China: Supreme Court of China Issues Judicial Interpretation Governing Private Antitrust Litigations

Last Updated: 6 June 2012
Article by Susan Ning, Liu Jia and Hazel Yin

On 3 May 2012,China's Supreme People's Court issued the Rules of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in Hearing Civil Cases Caused by Monopolistic Conduct ("Rules").The Rules contain 16 articles covering standing of plaintiffs,jurisdiction,burden of proof,evidentiary rules,expert witness,the judicial process, form of civil liabilities and the statute of limitations.The Rules entered into force on 1 June 2012.

Compared to the draft Rules released last year for public comments ("Draft Rules")1,the Rules contain fewer articles and remain silent on a few issues that were previously addressed in the Draft Rules.This article discusses the major provisions in the Rules.

  • Relationship of antitrust administrative investigations and the judicial process

    Since the AML does not mandate ex ante administrative proceedings,the Rules recognize that a plaintiff can either directly bring a civil action before the court,or bring a civil action after the decision of the AML enforcement agencies2 is confirmed effective.

    However,the Rules choose to stay silent on whether administrative decisions may be used as proof of the facts confirmed therein in a follow-on litigation.Under the Draft Rules,the parties do not have to bear the burden to prove facts that have been ascertained by the AML enforcement agencies in their valid decisions.It is unclear whether this retreat is intended to uphold the independence of courts in the fact-finding process.In practice,the role an administrative decision can play in a follow-on litigation remains to be tested.

  • Jurisdiction

    The Rules provide that civil monopoly cases of the first instance shall be heard by intermediate courts(i)in capital cities of the provinces and autonomous regions,(ii)in cities separately listed on the State plan,(iii)in municipalities directly under the State Council,or(iv)by intermediate courts specifically designated by the Supreme Court.

    In addition,the Rules also clarify that primary courts may also have jurisdiction over civil monopoly cases of the first instance,if approved by the Supreme Court.To empower primary courts with the jurisdiction to hear civil monopoly cases of first instance may encourage more consumers or smaller enterprises to file private actions under the AML.

  • Consolidation of cases

    The Draft Rules originally provided that plaintiffs can file"joint actions"against the defendant.However,the Rules removed this provision and only provide that where two or more plaintiffs have separately filed lawsuits before a court over the same monopolistic conduct, the court may consolidate the cases into one case for hearing.The Rules however does not specify what would constitute"the same monopolistic conduct",whether it refers to one particular conduct or one type of conduct.Such ambiguity may give the court more discretion in determining whether or not to consolidate the cases

  • Allocation of burden of proof in relation to a monopoly agreement claim

    Pursuant to the principles of Civil Litigation Law,a plaintiff shall bear the burden of proving:(i)the existence of the alleged monopolistic conduct;(ii)the damages it claims; and(iii)the causal relationship between the alleged monopolistic conduct and the damages.Whether or under what circumstances a plaintiff shall prove the anti-competitive effects of the challenged conduct remained a controversy before the Rules were promulgated.

    According to the Draft Rules,a plaintiff does not have to prove that a monopolistic agreement,either horizontal or vertical,has the effect of eliminating or restricting competition if the challenged conduct is expressly listed in the AML as constituting a monopolistic agreement, unless the defendants have enough evidence to prove otherwise.

    The Rules,on the contrary,removed the presumption of anti-competitive effects for vertical agreements,which under the AML include fixing resale price and restricting minimum resale price("RPM").For horizontal monopoly agreements that are explicitly identified in the AML(i.e.price fixing,output restriction,market segmentation,restriction on the procurement or development of new technologies,and joint boycott),the Rules followed the position in the Draft Rules,namely the defendant shall bear the burden to prove the lack of anti-competitive effects.As to other unidentified types of horizontal monopoly agreements,it will still be the plaintiff's burden to prove that such horizontal agreements have the effect of excluding or restricting competition.

    Such a change of position may suggest that the Supreme Court has adopted different standards of proof for horizontal agreements vis-à-vis vertical agreements.The head of the Intellectual Property Division of the Supreme Court said in a press interview in relation to the Rules that in most cases,vertical agreements become harmful only if the supplier and/or the buyer has market power.Therefore,in practice,if a plaintiff intends to challenge a vertical agreement,like RPM,it may have to establish that the agreement has anti-competitive effects and that the defendant has market power.In fact,this was the position taken by a Shanghai court in the Ruibang v.Johnson&Johnson case,where the plaintiff's vertical agreement claim was denied on the ground that it failed to prove J&J has market power and the RPM is anti-competitive.

    The broader implication of this evidentiary rule is that the Supreme Court appears to be advocating a rule of reason analysis for RPM.It is not clear whether the administrative agencies,in particular,the NDRC,will follow suit.

  • Allocation of burden of proof in relation to an abuse of dominance claim

    As to abuse of dominance,the Rules provide that the plaintiff shall bear the burden of proof regarding the dominant position of the defendant in the relevant market, and the alleged abusive conducts,whereas the defendant shall bear the burden of proving the justifications of its conduct if it asserts such a defense.

    In addition,the Rules provide that if the defendants are public utility enterprises or other undertakings legally authorized to possess a monopoly position, the court may have a preliminary finding of market dominance on the basis of the market structure and the competition conditions,unless otherwise rebutted by evidence to the contrary.

    The Rules have further clarified that the plaintiff can use information publicly released by the defendant as evidence of its dominance and the court may make a finding of the defendant's dominance on such basis.This article provides for a very helpful way for plaintiff to establish the defendant's dominant position.Companies with market power should also become more prudent in public promotions of their market positions.

  • Expert witness and independent professional institutions

    Antitrust cases may involve very complex issues that demand industry expertise or economics analysis.The Rules therefore provide that parties to litigations can apply to the court to entrust one or two specialists to testify at court hearings.They can also apply to the court to entrust an independent institution,either agreed by both parties,or designated by the court,to conduct market survey or economic analysis. For credibility reasons, it may take some time before independent professional institutions are involved in antitrust private actions.Nevertheless,expert witnesses have already been employed in an antitrust case,i.e.,the most recent 360 v.QQ case.3

Conclusion

Since the enactment of the AML in August 2008, quite some antitrust private actions have been filed. However, there barely is any case where the court ruled in favor of the plaintiff.More often,the courts ruled against the plaintiffs due to their failure of meeting the burden of proof.The Rules have made great efforts in filling the gap between the AML and its implementation in civil litigations.

A lot still remains uncertain.For example,the Rules do not clarify what action a private party can file in relation to a merger.Compared to the Draft Rules,it is less clear whether indirect purchasers would have the standing as a plaintiff.It also becomes less certain as to the assumption of dominance for public utility enterprises,potentially suggesting a compromise by the Supreme Court with other interested parties.

It may be too optimistic to anticipate that the Rules may bring about an outburst of private antitrust actions.Nevertheless,the Rules have laid a solid foundation for the development of antitrust judicial reviews in China.It is expected that along with the AML administrative enforcement, AML private actions will play an increasingly important role in shaping the antitrust regime in China.

Footnotes

1To read more,please refer to our articles titled" Supreme People's Court Issues Draft Rules Governing Private Actions under the Anti-Monopoly Law"," A Further Look At The Draft Rules Governing AML Private Actions,and AML Class Actions and The Draft Litigation Rules".
2 The AML enforcement agencies include the National Development and Reform Commission("NDRC"),in charge of the price-related monopolistic conducts,the State Administration for Industry and Commerce("SAIC"),in charge of the non-price related monopolistic conducts,and the Ministry of Commerce("MOFCOM"),in charge of merger control review.
3 Both Qihoo(operator of 360,the anti-virus software)and Tencent(operator of QQ,the instant messaging software)employed specialists in the court hearing held at April 18th at the Guangdong Higher People's Court.For details of the case, please refer to our article entitled" 360 v. QQ-Abuse of Dominance Action Tried at Guangdong Higher Court".

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions