China: The Standards For Determining An Equivalent Feature Shaohong LIU v. Junpei LIANG (Article No. 8 From "China Patent Case Review 2014" By Beijing East IP Ltd.)

Device Having Replaceable Liquid Crystal Display Card

Shaohong LIU v. Junpei LIANG - The Standards for Determining an Equivalent Feature (Civil Judgment (2011) Min Shen Zi No.438 by the Supreme People's Court on March 9, 2012)

An equivalent feature is a feature that, as compared to the feature described in a claim, performs substantially the same function by substantially the same means, produces substantially the same effect, and can be associated by an ordinary person skilled in the art without any inventive work. While determining whether a prosecuted product falls within equivalent infringement, the means, function, effect, and inventive work should be determined in the above order. Only when all four elements of a feature meet the above conditions, the feature can be determined as an equivalent feature.

The patentee, Shaohong LIU, owns a utility model patent No. 02225694.6 titled "Device Having Replaceable Liquid Crystal Display Card", where claims 1 and 2 are as follows:

"1. A device having a replaceable liquid crystal display card, including a case and a circuit board mounted therein, characterized in that, a display window within which a liquid crystal display card be plugged is provided on the case; the circuit board is provided with a microprocessor, a memory storing a plurality of different display types of programs and a display contact connected with a display output terminal of the microprocessor; the circuit board is provided with a conductive rubber strip, one side of which is pressed on the display contact and another side of which is conductively touched with pins of the liquid crystal display card directly.

2. The device of claim 1, characterized in that the circuit board is provided with a plurality of touching switches connected with the microprocessor, wherein one or more of the touching switches can be triggered by a corresponding concave-convex element on an outer side of the liquid crystal display card to output a display type selection signal to the microprocessor."

A prosecuted product is a game console of YD693. Both parties disputed on whether the feature "a short-circuited point provided in the pins of the liquid crystal display card is connected with a program in-out coding contact via a conductive rubber strip, so as to deliver a display type selection signal to the microprocessor on a circuit board" in the prosecuted product belongs to an equivalent feature of the technical feature "the circuit board is provided with a plurality of touching switches connected with the microprocessor, wherein one or more of the touching switches can be triggered by a corresponding concave-convex element on an outer side of the liquid crystal display card to output a display type selection signal to the microprocessor" in claim 2 of the involved patent. There is no disagreement on other features.

The first trial gave a decision that the prosecuted product does not fall within the equivalent scope of claim 2 of the involved patent and there is no infringement. The second trial supported the decision of the first trial.

The patentee submitted a retrial request to the Supreme People's Court and claimed that the prosecuted product falls within the equivalent scope of claim 2 of the involved patent.

The Supreme People's Court made the following opinions after retrial, although the technical features "short-circuit point," "conductive rubber strip" and "program in-out coding contact" in the prosecuted product realize substantially the same functions as those of "concave-convex element" and "touching switch" in the involved patent, different means are employed and different technical effects are achieved. So, the prosecuted product does not fall within the equivalent protecting scope of the involved patent. Accordingly, the retrial request of the patentee was rejected.

Remark

The Doctrine of Equivalent is an important principle in the patent infringement determination. It expands the literal infringement, reliefs the disadvantageous limits on claims by words and expressions, and provides the patentee with airer and more reasonable protection.

The Doctrine of Equivalent was proposed for the first time in China in Certain Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Hearing of Patent Dispute Cases.1 According to this provision, "during determining whether a technical feature of a prosecuted product and a patent technical feature are equivalent, it needs not only to consider whether or not the technical feature of the prosecuted product is a technical feature an ordinary person skilled in the art can conceive without any inventive work, but also needs to consider whether or not the technical feature of the prosecuted product, compared with the patent technical feature, is substantially the same means, performs substantially the same function and achieves substantially the same effect. Only when the conditions in the above two aspects are met at the same time, the technical feature of the prosecuted product and the patent technical feature can be determined as equivalent technical features." 2

In the practice of judicial judgment, the abuse of the Doctrine of Equivalent would expand the patent protection scope of the patentee improperly, and injure the public interest. To prevent the abuse of the Doctrine of Equivalent, conditions of applying the Doctrine of Equivalent shall be limited strictly. Namely, "having substantially the same means, function and effect and being obvious to an ordinary person skilled in the art are necessary conditions for the equivalent infringement."3 The patentee should provide evidence to prove or explain sufficiently that the prosecuted product and the involved patent meet all of the above conditions; and the prosecuted infringer can contend that there is no equivalent infringement as long as he/she puts in a plea that the prosecuted product does not meet any one of the above conditions against the involved patent.

When judging an infringement by applying the Doctrine of Equivalent, a corresponding technical feature in the prosecuted product should be found with reference to a technical feature in the involved patent. A two-step method can be used to judge whether there is an equivalent infringement. In the first step, it is determined whether the two features are substantially the same in terms of means, functions and effect. If so, go to the second step. If the two features are not substantially the same in either means, functions, and effect, it can be concluded that the two features do not belong to equivalent features. In the second step, the question of whether the corresponding technical feature in the prosecuted product is easily contemplated must be determined. If it is not easily contemplated, it can be concluded that there is no equivalent infringement. If it is easily contemplated, it can be concluded that there is an equivalent infringement.

In the present case, the judge explained in detail whether the technical feature (technical feature A hereafter) consisted of "short-circuit point," "conductive rubber strip," and "program in-out coding contact" in the prosecuted product and the technical feature (technical feature A' hereafter) consisted of "concave-convex element" and "touching switch" in the involved patent are equivalent.

Viewed from the function, the function realized by the technical feature A' of claim 2 in the involved patent utilizes the concave-convex element on the outer side of the liquid crystal display card to trigger the touching switch on the circuit board so as to deliver a display type selection signal to the microprocessor, i.e., a signal output function.

Viewed from the means, the way to realize a signal output function by the prosecuted product involves in connecting the short-circuit point provided in the pins of the liquid crystal display card with a program in-out coding contact via a conductive rubber strip, so as to deliver a display type selection signal to the microprocessor on a circuit board. Except for the signal input function as above, the "conductive rubber strip" in the prosecuted product also has the same function as the element "conductive rubber strip" in claim 2 of the involved patent, i.e., delivering the display output signal of the microprocessor to the liquid crystal display card via the pins of the liquid crystal display card.

Viewed from the effect, since the "conductive rubber strip" in the prosecuted product has both the signal input and output functions, compared with the involved patent, the prosecuted product reduces elements, simplifies the structure, and makes the input and output more stable and reliable. Thus, the technical effect achieved by the prosecuted product is different from that of the involved patent.

Therefore, the technical feature A in the prosecuted product and the technical feature A' in the involved patent do not constitute equivalent features.

Moreover, in China, the time for determining an equivalent infringement is a date on which the infringement took place. However, some opinions from the court say that, for claims including functional features, the time point of equivalent determination shall be the application date of the patent,4 and for other claims, the time point of equivalent determination shall be a date on which the infringement took place5.

Device Having Replaceable Liquid Crystal Display Card Case - PowerPoint Presentation (Chinese Version)

Footnotes

1 As stipulated in Paragraph 2, Rule 17, an equivalent feature is a feature that, as compared with the feature described in a claim, performs substantially the same function by substantially the same means, produces substantially the same effect, and can be associated by an ordinary person skilled in the art without any inventive work.

2 See the Civil Judgment No.(2010) Min Shen Zi No. 181 by the Supreme People's Court, Shanxi Jingye Fiberglass Co.,Ltd. v. Yongchang Jishui Composite Material Co.,Ltd.

3 See the Opinions of the Supreme People's Court on Issues concerning Maximizing the Role of Intellectual Property Right Trials in Boosting the Great Development and Great Prosperity of Socialist Culture and Promoting the Independent and Coordinated Development of Economy issued by the Supreme People's Court on Dec 16, 2011.

4 See Rule 54 of Guidelines for Patent Infringement Determination issued by the Beijing High People's Court: As to a claim including functional features, if not only a corresponding technical feature in the prosecuted technical solution realize the same function, but also the structure and steps of the corresponding technical feature for realizing the function are equivalent with the structure and steps in the embodiments recited in the specification of the patent, it can be determined that they constitute equivalent features. The time point to determine the equivalent shall be the application date of the patent.

5 See Rule 52 of Guidelines of Patent Infringement Determination issued by the Beijing High People's Court, The time point to determine whether a technical feature of the prosecuted technical solution and a technical feature of a claim are equivalent shall be the date on which the prosecuted act took place.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions