China: China Publishes Revised Draft Rules Explaining Key Anti-Monopoly Law Provisions

Last Updated: 2 June 2010

Article by Hannah C. L. Ha , John M. Hickin and Gerry P. O'Brien

Originally published 2 June 2010

Keywords: China, revised draft rules, anti-monopoly law, antitrust regulators, AML, SAIC, draft agreement

China's antitrust regulators have published revised drafts of three implementation rules explaining aspects of the enforcement approach that will be applied to key Anti-Monopoly Law ("AML") 'conduct rule' prohibitions.

Public consultation is continuing in relation to these drafts, and while this process continues it is expected that regulatory enforcement of the conduct rules will remain limited. However, the drafts may impact the approach China's courts take to AML private action cases (which are progressing, notwithstanding the lack of regulatory enforcement) and the latest changes to the drafts reveal new insights into the enforcement approach and methodology that may eventually be adopted by China's Anti-Monopoly Enforcement Authorities.

On 25 May 2010, the Anti-Monopoly and Anti-Unfair Competition Bureau of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce ("SAIC"), published on its website several revised draft rules relating to the AML. Specifically, the revised drafts were:

  • Draft Rules of Administrative Authority for Industry and Commerce on Prohibition of Monopoly Agreements ("Draft Monopoly Agreement Rules"); and
  • Draft Rules of Administrative Authority for Industry and Commerce on Prohibition of Abuse of Dominant Market Position ("Draft Dominance Rules"); and
  • Draft Rules of Administration Authority for Industry and Commerce on Prohibition of Abuse of Administrative Powers to Eliminate and Restrict Competition ("Draft Administrative Monopoly Rules")

Each of the revised draft rules expand on general prohibitions in the AML, and provide some detail about the methodology the Chinese authorities will apply when determining if a business operator (or, in the case of the Draft Administrative Monopoly Rules, a governmental authority) is in breach of those prohibitions. Additionally, the revised Draft Monopoly Agreement Rules and Draft Dominance Rules elaborate on the brief non-exhaustive list of examples of relevant unlawful agreements or activities that is contained in each of the AML Articles establishing the prohibitions, and provide further guidance on the circumstances in which business operators may be able to justify or raise defences for agreements or conduct that would otherwise fall foul of the prohibitions.

A number of the latest refinements to the rules bring them more into line with the enforcement approach taken to analogous prohibitions in mature jurisdictions such as the EU and US. However, the rules (like the AML prohibitions they correspond to) remain open-ended and will be capable of wide interpretation by the Chinese regulators, and thus it remains to be seen how closely the actual enforcement approach taken by the Anti-Monopoly Enforcement Authorities will align with international best practice.

In this legal update, we summarise the key changes the Chinese authorities have made in revising the Draft Monopoly Agreement Rules and Draft Dominance Rules, and provide thoughts on what impact these latest developments may have on the application of China's antitrust regime in the months ahead.

Draft Monopoly Agreement Rules

Our legal update summarising the prior version of the Draft Monopoly Agreement Rules can be found here.

Many of the changes in the latest draft are general refinements and do not appear to signal significant modifications to the enforcement methodology that the Chinese authorities will apply regarding the AML's prohibition of horizontal (i.e. between competitors) and vertical (i.e. between trading partners) monopoly agreements.

However, there are several noteworthy developments.

Firstly, the authorities have removed text that appeared in the previous draft of the rules and which indicated that the prohibition of vertical monopoly agreements could render unlawful certain agreements in which one business operator (i.e. a manufacturer) restricted another business operator (i.e. a distributor) from operating outside a designated geographic market, or from trading with certain other businesses. This is significant, as it suggests China's competition authorities may be reluctant to examine such restraints in vertical arrangements (such as distribution and supply contracts) unless the party imposing the restraint holds a dominant market position - in which case the AML prohibition regarding that matter will apply. Indeed, the Draft Dominance Rules now have more to say on this issue, as explained in the next section of this update. Secondly, there are significant changes to the leniency provisions in the draft rules. Specifically, text in the previous draft which applied tiered penalty discounting to business operators that report participation in a cartel (and provide relevant information to the Chinese authorities about it) has been modified. Now, while the draft rules still provide that a successful and 'first in time' leniency applicant will avoid regulatory penalty under the AML, the extent of penalty discount available to successful 'second in time' and 'third in time' leniency applicants will be at the discretion of the regulators rather than automatically set at 50% and 30% respectively.

Various other substantive changes have been made to the Draft Monthly Agreement Rule, including the removal of provisions expressly prohibiting various acts of bid rigging or tender manipulation (although such conduct may still be covered by more general prohibitions in the AML and the associated draft rules). Additionally, a number of provisions appear to have been removed in order to avoid unnecessary overlap and duplication with other AML-related implementation rules that have been published in draft or final form.

Draft Dominance Rules

Our legal update summarising the prior version of the Draft Dominance Rules can be found here.

The changes made to the latest draft of these rules include expansion of a non-exhaustive list of factors that the AMEAs will consider when assessing whether a business operator enjoys a dominant market position, and inclusion of several new examples of the types of behaviour that may qualify as unlawful 'abuse' conduct by a dominant market player.

For example, Article 17 of the AML prohibits a dominant business operator from imposing unreasonable trading conditions, and previous drafts of the rules contained no indication of the kinds of trading conditions that may be considered "unreasonable" beyond imposition of certain 'product tying' terms.

The revised draft addresses this issue, noting that unreasonable trading conditions may include the imposition of unreasonable restrictions on payment terms, delivery terms, or the manner of service provision, as well as the imposition of terms that are "irrelevant" to the subject of the transaction (which language perhaps raises more questions than it answers). Additionally, the revised draft states that unreasonable trading conditions will include the imposition of unreasonable restrictions on trading partners (presumably, in this context, distributors or retailers) regarding their sales territory, sales targets, and after-sales service in relation to products.

Further, the draft provides new examples of the kinds of evidence that a business operator should submit to overturn the presumption of dominance that will be raised against them if they meet relevant market share thresholds referenced in the AML (such as where the business operator holds a market share exceeding 50%).

Perhaps the most significant improvement to the draft is the inclusion of more detailed guidance on the possible 'defences' to abuse of dominance allegations. Specifically, Article 8 of the Draft Dominance Rules makes references to the various provisions in the AML which specify examples of conduct which will constitute unlawful abuse behaviour if undertaken by dominant firms "without valid justification", and states that the AIC Authority shall consider the following factors when determining if valid justifications do exist:

  • whether relevant activities are engaged in by business operators based on their usual business practice;
  • whether relevant conduct has the consequence of eliminating or restricting competition or impairing the interest of consumers; and
  • the effect of relevant conduct on economic operation efficiency, public interests and economic development.

This is the first useful guidance that has been provided on the issue of valid justifications for relevant behaviour by dominant business operators, and the use of language referring to efficiencies and effect on consumers is encouraging in terms of alignment with the key aims of competition laws in most mature antitrust jurisdictions.


Businesses operating in or selling into China will be grateful for the fact that greater guidance in relation to the AML conduct rules is slowly surfacing, permitting more developed compliance initiatives and staff training. Additionally, it is heartening to see clear improvements to the AML-related implementation rules through ongoing public consultation.

The latest public consultation period in relation to the revised draft rules ends on 7 June 2010.

It is hoped that the rules may then be swiftly finalised and adopted to allow for more certainty regarding the manner and methodology of AML enforcement - although to date rapid progress in finalising guidance documents has not been a notable feature of the AML conduct rule regime.

It is expected that regulatory enforcement of the AML conduct rules will remain limited until the rules are finalised, although sporadic enforcement of the various China laws containing competition-related provisions may be expected to continue in this period (as occurred when the several rice noodle manufacturers in Guangxi province where punished for price-fixing activities in March, primarily under the Price Law and Rules of Administrative Sanctions on Illegal Activities Relating to Price).

Additionally, AML-related private action hearings which have proceeded over the past 18 months notwithstanding the lack of regulatory enforcement may continue, and the revised drafts may be taken into account by China's Intermediate Courts when they are applying the law in such cases.

Learn more about our PRC offices and Antitrust & Competition practice.

Visit us at

Copyright 2010. JSM, Mayer Brown International LLP and/or Mayer Brown LLP. All rights reserved. Mayer Brown is a global legal services organization comprising legal practices that are separate entities ("Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: JSM, a Hong Kong partnership, and its associated entities in Asia; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales; and Mayer Brown LLP, a limited liability partnership established in the United States. The Mayer Brown Practices are known as Mayer Brown JSM in Asia.

This article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein. Please also read the JSM legal publications Disclaimer.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions