Cayman Islands: The Duty Of Full And Frank Disclosure: Zeller V British Caymanian Insurance Co Ltd

Last Updated: 10 July 2008
Article by Appleby  


The issue in Zeller v British Caymanian Insurance Co Ltd1 was whether a material non-disclosure had been made by an insured in completing a proposal form relating to the relevant insurance cover. As discussed in a previous article dated 27 October 2005, the majority of the Court of Appeal of the Cayman Islands had found in favour of the insurer, holding that it was entitled to avoid the policy as a consequence. In a judgment which marks a triumph for the "consumerist" approach to issues of non-disclosure, the Privy Council has now overturned the Court of Appeal's decision. The judgment of the Privy Council represents one of the leading decisions in the offshore and other common law jurisdictions dealing with the application of the duty of full and frank disclosure, and in particular the duties owed by a prospective insured in completing a proposal form for insurance cover.

The facts of the case are set out in more detail in the article dated 27 October 2005.

The Duty of Full and Frank Disclosure (October 2005)

The Court of Appeal's Decision

The Cayman Court of Appeal was divided in its decision. It was possible to discern a tension between the more traditional approach adopted by the majority of the Court of Appeal (per Forte JA and Zacca P) and the more modern, "consumerist" approach adopted by Taylor JA in his dissenting judgment, which followed the approach advocated by the English Court of Appeal (per Simon Brown LJ) in Economides v Commercial Assurance Co Plc.2

The majority of the Court of Appeal had dismissed Mr Zeller's appeal against the judgment at first instance, finding that Mr Zeller had made a material non-disclosure in completing the proposal form relating to his health insurance cover. Mr Zeller had failed to disclose in the proposal form the fact that he suffered from a heart murmur and high cholesterol levels. The majority of the Court of Appeal held that Mr Zeller could not truthfully have said that he did not know that he had been diagnosed with these conditions as a result of his previous physical examinations. Forte JA held that a reasonable person acting in the utmost good faith would have disclosed this information, and it was irrelevant whether Mr Zeller believed these were diseases or illnesses.

In a strong dissenting judgment, Taylor JA considered that the question of whether the proposal form called for disclosure of the conditions turned on whether these would have appeared to a reasonable person in Mr Zeller's position to be matters to which the proposal form was addressed. Taylor JA held that elevated cholesterol levels and a heart murmur would not be regarded by an ordinary applicant in Mr Zeller's position as amounting to a sickness, illness or disease from which he had been diagnosed as suffering. Taylor JA concluded that the conditions were not covered by any of the questions posed and found that the insurer had waived the disclosure of the conditions as a consequence.

The Decision of the Privy Council

The Privy Council allowed Mr Zeller's appeal, agreeing with the dissenting judgment of Taylor JA and holding that the insurer's avoidance of the policy was invalid.

Delivering the Privy Council's judgment, Lord Bingham noted that Mr Zeller had in signing the proposal form expressly stated that his answers were true to the best of his knowledge and belief, and Lord Bingham held that this statement was the very basis of the contract of insurance. Accordingly, the key question for determination was whether Mr Zeller, if he honestly believed he was answering the questions posed in the proposal form truthfully, had been guilty of any non-disclosure. Lord Bingham held that the insurer was not entitled to avoid the policy in the event of a material fact not being disclosed if the questions posed had been answered fully to the best of Mr Zeller's knowledge and belief. Lord Bingham noted that this approach was entirely consistent with the decision of the English Court of Appeal in Economides, where it was held that the duty of an applicant in such circumstances was one of honesty.

Lord Bingham agreed with Taylor JA's analysis of the questions posed in the proposal form and Mr Zeller's answers to these. Lord Bingham held that the evidence clearly established that, leaving aside some minor ailments (which he was not required to disclose) and his thyroid condition (which had been disclosed), Mr Zeller believed himself to have been in excellent health. On the basis that Mr Zeller genuinely did not know, and honestly did not believe, that his heart murmur and raised cholesterol levels amounted to a departure from good health, Lord Bingham held that Mr Zeller was not required to disclose these conditions. Mr Zeller was, therefore, found to have answered the insurer's questions completely and correctly to the best of his knowledge and belief, and as a consequence the insurer was not entitled to avoid the policy.


This decision ultimately turned on the construction of the proposal form and the particular questions posed by Mr Zeller's insurer. In assessing the answers given to such questions, the Privy Council expressly approved the "consumerist" approach advocated by Taylor JA and the English Court of Appeal in Economides, and held that the duty of the applicant insured in such circumstances, at least in non-commercial insurance, is one of honesty. In so holding, the Privy Council's decision brings the law in the Cayman Islands into line with that in England and Wales.

The Privy Council's decision highlights the importance for insurers of ensuring that questions posed in a proposal form are sufficiently precise and comprehensive. There is already existing (albeit limited) Cayman authority applying the contra proferentem rule to consumer contracts of insurance and supporting the proposition that ambiguities in a proposal form should be resolved in the insured's favour.3 The combination of this authority and the Privy Council's decision in Zeller means that the law in this area is now heavily in favour of consumer insureds.

Given that insurers should know precisely what underwriting information they require from proposed insureds and are in a position to be able to draft their proposal forms accordingly, this appears to strike a fair balance between the interests of insurers and insureds.

Given the Privy Council's ruling, insurers writing consumer insurance business in the Cayman Islands (and in other offshore jurisdictions) may want to reconsider the wording of their proposal forms to ensure that these are drafted with sufficient clarity and precision, and will elicit all required underwriting information from proposed insureds.


1 [2008] UKPC 4.

2 [1998] QB 587.

3 See the decision of Harre CJ in Jackson v Cayman Insurance Co. Ltd [1994-95] CILR 313, which was upheld by the Court of Appeal on appeal (see [1994-95] CILR n 19).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions