China: Developments In M&A Regulations In China And Impact On VIE Structures

The Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) for the People's Republic of China (the "PRC" or "China"), which provides security reviews for inbound mergers and acquisitions, has implemented new review features that have the potential to alter the foreign investment landscape. Variable Interest Entities ("VIEs"), corporate structures utilized in certain mergers and acquisitions (M&A) to access industries normally restricted to foreign investment, may now fall under the scrutiny of MOFCOM. This would subject VIEs to tighter screening procedures and increase the likelihood that certain transactions will not be completed. Foreign companies making acquisitions in China will have to reconsider their approach to VIEs as these structures come under greater scrutiny.

Regulatory Background

On August 8, 2006, six PRC regulatory agencies promulgated the Regulation on Mergers and Acquisitions of Domestic Companies by Foreign Investors (the "2006 M&A Rules"), which became effective on September 8, 2006, and was subsequently amended in 2009. The 2006 M&A Rules established a general legal framework for foreign investors to acquire either equity or assets of a Chinese company in exchange for cash or stock of the foreign acquirer, requiring, among other things, approval by one or more PRC government authorities. The 2006 M&A Rules also require foreign investors to notify PRC authorities if a proposed M&A transaction results in foreign investors gaining control of a PRC company that involves or affects: a key domestic industry; national economic security; or well-known or traditional trademarks or brand names.

On August 30, 2007, the Standing Committee of the People's Republic of China ("China" or the "PRC") National People's Congress issued the Anti-Monopoly Law of the People's Republic of China (the "AML") and it took effect on August 1, 2008. Article 31 of the AML signaled that a national security review mechanism would soon be implemented in connection with M&A of domestic companies by foreign investors in China by stating that "where a foreign investor participates in the concentration of undertakings by merging or acquiring a domestic enterprise or by any other means..., and national security is involved, besides the examination on the concentration of undertakings in accordance with this Law, the examination on national security shall also be conducted according to the relevant provisions of the State."

On February 12, 2011, the PRC State Council promulgated a Notice on the Establishment of the National Security Review Mechanism for the M&A of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors (the "NSR"), and on August 25, 2011, MOFCOM, which has primary authority over the NSR process, issued implementing regulations pertaining to the security review of inbound M&A transactions, which became effective on September 1, 2011. The NSR may impact the offshore structure of Chinese companies for the purpose of overseas listing as well the ability of companies with such structures to obtain private equity financing.

National Security Review and Implementing Regulations

The NSR and implementing regulations provide MOFCOM with the power to determine whether an acquisition of, or merger with, a domestic enterprise by a foreign enterprise should be subject to national security review by considering both the substance of the acquisition, as well as its actual impact on national defense, national economic stability, social stability, and on the research and development of key technologies related to national security.

Covered Transactions

The NSR covers: (i) the purchase by foreign investors of existing equity interest or shares or increased capital of PRC non-foreign-invested enterprises and conversion of such domestic PRC enterprises into foreign-invested enterprises (FIEs); (ii) the establishment by foreign investors of FIEs and the purchasing and operating of assets acquired from domestic PRC enterprises through such FIEs; (iii) the purchase of equity interests or shares of domestic PRC enterprises through FIEs; (iv) the purchase by foreign investors of assets owned by domestic PRC enterprises and the establishment of FIEs to operate such assets; and (v) the purchase by foreign investors of equity interests or shares owned by PRC parties in FIEs or the purchase by foreign investors of the increased capital of FIEs; with no minimum thresholds.

Covered Industries

National Security reviews are required for transactions involving PRC companies that are "Military and Related Enterprises," "Military Area Enterprises" and are otherwise deemed to be "Key Companies". Military Related Enterprises includes military enterprises, as well as enterprises that provide support to, or are otherwise connected to military enterprises. Military enterprises also include enterprises that are located near key and sensitive military facilities (the "Military Area"). Therefore, even if the a PRC target company is engaged in non-military business, if it is located in a Military Area, the transaction will also be subject to the security review. Although the NSR does not define what "key" means in this context, transactions involving PRC target companies involved with key agricultural products, key energy or natural resources, key infrastructure and transportation services, key technologies and key equipment manufacturing activities that raise national security concerns, so called Key Companies, are subject to national security review if the foreign investor may acquire actual control of such PRC target company.

For the purposes of the NSR, an acquisition of "actual control" refers to a situation where a foreign investor (including its parent or subsidiary), or several foreign investors: (i) acquire 50 percent or more of the PRC target's equity interests or voting rights; (ii) have a significant influence over the PRC target's shareholder meetings or its board of directors, or (iii) obtain actual control over the PRC target's business decisions, financial affairs, personnel and/or technology or other matters.

National Review Process

MOFCOM has the power to determine, whether a given M&A activity requires national security review. Upon its receipt of a notification or application from the transaction parties with respect to a covered transaction, MOFCOM has 5 business days to refer a transaction for national security to a ministerial-level review committee established under the State Council, led by MOFCOM and the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), and comprised of other authorities in charge of the industry to which the transaction is related (the "Committee"). If MOFCOM decides not to refer the transaction for review (a) other relevant departments or ministries under the PRC State Council, (b) national industrial organizations, (c) enterprises in the same industry as the PRC target; and (d) upstream and downstream enterprises of the PRC target company (together, the "Domestic Constituents"), have the right to request that MOFCOM refer a transaction to the Committee for national security review. MOFCOM is obligated to forward such Domestic Constituent requests to the Committee without discretion (although no specific timeframe is mandated in such cases).

The NSR stipulates a two-step review procedure: a preliminary review and a special review. The preliminary review commences with a written notice from the Committee to the Domestic Constituents within 5 business days after the Committee receives a request from MOFCOM. Domestic Constituents have 20 business days after receiving such written notice to provide comments, if any, to the Committee. If Domestic Constituent believes that the transaction will affect PRC national security, then the transaction must undergo a special review. The Committee will initiate the special review procedure within 5 business days after it receives notice from a Domestic Constituent that, in its view, the transaction will affect PRC national security. The Committee will then assess the transaction for impact on national security. If an absolute majority of the members of the Committee reach a conclusion regarding the transaction, the Committee will issue its decision. If the members of the Committee hold significantly different views on the transaction such that an absolute majority cannot be reached, or if the special review could not be completed within 60 business days after its initiation, then the transaction will be submitted to the PRC State Council for review.

After completion of its review, the Committee will issue a determination (through MOFCOM) as to whether the transaction will affect or will not affect national security. If the Committee concludes that the transaction has or will affect national security, it will issue a separate order or notice to MOFCOM, regarding what actions should be taken by the foreign investor and the PRC target. In such cases the Committee can require MOFCOM to either terminate the transaction, require the foreign investor to transfer its equity or assets, or take other measures for the purpose of eliminating the negative effect of the transaction on national security.

Prior to a formal submission to the review process, parties have the option of engaging in non-binding preliminary discussions with MOFCOM, subject to a confidentiality obligation imposed on the applicable commerce departments and personnel. In addition, the parties have the right modify or withdraw a transaction from review at any time during the review process.

Impact of Security Review on Variable Interest Entities

The implementing regulations of the NSR and other recent developments in China have raised some uncertainty relating to the long-term viability of the variable interest entity structure in China, as well as the ability of companies with such structures to obtain future financing. Although there is no express prohibition against the VIE structure, national security review of transactions with VIE structures will subject them to increased scrutiny and longer periods of time to complete. Article 9 of the implementing regulations expressly states that foreign investors may not for any reason evade the security review process, such as holding equity via trusts and exercising control through contractual arrangements, meaning that any foreign investment, including those with VIE structures, can be subject to security review.

A variable interest entity ("VIE") is a term used by the United States Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) to refer to an entity in which the investor holds a controlling interest that is not based on equity ownership or majority voting rights. Since the adoption of the 2006 M&A Rules, certain PRC companies without an offshore structure in place would establish a VIE structure in order to circumvent the requirement to obtain PRC governmental approval for covered merger or acquisition transactions. The typical VIE structure involves the establishment by the founder or nominee of a domestic operating company (Domestic Co) of an offshore company (Offshore Co), which in turn would establish a wholly foreign owned enterprise (WFOE) in China, that would, through a series of contractual agreements, gain most, if not all, of Domestic Co's profits, and control Domestic Co's management and operations. In such cases FASB Interpretation 46(R) permits consolidation of Domestic Co's financial data into the financial statements of the WOFE, regardless of ownership, as the WOFE controls the economic risks and rewards of the entity.

It is unclear what level of scrutiny of VIEs will be implemented by MOFCOM at the time of its national security review, but recent developments indicate that almost all VIEs may be subject to enhanced scrutiny. On July 4, 2011, the Communist Party School paper, Study Times, published an article criticizing the supposed influence of foreign capital within the country's sensitive IT sector, which has been largely accomplished through the VIE structure. In mid-September, 2011, Reuters reported on the existence of an unconfirmed internal China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) report, dated August 17, 2011, describing VIEs as a major threat to China's national security and asking the PRC State Council to take action against VIEs in the following manner: (i) PRC companies under the VIE structure must receive approval from both MOFCOM and the CSRC to list overseas, but the old rules would still apply to companies that are already listed; (ii) the PRC government should encourage PRC internet companies to list on PRC domestic exchanges, and if such listings are not possible, then to list directly in foreign markets; (iii) the CSRC should collaborate with the SEC, and other foreign equivalents, regarding the enforcement of such rule.

There is also uncertainty as to whether the contracts that establish control in the VIE structure are enforceable under PRC law. The recent case of GigaMedia Ltd., a foreign private issuer with a PRC VIE relationship through T2CN Holding Limited, shows that the enforceability risk is real. Control of the VIE was usurped by its original PRC owner, Wang Ji, after the GigaMedia board voted to replace him as CEO of its PRC operations. GigaMedia reported that Wang had the seals, financial chops and business registration certificates necessary to run its online games business in the PRC, including, to declare dividends and approve service fee payments, conduct banking business and register the resolutions removing Wang from his position. The parent filed lawsuits against him in the PRC, Hong Kong, Singapore and the British Virgin Islands, but subsequently disclosed that it was highly unlikely that its VIE contracts would be enforced in court. GigaMedia based this conclusion on the fact that it had failed to register the equity pledge included in the VIE contracts, however, it is unclear whether they would be able to enforce VIE contracts with a restricted company in any event, especially in the current PRC regulatory environment. The company subsequently disclosed that it was considering writing off the entire investment in the entities held by the WFOE since they had lost control of the WFOE and were unable to gain access to any financial information regarding the entities.

In order to consolidate a VIE in the controlling company's financial statements, one has to show that the controlling company not only receives the economic benefits and takes the economic risks of the venture, but also that the VIE is in fact controlled by such company. In light of the foregoing, investors are increasingly concerned that control of VIEs in China may no longer be valid or justifiable for purposes of FASB Interpretation 45(R) now that the enforceability of VIE contracts is uncertain. If the contracts, which establish this control, are deemed invalid or unenforceable, consolidation may no longer justifiable under FASB Interpretation 46(R), then foreign investment in PRC companies with such VIE structures may be more difficult to secure.

What These Changes Mean to You

Potential PRC targets will need to be carefully considered and a coordinated strategy developed to address possible concerns, including, modification of the transaction scope or structure, especially in light of the rights provided to third parties to initiate the national security review process. Any existing VIE structure in the PRC target company should be examined to determine (i) whether the VIE structure is necessary due to operations in a restricted industry, i.e. was it established merely to circumvent PRC regulatory requirements; and (ii) if the VIE structure is necessary to participate in a restricted industry, whether the operating company is engaged in a military or related industry or located in a Military Area or engaged in one of the key industries identified in the NSR, and if the latter, whether the transaction is structured to provide a foreign person or entity actual control over the operating company. Foreign investors should also assess whether the VIE operates in the telecommunications sector, internet gaming sector, e-commerce/online payment services sector or steel sector, where PRC authorities have expressed disfavor to the use of VIE structures for foreign investment.

In 2006, the PRC Ministry of Information Industries (MII) issued its Notice Concerning Strengthening the Administration of Foreign-Invested Value-Added Telecommunications Business Operations, suggesting it would be taking a closer look at VIE structures used by internet companies. The use of the VIE structures continued in this sector, but practitioners viewed the notice as a warning and proceeded with additional cautions, including additional risk factors in disclosure documents like prospectuses. In September 2009, the PRC General Administration of Press and Publication (GAPP), the National Copyright Administration and the National Office of Combating Pornography and Illegal Publications jointly published the Notice Regarding the Consistent Implementation of the "Stipulations on 'Three Provisions'" of the State Council Internet Games, etc. This notice expressly prohibited the use of technology support or other agreements to give foreign investors control over internet game operations and services in China. This was significant in that it signaled PRC government awareness of the proliferation of VIE structures and its ability to regulate them.

In August 2010, the management of Alibaba Group Holding Limited, in which foreign entities, Yahoo Inc. and Softbank Corp, had "controlling" interests, transferred the assets of its VIE and largest e-commerce business, Alipay, to purely domestic ownership with no contractual arrangements made with the foreign entity, because, according to Jack Ma, Alibaba's founder and CEO, China's central bank refused to issue required payment business permits to online payment companies that have foreign ownership. It is unclear whether this case is signaling PRC government discontent with the level of foreign control over a PRC e-commerce and payment services business, or whether the spinoff was a strategic move by Ma to force the foreign investors, including Yahoo to sell their interests at a discount.

Buddha Steel, Inc. held its operations in a PRC company, Baosheng Steel, which was owned primarily by Buddha Steel's CEO and his family, but controlled pursuant to the usual VIE agreements and consolidated into Baosheng Steel's financial statements as a VIE. Buddha Steel was in the process of conducting a $38 million underwritten public offering in the U.S. when, in March 2011, the local government authorities in Hebei Province reportedly advised the PRC operating company that the VIE agreements "contravene current Chinese management policies related to foreign-invested enterprises and are against public policy." In response, Buddha Steel terminated its commercial agreements with its VIE and the VIE reverted to 100% control of the original PRC owners. This rendered Buddha Steel a shell company with no operations and resulted in a withdrawal of the public offering.

The foregoing represents examples in which PRC regulators have confirmed their awareness of the widespread use of the VIE structure, which in certain situations they believe may have been used to circumvent foreign investment restrictions in certain sectors, and the actions taken to discourage or prohibit such use.

Regulatory Outlook

The use of the VIE structure is prevalent among PRC listed companies. According to informal research conducted by China Finance blogger, Fredrik Öqvist1: (i) 42% of U.S. listed PRC companies use the VIE structure; (ii) more than half of NASDAQ listed companies (53%), 29% of NYSE listed companies and 6% of NYSE Amex companies use the structure; and (iii) the use of the VIE structure increased during 2010, with 47% of 2010 NYSE listings of PRC companies (9 out of 19) having used VIEs, and 65% of 2010 NASDAQ listings (10 out of 16) having used VIEs.

In his article "Cleaning up the VIE Section" in the China Accounting Blog2, Prof. Paul Gillis, visiting professor of accounting at Peking University's Guanghua School of Management, posits that the solution to the current uncertainty rests in the hands of the PRC regulators, and he makes the following suggestions for reform: (i) make it easier for PRC companies to directly list overseas without using an offshore entity; (ii) recognize the reality that there already is significant foreign investment in prohibited sectors, and find a way to regulate this investment; (iii) develop rules to make it possible to bring the offshore structures back onshore; (iv) develop a regulatory structure that works for these companies, and which coordinates effectively with the SEC and PCAOB; (v) create more opportunities for U.S. listed PRC operating companies to obtain a listing on PRC stock exchanges; and (vi) make it easy for firms to regularize their operations, and then strictly enforce existing PRC laws where such companies do not restructure.

While it is clear that MOFCOM wants to ensure that foreign investors do not avoid the NSR, including pursuant to a VIE structure, it does not necessarily mean that they will enforce existing rules in the future to the detriment of foreign investors. The consensus appears to be that while China could just get tough and force all of the companies using VIE structures to restructure into PRC owned entities, it is unlikely to do so as such conduct that would cause a great deal of harm to PRC companies with such structures, such as Sina.com and Baidu, their shareholders and the PRC economy.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions