China: China Steps Up Antitrust Capacity Building - Cartels a Focus

Last Updated: 20 July 2010

Article by Hannah C. L. Ha , John M. Hickin and Gerry P. O'Brien

Originally published 20 July 2010

Keywords: China, antitrust, cartels, merger control, anti-monopoly law

A casual observer of China's competition law regime could be excused for assuming that antitrust-related enforcement has been scaled back in the lead up to the second anniversary of the commencement of the Anti-Monopoly Law (AML), given the absence of significant new merger control decisions and the continued paucity of AML conduct rule cases.

Indeed, it is now ten months since China's Ministry of Commerce (Mofcom) imposed any constraints on deals reviewed under the AML merger control regime. Further, no AML private action decisions or significant enforcement initiatives relating to the AML conduct rules have been reported during 2010.

The truth, however, is that the Chinese authorities are actually stepping up their antitrust enforcement efforts, as well as their initiatives aimed at preparing for even more vigorous application of competition laws in the near future. In particular, considerable efforts are being directed at strengthening regulatory enforcement powers in relation to price-fixing cartels. Further, while the authorities continue to piece together the AML enforcement framework, pre-existing laws (such as the 1997 Price Law) are being used to crack down on cartel behaviour in politically sensitive industry sectors.

Meanwhile, Mofcom is continuing to develop its merger control framework and authority. New guidelines were recently published to provide guidance on the procedures for divestments that may occur as a condition of deal approvals, amid signs that the Ministry is having increasing success in making domestic Chinese businesses submit to the regime. These developments may be seen as heightening the likelihood that Mofcom will begin actively penalising non-compliance with the regime's mandatory notification requirements in the months ahead.

In this update bulletin, we summarise each of the developments mentioned above, and further explain their significance for the business sector.

New Anti-Cartel Enforcement Initiatives and Framework

It is generally agreed that cartels are very prevalent in the Chinese economy. Although China has had laws which can be used to tackle cartels since long before the AML was introduced, application of those laws has been very limited - and the continued paucity of specific AML-related enforcement action means that the risk level for price-fixing and market-sharing arrangements in China did not change significantly in recent years.

However, developments over the last few months have begun to alter the risk analysis for cartels in China. In particular, politically sensitive sectors such as agriculture have come under increasing scrutiny, with the Chinese government keen to address concerns amongst the general populace about rising food prices and price manipulation practices (particularly following a series of recent natural disasters in Chinese provinces heavily involved in agricultural production).

The concerted focus on this sector by the regulatory body with primary responsibility for enforcing price-related antitrust laws in China, the NDRC, is not surprising - as this body is also charged with protecting of the stability of market prices in key China markets.

There are several recent examples of the NDRC's more active enforcement in this sector.

As we reported in an earlier bulletin, the NDRC announced in June that significant fines have been imposed on a group of rice noodle manufacturers in Guangxi province, due to their involvement in a joint action to increase prices in the region.

More recently, on 1 July, four further enforcement actions were jointly announced by the NDRC, Mofcom and SAIC - also focused on food sectors. As with the Guangxi rice noodle case, all four enforcement actions were taken under the authority of the pre-AML laws (mainly the Price Law).

Perhaps the most significant of the most recent cases involved the Jilin Corn Centre Wholesale Company ("Jilin Corn Centre"), a large Chinese mung bean producer. Jilin Corn Centre was fined RMB1,000,000 (approx. US$147,000) by local price bureaus that are effectively supervised by the NDRC, after it was found to have been the 'ringleader' for serious price-fixing behaviour and the fabrication and spreading of price-hike information in relation to mung beans. Several other co-conspiring enterprises were each fined RMB500,000 (approx. US$73,000), and a large number of further competitors across 16 provinces in China received warnings about their behaviour.

The case related to a conference concerning the mung bean production situation in China that was held in October 2009, during which it is alleged that steps were taken to spread false information regarding production output and to coordinate future pricing activities in the sector.

One of the three other cases announced by the NDRC also concerned collusion in relation to the production and sale of mung beans, while the other two cases concerned garlic production and sales. The fines imposed in these cases ranged from RMB 20,000 (approx. US$3,000) to RMB 100,000 (approx US$15,000).

The NDRC is clearly anticipating that anti-cartel work will keep it busy in the months ahead, as it has also now announced its intention to set up a new team within its existing Price Supervision and Inspection Department, which team will be specifically dedicated to pre-related anti-monopoly enforcement and market price supervision.

In addition to its new resources in this area, the NDRC may soon benefit from stronger enforcement powers. The Chinese authorities have published new draft Special Provisions on the Punishment of Price Violation Conducts During Market Price Unusual Fluctuation Periods ("Special Provisions") which amongst other things empower regulatory bodies like the NDRC to fine cartel participants 5 times the amount of any illegal gain they obtain from their unlawful collusion behaviour, and suspend or revoke the operating licenses of those businesses. The draft Special Provisions also provide the NDRC with the power to impose similar penalties on businesses that fabricate and spread information on price increases to the extent that such practices "disrupt the market price order".

Although this is not stated with precision in the draft Special Provisions, it appears these powers are primarily intended to be utilised in circumstances where unusual fluctuations are identified in respect of the market price for major merchandise (including services), which may have significant impact on people's life and the operation of enterprises. As such, they are likely to be applied to address cartel behaviour not only in the agricultural sector, but also in other markets relating to key business inputs and basic resources or services.

It also appears that the draft Special Provisions may be applied in conjunction with the AML, so that cartel participants would also face the prospect of fines up to 10% of business turnover under that law in addition to the 'illegal gain' penalties that may be imposed under the draft Special Provisions.

Mofcom's New Divestment Procedures

Earlier this month, Mofcom published guidelines relating to the way in which divestitures must occur when divestment is a condition of Mofcom's approval of a deal under the AML merger control regime.

The guidelines largely reflect processes which are already in effect, and which have most recently been applied by Mofcom to require Pfizer to divest parts of its business relating to the production and sale of several types of animal health vaccines, pharmaceuticals and medicinal feed additives as a condition of approval for its $68 billion acquisition of Wyeth. That divestment proceeded in June, with China's Harbin Pharmaceutical Group being the successful purchaser.

Amongst other things, the guidelines make it clear that:

  • Companies who are required to make divestments under the AML merger regime may be held to strict timelines (for example, transfers must ordinarily occur within 3 months from the execution of the relevant sales agreement); and
  • Mofcom may appoint independent trustees to oversee divestment procedures, largely replicating arrangements that may be instituted in other mature antitrust jurisdictions such as Europe. A divestment trustee may also be empowered to sell relevant company assets if that company itself fails to proceed with a Mofcom divestment order in accordance with the stipulated timeframes.

Contrary to recent Mofcom practice, a public consultation process was not held in relation to the guidelines before they were finalised and published. Instead, the guidelines came into effect on the day of the first publication (5 July).

The 'fast tracking' of the guidelines probably reflects the fact that they are viewed as unlikely to raise significant controversy (although some observers remain uneasy about the fact that Mofcom publicly releases deadlines for the making of divestments - which practice could be argued to undermine the negotiation position of the company forced to make that divestment), and may also indicate that Mofcom is keen to hasten the advancement of its broader enforcement framework.

That framework is now quite well developed, with over a dozen implementing regulations, rules and guidelines now published in final or interim draft form.

Complimenting this progress, there are signs that Mofcom is also encountering more success in its efforts to ensure that relevant domestic Chinese deals submit to the AML merger review process. This has previously been a sticking point in the development of the AML regime, with several high profile deals between State Owned Enterprises in China having closed without competition review by Mofcom notwithstanding that those deals clearly triggered the AML's mandatory notification and Mofcom's pre-approval requirements.

Domestic avoidance of the AML merger control regime is likely to have been a significant factor in Mofcom's decision to thus far hold off from penalising foreign firms for non-compliance with the notification provisions. Mofcom has already faced criticism over the fact that all of its conditional approval decisions to date have applied to transactions wholly between foreign multinationals (i.e. InBev/Anheuser Busch, Mitsubishi Rayon/Lucite, Pfizer/Wyeth, GM/Delphi and Sanyo/Panasonic), while the single prohibition decision that has been announced concerned a foreign takeover of a domestic Chinese business (Coca-Cola/Huiyuan), and in this context it may have been reluctant to invite further criticism relating to discriminatory enforcement of the law.

However, with more recent successes in convincing domestic firms to submit to the merger control regime (as has occurred in relation to recent deals in China's aviation and banking sectors), there is an increasing likelihood that Mofcom will feel it can justifiably penalise foreign firms who fail to notify their deals - and any window for avoidance of the regime may therefore have now closed.

Summing Up

As we approach the second anniversary of the AML's commencement, it is clear that the primary bodies charged with enforcing the law (Mofcom, SAIC and NDRC) remain committed to a process of capacity building and are preparing for more vigorous enforcement of antitrust regulation than has previously been witnessed in China. As is common in emerging antitrust regimes, there is a primary focus on domestic cartel-busting, but it can be expected that the initial steps the NDRC is taking in China's agricultural sector will gradually widen to encompass other industries and - before long - foreign business operators.

Accordingly, all business operators with operations in (or sales into) China should be taking steps to ensure they are in compliance with the AML and pre-AML prohibitions relating to horizontal cooperation and agreements. Appropriate business reviews and compliance steps now will mitigate the risk of exposure to potentially massive penalties - including fines which the authorities are now (through instruments such as the draft Special Provisions) taking steps to escalate.

Additionally, foreign business operators should take heed of the news that Mofcom is further strengthening its merger control framework and authority. While inadvertent violations of the broad mandatory notification provisions (which can apply to wholly foreign deals) may previously have gone unpunished, there are signs that Mofcom's forbearance may be unlikely going forward.

Finally, businesses that may be interested in reviewing a full translation of the draft Special Provisions, and contributing to feedback Mayer Brown may provide on that document to the Chinese authorities, are encouraged to contact us via the details provided.

Learn more about our PRC offices and Antitrust & Competition practice.

Visit us at www.mayerbrownjsm.com

Copyright 2010. JSM, Mayer Brown International LLP and/or Mayer Brown LLP. All rights reserved. Mayer Brown is a global legal services organization comprising legal practices that are separate entities ("Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: JSM, a Hong Kong partnership, and its associated entities in Asia; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales; and Mayer Brown LLP, a limited liability partnership established in the United States. The Mayer Brown Practices are known as Mayer Brown JSM in Asia.

This article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein. Please also read the JSM legal publications Disclaimer.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions