Cayman Islands: Primacy Of Arbitration Recognised As Stay Granted In Cayman Insolvency - In Re The SPhinX Group Of Companies

Last Updated: 14 March 2016
Article by Simon Dickson and Louis Mooney


The Cayman Islands Court of Appeal has recently upheld a stay of certain Cayman liquidation applications, in favour of an arbitration in New York. The applications were for a reserve to be made for a disputed debt. The Court held that the reserve application would have required the Cayman Court to consider the substantive merits of the disputed debt, which dispute was governed by an arbitration agreement. The legislative justification is grounded in section 4 of the Foreign Arbitral Awards Enforcement Law (1997 Revision) (the Foreign Awards Law) which provides that any party to Court proceedings may apply to have the proceedings stayed if they are "in respect of any matter agreed to be referred" to arbitration.

This decision is reflective of a broader international trend towards recognising the greater prominence of arbitration and the decline in the types of disputes which are considered non-arbitrable. In particular, it underlines the importance of arbitration in insolvency proceedings, and allows for potential stays in such proceedings where mandated by the contractual obligations of the insolvent company and third parties.

The judicial context

SPhinX represents a significant departure from the Grand Court's last foray into the interface between domestic liquidations and arbitration.

In Cybernaut Growth Fund2 Jones J in the Grand Court was asked to stay or strike out a petition to wind up an investment fund on the basis that arbitration proceedings had commenced in New York in relation to the fund's partnership agreement. Jones J found that a petition to wind up a company fell within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court and that it was in the public interest that this was so, particularly, as here, in the case of a regulated business. As such, a winding up application was a dispute that was non-arbitrable, and so the Court would not stay the petition.

The Grand Court decision in SPhinX

In SPhinX, Sir Andrew Morritt in the Grand Court rejected the submission, based on inter alia, Cybernaut that the issues raised by the reserve application were non-arbitrable on two grounds. Firstly, he considered that the reserve in question was "entirely dependent" upon the existence of the debt, which itself was subject to a binding arbitration clause.

Secondly, he carefully considered three recent English authorities on point. In Fulham FC v Richards3 Fulham FC, the petitioner, brought unfair prejudice proceedings under section 994 of the Companies Act 2006. The parties had agreed that all disputes between members of the FA Premier League, including the petitioner, should be referred to arbitration. Fulham FC argued that unfair prejudice disputes fell outside of the scope of decisions that were arbitrable because the section engaged the supervisory jurisdiction of the High Court and included winding-up as a potential remedy.

The High Court and Court of Appeal both held that a stay could be awarded based on section 9 of the Arbitration Act 1996 (which is in substantially the same form as section 4 of the Foreign Awards Law). Patten LJ held that "it does not follow from the inability of an arbitrator to make a winding-up order affecting third parties that it should be impossible for the members of a company, for example, to agree to submit disputes inter se as shareholders to a process of arbitration. It is necessary to consider in relation to the matters in dispute in each case whether they engage third party rights or represent an attempt to delegate to the arbitrators what is a matter of public interest which cannot be determined within the limitations of a private contractual process."

In Assaubayev v Wilson Partners4, a solicitor sent his client a bill under a retainer which contained an arbitration clause. The client sought to challenge the bill in court proceedings and argued that the arbitration clause should not apply as the court claim raised issues concerning the Court's supervisory jurisdiction over solicitors.

The Court of Appeal agreed with the High Court that the court claim should be stayed under section 9 of the Arbitration Act. In doing so it followed the Fulham case to the effect that just because an arbitrator cannot exercise a Court's supervisory jurisdiction, that is no reason not to grant a stay. There was no public interest reason why the costs matters referred to arbitration should not be so decided.

Finally, in Salford Estates (No. :2) Ltd v Altomart Ltd5 a petition to wind up a company was based on a debt which was itself subject to arbitration. The judge ordered a stay, the petitioner appealed. The Court of Appeal held that the automatic stay entitlement of section 9 of the Arbitration Act was triggered by the fact that the disputed debt fell within the arbitration clause.

Sir Andrew concluded that the ground for refusing a stay in matters referred to arbitration is that the matter is of such public interest that it cannot be delegated to a private contractual process. On the facts here, he concluded that all the conditions for ordering a stay pursuant to section 4 of the Foreign Awards Law having been made out, he was bound to grant a stay. He further observed that whilst he did not decide the matter on this basis, had it been necessary the Court would not have hesitated to grant a stay on the grounds that such a power derived from its inherent jurisdiction.

The Cayman Court of Appeal

Sir Richard Field JA, in a judgment with which Mottley JA and Morrison JA concurred, affirmed Sir Andrew's judgment. He held that by applying the stay in section 4 of the Foreign Awards Law the Courts were respecting the parties' private contractual rights to have certain agreed issues determined by arbitration and not by judicial proceeding.

The Court expressly recognised that "the enforcement of an arbitration agreement in a liquidation context may delay the liquidation court process and add to the expense of administrating the estate but that cannot be a reason for failing to protect the contract right to arbitration as required by section 4 of the Foreign Awards Law", but to do otherwise would allow one party escape its "freely undertaken obligation". Finally the Court stopped short of overruling Cybernaut, but said it considered its correctness to be "debatable".


This decision may be seen as a part of a general trend in common law jurisdictions, including England and Australia, of recognising a greater degree of primacy for arbitration in insolvency proceedings. Applications to stay Cayman winding up petitions in favour of foreign arbitral proceedings are now more likely to succeed. Such stays will most likely be available in cases that concern the adjudication of private rights between an insolvent company or partnership and a third party when those rights are governed by an arbitration clause, but which may nonetheless affect the way an insolvency is managed by the Grand Court.


1 CICA No. 6 of 2015, judgment released: 2 February 2016

2 [2014 (2) CILR 413]

3 [2012] Ch 333

4 [2014] EWCA Civ 1491

5 [2014] EWCA Civ 1575

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions