China: PRC Courts Clarify Aspects Of Anti-Monopoly Civil Actions

Last Updated: 9 May 2011
Article by Hannah C. L. Ha, Helen Hai and Gerry P. O'Brien

Originally published April 28, 2011

Keywords: China, Supreme People's Court, PRC courts, anti-monopoly civil actions

On 25 April 2011 China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) published a draft judicial interpretation that explains how civil cases relating to alleged violations of the country's Anti-Monopoly Law (AML) may be handled going forward. The draft is entitled Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in Hearing Monopoly Civil Cases.

Release of the draft is a welcome development, given that a number of civil cases in this area have already been permitted to proceed (although none, it is understood, involving major foreign multinationals) notwithstanding the absence of clear procedural and substantive rules on case handling.

The new document contains 20 articles, and deals with issues such as standing to bring civil cases, the burden of proof, the extent of civil liability, and the relevant statute of limitations for such cases. Comments on the draft have now been invited, with 1 June 2011 set as the deadline for submissions.

In this update, we summarise key aspects of the draft and the progress of civil actions relating to the AML to date.

The right of plaintiffs to bring both stand-alone and follow-on civil cases

The draft judicial interpretation repeats certain provisions in the AML providing that a party who is injured by another party's anti-competitive conduct in violation of the AML may file a civil case in order to seek compensation and related orders. The draft also confirms a previous designation by the SPC that certain Intermediate People's Courts will be the courts of first instance for such cases, and the relatively well-regarded and well-trained intellectual property divisions of such courts are expected to continue to take a leading role in case handling. According to the draft, the courts are required to accept civil cases under the AML if they satisfy the requirements of instituting a civil action under the provisions of Article 108 of China's Civil Procedure Law (which, amongst other things, stipulates that the plaintiff must have a direct interest in the case, and the claim, factual basis and defendant must be appropriately specified).

The draft makes it clear that such cases can generally be brought whether or not China's Anti-Monopoly Enforcement Authorities (AMEAs) have investigated or made a determination on the relevant matter. However, the draft provides that the courts may elect to suspend hearing a civil case if an AMEA is in the process of its own investigation. Further, an exception is made in relation to certain matters involving alleged 'administrative monopoly' (anti-competitive use of state administrative power), in respect of which it appears a prior finding of abuse of administrative power by an AMEA is required before a follow-up civil case may be brought.

Civil cases that are brought as a follow-on case after an AMEA determination may, however, have some strong advantages from the plaintiff's perspective.

In particular, the draft provides that the plaintiff in such cases will not need to prove any facts that have already been acknowledged in the AMEA's findings. Such facts will essentially be considered by the courts as satisfactorily established, unless the defendant can produce new evidence to show otherwise.

Burden of proof

Article 7 of the draft provides that the plaintiff will usually bear the burden of proving the existence of alleged anti-competitive conduct by a defendant, as well as any injury in respect of which compensation is claimed and a sufficient link between that injury and the defendant's conduct.

However, the draft also provides that certain forms of agreement will be automatically deemed to restrict competition, and will therefore be presumed anti-competitive and unlawful unless the parties to those agreement can show that this is not the case (or that a relevant defence applies). The relevant forms of agreement are those listed in Articles 13 and 14 of the AML, being:

  • agreements between competitors to do such things as fix prices, limit production volumes, divide markets, limit the development or application of new technology, or jointly boycott transactions; and
  • agreements between parties at different levels of the vertical supply chain to fix the prices of products re-sold to third parties, or to limit the minimum prices of products re-sold to third parties.

In relation to abuse of dominance cases, the draft provides that the plaintiff usually bears the burden of proving:

  • the alleged relevant market involving the monopolistic behaviour;
  • the dominance of the defendant in the relevant market; and
  • that the defendant has abused that power and therefore contravened the AML.

The defendant will then bear the onus of proving that any conduct it engaged in that may otherwise be considered to be unlawful abuse of dominance was justified and therefore lawful in the circumstances.

Interestingly, however, the draft builds on provisions in the AML that automatically presumes business operators to possess market dominance in certain cases. According to the draft, this presumption will arise if the plaintiff shows that the defendant is:

  • a public utility supplying the community with water, electricity, heat, gas etc.
  • an undertaking that is vested with exclusive qualification for supplying certain products or services; or
  • involved in supplying a product that lacks effective competition, in respect of which purchasers are highly dependant.

The draft also provides some explanation of the types of evidence that may be relied upon to establish a defendant's dominant market position. In particular, the draft mentions that disclosed information of a listed company, information acknowledged by the alleged monopolist itself, reports on market researches, economic analysis, monographic studies, and statistics provided by qualified independent third parties will be taken into consideration.

Orders for production of evidence by the defendant

According to the draft, the plaintiff can apply to the court for a ruling that the defendant must submit relevant evidence, provided that the following conditions are met:

  • the evidence can prove that the plaintiff has been, or is likely to be, harmed by the alleged anti-competitive behavior;
  • even after making reasonable efforts, due to objective reasons, the plaintiff cannot obtain the evidence without a relevant order from the court;
  • the evidence is relevant to the case, and is necessary to prove the claims or assertion of the plaintiff; and
  • there is evidence which proves that the defendant possesses the evidence in question.

Any refusal by the defendant to obey such an order issued by the court could then lead to a fine, detention, or may even constitute a criminal act under China's Civil Procedure Law.

Orders that may be made at the conclusion of the case

If the court finds that a defendant has violated the AML, it may (on request of the plaintiff) make various orders, such as requiring the defendant to stop the infringing act and pay for the damages, as well as any reasonable expenses incurred by the plaintiff in bringing the case. Additionally, relevant contracts including unlawful terms under the AML may be ruled invalid.

Interestingly, the newly published draft judicial interpretation does not contain any provisions suggesting a double-damages regime may apply in AML cases for certain successful cases by plaintiffs. This is a departure from an earlier draft that was circulated to just a small group of law firms and experts for comment.

Statute of limitations

According to the draft, a two-year statute of limitations period will normally apply for civil cases relating to violations of the AML, with the period beginning on the day the defendant knows, or should have known, about the relevant violation.

However, some exceptions are also provided for.

If an AMEA has investigated the matter and has determined that the defendant's conduct does constitute a violation of the AML, the statute of limitations period will begin on the day that the plaintiff knows, or should have known, about the AMEA's determination taking effect.

If the plaintiff has filed a complaint regarding the matter with an AMEA, but the AMEA has not yet reached a decision, then the statute of limitations period will be suspended during the period between lodgement of the complaint with the AMEA and the conclusion of the AMEA's investigation.

Further, the draft also contemplates that the courts should permit a plaintiff to bring a civil action relating to a violation of the AML after the two-year statute of limitation period has expired, if the alleged anti-competitive conduct of the defendant is still continuing. However, provided that the defendant enters a demurrer on the ground that the plaintiff 's action has passed the two-year limitation for action, the calculation of damages in such cases will cover only the two years beginning from the day that the plaintiff brings the action to the court.

Other matters addressed by the draft

Several further matters are addressed in the draft. For example, the draft contemplates that economic experts and other specialists may be involved in civil cases to help explain relevant matters, and provides that parties may apply to the court to have measures taken to ensure protection of their business secrets during the course of hearings.

Additionally, the draft provides that a plaintiff may choose to bring an individual action or a joint action, with the courts also able to consolidate multiple cases into one action provided that those cases concern the same defendant and conduct.

The progress of civil actions relating to the AML to date

According to official statistics released by the Chinese authorities, just 43 civil action cases under the AML had been submitted to, and accepted by, China's people's courts to the end of 2010 - many of which are understood to have focused on alleged abuse of dominant market position. Based on decisions made public so far, it is believed that very few - if any - of the plaintiff's claims in these cases were sustained by the people's courts (and some were withdrawn by the defendant, due to settlements or other reasons, before a decision was handed down).

While it is clear further cases have arisen since that time, no comprehensive records on the precise number of cases are understood to be available. It is also not clear whether other potential cases are commonly being rejected by the courts for any reason. However this is not inconceivable given that the courts may be reluctant to hear cases involving state owned enterprises or foreign multinationals, or involving particularly complex issues, before the approach to issues dealt with in the new draft judicial interpretation are confirmed.

Conclusion

With a 1 June 2011 deadline set for submissions on the new draft, it appears likely that key aspects relating to the future handling of AML-related civil cases will be finalised in the coming months. This may open the door to a significant increase in the number of such cases coming before the courts, and the apparent reluctance of the courts to hear such cases when they involve foreign multinationals as defendants may evaporate. Accordingly, all businesses with operations or sales into China should ensure they have taken relevant compliance steps to minimise the risk of becoming a target in this emerging area of anti-monopoly enforcement in China.

Learn more about our PRC offices and Antitrust & Competition practice.

Visit us at www.mayerbrownjsm.com

Mayer Brown is a global legal services organization comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the Mayer Brown Practices). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP, a limited liability partnership established in the United States; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership, and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

© Copyright 2011. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein. Please also read the JSM legal publications Disclaimer.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions