China: Condition To Apply The Doctrine Of Estoppel (DOE) Zhongyu Electronics (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd. v. Shanghai Nine Eagle Electronic Technology Co.,Ltd.(Article No. 9 From "China Patent Case Review 2014" By Beijing East IP Ltd.)

Steering Engine

Zhongyu electronics (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd. v. Shanghai Nine Eagle Electronic Technology Co.,Ltd.- Condition to Apply the Doctrine of Estoppel (DOE) (Civil Judgment (2011) Min Ti Zi No.306 by the Supreme People's Court on April 12, 2012)

The Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Patent Infringement Dispute Cases stipulates, in Rule 6, "where the applicant or patent right owner abandons a technical solution through amendments to the claims and/or specification or observations during the prosecution of the application or the invalidation proceedings of the patent, the court shall not support the right owner's claim of reclaiming the abandoned technical solution back into the protection scope in the infringement litigation case." Therefore, application of the DOE is premised with a condition that the right owner has abandoned the technical solution through amendments or observations during the patent prosecution or invalidation proceedings. The key issue presented in this case is that abandonment is not justified unless the patent owner has the intention to abandon by amendments or observations.

The patent owner, Zhongyu electronics (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Zhongyu"), brought a lawsuit for patent infringement against Shanghai Nine Eagle Electronic Technology Co.,Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Nine eagle"). The patent owner holds a patent for utility model No. ZL200720069025.2 titled "Steering Engine" including six claims. Its claim 3 recites,

"The steering engine of claim 2 wherein a strip of carbon film and silver film is printed on the driving circuit board of the steering engine, said bracket is secured to the driving circuit board of the steering engine via a securing aperture thereon, and the electric brush on the bottom side of the slider keeps in touch with the carbon film and the silver film."

Claim 2 depends from the independent claim 1 whereas neither of them has defined the driving circuit board or any parts thereon. The allegedly infringing product differs from claim 3 in that a strip of carbon film and a gilded copper strip, instead of the silver film, are printed on the driving circuit board of the allegedly infringing product. Both the plaintiff and defendant agreed that the silver film and the gilded copper strip were equivalent to each other. The defendant made a prior art defense.

In the invalidation proceedings of the asserted patent, claims 1-2 and 4-6 were declared invalid while claim 3 was maintained valid in the Decision on Request for Invalidation No. 13717 made by the Patent Reexamination Board.

The first instance judgment ascertained the equivalent infringement of the alleged product based upon claim 3, but rejected the plaintiff's claim on merit of the defendant's prior art defense.

The second instance judgment rejected application of the doctrine of equivalence on merit of the DOE, although it concurred that the silver film and the gilded copper strip constituted equivalent technical features. In particular, the second instance court held that maintenance of validity of claim 3 by the Decision on Request for Invalidation essentially implied amendment to claim 1 by adding the features of claims 2 and 3 to claim 1. On such ground, the second instance court identified it as restrictive amendment to the claims for a purpose of maintaining validity of the patent. The added feature restricted the current conducting strip, used as a straight line-type variable resistor on the driving circuit board of the steering engine, to the silver film, implying the patentee's abandonment of other types of material to be used as the current conducting strip. Therefore, equivalent infringement cannot be established. Nevertheless, the second instance court sustained the prior art defense.

The patentee filed for a retrial upon dissatisfaction with the second instance's judgment. The Supreme Court rejected application of the DOE by the second instance court and concluded equivalent infringement. First, the Supreme Court set forth that the DOE is based upon the principle of good faith. The patent applicant usually tends to expedite granting of patent right by restrictive observation or amendment during the prosecution, and hopes to reclaim the abandoned technical solution back into the protection scope on merit of equivalent infringement during the litigation. To keep the stability and certainty of the granted patent right, the legal system prevents the patentee from benefiting from both sides by abusing the DOE. Second, the Supreme People's Court clarified the condition upon which the DOE is applied. Generally, the DOE is triggered by abandonment of technical solution(s) through either amendments to the specification and/or claims or observations. The Supreme People's Court pointed out that the subject matter and protection scope of a dependent claim would not change with invalidation of the claim from which it depended, and accordingly overruled the grounds of the second instance judgment that maintenance of validity of claim 3 essentially equaled amendment to claim 1. Moreover, it was elaborated by the Supreme People's Court that abandonment stems from restriction to the protection scope of a claim by adding technical feature(s) or restrictive observations on the protection scope of a claim made by the patent applicant voluntarily or in response to the examiner's requirement during the prosecution or invalidation proceedings. In a situation where the independent claim is declared invalid while the dependent claim is maintained valid by the Patent Reexamination Board and the applicant has never made any abandonment as described above, full attention should be paid to the condition that the applicant has not intended to abandon, and thus a strict criteria should be taken to determine abandonment while applying the DOE. If the additional feature of a dependent claim is not encompassed by the independent claim it depends on, it is not justified to say that any technical solutions excluding the additional feature have been totally abandoned, as the additional feature does not have a basis in the original independent claim. Specifically, the silver film recited in claim 3 of the asserted patent had not been defined in claims 1-2. The patentee didn't abandon any technical solutions using other conducting materials than the silver film as the current conducting strip by amendments to the specification and claims or observations. Therefore, it was inappropriate to prevent the doctrine of equivalence from being applied to interpret the additional feature concerning the silver film simply because claims 1-2 were declared invalid. Meanwhile, the Supreme People's Court held for the infringement instead by rejecting the defendant's prior art defense.

Remarks

This case elucidates the conditions upon which the DOE is applied in China, especially where independent claims are declared invalid but dependent claims are maintained valid.

The Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Patent Infringement Dispute Cases stipulates, in Rule 6, "where the applicant or patent right owner abandons a technical solution through amendments to the claims and/or specification or observations during the prosecution of the application or the invalidation proceedings of the patent, the court shall not support the right owner's reclaiming of the abandoned technical solution back into the protection scope in the infringement litigation case." In other words, application of the DOE is premised with a condition where the right owner has abandoned the technical solution(s) through amendments or observations during the prosecution or invalidation proceedings of the patent.

First of all, this case clarifies that the claims should not be interpreted as having been narrowed in the protection scope when the independent claims are declared invalid but the dependent claims are maintained valid. Each of the claims, either independent or dependent, defines a separate and complete technical solution, despite the difference in drafting format. Accordingly, it is inappropriate to pose any restriction to the protection scope of a dependent claim simply because the independent claim on which the dependent claim depends is declared invalid.

Second, this case restates the condition on which abandonment of technical solution(s) by the patentee is ascertained. Specifically, the condition is that the patentee has restricted the protection scope of the claims, either voluntarily or in response to the examiner's requirement, through claim amendments or restrictive observations during the prosecution or invalidation proceedings of her/his patent. In a situation where the independent claim is declared invalid while the dependent claim is maintained valid by the Patent Reexamination Board and the applicant has never made any voluntary abandonment as described above, full attention should be paid to the condition that the applicant has not made intentional abandonment and a strict criteria should be taken when determine abandonment while applying the DOE. If the additional feature of a dependent claim is not encompassed by the independent claim which it depends on, it is not justified to determine total abandonment of any technical solutions excluding the additional feature, because it does not have a basis or counterpart in the original independent claim.

Here, it is also noted that the DOE should not be applied in a rigid manner, but depending on the genuine intention and purpose for which the patent owner makes claim amendments or observations in individual cases. The Interpretation II of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Patent Infringement Dispute Cases (Draft for Public Comments), released on July 31 2014, stipulates, in Rule 16, "where the applicant or patentee makes amendments to the claims and/or specification or observations during the prosecution and affirmation of the patent right, the court should repudiate abandonment of any technical solution(s) due to the amendments or observations if the right owner can prove that the amendments and observations were not adopted by the examiner or had nothing to do with the granting or affirmation of the patent right despite the alleged infringer's allegation that the abandoned technical solution in this scenario should be excluded from the protection scope of the patent right."Attention will be continuously paid upon the application of the DOE.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration
Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:
  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.
  • Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.
    If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here
    If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here

    Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

    Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

    Use of www.mondaq.com

    You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

    Disclaimer

    Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

    The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

    Registration

    Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

    • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
    • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
    • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

    Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

    Information Collection and Use

    We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

    We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

    Mondaq News Alerts

    In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

    Cookies

    A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

    Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

    Log Files

    We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

    Links

    This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

    Surveys & Contests

    From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

    Mail-A-Friend

    If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

    Emails

    From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

    *** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .

    Security

    This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

    Correcting/Updating Personal Information

    If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

    Notification of Changes

    If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

    How to contact Mondaq

    You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

    If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.

    By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions