Cayman Islands: A Comparison Of Cayman And US Funds

Last Updated: 23 February 2017
Article by Ian Gobin

In a recent interview with HFM Week, Harneys Partner Ian Gobin compared Cayman and US funds and discusses how Cayman continues to lead the market. The full interview was published in February 2017 in their report, How to start a Hedge Fund in the US.

Why set-up a Cayman fund at the same time as setting up a US fund?

It's a frequently asked question, particularly with start-up and emerging managers. Where a manager is setting up a US fund (a US limited partnership or US limited liability company, generally organised in Delaware) to attract US taxable investors, the manager will often market to or come across US tax-exempt investors, such as charities, pension funds, and university endowments, as well as non-US investors, who like the product and want to invest. If that's the case then simultaneously with the set-up of the US fund, the manager will set up a Cayman fund as part of the pooled investment structure to take in the US tax-exempt investors and non-US investors.

Why? In short, to avoid potential US tax exposure that could result from direct investment in a US pass-through entity such as a US limited partnership or US limited liability company. It's been explained to me by US Counsel, and I apologise in advance for the tax talk:

  1. US tax-exempt investor issues: When a US tax-exempt investor derives income that is separate from its US tax-exempt purpose, then such income may be subject to a form of US federal income tax known as unrelated business income tax (Ubit). Certain types of passive income are specifically exempt from Ubit, including short-term and long-term capital gains, dividends, and interest income. However, such Ubit exemptions do not apply if the income is considered "debt-financed income". Thus, if the partnership or other pass-through fund uses borrowed funds, there could be Ubit for the US tax-exempt investors that are direct investors in that fund. In addition, if the pass-through fund invests in businesses organised as partnerships (including publicly traded partnerships), the income and gains realised could be Ubit even if no debt financing is involved. US tax-exempt investors can avoid such Ubit exposure by investing through a Cayman fund that is treated as a foreign corporation for US tax purposes. There is no pass through treatment in the case of investments made in a fund that is treated as a corporation (hence the term "blocker" corporation). Thus, the Cayman fund, or the Cayman master fund in which it invests, can use debt without creating Ubit exposure for the tax-exempt investors in the Cayman fund.
  2. Non-US investor issues: Non-US investors are also advised to invest in funds that are organised as foreign "blocker" corporations for US tax purposes. There are two US tax reasons. First, if the US partnership fund were to engage in a US trade or business (other than merely trading in stocks or securities for its own account), then the non-US investors in such fund would be subject to US income tax on their share of any of the fund's income that is treated as effectively connected US trade or business income (ECI). The non-US investor in the partnership fund would be required to file US income tax returns even if the fund's ECI for the year is nominal or a negative number. In the case of non-US individual investors, there is also US estate tax exposure if the investor invests directly in the US partnership fund. Non-US individuals are not subject to US estate tax at death if they own stock in a non-US corporation that owns US securities, whereas direct ownership of an equity interest in a US partnership fund would be treated as "property situated in the US" which is subject to such US estate tax.

Therefore, managers wanting to attract US taxable investors, US tax-exempt investors and non-US investors will generally set-up both a US fund and an offshore fund in a jurisdiction such as the Cayman Islands. As such the manager needs to decide from the outset which investor groups they will be targeting; and in doing so managers need to be realistic. Much will depend upon their track record, history and story for the new fund. The early stages in the capital-raising of a new fund will generally, with some exceptions, be challenging. To set up both a US fund and an offshore fund is not insignificant in terms of organisational and running expenses; particularly with a start-up or emerging manager, their survival depends upon making the right decision from the outset. Most US-based managers will likely have access to US taxable investors from the start but may not yet have the critical mass to attract allocations from US tax-exempts investors or may not yet have a network of international investors. For these managers the best route may be to set-up a US fund which will lead to the establishment of an offshore fund once they have established their track record. More established, mid-market and billion-dollar-plus managers will typically already have the internal infrastructure and resources to establish the US fund and the offshore fund at the same time in order to approach both markets from the outset.

Why choose Cayman rather than, say, BVI for the offshore fund?

This a question that I'll have to be careful with, given that we're the oldest and largest offshore law firm in the BVI. Therefore, we have had the honour and pleasure of helping to shape the legislation over the years and design the fund products that are available in the BVI which meet the ever-changing challenges of the global funds industry.

There could be a number of reasons why the BVI would be the right jurisdiction for the manager to domicile their offshore fund and over 5,000 funds have their home in the BVI. Like the Cayman Islands, the BVI is a tax neutral jurisdiction. Both have no direct personal, corporate or property taxes. BVI law and Cayman Islands law are derived from English common law and supplemented by local legislation, ensuring that both BVI and Cayman Islands funds are structured as widely accepted vehicles on the international stage.

The two primary reasons we see managers elect to use the BVI are firstly the fact that it is slightly more cost-effective to establish a fund than Cayman and secondly that there are slightly fewer regulatory requirements; with registered funds not needing a local audit sign-off or director registration requirement, for example. While this remains appealing to our long-standing institutional managers, it is also attractive to start-up and emerging managers who are looking to find reasonable cost savings and flexibility in every aspect of their launches to allow them to grow their asset base as quickly as possible.

But why Cayman? There are more than 10,000 funds registered in the Cayman Islands (with probably a similar number of unregistered funds). The financial services industry in the Cayman Islands is highly competitive and there is a deep bench from which managers can choose their Cayman service providers. As such, it's the undisputed global jurisdiction of choice for investment funds. With over 30 years of servicing the funds industry, the Cayman Islands have grown through innovation and forward-looking policies which have served as models in other jurisdictions. The Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA) promotes a pragmatic regulatory environment for investment funds and the courts of the Cayman Islands have a specific financial services division, which allows for much quicker resolution of fund disputes than some notable onshore centres. A robust and quick launch and registration process for investment funds and fund managers allows managers to get their offshore fund and management vehicles up and running quickly to take advantage of market opportunities.

What is the process of setting up a US fund and Cayman fund like? How quick/seamless is it?

Quick, easy and yes, seamless, provided that the manager chooses US and Cayman Counsel who, as part of their core businesses, structure investment funds. These are the folks who, if the manager chooses wisely, will become their trusted advisors for many years to come. If this is the case then US Counsel will work seamlessly with Cayman Counsel.

But before we get to the process, the manager needs to decide how their US Fund will work in conjunction with their offshore fund. In deciding which route to follow, US Counsel will walk the manager through the options. The three most widely-used options are "side-by-side", "master-feeder" and "mini-master". With a side-by-side structure, the US fund and the offshore fund both make investments directly with trade tickets allocated between them. Given the extra administration involved, we rarely have managers opt for side-by-side funds. Probably the most popular route is to set-up a master-feeder structure. Here an offshore master fund is created with the US fund and the offshore fund investing all of their assets into the offshore master fund, leaving the offshore master fund to make the investments. In a mini-master structure a US fund and an offshore fund are established, but in this structure, the offshore fund invests in the US fund which acts as the master fund and also as the fund into which the US taxable investors will invest. The offshore fund will be taxed as a corporation to benefit US tax-exempt investors and block Ubit and non-US investors.

In all models, it's also important for the US manager to consider how they will be paid in the most tax efficient manner. It is crucial that US managers discuss with their US counsel about how this may be structured. At the moment, the current preference is for US managers to take their performance fee as an allocation from the relevant master fund (be it the offshore or in the case of the mini-master, the onshore (master) fund).

Once the structuring advice has been given and the structure is agreed, the manager will need to select the other service providers to the funds. These will include a fund administrator, auditor, bank, custodian, prime broker and, often, independent directors. We'll know about the fund from the manager, including details of the investment strategy, likely AuM and background of the principals and have a feel for both what the manager needs and what they are looking for in selecting the other service providers. We're always more than happy to make the right recommendations and introductions.

Simultaneously with the appointment of the other service providers, US Counsel will form the US fund and work begins on preparing the offering document for the US fund and the offshore fund, as well as the subscription documentation and investment management agreement. At the same time, Cayman Counsel will incorporate, assuming say, a traditional master/feeder structure has been decided upon, the exempted limited companies to be used for the master fund and the feeder fund (although it is not unusual to see exempted limited partnerships being used for master funds). This can be completed within the day. Standard form constitutional documents will be used, which will be amended and restated as necessary to tailor them to the offering document, once final. One key road block is often the establishment of a banking relationship for the fund. Sometimes this can be done through the relevant administrator but there may be trading or other requirements for the relevant strategy which will mean the manager may want to set this up. If this is the case, the manager is well-advised to start the banking discussions early and provide all relevant documentation and information required to the bank as soon as possible. The same applies for the other service providers being appointed. Cayman Counsel will review the offering document and build-in the Cayman Islands disclosure and legal requirements, such as Cayman Islands mutual funds law disclosure, Cayman Islands anti-money laundering legislation and automatic exchange of financial information disclosures, share rights including the terms of the offering, general disclosure language regarding providing information to law enforcement and other authorities. Cayman Counsel will also complete the set-up of the master fund and the feeder fund which would include the appointment of the directors and prepare the suite of Cayman launch documents, which will include board resolutions, various documents required by the CIMA, consent letters for the administrator and auditor and prepare the amended and restated constitutional documents of the master fund and the feeder fund. Cayman Counsel will also need to review the administration agreement, custodian agreement and prime brokerage agreements to ensure they comply with Cayman Islands law. Once all of the documents are in final form, it's down to the directors of the feeder fund and the master fund, who should have been involved with the process from the beginning, to review all of the documentation and ultimately approve by way of the board resolutions, the launch of the feeder fund and the master fund. Following which Cayman Counsel will attend to the various filings with the Registrar of Companies and the CIMA and when complete the offshore fund can take in investors and trade. Other than the legal work involved, transaction management is key. Both US Counsel and Cayman Counsel will be pressing all service providers to make sure they have what they need to jump through the various internal hoops required for them to be appointed and sign-off on the documentation and ultimately provide the services to the Funds and that this is done efficiently and within the deadlines given.

Timing, from the initial kick-off call with the manager to the launch of the US fund and offshore fund is a manager moveable feast. It's not overnight, that's for sure, but neither should it take six months, unless than manager needs the six months to, for example, line-up investors, seed capital or on-board the service providers. Some managers have already worked on their detailed investment strategy and have considered the commercial terms of the offering. Some managers need advice on both. Some managers have all of their anti-money laundering documentation ready for the service providers and some haven't. Often it's the opening of the bank accounts and take-on sign-offs from service providers that can cause delays to the launch of the funds. All things being equal, the timing is around six to 12 weeks, six weeks being pretty aggressive, but it can be done and that's for the US fund and the offshore fund.

How popular are Cayman structures with US managers? Do you see this popularity continuing? Why?

Very popular and more popular than any other offshore jurisdiction by, as you would say in the UK, a "country mile".

The glass half-empty brigade of investment fund commentators were all doom and gloom for 2016. Underperformance from some of the institutional fund managers, some institutional investors pulling out of institutional funds, over-regulation in the US, cyber-security, the SEC's treatment of managers, being some of the reasons why and leading to many journalists writing headlines such as "is this the end of the hedge fund?". We were fortunate to have been involved and co-sponsored a Private Funds Leadership Forum with a major US investment funds law firm at the end of 2016, attended by many of the industry's big names, the aim being to take the temperature of the investment funds market for the coming year. Let's just say that I'm extremely optimistic about 2017 in terms of new fund launches for US funds and Cayman funds. Although there might be a bump or two in the road, 2017 will be seen as a much better year than 2016! Famous last words? Let's hope not!

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Maples and Calder
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Maples and Calder
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions