Cayman Islands: Legal Issues In The Creation of Security - Part 2

Last Updated: 29 June 2008
Most Read Contributor in Cayman Islands, September 2018
This article is part of a series: Click Legal Issues In The Creation of Security - Part 1 for the previous article.

SECURITY OVER FUTURE ASSETS

The common law has always denied the legality of taking security over future assets (ie assets which do not yet exist). At common law, therefore, security over future property by way of a mortgage or a charge is invalid. However, in Holroyd v Marshall37, the House of Lords held that security over future assets is valid in equity by virtue of the contract of assignment. Hence, while it is not possible to have a legal mortgage over future assets, it is possible to take an equitable mortgage or charge over future assets. Security by way of pledge or lien, however, can never be taken over future assets, because there can be no physical delivery of future assets.

Attachment of security to existing assets takes place, when possession passes (pledges and liens), when legal title is conveyed (legal mortgages) or when the security agreement is made or when money is advanced (equitable mortgages and charges). Before Holroyd, however, it was difficult to conceive of when attachment would take place in the case of a security over future assets. In Holroyd, it was decided that security over future assets attaches automatically once the assets are acquired, with no fresh consideration needed.

Once attachment has taken place, the security still takes effect from the date of creation of the security agreement. This means that even though attachment does not happen until the assets are acquired, once they are acquired priority will be governed by the date of the original security agreement.

SECURITY OVER BOOK DEBTS

Security may be taken over a book debt either by a mortgage or a charge. Strictly speaking, the security will be over either the right to payment of the debt or the proceeds of the debt.

Security by legal mortgage

A legal mortgage over a debt is created by a legal assignment. An assignment must be by writing, must not purport to be by way of charge only and must be of the whole debt. The assignee will take subject to equities such as a prior perfected equitable assignment and accrued rights of set off. The assignee does not therefore have the full rights of a bona fide purchaser for value. He will however, after having given express notice in writing to the debtor, be able to sue for the debt in his own name.

Security by equitable mortgage

An equitable mortgage over a debt is created by equitable assignment. Any other equitable assignment can be created informally subject to an act by the assignor manifesting an intention to make a present assignment. Additionally, if the assignment is over future debts, the assignment will only take effect in equity as an agreement to assign and must be supported by consideration.

There is no requirement that notice need be given to the debtor. However, if an equitable mortgagee wishes to convert its security to a legal mortgage, it can do so by giving notice to the debtor. Often, however, an assignee will not wish to give notice for commercial reasons – such as the assignor not wishing the debtor to know about the assignment or the assignee preferring that the assignor continues to collect payment of the debt.

An equitable mortgagee differs from a legal mortgagee in that he cannot sue the debtor without joining the assignor as a party to the proceedings either as plaintiff or defendant.

Security by charge

A mere chargee in respect of a charge over a debt has no right to sue the underlying debtor. He may require the chargor to sue and he will then be entitled to the proceeds of the debt. A charge over receivables should confer on the chargee power to convert it into a mortgage and should therefore contain a power of attorney to the chargee to execute an assignment in the name of the chargor.

Priority

It is possible for a number of people to have taken security over the same debt. The rules as to who takes priority will depend on whether or not the claimants have notice of the security taken before theirs.

1. Claimant has no notice

Between all permutations of legal assignees and equitable assignees, priority is governed by the date notice is given to the debtor, regardless of the time that the assignment was actually made.38 Here, it is only necessary that the second chargee has no notice of the first charge at the time of creation of the second charge. It is irrelevant if he has notice of the first charge at the date he notifies the debtor.39 Where neither party has given notice, the charge created first in time has priority.

The rules as to priority between a legal or equitable assignee and a mere chargee are still unclear. It is possible that it will be governed by the date of notice to the debtor. However, the better view is that priority is governed by the date of creation of the competing interests.

The rules as to priority between two mere chargees are also unclear. It is thought here also that the better view is that the priority will be governed by the date of creation of the charges.

2. Claimant has notice

If a chargee or mortgagee has actual and constructive notice of a prior interest, he will take subject to that prior interest.

3. Freedom of dealing

Where there is a floating charge, priority may be affected by the terms of the charge itself.

If the floating charge permits the debtor to remove debts from the scope of the floating charge, then prior to crystallisation, any assignees of debts will take priority to the chargee.

Often, however, there is a prohibition in the charge on the creation of further charges having priority to a floating charge. Whether a party with a subsequent interest will take subject to this floating charge will then depend on whether they have actual notice.

RECHARACTERISATION OF FIXED AND FLOATING CHARGES

Book debts

Before Spectrum Plus Limited v National Westminster Bank plc40, it had been judicially accepted that, in the right circumstances, a fixed charge may be created over book debts. This comes from Siebe Gorman & Co v Barclays Bank Ltd41. Similar decisions were reached in Re Keenan Bros Ltd42 and in Oakdale (Richmond) Ltd v National Westminster Bank plc43. Siebe Gorman was approved and followed in the Court of Appeal in National Westminster Bank plc v Spectrum Plus Ltd44. Given the rationale employed by the court in Siebe Gorman, the court categorised a charge as floating if the company could use the proceeds of book debts without the consent of the chargee. This logic was used to reach that very result in Re Brightlife Ltd45.

In Re New Bullas Trading Ltd46 the Court of Appeal recognised a third option open to the court in such cases – that is to find that the charge on book debts is, in fact, a divisible one, which can be both fixed and floating. The Court of Appeal were prepared to see two assets (one a debt; the other its proceeds) and so were able to accept that one could be subject to one type of charge and one another. Nourse LJ said that was how the parties had labelled the charges and that the court's interpretation that there were two assets allowed the court to respect the parties' wishes. The approach has been criticised by academics, for example, Goode, Charges Over Book Debts: a Missed Opportunity47 and Gregory and Walton, Book debt charges-the saga goes on.48 However it should be noted that the Court of Appeal's approach in Re New Bullas49 is not without support. For example, Berg describes it as "correct"50.

However in Re Brumark51 the Privy Council reviewed Re New Bullas52. As a result and following that judgment, it seemed less likely that a court would readily accept that, in the circumstances before the court in Re New Bullas, a charge over book debts could be part fixed and part floating just because the parties had labelled it that way. In that decision, Lord Millett held that the New Bullas decision had been wrong and that the charge over book debts, even in their uncollected form, was only a floating charge. What troubled Lord Millett was the fact that there was no control by the bank over the collection of the proceeds and, accordingly, the bank's security interest was 'defeasoble'. The fundamental issue was whether the company intended to continue to receive book debts and use the proceeds of such debts paid into the company's bank account in an unrestricted manner in the carrying on of its business.

Spectrum Plus Limited v. National Westminster Bank plc53

In a landmark decision, the House of Lords have now rejected in principle the validity of a Siebe Gorman type of fixed charge over a company's present and future book debts as usually contained in the standard bank debenture. The company's ability to draw money from the account into which the proceeds of the book debts are paid is inconsistent with the absolute assignment and control required to create a fixed security. The Siebe Gorman type of charge has now clearly been stated to be an equitable charge with the knock on effect that a company can deal with the asset and dispose of it in the ordinary course of business prior to any event of crystallisation.

This decision has put an end to the debate over the validity of a fixed charge over book debts. It is now clearly set out that in order for a bank to claim such a security interest it must have effective control over the proceeds paid into the company's segregated accounts. Clearly, from a commercial perspective, such an arrangement is impractical in that it would severely hamper a company's cash flow. As such, lenders should undertake a thorough review of debentures that purport to give them a fixed charge over book debts. In all likelihood, the security interests are now equitable and defeasible by the company in the ordinary course of business.

QUASI-SECURITY

Quasi-security is a generic term for forms of comfort which do not strictly create security interests. The following types are commonly seen:

  1. guarantees;

  2. set-off;

  3. subordination; and

  4. ring-fencing arrangements.

Guarantee

Under a guarantee, the guarantor guarantees the obligations of one party to a contract to another. Should the contracting party fail to meet his obligations, the guarantor will be required to furnish payment in his stead. This example will use the example of a guarantee of the obligations of a borrower to a lender under a loan agreement.

In principle a guarantee is an accessory contract: that is, it depends on the existence of a primary obligation (for example, that of a borrower). In practice, though, many contracts which are given the title of guarantees are in fact free-standing obligations and include wording specifying that the guarantor's obligations are free-standing principal debtor obligations and will not fall away if the underlying contract fails for any reason.

Under a guarantee, the guarantor may guarantee just the borrower's obligation to make his payments under the loan agreement, or he may undertake responsibility not just for the repayment of the debt but also for performance of all other obligations of the debtor. This will cover any additional liability in damages which the debtor may incur.54

It should be stressed that the lender does not obtain any security as a result of the guarantee. All he has is a personal right against the guarantor should the conditions for payments being required to be made under the guarantee be met.

On the bankruptcy of the principal obligor, however, the lender does not have to deduct anything received from the guarantor from the amount of his proof. This gives some comfort and increases his chances of recovery. The guarantor cannot lodge a proof until the creditor has been paid in full (unless the creditor has unwisely accepted a guarantee for less than the full amount and the guarantor has paid his share).

Upon paying the guaranteed debt in full, the guarantor becomes subrogated to the rights of the lender. Should the lender hold any security over the borrower's assets, the guarantor will succeed to this. He will also usually have an indemnity from the borrower for sums paid under the guarantee.

Set-off

Set-off may broadly be described as the discharge of mutual obligations to the extent of the smaller obligation. The right of set-off falls into a number of classes as set out below. Classes (1) to (3) all apply preinsolvency, and operate in a different fashion from set-off post-insolvency as in class (4). The most relevant of these to a structured finance lawyer are classes (2), (3) and (4).

  1. Legal set-off

    Legal set-off is the set-off of liquidated claims in court proceedings.

  2. Equitable set-off

    Equity extends this right of set-off, most importantly by permitting a claim for unliquidated damages to found a set-off.

  3. Banker's right of set-off

  4. This allows bankers to combine accounts of a single customer so that they can set-off the debt balance on one against the credit balance on another and pay only the difference (unless there is an agreement to keep them separate).

    In order for set-off to operate (and this applies to set-off generally), there must be mutuality between the parties, unless they have made an agreement to the contrary. Essentially, this means that the parties must have contracted with one another (or the bank account must be held) in the same capacities. If, for example, one account is held in a personal capacity, and another is held as trustee for a third party, the bank is not permitted to set one off against the other.

    It was made clear in National Westminster Bank v Halesowen Presswork and Assemblies Ltd55 that there is no requirement on the bank to give notice to or obtain the consent of the other party – where set-off is otherwise permitted – to the set-off.

    In the absence of agreement, a bank is also restricted in that it may not combine a debt presently due to the customer with a debt payable by the customer at a future date. Nor may the bank retain money presently payable to the customer so as to combine accounts at a future date.56

4. Contractual set-off (applicable pre and post insolvency)

a. Generally

Amendments were made to the Companies Law in 1993 so that contractual rights of setoff and netting are given statutory recognition so that lenders are protected in particular in the event of the insolvency or liquidation of a company. Section 112(2) provides that in the course of the winding up of a company:

"the collection in and application of the assets of the company & is without prejudice to and after taking into account and giving effect to the rights of preferred and secured creditors, to any agreement between the company and any creditors that the claims of such creditors shall be subordinated or otherwise deferred to the claims of any other creditors and to any rights of set-off or netting of claims between the company and any persons, whether conferred by agreement or law, and subject to any agreement between the company and any persons to waive or limit the same".

b. Ring fencing arrangement

By using limited recourse wording in contracts, creditors can agree that their recourse is limited to specific pools of assets and will not extend to other pools which may be available to satisfy other creditors or, often in the case of CDOs, to pay amounts owing in respect of preference shares. Segregated portfolio companies can also be used to ringfence separate portfolios of assets to specific creditors.

c. Subordination

Under a subordination agreement, two creditors of the same debtor agree between themselves that the claims of one of them (the "junior creditor") shall rank behind those of the other (the "senior creditor").

FORMALITIES AND REGISTRATIONS

Searching at local registries

There is no central public registry in relation to Cayman Islands companies or charges created by such companies. Each company must, however, maintain a Register of Mortgages and Charges at its registered office in the Cayman Islands. Each Cayman Islands company must maintain a registered office in the Cayman Islands.

Court search

A search of the Cause List and the Register of Writs and Originating Process maintained by the Clerk of Courts Office in Grand Cayman will reveal if there are any court actions pending against the company.

Company incorporated under local law and asset within jurisdiction

Where security is created by a company incorporated in the Cayman Islands and the asset is situated within the Cayman Islands, it is necessary under section 54 of the Companies Law to register any charge created by the company in the Register of Mortgages and Charges of the company. This is a register maintained at the registered office of the company in the Cayman Islands and may be inspected by any member or creditor of the company.

Section 54 provides as follows:

"(1) Every limited company shall keep at its registered office in writing on one or more sheets, whether bound or unbound, a register of all mortgages and charges specifically affecting property of the company, and shall enter in such register in respect of each mortgage or charge a short description of the property mortgaged or charged, the amount of the charge created and the names of the mortgages or persons entitled to such charge.

(2) If any such property of the company is mortgaged or charged without such entry as aforesaid being made, every director, manager or other officer of the company who knowingly and wilfully authorises or permits the omission of such entry, shall incur a penalty of one hundred dollars.

(3) The register or mortgages required by subsection (1) shall be open to inspection by any creditor or member of the company at all reasonable times; an if such inspection is refused, any officer of the company refusing the same, and every director and manager of the company authorising or knowingly and wilfully permitting such refusal shall incur a penalty of four dollars every day during which such refusal continues; and in addition to the above penalty, the Judge sitting in chambers may, by order, compel an immediate inspection of the register."

Company incorporated under local law and asset outside jurisdiction

Where security is created by a company incorporated in the Cayman Islands and the asset over which security is taken is situated in the Cayman Islands, it is still necessary to register any security as a charge as described above.

Ships

Taking security over ships registered in the Cayman Islands is achieved through the grant of a deed of covenant which is supported by a registered statutory mortgage as required by the Merchant Shipping Laws.

Aircraft

There is no prescribed form to the taking of security over aircraft registered in the Cayman Islands, however, the general law relating to mortgages of chattels applies and it is necessary to register the mortgage in the Register of Aircraft Mortgages.

NOTES ON STANDARD FORM EQUITABLE MORTGAGE

The equitable mortgage is drafted as a form of freestanding third party security deed to be granted by the company in respect of its subsidiary's obligations under a loan agreement. The drafting contemplates either the chargor being a corporate service provider holding shares on a charitable trust or an operating company owning full legal and beneficial title to the subsidiary's shares. In the case of any execution of the document by a corporate services provider holding shares pursuant to a declaration of trust, care should be taken to ensure that the declaration of trust includes rights for the trustee to charge the beneficial title to those shares pursuant to the terms of the share charge.

Clause 3 chargor covenants

It is important to create this freestanding principal payment obligation in this document and not to merely reference that the chargor is creating security in respect of the secured obligations.57 This wording is of course not required to the extent that the equitable mortgage is in respect of the chargor's own obligation under a loan agreement as opposed to the obligations of its subsidiary.

Clause 4.1

It is not necessary to specify the consideration where the mortgagor is the borrower and the mortgage is a condition precedent to withdrawing. The purpose of describing the security in Clause 4.1 as continuing is to exclude the rule in Clayton's case (1816) and provide that the security is not discharged by a payment which temporarily reduces the secured obligations to zero.

Clause 4.2(d)

This is only required to the extent that the charge is in respect of all of the shares in the company and that on enforcement of the charge, the chargor should be able to appoint new directors and officers.

Clause 4.2(e)

As well as Clause 4.2(e) which provides an undertaking for the company to register transfers of the charged shares to the chargee or its nominee, it is sometimes requested that the memorandum and articles of association of a company be amended to specifically permit any transfers of shares made pursuant to the charge. This is unnecessary and not particularly helpful in our view and, in particular, the chargor would not have any rights in respect of the memorandum and articles of association of the company prior to it becoming a shareholder in the company.

Clause 4.2

Often includes a form of irrevocable proxy to be given by the chargor to the chargee. Again, our view is that this is unnecessary. Any powers that the chargee should reasonably require to act in the name of the chargor are already provided under the irrevocable power of attorney contained at clause 10.1 of the charge.

Clause 4.6

Where the company is a single purpose SPV, the chargor often covenants to procure that the subsidiary's business will be run fully in accordance with the transaction documents and, in particular, that the subsidiary will not incur any material liabilities.

Clause 5.4

This clause is required. For any charge to also constitute an equitable mortgage it must include a provision allowing the mortgagee to convert the same into a legal mortgage at any time.

Clause 10

The equitable mortgage contains a power of attorney and it must be executed by deed on behalf of the chargor in accordance with the Powers of Attorney Law in order that it constitutes an irrevocable power of attorney which will outlast the chargor's insolvency.

Limited Recourse – Clause 12

Please note that in giving opinions that limited recourse clauses generally constitute obligations of non- Cayman entities and not obligations of Cayman obligors or chargors. It is therefore not meaningful to say that the Cayman company's obligations in respect of all such clauses are enforceable.

Schedule 1 – Share Transfer Certificate

Please note that the form of this share transfer certificate is different from the form Walkers has traditionally used and is more appropriate for use in connection with the creation of security over shares.

Footnotes

37 Holroyd v Marshall (1862) 10 HL Cas 191

38The rule from Dearle v Hall (1828) 3 Russ 1

39 Mutual Life Assurance Society v Langley (1886) 32 Ch 460

40 [2005] UKHL 41

41 [1979] 2 Lloyd's Rep 142

42 [1986] BCLC 242

43 [1997] 1 BLCL 63

44 [2004] EWCA Civ 670

45 [1986] 3 All ER 673

46 [1994] 1 BCLC 485

47 [1994] LQR 592

48 [1999] LQR 14

49 [1994] 1 BCLC 485

50 A. Berg Charges Over Book Debts: A Reply [1995] JBL 433-471 at p436

51 [2001] 2 A. 710

52 [1994] 1 BCLC 485

53 Insert details

54 See Moschi v. Lep Air Services Ltd [1973] AC 331

55 [1972] AC 785

56 See Jeffryes v. Agra and Masterman's Bank (1866) LR 2 Eq 674

57 See Lingard on Security pages 119-120

Cayman Islands

Wayne Panton, Partner

London

David Whittome, Partner

Jersey

James Gaudin, Partner

British Virgin Islands

Jack Boldarin, Partner

Hong Kong

Hugh O'Loughlin, Partner

Dubai

Rod Palmer, Partner

To return to part 1 of this article click 'previous page' below.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

This article is part of a series: Click Legal Issues In The Creation of Security - Part 1 for the previous article.
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions