China: China Solidifies Its Position In IP

While 2009 will probably be remembered mostly as the year of the Great Recession, it will also likely be remembered as the year in which China solidified its position as a major force in many areas, not the least of which is intellectual property. In a year during which the number of patent and trademark applications fell in almost all major countries, including with the WIPO, China's State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) and Trademark Office (CTO) continued to receive record number of applications. The country also saw the implementation of the third amendment to its patent law, while the newest round of amendment to its trademark law is also in the works. In the enforcement area, IP civil cases received and completed by the court system remained at record level, as the legal system continued to see more landmark cases and becomes more mature.

The Rise of the Chinese Applicants

In 2009, the SIPO received over 976,000 patent applications, an increase of about 18% over 2008. Chinese entities accounted for almost 90% of the total applications. While Chinese applicants have traditionally been responsible for almost all of the applications for utility model and design patents, it is surprising to many people that domestic applicants also accounted for over 75% of the more valuable invention type patent applications in 2009. More significantly, Chinese entities received over 50% of granted invention patents for the first time in 2009.

Another indication signaling the rise of the Chinese applicants is international patent filings under WIPO's PCT regime. While the total PCT filings fell by 4.5% in 2009, with sharper than average declines experienced by industrialized countries such as the U.S., Germany and the UK, applications from China rose almost 30%, making the country the fifth largest user of the PCT system, behind the U.S., Japan, Germany and South Korea. The Chinese company Huawei Technologies has become the number one PCT filer in the world.

The numbers for trademarks continue to be striking. The CTO has been the largest in the world, in terms of number of applications received, for the past eight years. Trademark filings and cases of all types remained at record level in 2009, despite a global downward trend. Among them, the number of new trademark applications in 2009 was 830,000, a 20% increase over 2008. As in the past several years, over 85% of the applications were filed by Chinese entities.

It is true that many people believe patent applications filed by Chinese entities are generally simple in nature and lack pioneering innovations; and many trademark applications by Chinese entities are imitations or outright copying of international brands. At the same time, most people also believe that the quality and complexity of patent applications by Chinese applicants continue to enhance over time, as does the sophistication of trademark applications. One also has to remember that the concept of intellectual property was almost non-existent to the Chinese system and culture before the 1980s. It is remarkable that, in a span of less than thirty years, China and its people's attitude towards intellectual property has undergone a breathtakingly fast evolvement, from totally foreign to uneasiness and ambivalence, and to active embracing, as clearly demonstrated in 2009.

It seems that every Chinese company of a certain size is including IP in its business strategy. The government certainly recognizes and encourages the trend. The National Intellectual Property Strategy, released by China's State Council in 2008 represents a genuine intention by China that it does not want to remain a mere manufacturing power. Rather, the Strategy sets out a course for China to concentrate more on innovation and move up the ladder in the global economy. In October of 2009, the Ministry of Finance announced a government program to support small- and medium-sized companies in overseas patent filings. The program allocated RMB 100 millions (about US$15 millions) in direct financial support for qualified applicants. It is safe to say that awareness and activities by Chinese applicants will continue to increase at a fast pace.

Newly Amended Patent Law

The Third Amendment to the Chinese Patent Law took effect on October 1, 2009. Unlike the first two amendments, which were made in 1992 and 2000 and primarily to fulfill China's international treaty obligations, the Third Amendment aims to enhance the law's effectiveness in promoting innovation and avoiding abuses, as well as eliminating problems or gaps in the prior law.

With regard to inventions made in China, the current law allows related applications to be filed in foreign countries first, after receiving approval from the SIPO based on secrecy review, a similar regime as granting a foreign filing license in the United States. Although the timing and the exact nature of the secrecy review are still to be seen, the law provides more certainty to international companies, which are increasingly seeing their inventions made by team members residing in different countries.

The change in prior art definition makes China's novelty standard absolute, on par with what is required under the European Patent Convention. In making public use outside of China as part of prior art, the new law is especially helpful for international companies having operations outside of China and may want to use such activities as prior art to invalidate certain patents or defend itself against infringement charges.

The several changes made with regard to design patents should enhance the quality of design patents, as well as reducing filing costs for multiple similar designs. The provision regarding Patent Assessment Reports for design and utility model patents will undoubtedly reduce frivolous infringement allegations, as well as discouraging the so-called junk-filings for design and utility model patents. As the vast majority of design and utility model applications are filed by Chinese entities, this should be a welcome change for international companies who often feel that they are threatened by lawsuits based on patents that are copies or imitations of their own technologies or designs.

Speed is Everything at the CTO

With record numbers of trademark applications, the number one issue for the Chinese Trademark Office, in fact for everyone involved with the Chinese trademark system, has been backlog and examination speed. At the end of 2007, the CTO set a two-fold goal: solving the backlog problem in 3 years and matching the international examination level in 5 years.

In 2009, the number of preliminary examination made and published by the CTO was over 1,000,000, and new trademark registrations were over 800,000. Both numbers are record-breaking. At the same time, and probably as a result, the number of cases received by the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board TRAB saw an increasing of about 120% from 26,000 cases in 2008 to 57,000 cases in 2009. The TRAB also issued judgment in 36,000 cases, the highest in history as well.

While the CTO appears to be on its way to achieve the goal of eliminating backlogs by the end of 2010, the second goal, matching international examination level, will probably take a much longer time to achieve. Many people believe that, to increase the quality of examination, improvements need to be made in many aspects, such as in law and regulations, qualification and training of examiners, and communications and coordination between the CTO and TRAB. In addition, as many people have argued, the backlog problem should not be solved at the expense of the quality of examinations and of the examiners. Because of the strict speed and quota requirements, many under trained or even unqualified examiners are being pushed to the front line, resulting in many inconsistent and sub-par examinations.

An Increasingly Used Legal System

The number of IP related litigations is probably the most surprising, especially for people outside of China. Even though statistics in this regard are not very complete, it is safe to estimate that the number of IP related civil cases handled by the People's Courts saw an increase of about 30% over each of 2008 and 2009. In 2009, the Chinese courts issued judgment in about 30,500 patent, trademark and other IP related first instance cases, an astonishing number, especially when you consider that there were probably more IP cases handled by the various administrative agencies. The vast majority of the cases are between Chinese entities, which, until less than 30 years ago, did not even have or know such means to resolve disputes. Even though the process and cost involved in Chinese IP cases are usually substantially simpler and lower than those involved in IP cases in the western countries such as the U.S., the numbers demonstrate not only that the Chinese are becoming more litigious, but also that the legal and court systems are maturing and being relied upon by IPR owners, Chinese and foreign, to resolve disputes and achieve their business objectives.

Two of the cases concluded in 2009 are illustrative of the current state of the court system. The first case has been dubbed by the media as "China's No. 1 Bus Infringement Case," because of its high profile and damage amount. The case involves Germany's Neoplan Bus GmbH and its competitor in China, the Zhongwei Bus Group. Neoplan filed the lawsuit in 2006 with the Beijing First Intermediate People's Court, alleging infringement of its Chinese design patent by Zhongwei's A9 buses. The course of the case included a validity challenge against Neoplan's patent, Zhongwei's defense that its A9 bus' design is different and protected by its own design patent, and field trips organized by the court to inspect the alleged infringing product. In January 2009, the court rendered its decision in favor of Neoplan. The 23 page judgment includes detailed analysis, as well as photographs both of the design patent and one of the infringed buses. The court holds that the A9 Buses made and sold by Zhongwei are copies of Neoplan's "Starliner Buses," the design patent right of which is held by Neoplan in China. The Zhongwei is ordered to pay damages in the amount of RMB 20 million, plus RMB 1.16 million in legal costs (a total of about US$3.1 millions). Although it is currently being appealed art the Beijing High People's Court, the Neoplan case has illustrated the sophistication and thoroughness of the Beijing No. 1 Court, as well as the maturity and consistency of the different parts of China's IP system involved in the case.

The second case involves an eight-year long battle pitching China Environmental Project Company (CEPT), an engineering company based in Wuhan, central China, against Japanese company Fujikasui Engineering and Huayang Electric Power Company, a coal-fired power plant based in southeastern Fujian Province. CEPT first filed suit in 2001 in Fujian, alleging infringement by Fujikasui and Huayang of CEPT's patent related to method and apparatus for removing sulfur from power plant discharges by using seawater. In the subsequent years, the defendants filed a total of five invalidation requests with the SIPO against CEPT's patent, all failed to wholly invalidate the patent. But the invalidation requests and the subsequent appeals of the invalidation decisions to the court did slow down the infringement case. During the course of the cases, the Fujian High Court also appointed a large group of technical experts, providing the court with technical analysis.

The case went all the way to the Supreme People's Court, a rare occasion for patent cases. In December 2009, The Supreme Court issued its final decision and held that Fujikasui and Huayang had jointly infringed CEPT's patent. The two defendants were ordered to pay damages in the amount of over RMB 50 million (about US$7.3 millions). The court also ordered Huayang, the power plant operator, to pay CEPT an annual patent usage fee based on the power plant's operating capacity.

The CEPT case is unusual in several aspects, including its length of eight years, which is very rare for Chinese patent cases, the number of invalidation requests involved, that the Supreme Court is involved, the damage amount, and the fact that the decision effectively gives a compulsory license to the power plant operator Huayang, even though it had to pay an annual usage fee. The case illustrates fully the various factors that could be involved in a Chinese patent litigation, such as the bifurcation of infringement and validity issues, that the invalidation proceeding may be used, or abused, in an effort to delay or distract the infringement case, the important and complex roles of technical experts, international politics and local protectionism, as the case involves a Japanese company and a Taiwanese backed Fujian power plant, which is a big tax payer locally. While the case exposed certain weaknesses and gaps in the Chinese legal system, it also demonstrates the depth and capacity of the system in handling such complex cases.

On December 21, 2009, the Supreme People's Court issued "Provisions regarding Several Issues Concerning Applicable Law in Patent Infringement Trials" (Judicial Interpretation), the third of its kind. The Interpretation aims to clarify issues related to asserted claims by the plaintiff, interpretation regarding functional claims, prosecution history estoppel, the "all technical features" requirement, "practicing prior art" as a defense, determination of damages, and declaratory judgment. Although the Interpretation does not include as many issues as people had been expecting, it represents an effort by the Supreme Court some of the more important and less controversial issues, while leaving other issues to be further discussed and determined later. Although the full effect of the Interpretation will only be seen in the coming years, it is safe to say that it will help courts in issuing more consistent decisions and encourage more usage of the system.

The Chinese are innovative people. They are pound and always like to remind the world of their glorious past and great contributions to civilization, such as the Four Great Inventions: paper making, gunpowder, movable print, and the compass. The current legal system, despite all its shortcomings, has by and large encouraged and freed people to release and realize their ingenuity and potentials. With all that happened, 2009 will be remembered as the year that China solidified its position as a major force in the field of intellectual property.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
CCPIT Patent & Trademark Law Office
King & Wood Mallesons
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
CCPIT Patent & Trademark Law Office
King & Wood Mallesons
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions