The Companies Law (as amended) (the "Law") applies only to companies formed and registered under the Law1. Accordingly, only those companies may be wound up in the Cayman Islands. There is no provision akin to Part V of the UK Insolvency Act 1986 (UK) under which the English court can wind up unregistered or foreign companies.

The Cayman winding up regimes are found in Part V of the Law.

There are three regimes:

1. voluntary winding up;

2. compulsory winding up; and

3. voluntary winding up subject to Grand Court supervision.


Voluntary winding up

The date of commencement of the relevant winding up is a key factor in the setting aside of a Cayman Islands charge.

A voluntary winding up is taken to have commenced2 at the time when either:

1. a special resolution (being greater than a two thirds majority or such greater number as may be specified in the articles) is passed by the company in general meeting; or

2. when the period fixed for its duration expires or the event specified in the company's articles occurs the occurrence of which it is provided by the articles that the company is to be dissolved and the company in general meeting passes an ordinary resolution (being by way of a simple majority) requiring its voluntary winding up; or

3. in the context of a Limited Duration Company when3:

(a) the period fixed for the duration of the company expires;

(b) if the members pass a special resolution that the company be wound up voluntarily;

(c) subject to any contrary provision in the memorandum or articles of the company, on the expiry of a period of 90 days or starting on:

(i) the death, insanity, bankruptcy, dissolution, withdrawal, retirement or resignation of a member of the company;

(ii) the redemption, repurchase or cancellation of all the shares of a member of the company; or

(iii) the occurrence of any event which, under the memorandum or articles of the company, terminates the membership of a member of the company

unless there remain at least two members of the company and the company is continued in existence by the unanimous written resolution of those members pursuant to amended articles of association adopted during that 90 day period.

Compulsory winding-up

When a compulsory winding-up order is made, the liquidation is deemed to have commenced at the date of presentation of the petition4.


There are no specific provisions in the Law which would apply to invalidate a charge when a company is placed into voluntary liquidation. However, the Law provides that upon the appointment of liquidators to a company, all the powers of the directors shall cease, except insofar as the company, by resolution of its members or liquidators, may sanction the continuance of such powers.

The position is different where a company is wound up by the court or under the supervision of the Court. Any disposition of the company's property, effects and things in action, or any transfer of shares or alteration in the status of members of the company during the period between presentation of the petition and the making of the winding up order is void, unless the Grand Court orders otherwise5.

Should a secured lender execute a security after the commencement of the winding-up by a court or subject to the supervision of the court, that security is liable to be set aside by the Grand Court. Therefore, prior to taking any security, a secured lender should make certain that no winding up petition has been issued at the Grand Court. A secured lender should also ensure that an appropriate special resolution placing the company into voluntary liquidation has not been passed by the members in general meeting, and, in respect of a limited duration company, that a triggering event has not occurred: a security executed by the directors of the company after a voluntary winding up had been commenced, without the consent of the liquidators or the members of the company, would not be enforceable.


Both Official and Voluntary Liquidators have the power to apply to the Grand Court for an order that any security be set aside on the basis that its intention was fraudulently to prefer that creditor over others6. Any security granted by the debtor company within six months prior to the commencement of the winding-up may be challenged if the liquidator can prove that the dominant intention of the company was to give that creditor a preference for his debt over others. Case law suggests that the burden of proof, which falls upon the liquidator, is a heavy one.

It is unlikely that a bank in consideration of it agreeing to continue to support a company financially would be held to have fraudulently preferred itself if, in consideration for providing that further support, the bank had obtained security for its historic lending.


Under the Fraudulent Dispositions Law (as amended) any disposition of a company's property at an undervalue with an intent to defraud a creditor is voidable at the instance of a creditor thereby prejudiced.

"Undervalue"7 is defined as:

1. provision of no consideration for the disposition; or

2. a consideration for the disposition the value of which in money or money's worth is significantly less than the value of the property the subject of the disposition.

"Disposition" is defined by reference to the Trusts Law (as amended) as "every form of conveyance, transfer, assignment, lease, mortgage, pledge or other transaction by which any legal or equitable interest in property is created, transferred or extinguished"8.

If a court finds that there has been a disposition of the company's property at an undervalue with an intention to defraud creditors it will set aside that disposition only to the extent necessary to satisfy the obligation to a creditor at whose instance the disposition has been set aside together with such costs as the Court may allow. Accordingly, a lender must make sure that he is providing good consideration for the security interest. If it does not, it risks its security coming under attack at the instance of other creditors. Before a disposition will be set aside the Grand Court must be satisfied that there was an element of bad faith in the transaction. Any application under the Fraudulent Dispositions Law must be commenced within six years of the date of the relevant disposition.


The onset of a winding-up will affect a company's ability to grant a valid security interest over its assets and the cautious lender should make sure that no formal steps have been taken by the company or any third party to commence the company's winding up. In respect of a compulsory winding-up petition or a petition to place a company in voluntary liquidation subject to the supervision of the Grand Court, a search of the court records will show whether there is a pending petition. In respect of a voluntary liquidation warranties from the directors and examination of the directors' and shareholders' minute books should show whether the company has commenced a voluntary winding up. Security will not be set aside either as a fraudulent preference or as a fraudulent disposition unless it can be shown that the company acted in bad faith in granting the security to the lender.


1. S.2 Companies Law, definition of "company"; see also In the Matter of Dyoll Insurance Company Ltd, unreported judgment of the Grand Court, 9 May 2005.

2. s.133 Companies Law

3. s.200 Companies Law

4. s.98 Companies Law

5. s.156 Companies Law

6. s.168 Companies Law

7. s.2 Fraudulent Dispositions Law, definition of "disposition"

8. s.87 Trusts Law

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.