China: China Establishes Mechanism for National Security Reviews of Foreign Investments

Last Updated: 18 February 2011

Article by Nathan Bush , Theodore Kassinger , Qiang Li and Fay Zhou

On February 3, 2011, the General Office of the State Council released long-anticipated rules for reviewing foreign direct investments in China for national security concerns. The new procedures, effective March 5, 2011, are set forth in the Notice of the General Office of the State Council on Establishing the Security Review Mechanism for Merger with and Acquisition of Domestic Enterprise by Foreign Investors (the Notice)1. As of the effective date, foreign investors may be required to file notices of transactions covered by the Notice - a potentially broad universe of investments.

While foreign direct investment projects in China have long faced a gauntlet of review and approval procedures by various government authorities, the Notice establishes the first detailed review mechanism devoted to national security issues. Several procedural and substantive facets of the new process resemble analogous procedures in the United States and elsewhere for screening foreign investment on national security grounds. Nevertheless, the Notice incorporates distinctive and broad standards, leaving unanswered many questions about the scope and impact of the new national security reviews.

KEY POINTS

Here are five key points about the new review mechanism:

  • The Notice covers two basic categories of transactions: (1) Investments involving Chinese enterprises directly involved in the national defense industry, and businesses located "adjacent" to such enterprises; and (2) investments involving any other Chinese enterprise that more indirectly invokes national security concerns, such as critical infrastructure, "key" technologies, and "important" agricultural or energy products. Notably, the rules do not apply to transactions involving financial institutions or certain transactions involving "state-owned assets."
  • With respect to the first category of covered transactions, any "merger or acquisition" transaction is subject to review. Such transactions involving the second category are reviewable if the foreign investor will gain "actual control" of the enterprise. The Notice describes various scenarios by which such control may be acquired. The overall structure reflects an analytical approach quite similar to that followed by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), but a number of questions concerning treatment of minority investments, for example, remain unanswered.
  • Reviews will be conducted by an interagency committee co-chaired by the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) and the Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM). The committee will follow a two-step review process that also mimics the CFIUS process, including following a timeline that aims to complete reviews in about 90 days.
  • Importantly, covered transactions will be reviewed not only for their potential impact on national security, but also with respect to potential impacts on China's "economic stability" and "social order."
  • The interaction between the general foreign direct investment approval procedures and the national security review process remains uncertain. In recent years, provincial and local authorities have received greater authority to approve larger projects in more industries without central government involvement. The new national security review system channels certain transactions to the central government for review.

LEGISLATIVE BACKGROUND

National security concerns have long colored the Chinese government's view of foreign investments, but the first measures providing for separate review of foreign direct investment on national security grounds appeared in the 2006 Rules for M&A of Domestic Enterprise by Foreign Investors (2006 M&A Rules)2. These rules introduced requirements for foreign acquisitions of Chinese firms that "result in actual control by the foreign investor" and "involve key industries, have factors imposing or possibly imposing material impact on the economic security of the State, or would result in transfer of actual control in a domestic enterprise which owns any well-known trademarks or Chinese historical brands"3. MOFCOM, "together with other relevant departments," may act to block, modify or unwind unreported transactions with actual or potential "material impact" on the "economic security of the State." The 2006 M&A Rules did not list "key economic sectors," define "national economic security," or prescribe detailed procedures.

In practice, few parties have formally notified transactions for review pursuant to the 2006 M&A Rules, and MOFCOM has not publicly invoked these provisions to block any investments. Nevertheless, it was widely understood that Carlyle Group's proposed acquisition of Xuzhou Machinery and certain other transactions foundered on issues spotlighted in the 2006 M&A Rules4.

National security concerns resurfaced in the Antimonopoly Law (AML), China's principal antitrust statute5. The (AML), which became effective on August 1, 2008, severs the review of mergers, acquisitions, and other concentrations on competition grounds from the review of investments on national security grounds. AML Article 31 provides that where a foreign investor merges with or acquires an enterprise within China or where any other form of concentration "concerns national security," the transaction will be subject to separate review on national security grounds "in accordance with relevant regulations of the State." This bifurcation was consciously modeled on the U.S. practice of separating antitrust reviews from national security reviews conducted by CFIUS6. The AML did not, however, prescribe specific procedures or standards for review.

On August 21, 2008, the NDRC announced plans to form an interagency committee to review the national security effects of foreign acquisitions of Chinese companies, but provided few details about the plans7. In June 2010, NDRC, MOFCOM and the Legal Office of the State Council circulated draft regulations entitled The Security Review System for Merger & Acquisition of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors to domestic and foreign companies and trade associations for comment. The new Notice derives substantially from those draft measures.

SUMMARY OF KEY PROVISIONS

Scope of Covered Transactions

The Notice defines two categories of transactions that are subject to national security review:

  1. "mergers and acquisitions by foreign investors of any domestic defense industry enterprise or any defense industry supporting enterprise, any enterprise adjacent to key or sensitive military facilities, or any other enterprise related to national defense or security"8; and
  2. "mergers and acquisitions by foreign investors of any domestic enterprise engaging in important agriculture products, important energy and resource products, critical infrastructure, critical transportation systems, key technology or equipment, in each case involving national security; provided that the actual control of the domestic enterprise is acquired by foreign investors after the transaction"9.

Both categories involve "mergers and acquisitions of domestic enterprises by foreign investors." Such transactions are defined by reference to the concept of a Foreign Invested Enterprise (FIE), and encompasses the following four scenarios involving the formation or change in ownership of an FIE:

  1. "Foreign investors purchase shares from a domestic non-FIE, or subscribe for any capital increase of a domestic non-FIE, and after the transaction the status of the domestic enterprise is changed into an FIE.
  2. Foreign investors purchase shares from a Chinese shareholder of an existing FIE, or subscribe for any capital increase of an existing FIE.
  3. Foreign investors establish an FIE, and use that FIE to (a) purchase assets of a domestic enterprise and operate such assets after the purchase or (b) purchase shares of a domestic enterprise10.
  4. Foreign investors purchase assets directly from a domestic enterprise, and then establish an FIE to hold and operate such assets"11.

The 2006 M&A Rules did not specifically address the types of transactions described in items (ii) and (iii) (to the extent (iii) covers the use of existing FIEs to acquire shares or assets of domestic enterprises).

Unlike the first category of covered transactions, the second category adds language limiting the enumerated types of transactions to ones in which the foreign investor acquires "actual control" of the domestic enterprise. The Notice defines the acquisition of "actual control" as "a merger or acquisition after which a foreign investor becomes the controlling shareholder or the actual controller of a domestic enterprise." Such control may result from the following circumstances:

  1. "A foreign investor, its share-controlling parent companies, and share-controlling subsidiaries, collectively hold more than 50% of the total outstanding shares of the target enterprise after the transaction.
  2. Several foreign investors collectively hold more than 50% of the total outstanding shares of the target enterprise after the transaction.
  3. Although a foreign investor holds less than 50% of the total outstanding shares after the transaction, the foreign investor, through the voting power of such shares, may nevertheless materially influence the outcomes of shareholder meetings, general meetings or board meetings of the target enterprise.
  4. Any other circumstances in which the actual control of business operations, finance, personnel and technology decisions of a domestic enterprise is transferred to a foreign investor"12.

Importantly, the Notice specifies that mergers and acquisitions of domestic enterprises by investors from Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan are subject to its provisions13.

Joint Committee

According to the Notice, a joint committee (the "Committee") shall be established at the inter-ministry level under the State Council14 The Committee will be led by the NDRC and MOFCOM, and will be overseen by the State Council. The Committee shall involve other relevant ministries and governmental agencies in its activities, depending on "the industries and areas involved"15. The major responsibilities of the Committee include: (i) analyzing the impact of transactions on China's national security, (ii) analyzing and coordinating major issues during the security review process, and (iii) conducting security reviews of applicable transactions and making decisions accordingly16.

Substantive Standards

Without further elaboration, the Notice lays down four criteria for evaluating transactions:

  1. (i)"The impact of the transaction on national security, including the domestic production capacity, the domestic service capacity and related equipment and facilities needed for national security purposes.
  2. The impact of the transaction on China's economic stability.
  3. The impact of the transaction on China's social order.
  4. The impact of the transaction on China's R&D capacity of critical technology related to national security"17.

Initiation of Reviews by Application and Referral

The Notice establishes two channels for initiating reviews. First, the Notice explicitly requires foreign investors to submit applications to MOFCOM regarding covered transactions - they "shall" do so. The Notice does not, however, specify when the investors must file such a notice. (Presumably, the common and prudent approach, implicit in the Notice, will be for investors to file a notice after an initial deal signing, but prior to closing.) Within five working days of such submission, MOFCOM "shall" submit any transaction falling under the scope of the security review to the Committee18.

Second, if any department or agency of the State Council, any national industry association, any enterprise in the same industry, or any upstream or downstream enterprise believes that a transaction should be subject to the security review process, it may suggest to MOFCOM that a review be conducted. If the Committee determines that a review is indeed necessary, it may initiate the security review process19.

Two-Stage Review Process

The Notice outlines a two-stage review process entailing a general review and special review (or an extended review). According to the Notice, the Committee shall first conduct a general review of a transaction submitted by MOFCOM. If the Committee does not clear the transaction after the general review, then a special review shall be conducted20.

General reviews will be conducted through written inquiries. The Committee shall solicit opinions from relevant agencies within five working days after the submission by MOFCOM. Relevant agencies shall provide their opinions in writing within 20 working days after the opinion solicitation notice. If all the relevant agencies find that the transaction has no impact on national security, then no special review is required. The Committee shall issue the decision within five working days after receipt of all opinions and inform MOFCOM in writing21.

If any agency finds that the transaction may potentially have any impact on national security, the Committee shall start the special review process within five working days after receipt of such opinion in writing. The Committee shall organize a security assessment of the transaction and review the transaction in connection with such assessment. If there is a general consensus by the members of the Committee, the Committee shall issue a final decision based on such consensus. If there is any major disagreement among the members of the Committee, the Committee shall submit the case to the State Council for further review. A special review shall be completed (or submitted to the State Council) by the Committee within 60 working days after the launch of the special review22.

Written Decisions

The results of the review will be communicated to the applicants in writing by MOFCOM23. If a transaction has already had, or would reasonably be expected to have, a material impact on national security, the Committee shall request that MOFCOM, together with relevant agencies, order the parties to terminate the transaction, or order the parties to take necessary measures (such as transferring shares or assets) to eliminate such impact on national security.

Rights and Obligations of Parties

The Notice requests the Parties to the transaction to cooperate with the Committee, to provide relevant materials and information, and to respond to inquiries24. It does not specify, however, what materials and information must be provided at the time of initial notification to MOFCOM.

Mitigation Agreements

During the process of security review, the applicant may revise the transaction structure or withdraw the transaction25. Similar to U.S. practice, the apparent intent is to permit the parties room to negotiate "mitigation agreements" to address potential national security concerns.

Other Review Procedures

The Notice confirms that transactions subject to review under existing regulations governing certain acquisitions of fixed assets investment or state-owned assets shall continue to be subject to such regulations26. Separate regulations will be issued for security reviews of transactions involving domestic financial institutions27.

COMMENTARY

After years of uncertainty, and with growing concerns that increasing domestic protectionism and economic nationalism in China would lead to sweeping new approval requirements for foreign investments, the publication of the Notice at last marks the path forward by establishing a firm framework for reviews of transactions on national security and related policy grounds. The State Council's statements in the Notice regarding the positive role and effect of foreign merger and acquisitions, and the government's willingness to receive public comments on such sensitive issues as national security reviews during the legislative process, are encouraging signs that the mechanism will be implemented with a degree of openness and transparency, and will not be applied arbitrarily to deter specific investments. Indeed, the drafters appear to have adopted many recommendations from commentators for revisions to the 2010 draft, notably by setting concrete deadlines for action by the committee and by deleting other provisions of concern.

The Notice clearly reflects an attempt to mirror the scope and practice of national security reviews conducted by CFIUS, and by comparable authorities in other developed countries such as Australia and Canada. At the same time, the new process is tailored to China's particular legal and policy environment. In many practical respects it remains opaque and discretionary. Hopefully, many questions will be answered through promulgation of rules or guidelines by NDRC and/or MOFCOM.

Several features of the new national security review mechanism are especially noteworthy.

Scope of Covered Transactions

  • Although there is some ambiguity due to the structure of the Chinese text, it appears that the requirement that a transaction result in "actual control" of a Chinese enterprise applies only to the second category of covered transactions. Under this reading, any foreign investment in Chinese enterprises with close physical proximity or operational links to defense will be subject to review under the first category, while projects under the broader second category would only trigger review if they result in "actual control" by foreign investors.
  • The focus on actual control in the second category is generally consistent with United States practice. "Control" may result from majority ownership or "actual" control, which would involve power to control various fundamental business operations or decisions of the enterprise.
  • Not all foreign investments in the second category that result in control of a domestic enterprise would, fall within the scope of the Notice. The language limits the scope of that category to transactions involving enterprises engaged in "important" sectors and ones involving "key" technology or "major" equipment. These qualifiers are both broad and undefined, however, and absent further clarification, it appears that a notice must be filed in order for an investor to learn whether a specific investment merits review. (For example, an investor in the agricultural sector has no guidance as to whether its investment happens to involve "important" agricultural products).
  • Transactions are subject to review regardless of the amount of the investment. There is no minimum threshold amount, below which transactions are not subject to review if they otherwise fall within the Notice's scope.
  • Physical proximity of a target enterprise to sensitive military installations will subject a transaction to review, regardless of the business in which the enterprise engages. This language is clearly inspired by recent decisions in Australia and the United States that effectively blocked proposed Chinese investments in mining companies that turned out to be proximate to military facilities28.
  • As noted above, it remains to be clarified as to whether the Notice adds to prior rules a third covered transaction scenario involving the use of existing FIEs to acquire assets of and shares in domestic enterprises. The use of existing FIEs as acquisition vehicles has been a common strategy to skirt many formal approval procedures for foreign direct investment.
  • It does not appear that "greenfield" foreign investments - ones not involving the acquisition of "control" of a existing Chinese enterprise - are covered by the Notice.
  • "Actual" control may result from the acquisition by "several foreign investors" of more than 50% of a target enterprise, even if those investors are unrelated and their actions are not coordinated. (It is not clear what happens if "several foreign investors" acquire a significant, but not majority, stake in a the target. Presumably, the Committee may find control in those circumstances as well, at least if the investors are individually or collectively able to "materially influence" key actions of the enterprise.)
  • No guidance is provided about the role of typical minority shareholder protection provisions in determining whether "actual control" exists.
  • No guidance is provided about how convertible shares or lending transactions will be treated for purposes of determining "control."

Review Standards

  • Section II of the Notice enunciates four substantive standards by which the Committee will review covered transactions. As in the United States and elsewhere, the concept of "national security" is not defined, and one should assume it will be interpreted broadly. Also like CFIUS, the Committee is directed to assess the impact of the investment on "critical technologies." CFIUS rules specifically define "critical technologies;" perhaps the Committee will issues rules or guidance as well on this point.
  • Section II widens the scope of reviews well beyond national security by subjecting them to a test of their impacts on China's "economic stability" and "social order." There is no comparable test in the United States, but Canada and Australia, for example, both broadly take into account economic and social considerations in their foreign investment reviews29.
  • It is not clear whether Article 12 of the 2006 M&A Rules has survived the enactment of Article 31 of the AML, or whether the concept of protecting "famous brands" in Article 12 is now encompassed within the four standards laid out in the Notice.

Procedures

  • The function of the initial five-day review by MOFCOM is not clear. For example, perhaps MOFCOM will determine the adequacy of notices before sending them to the Committee, or determine whether some transactions reported by parties do not merit national security review.
  • It is apparent that competitors and other private sector parties may encourage reviews by the Committee.
  • The Notice sets a timeline for reviews by the Committee that parallels the 90-day timeline governing the CFIUS process, including the initial 30-day review to determine whether a more in-depth review is warranted. As with CFIUS, the deadlines effectively may be extended by withdrawals from the reviews by the parties, followed by a refilling. Ambiguity in the language suggests that reviews may extend up to 95 days, depending on when the second-stage special review is commenced.
  • While the Notice requests the related departments and units to guard state secrets and commercial secrets, there is no explicit protection for the confidentiality of information submitted by parties in the course of the review30.
  • The Notice does not provide for direct participation in the review by the parties.

Interaction with General Foreign Investment Regime

  • China's general foreign direct investment approval system has been progressively decentralized in recent years, with provincial and local authorities receiving greater authority to approve larger projects in more industries without central government involvement. The new national security review system channels certain transactions to the central government for review (much like antitrust review under the AML).
  • The interaction between the general foreign direct investment approval procedures and the national security review process remains uncertain. For example, it is unclear whether provincial or local approval authorities will suspend their reviews or withhold their decisions pending the outcome of the national security review process.

While the Notice leaves open many questions about the scope and impact of Chinese national security reviews to be addressed through future rulemaking and enforcement activity, it provides foreign investors with valuable guidance on the basic principles and procedures for national security review of future investments in China. Meanwhile, investors will need to examine closely the potential application of the Notice to their proposed transactions and be prepared to navigate the new review process as an added regulatory approval.

Footnotes

1. Guowuyuan Ban'gongting Guanyu Jianli Waiguo Touzizhe Binggou Jingnei Qiye Anquan Shencha Zhidu de Tongzhi [Notice of the General Office of the State Council on Establishing the Security Review Mechanism for Merger with and Acquisition of Domestic Enterprise by Foreign Investors] (the Notice), issued by the General Office of the State Council on Feb. 3, 2011, available at http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2011-02/12/content_1802467.htm.

2. Guanyu Waiguo Touzizhe Binggou Jingnei Qiye De Guiding [Rules for M&A of Domestic Enterprise by Foreign Investors], issued by the Ministry of Commerce, Commission of the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration, the State Administration of Taxation, the State Administration for Industry and Commerce, China Securities Regulatory Commission, and State Administration of Foreign Exchange on August 8 , 2006, and amended by the Ministry of Commerce on June 22, 2009, available at http://www.mofcom.gov.cn/aarticle/b/c/200907/20090706416939.html?3808473952=906731732.

3. See 2006 M&A Rules, art. 12.

4. See See Xizhu Zhang and Vanessa Yanhua Zhang, The Antimonopoly Law in China: Where do we stand?, COMPETITION POLICY INTERNATIONAL, Autumn 2007, 185, at 193; Carlye Fails to Secure Stake in China Firm, ASIA WALL STREET JOURNAL, Jul. 23, 2008.

5. Zhonghua Renmin Gongheguo Fanlongduan Fa [Antimonopoly Law of the People's Republic of China] (promulgated by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress on Aug. 30, 2007 and effective on Aug. 1, 2008), available at http://www.gov.cn/flfg/2007-08/30/content_732591.htm.

6. See Zhengguo Wu, Perspectives on the Chinese Antimonopoly Law, 75 ANTITRUST L. J. 73, 101 (2008). See generally, 50 App. U.S.C.A. § 2170 (2007).

7. Guojia Fazhan He Gaige Weiyuanhui Zhuyao Zhize Neishe Jigou He Renyuan Bianzhi Guiding [Rules on the Responsibility, Internal Organization and Staff System of the National Development and Reform Commission], issued by the National Development and Reform Commission on August 25, 2008, available at http://zfxxgk.ndrc.gov.cn/PublicItemView.aspx?ItemID={2050a9f4-cd8e-41de-836e-e2ea2a9950d5}

8. Section I.1 of the Notice

9. Id.

10. (iii)(b) was not covered by the scope of transactions under the 2006 M&A Rules; the wording of (iii)(a) was included in the 2006 M&A Rules but is widely interpreted to exclude the use of existing (as opposed to newly established) FIEs as asset acquisition vehicles from the scope of the 2006 M&A Rules. It is not clear if the use of existing FIEs as asset acquisition vehicles is captured under (iii)(a) of the Notice.

11.Section I.2 of the Notice

12. See Section I.3 of the Notice

13. See Section V.5 of the Notice

14. See Section III.1 of the Notice.

15. See Section III.2 of the Notice.

16. See Section III.3 of the Notice.

17. See Section II of the Notice.

18. See Section IV.1 of the Notice.

19. See Section IV.2 of the Notice.

20. See Section IV.3 of the Notice.

21. Id.

22. Id.

23. See Section IV.5 of the Notice.

24. See Section IV.3 of the Notice.

25. See Section IV.4 of the Notice.

26. See Section V. 2& V.3 of the Notice.

27. See Section V.4 of the Notice.

28. See OMM Client Alert, "Location, Location, Location: Observations on CFIUS Opposition to Investment by Chinese Mining Company in Firstgold Corporation," (Jan. 7, 2010), available at http://www.omm.com/newsroom/publication.aspx?pub=911.

29. See "Minister of Industry Confirms Notice Sent to BHP Billiton Regarding Proposed Acquisition of Potash Corporation," http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/ic1.nsf/eng/06031.html; "Australia Blocked China Rare Earth Deal on Supply Concerns," http://news.businessweek.com/article.asp?documentKey=1377-aOMenaxK5ti0-00EQIQA8VNOGJ8PR9RO9HI6HLS

30. See Section V.1 of the Notice.

O'Melveny & Myers LLP routinely provides advice to clients on complex transactions in which these issues may arise, including finance, mergers and acquisitions, and licensing arrangements. If you have any questions about the operation of the applicable statutory provisions or the case law interpreting these provisions, please contact any of the attorneys listed on this alert.

www.omm.com

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions