China: Definition of State Secret Narrowed: Causes Unease by Requiring Internet Informers

PRC Law on State Secrets Amended
Last Updated: 18 May 2010
Article by Nicolas Groffman and Joseph Wang

Hot on the heels of SASAC's rules on commercial secrets, China has amended the PRC Law on State Secrets, a much more significant piece of legislation. It was issued by the national legislator, the Standing Committee of National People's Congress. The new version of the law will take effect on 1 October 2010.

The Amendments, announced on 29 April, 2010, attempt to reinforce protection of state secrets on the one hand and claim to balance citizen's rights to access information on the other. The definition of state secrets has been narrowed considerably from the all-encompassing scope that formed the basis of this law since 1988, which is cheering news for those of us who deal with this issue frequently. Indeed, the national government clearly wants to reassure ordinary Chinese that access to information is a recognised right, and has said so in much of its public commentary on this law.

Less cheering news is that the redrafted law requires internet and telecommunications companies to inform on users who share 'state secrets' which will cause a headache for foreign-invested telecoms companies in China.

Again, this legislation is clearly influenced by the Stern Hu case, in particular by the initial allegation, which was later withdrawn, that Rio Tinto workers had stolen state secrets. What, the international and Chinese business and legal communities asked, is a state secret?

Revised definition

This old definition simply provided, in Article 2, that a state secret is a "matter that has a vital bearing on state security and national interests and, as specified by legal procedure, is entrusted to a limited number of people for a given period of time."

The revised law has not changed this clause (other than a minor syntactical change), but it has added more wording into Article 9, to provide that to be a state secret, the matter concerned must be "information concerning state security and national interests which, if leaked, would damage state security and interests in the areas of politics, economics and national defence."

In our view, this narrows the scope of application significantly, which is a positive sign.

Local authorities can no longer decide that their information is a state secret

As mentioned above, unlike the previous law, the revised version provides that only central State Secret Administration (SSA) and the SSA above county-level have the authority to administrate state secret affairs.

This is part of an attempt to address the concerns of ordinary Chinese, that local-level governments had been using 'state secrecy' as an excuse to cover upevidence of their own wrongdoing. This particular loophole has been closed by allowing only city-level governments to determine the scope of secrecy.

Indeed, much of the state media coverage deals with people's "right to information", and how the law will seek to prevent unnecessary restrictions on this right.

Classification levels

Under the Amendments, central SS, provincial SS and authorities or unit authorized by them have the power to determine the classification level:

  • topsecret (the highest level, with the toughest penalties attached to it)
  • secret (the second level)
  • confidential (the lowest and least secure level).

The SSA at city level can determinate the scope of state secrets - but not "topsecret". The power and scope of authorization should be determined by the central SSA.

Powers of the SSA

The Amendments also expressly grant the SSA the following powers:

  • to carry out protection education, protection check, technology protection, and case investigation, guidance and supervision relating to state secret;
  • to notify relevant authorities and units who improperly determine, change the scope of state secret, or improperly disclose state secrets, to make correction;
  • to order relevant authorities and units to take measures or make corrections within a fixed period if there is any potential leaks of state secrets or suggest relevant authorities and units to dismiss employees seriously violating state secret measures or to carry out an investigation in the event of any leaks of state secrets; and
  • to confiscate any state secret media which are illegally acquired or held.

Minimizing staff with access to secrets

As in any good confidentiality agreement, the Amendments require staff with access to state secrets to be kept at a minimum level. In the case of personnel outside the original agreed scope that need access to the information, approval from the SSA must be obtained.

A letter of undertaking should be signed by staff with access to state secrets, and such staff must not accept a job opportunity 'in violation of the state secret measures.'

Must be marked 'secret'

The state secret symbol must be marked out in the paper media, optical media or electromagnetic media containing state secrets.

Internet service providers' obligations

Under section 28, internet service providers and telecommunication service providers are required to cooperate with the SSA, national security authority and the public security authority in case investigation, to immediately cease transmitting information involving state secrets, keeprecords for them and report to the abovementioned authorities, or delete leaking state secret information at the request of the above authorities.

Hot on the heels of SASAC's rules on commercial secrets, China has amended the PRC Law on State Secrets, a much more significant piece of legislation. It was issued by the national legislator, the Standing Committee of National People's Congress. The new version of the law will take effect on 1 October 2010.

The Amendments, announced on 29 April, 2010, attempt to reinforce protection of state secrets on the one hand and claim to balance citizen's rights to access information on the other. The definition of state secrets has been narrowed considerably from the all-encompassing scope that formed the basis of this law since 1988, which is cheering news for those of us who deal with this issue frequently. Indeed, the national government clearly wants to reassure ordinary Chinese that access to information is a recognised right, and has said so in much of its public commentary on this law.

Less cheering news is that the redrafted law requires internet and telecommunications companies to inform on users who share 'state secrets', which will cause a headache for foreign-invested telecoms companies in China.

Again, this legislation is clearly influenced by the Stern Hu case, in particular by the initial allegation, which was later withdrawn, that Rio Tinto workers had stolen state secrets. What, the international and Chinese business and legal communities asked, is a state secret?

Revised definition

This old definition simply provided, in Article 2, that a state secret is a "matter that has a vital bearing on state security and national interests and, as specified by legal procedure, is entrusted to a limited number of people for a given period of time."

The revised law has not changed this clause (other than a minor syntactical change), but it has added more wording into Article 9, to provide that to be a state secret, the matter concerned must be "information concerning state security and national interests which, if leaked, would damage state security and interests in the areas of politics, economics and national defence."

In our view, this narrows the scope of application significantly, which is a positive sign.

Local authorities can no longer decide that their information is a state secret

As mentioned above, unlike the previous law, the revised version provides that only central State Secret Administration (SSA) and the SSA above county-level have the authority to administrate state secret affairs.

This is part of an attempt to address the concerns of ordinary Chinese, that local-level governments had been using 'state secrecy' as an excuse to cover upevidence of their own wrongdoing. This particular loophole has been closed by allowing only city-level governments to determine the scope of secrecy.

Indeed, much of the state media coverage deals with people's "right to information", and how the law will seek to prevent unnecessary restrictions on this right.

Classification levels

Under the Amendments, central SS, provincial SS and authorities or unit authorized by them have the power to determine the classification level:

  • topsecret (the highest level, with the toughest penalties attached to it)
  • secret (the second level)
  • confidential (the lowest and least secure level).

The SSA at city level can determinate the scope of state secrets - but not "topsecret". The power and scope of authorization should be determined by the central SSA.

Powers of the SSA

The Amendments also expressly grant the SSA the following powers:

  • to carry out protection education, protection check, technology protection, and case investigation, guidance and supervision relating to state secret;
  • to notify relevant authorities and units who improperly determine, change the scope of state secret, or improperly disclose state secrets, to make correction;
  • to order relevant authorities and units to take measures or make corrections within a fixed period if there is any potential leaks of state secrets or suggest relevant authorities and units to dismiss employees seriously violating state secret measures or to carry out an investigation in the event of any leaks of state secrets; and
  • to confiscate any state secret media which are illegally acquired or held.

Minimizing staff with access to secrets

As in any good confidentiality agreement, the Amendments require staff with access to state secrets to be kept at a minimum level. In the case of personnel outside the original agreed scope that need access to the information, approval from the SSA must be obtained.

A letter of undertaking should be signed by staff with access to state secrets, and such staff must not accept a job opportunity 'in violation of the state secret measures.'

Must be marked 'secret'

The state secret symbol must be marked out in the paper media, optical media or electromagnetic media containing state secrets.

Internet service providers' obligations

Under section 28, internet service providers and telecommunication service providers are required to cooperate with the SSA, national security authority and the public security authority in case investigation, to immediately cease transmitting information involving state secrets, keeprecords for them and report to the abovementioned authorities, or delete leaking state secret information at the request of the above authorities.

This could also present problems to other types of media that are transmitted via shared channels with the internet.

Providing secret information to foreigners

When state secrets need to be provided in 'foreign cooperation', an approval from provincial SSA or above must be obtained, and a confidentiality agreement should be signed by the parties.

Disclosure period

Under the Amendments, the 'guarding term' of a state secret must be defined. In general, the maximum guarding term of topsecret information is thirty years, and the maximum guarding term of for classified state secret twenty years, and for confidential state secrets, ten years.

The Amendments also provide that a state secret should be declassified if the guarding term expires; whether it is no longer considered as national state secret or if it's declassified would not undermine national security interest.

Liability

In addition to criminal sanctions, a unit or staff violating the Amendments will be subject to administrative penalty, and where such penalty is inapplicable, subject to disciplinary actions. Internet service providers and telecommunication service providers will also be subject to sanctions by Ministry of Information and Industry Technology.

Conclusion

State secrets have a clearer definition in the amended law (although still very broad). Part of the Chinese government's publicity campaign surrounding the legislation this week has focussed on citizens' obligations, as well as their rights. For example, with a Xinhua cartoon showing an office worker telling her gormless colleague not to connect a computer marked "secret" to the internet. However, the government is also, seemingly for the first time, attempting to strike a balance between the need for freedom of information and the need to maintain security.

It is very unlikely that the underlying mentality of the Chinese government, which is often to assume secrecy by default, will change overnight. And the provisions in this new law regarding obligations of internet service providers might cause concern for international investors in this sector. Not only might they cause concerns for international investors in this sector, but they might motivate domestic carriers to make more effort to regulate the flow of information over the internet, for fear of missing the transmission of a state secret. Arguably, they have this obligation already under existing rules, but the revised law might increase their vigilance.

Disclaimer

The views set out in this publication are based on our experience as international counsel representing clients in their business activities in China. As is the case for all international law firms licensed in China, we are authorised to provide information concerning the effect of the Chinese legal environment. However we are not admitted to practice Chinese law and so are unable to issue opinions on matters of Chinese law. The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions