Cayman Islands: Perceptions, Reputations & Mainstream International Financial Centres

Paul Byles takes a deeper look into recent trends from the Global Financial Centres Index to assess how the major offshore centres are doing.

If we are to go by the news stories in the media, or the latest Hollywood flick, with the now almost mandatory references to an 'offshore account', it's clear there is still some way to go before offshore centres put a dent into the negative perceptions (mostly unwarranted) that still prevail. But what if we were to use a more objective measure of perception rather than those occasional news stories and movies targeted at entertaining readers? And in the face of numerous global regulatory changes and pressures, what has been the impact on these centres? Since 2007, the Z/Yen group in London has published the Global Financial Centres Index (GFCI) twice per year. The survey is based on a mix of instrumental factors and an online survey aimed at financial services professionals around the world. Using data from the past six reports, from 2016, dating back to 2011, this article looks at how the mainstream offshore centres in the Caribbean (Cayman Islands, Bermuda and BVI) are doing in comparison to the offshore crown dependencies from across the Atlantic (Isle of Man, Jersey, and Guernsey). The GFCI is being used here to illustrate what can be achieved through the use of similar tools. Taking a look at how certain IFCs have fared with this measure might give us some insight into whether the various changes made to their regimes and efforts to counter negative publicity have had any impact so to speak, on how they are perceived.

The GFCI has been consistent in its methodology, so it may be a useful exercise to compare how these countries have performed over a period of time. The fall report has been used, which is normally published in October/ September each year.

Looking at the numbers, the regional IFCs have displayed a stronger trend upwards and have stuck closely together in terms of perception (see Figure 1). This supports the idea that the region (or islands) tend to suffer from being lumped together perception-wise. It also explains why their reputations would tend to improve together as well.

On the contrary, Figure 2 shows there is a much larger gap between the scores of the Channel Islands IFCs during the period with the possible exception of the drop in 2014, suggesting their reputations may be more independent of each other.

All of the regional IFCs also have a higher score in 2016 than the Channel Islands. The regional IFCs demonstrate contrasting fortunes in 2016, with the Cayman Islands being the only financial centre to show an increase in its index, while the BVI and Bermuda both declined.

There is a similar trend at play in 2016 in the Channel Islands, with Jersey demonstrating an upward bias over the year while Isle of Man and Guernsey both saw declines in their indices. That the Cayman Islands and Jersey have experienced an upward trend is not especially surprising because anecdotal evidence suggests these two centres are held in high esteem by clients in their respective areas.

This does not mean the other centres are viewed poorly but relatively speaking, Jersey and Cayman are regarded as being more developed than their respective peers in each group.

One of the key differences between the Caribbean and the Channel Islands is that the Channel Islands started off with relatively high indices in 2011 and are all lower now as compared to five years ago, while the Caribbean IFCs generally started at lower points and have all experienced consistent average increases in their indices over the same period, see Table 1.


Using the index as a proxy for perceived reputations, the Caribbean based centres have done much to improve their perception over the years and this may be the direct result of numerous sweeping enhancements to their regulatory regimes, some of this starting as early as 2001 after the OECD blacklisting. This is very interesting because in general the Caribbean IFCs have most certainly faced the harsher criticisms over the years in terms of media reporting of weaknesses in regulatory frameworks, reinforcing negative perceptions. Since those heavy criticisms at the start of the century, there have been numerous objective assessments conducted including by the IMF, which highlighted that weaknesses existed across many varying financial centres and that, not only were earlier perceived well developed IFCs such as the USA failing in certain areas, but some of the previously perceived weaker jurisdictions ranked higher in some key factors relating to AML and CFT frameworks.

It could be argued that the Caribbean based IFCs, faced with relatively more pressure have pushed hard to either correct their true deficiencies or address the perceived ones with effective public relations campaigns, while the Channel Islands which have not faced similar pressures (relatively speaking), have not benefitted from any additional 'push' to address such perceptions.


The GFCI report also provides a measure of what it terms 'reputational advantage' or 'disadvantage'. In summary this measure looks at the average score that a centre receives from financial professionals across the world and compares that number with the actual GFCI index. The report explains that if a centre has a higher average assessment than its GFCI rating this indicates that respondents' perceptions of a centre are more favourable than the quantitative measures alone would suggest. The difference between the two is then regarded as a reputational advantage (a positive number) or a reputational disadvantage (a negative number).

Figure 3 demonstrates that all of the IFCS in the Caribbean and Channel Islands suffer to varying degrees from this reputational disadvantage. At -5, Guernsey has the least reputational disadvantage with Cayman being next while Bermuda and BVI demonstrate the largest reputational disadvantage (meaning the index scores are worse than respondents expected).

Delving into the numbers (and the numbers behind the numbers) the GFCI provides some interesting insights into how Caribbean IFCs compare with their counterparts across the Atlantic. Perception is almost as important as the reality in the market place and this is especially the case where financial services and financial markets are concerned. In that sense the GFCI data presents a useful comparison on how the global market place continues to perceive these centres. Policymakers would do well to follow its trends as an objective measure of, if nothing else, how their jurisdictions are perceived by thousands of financial services professionals around the world, as well as how that perception compares to their competitors and importantly how reputations might be impacted by changes in regulatory frameworks.

About the Author

Paul is Managing Director of First Regents Bank & Trust. He is also serves as an independent director and consultant to financial services firms.

He is an economist and former regulator who has worked in the offshore sector for over 20 years. He is author of the books "Inside Offshore" and "Introduction to Offshore Financial Services: A BVI Text."

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions