b) when the bracket body (8) is mounted on the rear fork end (51)." As Sunrun did not engage in mounting actions, and the allegedly infringing products can also be mounted in other ways than that defined by the '621 Patent, the actions of Sunrun did not infringe Shimano's patent right. The court of the second instance rejected the appeal and affirmed the judgment of the court of the first instance.

Shimano once again was dissatisfied with the judgment of the second instance and applied for a retrial before the Supreme People's Court. The Supreme People's Court appointed the court of the second instance to retry. In this retrial, the court of the second instance continued to held that the main technical features of the '621 Patent are comprised of structural features and mounting features, and although the alleged infringing products include the structural features of the '621 Patent, the alleged actions of Sunrun did not infringe the '621 Patent as Sunrun embodied no actions of mounting the alleged products and Shimano failed to prove that the allegedly infringing products are mounted with the mounting feature as claimed by the '621 Patent. As a result, the court of second instance ruled that the reason for applying the retrial by Shimano was unsound.

However, Shimano was dissatisfied with the judgment of the retrial and applied for a retrial for the second time before the Supreme People's Court. The Supreme People's Court conducted the second retrial and reversed all the judgments. The Supreme People's Court held that the claimed subject matter of the '691 Patent is a bicycle rear derailleur bracket, and claim 1 of the '691 Patent actually defines the specific structures of the rear derailleur and the bicycle frame that are to be connected to the rear derailleur bracket, in addition to the description of the structural features of the rear derailleur bracket itself. The features of the rear derailleur and the bicycle frame that are to be connected to the rear derailleur bracket define the working environment and conditions of the rear derailleur bracket and thus corresponds with the usage environment features providing limitations on the rear derailleur bracket claimed in claim 1. Although the allegedly infringing products have not yet been mounted on the bicycles, the mounting method adopted by Sunrun, that is, directly mounting the allegedly infringing products on the bicycle frames without the rear fork end extension by adding a gasket, is not customary in the industry. Sunrun also failed to prove that it is commercially popular in the market that the allegedly infringing products are mounted on the frames without the rear fork end extension. For these reasons, the Supreme People's Court held that based on the comparison of the technical features, the alleged infringing products are certainly to be used commercially for the bicycle frames as defined by the '621 Patent. Therefore, the Supreme People's Courts found the usage environment features concerning the bicycle frame in the allegedly infringing products, where the allegedly infringing products include both the structural features of the rear derailleur bracket and the usage environment features of the rear derailleur in the asserted claim 1. The Supreme People's Courts ruled that the allegedly infringing products fall within the scope of protection of the claim 1 of the '621 Patent. As a result, the judgments of the courts of first and second instances are reversed.

Remarks

According to the principle of universal coverage, a technical solution shall be determined to fall in the protection scope of a patent if the technical solution includes all and each technical features of a claim of the patent. That is to say, all the technical features in the claims of the patent must be taken into account in the infringement determination. However, some technical features, for example, the usage environment feature in this case, generally does not define any specific structure of the product or any specific step of the method as claimed in the claims, and instead, they are mainly used for describing the working environment or conditions of the subject matter claimed by the claims. Therefore, in patent infringement disputes, the allegedly infringing products or methods normally exclude or fail to directly reflect the usage environment feature. Under this circumstance, it is important to determine whether and in what degree do the usage environment feature limits the protection scope of the claims.

Epson v. Mipo is also related to the issue of usage environment feature.1 In this case, the asserted patent claims an ink cartridge, defining in the claims both the structure of the ink cartridge and the carriage to which the ink cartridge is mounted, that is, "the carriage is provided with a lever and the lever is formed with a projection." The plaintiff, Seiko Epson Corporate, held that the definition of the carriage is merely the description of the usage environment of the ink cartridge and thus it should be disregarded when comparing the allegedly infringing ink cartridge with claimed ink cartridge of the patent. However, the court ruled that the technical feature of the carriage constitutes an important part of the technical solution of the patent and should be taken into account when determining the scope of protection of the patent. As the allegedly infringing product did not contain the carriage, it did not cover all of the technical features of any of the claims and thus did not infringe the asserted patent right. According to this case, the judge held that the usage environment feature will contribute to define the protection scope of a claim. Where the allegedly infringing technical solution only contains the usage environment feature, it shall be determined as infringing.

In Shimano v. Sunrun, the Supreme People's Court touched again the issue of usage environment feature, and set forth in the judgment specifically whether and in what degree the usage environment feature will limit the protection scope of a patent, and how to consider the usage environment feature in infringement determination.

First, regarding the limitation of the usage environment feature on the protection scope of protection patent, the judge of the Supreme People's Court held that all the technical features contained in a claim should be interpreted as indispensable essential technical features of the technical solution of the patent, which contribute to define the protection scope of the patent and thus must be taken into account when determining the protection scope of the patent. The usage environment feature is nevertheless one of the essential technical features of a claim once written in the claim and thus contributes to define the protection scope of the claim.

Second, regarding the degree of the limitation of the usage environment feature on the protection scope of protection patent, the degree of the limitation specifically refers to whether the claimed subject matter defined by the usage environment feature has to or may be used in the usage environment. The judge of the Supreme People's Court pointed out that the degree of the limitation of the usage environment feature on the protection scope needs to be specifically determined case by case. Generally, the usage environment feature should be interpreted as requiring that the claimed subject matter may be used in the usage environment rather than that the claimed subject matter has to be used in the usage environment. However, if those skilled in the art can clearly and reasonably learn that the claimed subject matter can only be applied to the usage environment after reading the claims and the specifications of the patent, and the patent prosecution history, the usage environment feature should be interpreted such that the claimed subject has to be applied in the specified environment.

Final, regarding how to consider the usage environment feature in infringement determinations, the judge's opinion is that when an allegedly infringing technical solution is compared with a claim of the asserted patent, the technical solution, as long as applicable to the usage environment feature as defined in the claim, the asserted patent shall be determined as containing the usage environment feature, no matter whether or not the technical solution is actually embodied in the environment as defined by the usage environment feature. Apparently, the judge of the Supreme People's Court has given a different opinion in this case from the judge in the earlier Epson v. Mipo case.

In short, the judgment of Shimano v. Sunrun provided more reasonable opinions about the limitation of the usage environment feature on the protection scope of the claims, and illustrated a guideline for patentee when enforcing the patents with the usage environment feature.

Footnote

1. Civil Judgment (2007) Er Zhong Min Chu Zi No.527 by Beijing Second Intermediate People's Court http://bjgy.chinacourt.org/paper/detail/2008/01/id/7298.shtml

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions