China: Review of merger control and merger remedies regime in China from 2008-2013

Last Updated: 24 September 2013
Article by Susan Ning, Hazel Yin, Ziqing Zheng and Kailun Ji

August 1st, 2008 marks the fifth anniversary of China's Anti-Monopoly Law ("AML"). Along with debates and controversies, the AML is gradually taking root and has contributed to shaping the economic landscape and competition status in China.

During the past 5 years, the Ministry of Commerce ("MOFCOM"), the authority in charge of merger control, has cleared more than 640 cases, including 19 cases that were cleared with conditions and 1 case that was denied.1 MOFCOM has been making continuous progress in improving its enforcement capabilities, which are highlighted by the increasingly mature merger remedy regime. This article presents an overview of the merger control regime, in particular the merger remedies regime in China from the perspective of practitioners.

  1. Overview of Merger Control Regime and Cases Cleared with Conditions

As of June 30, 2013, MOFCOM received 754 cases in total, officially accepted 690 cases and cleared 643 of them, including 18 conditionally approved cases and 1 forbidden case (Coca Cola's acquisition of Huiyuan). The following chart indicates the yearly statistics of all cases cleared (with or without conditions) and cases conditionally approved by MOFCOM.2

1.1 Industries Involved in Cases with Conditions and Types of Concentration

According to the Industrial Classification for National Economic Activities (GB/T 4754-2011) of the National Bureau of Statistics, 5 industry categories are involved in the 18 cases with conditions, including "manufacturing", "production and supply of electricity, heating, gas and water", "information transmission, software and information service industry", "wholesale and retail", and "mining industry". In particular, a total of 12 cases relate to the manufacturing industry. (See Table 1 below)

Horizontal mergers usually are considered more likely to cause competition concerns. Similar as law enforcement authorities in other jurisdictions, MOFCOM pays closest attention to horizontal mergers. Among the 18 conditionally approved cases, 11 cases relate to horizontal mergers, and 1 case relates to both horizontal and vertical relationship. Only 4 cases relate to vertical relationship and the other 2 cases concern conglomerate relationship. (See Table 1 below)

Table 1: Industries Involved in Cases with Conditions and Types of Concentration

Industry Sub-Industry Case Types of Concentration
Manufacturing Industry Alcohol, drinks and refined tea manufacturing industry Acquisition of Inbev N.V./S.A. by Anheuser-Busch Companies Inc. (2008) Horizontal
Chemical raw materials and chemical manufacturing industry Acquisition of Silvinit by Uralkali (2011) Horizontal
Acquisition of Lucite by Mitsubishi Rayon (2009) Horizontal + Vertical
Establishment of Joint Venture between HenkelHong Kongand Tiande Chemical (2012) Vertical
Pharmaceutical manufacturing industry Acquisition of Alcon by Novartis (2010) Horizontal
Acquisition of Wyeth by Pfizer (2009) Horizontal
Specialized device manufacturing industry Acquisition of Savio by Penelope (2011) Horizontal
Automobile manufacturing industry Acquisition ofDelphiby General Motor (2009) Vertical
Electric machinery and equipment manufacturing industry Acquisition of Sanyo by Panasonic (2009) Horizontal
Computer, communications and other electric device manufacturing industry Acquisition ofSamsung Hard Disk Driveby Seagate (2011) Horizontal
Acquisition ofHitachiGlobal Storage Technologies by Western Digital (2012) Horizontal
Manufacturing of railway, shipping, aircraft and other transportation equipment Acquisition of Goodrich by United Technologies (2012) Horizontal
Production and Supply of Electricity, heating power, gas and water Production and supply of gas Establishment of Joint Venture between General Electric and Shenhua (2011) Conglomerate
Information Transmission, Software and Information Service Industry Telecommunication, broadcasting and satellite transmission service Acquisition of Motorola Mobility by Google (2012) Vertical
Software and information technology service Establishment of Joint Venture between ARM Holdings, Giesecke & Devrient and Gemalto (2012) Vertical
Wholesale and Retail Retail Acquisition ofNew HavenHolding by Walmart (2012) Conglomerate
Wholesale Acquisition of Gavilon by Marubeni (2013) Horizontal
Acquisition of Xstrata by Glencore (2013) Horizontal
Mining Industry Non-Ferrous Metal Acquisition of Xstrata by Glencore (2013)

Note: The rejected acquisition of Huiyuan by Coca Cola (2009) is a conglomerate concentration related to "alcohol, drinks and refined tea production industry".

1.2 Review Timeline for Conditionally Approved Cases

All conditionally approved cases, but for the earliest two, were closed at Phase II or extended Phase II, showing that MOFCOM has become increasingly cautious when imposing conditions. (See Table 2 below)

Table 2: Timeline for Cases Conditionally Approved by MOFCOM

Year Number of Cases
Phase I Phase II Extended Phase II
2008 1
2009 1 2 1
2010 1
2011 2 2
2012 1* 5
2013** 1* 1*

* In WD/Hitachi (2012), Marubeni/Gavilon (2013) and Glencore/Xstrata (2013), the filings were withdrawn from MOFCOM by the parties before the deadline of the Extended Phase II and then resubmitted. The stage shown in the above table therefore refers to the stage in the second round of review process.
** Statistics updated as of Q2 of 2013.

In November 2008, when the first conditional case (AB/Inbev) was issued, information disclosed in the final decision was very limited. Five years later in the Glencore/Xstrata (2013) case, not only did MOFCOM provide detailed competition analysis of market share, market power, market entry and influence upon consumers, but also disclose, for the first time, the full text of the parties' final commitment proposals. This shows that MOFCOM has made great progress in merger remedy practice, and has been making efforts to increase transparency of its law enforcement.

2. Types of Remedies

Although the AML is largely influenced by EU experiences, MOFCOM has gradually developed its own methodology and distinguished itself from its foreign counterparts. For example, MOFCOM was the only antitrust authority imposing conditions upon such global transactions as General Motor/Delphi (2009), Seagate/Samsung (2011), Google/Motorola (2012) and Marubeni/Gavilon (2013). In other transactions, such as WD/Hitachi (2012) and Glencore/Xstrata (2013), MOFCOM imposed conditions different from other jurisdictions. We hereby analyze the structural and behavioral conditions as follows:

2.1 Structural Remedies

MOFCOM has been relatively cautious in the application of structural conditions, which usually mandate the divestiture of the parties' assets or businesses. Such reluctance may be prompted by MOFCOM's intention to preserve the original structure of a transaction to the extent possible. Of the 18 conditionally cleared cases, 7 cases involve structural conditions and all of them are horizontal mergers.

Structural conditions in these cases include not only typical ones, i.e. divesture of existing independent business unit, but also relatively less common ones, such as divesture of assets, production capability, shares in affiliates and shareholders' interests that do not constitute independent business unit. (See Table 3 below)

Table 3: Cases Involving Structural Remedies

Types of Structural Conditions Cases
Typical Structural Conditions Divesture of existing independent business unit Acquisition of Wyeth by Pfizer
Acquisition of Sanyo by Panasonic
Atypical Structural Conditions Divesture of assets, production capability, shares in the affiliates and shareholders' interests that do not constitute independent business unit Acquisition of Lucite by Mitsubishi Rayon
Acquisition of Savio by PenelopeAcquisition of Sanyo by Panasonic
Acquisition of Sanyo by Panasonic
Acquisition ofHitachiGlobal Storage Technologies by Western Digital
Acquisition of Goodrich by United Technologies
Acquisition of Xstrata by Glencore

2.2 Behavioral Remedies

In contrast to the experiences in some other major jurisdictions, MOFCOM employs a more receptive approach to conduct remedies. The majority of the 18 conditionally cases involve behavioral conditions. Some of the behavioral conditions are also frequently used by foreign authorities, such as the opening up commitment, non-discrimination terms, termination of exclusive contracts, and transitional assistance obligations. Some, on the other hand, are less common, such as the commitment of supply and service standard, prohibition of market expansion, hold-separate and prohibition of certain market behaviors. (See Table 4 below)

Table 4: Cases Involving Conduct Remedies

Types of Conduct Remedies Cases
Typical Conduct Remedies Opening up commitment

Acquisition of Sanyo by Panasonic

Acquisition of Motorola by Google

Establishment of JV between ARM Holdings, Giesecke & Devrient and Gemalto


Acquisition ofDelphiby GM

Establishment of JV between Henkel and Tiande

Acquisition of Motorola by Google

Acquisition of Gavilon by Marubeni

Establishment of JV between ARM Holdings, Giesecke & Devrient and Gemalto


Acquisition ofDelphiby GM

Acquisition ofSamsung Hard Disk DriveBusiness by Seagate

Acquisition ofHitachiGlobal Storage Technologies by Western Digital

Acquisition of Gavilon by Marubeni

Termination of exclusive contracts Acquisition of Alcon by Novartis
Transitional assistance obligation

Acquisition of Wyeth by Pfizer

Acquisition of Goodrich by UTC

Commitment to refrain from abuse of dominance

Establishment of JV between General Electronics and Shenhua

Acquisition ofSamsung Hard Disk DriveBusiness by Seagate

Acquisition ofHitachiGlobal Storage Technologies by Western Digital

Establishment of JV between ARM Holdings, Giesecke & Devrient and Gemalto

Atypical Conduct Remedies Commitment of supply and service standard

Acquisition of Silvinit by Uralkali

Acquisition ofSamsung Hard Disk DriveBusiness by Seagate

Acquisition ofHitachiGlobal Storage Technologies by Western Digital

Acquisition of Xstrata by Glencore

Prohibition of market expansion

Acquisition of Anheuser-Busch by Inbev

Acquisition of Lucite by Mitsubishi

Acquisition of Alcan by Novartis


Acquisition ofSamsung Hard Disk DriveBusiness by Seagate

Acquisition ofHitachiGlobal Storage Technologies by Western Digital

Acquisition of Gavilon by Marubeni

Prohibition of certain market behavior Acquisition ofNew HavenHolding by Walmart

In Seagate/Samsung (2011), WD/Hitachi (2012) and Marubeni/Gavilon (2013), MOFCOM imposed "hold separate" conditions requiring the merged parties to maintain operations independently. While the "hold separate" condition may be categorized as behavioral, MOFCOM has publicly expressed that such condition was intended to achieve similar effects as structural conditions.

Although some of the behavioral conditions imposed by MOFCOM are creative, proper supervision of these conditions has become a challenge. In Novartis/Alcon (2010), Uralkali/Silvinit (2011), Seagate/Samsung (2011), Henkel/Tiande (2012), WD/Hitachi (2012), Google/Motorola (2012), Glencore/Xstrata (2013) and Marubeni/Gavilon (2013), MOFCOM requested the parties to engage an independent supervision trustee. In the Walmart (2012) and ARM (2012) cases, the decisions provide that MOFCOM is entitled to supervise either by itself or through the supervision trustee. In AB/Inbev (2008), General Motor/Delphi (2009) and GE/Shenhua (2011), however, the decisions did not specifically mention the requirement for a supervision trustee.

Even in cases with supervision trustees, such difficulty still exists. For instance, in the WD/Hitachi (2012) case, MOFCOM requested the parties to maintain Viviti (Hitachi's subsidiary operating the relevant business) as an independent competitor and to adopt safeguard measures to avoid exchange of competitive information. This condition places enormous burdens on the parties, in particular in light of integrations that are usually required of merging parties under applicable corporate and securities laws. Therefore, a balance has to be made to ensure that such supervision does not strip the conditions of their substance nor introduce unintended burdens on the obligors' businesses.

  1. Market Survey Instruments Adopted by MOFCOM

MOFCOM has adopted numerous market survey instruments in the merger review process, including written consultation, meetings, hearings, site investigation, entrusted investigation, face-to-face interview with relevant parties, telephone interview and questionnaire. In such market surveys, government authorities, relevant industry associations, competitors, upstream and downstream entities as well industry experts will be consulted on important issues in the cases.

The weight MOFCOM gives to these opinions differs as shown in Chart 2 below.

Chart 2:

Generally, opinions from government authorities are most influential on MOFCOM's decision. MOFCOM usually seeks the opinion from the National Development and Reform Commission ("NDRC"), sometimes also from competent authorities in charge of different industries, for instance, from the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology ("MIIT") for filings related to traditional and high-tech industries, and from the Ministry of Agriculture ("MOA") for filings involving agricultural products. In addition, for filings involving foreign investment, MOFCOM usually consults with the relevant approval authorities for foreign investment, such as the Department of Foreign Investment Administration of MOFCOM and/or local foreign investment approval authorities.

The review timeline and the MOFCOM decision may be affected by the opinions of other government authorities. For example, in the Marubeni/Gavilon (2013) case, the parties are required to "hold Marubeni Soybean Sub and Gavilon Soybean Sub separate from each other". One could imagine that MOFCOM should have consulted the domestic soybean industry association and the MOA. Considering both MOFCOM and MOA are at the same administrative ranking, MOFCOM would be prone to give substance to MOA's opinions.

  1. Conclusion and Forecast

Looking back upon the past 5 years, MOFCOM's achievements are widely recognized by domestic and international communities. Going forward, we expect that:

  • behavioral remedies will continue to be put equal weight as structural remedies;
  • innovation on the types of remedies will continue to be encouraged;
  • MOFCOM's review process may be accelerated by introducing the "fast track" mechanism; and
  • Transparency of MOFCOM's review process will be further enhanced.

With China becoming one of the "major" antitrust jurisdictions alongside the U.S. and Europe, both domestic and international companies should consider the implications of a MOFOM review and identify in advance the competition issues that their transaction may raise, before embarking on major transactions in China.


1On August 13, 2013, MOFCOM issued conditional clearance of Baxter's acquisition of Gambro. Since most data used in this article dates as of Q2 of 2013, this case was not included in the below discussions.

2The number of conditionally approved cases in year 2013 is updated as of Q2 of this year, while the total case number is an estimate based on cases cleared as of Q2 of 2013.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions