Cayman Islands: Parent Company Contribution Order: Potential Guidance for Irish Practitioners

In Lewis Holdings Limited & Others v. Steel and Tube Holdings Limited,1  the High Court of New Zealand made an order requiring a parent company to contribute to the debts of a subsidiary which was in liquidation.  The decision is of interest to Irish practitioners because there has been an absence of case law concerning a comparable Irish provision (section 140 of the Companies Act, 1990), which was modelled on a previous iteration of the New Zealand provision dealing with the pooling of assets of related companies (section 271 of the New Zealand Companies Act, 1993). 

The Plaintiff was the owner of a particular property which was the subject of a perpetually renewable ground lease.  The lessee at the time the Plaintiff purchased the property was Stube Industries Limited ("SIL"), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Defendant.   

The history of the matter was that from approximately 1990, although the property was leased to SIL, the Defendant parent company occupied the property under an informal sub-lease from SIL, which from that time onwards had no employees.  The property was effectively managed by the Defendant.  In 1996, 1997 and again in 2003 the Defendant paid for decontamination works which had to be carried out on the property on behalf of SIL.  The ground lease was due to expire on 1 December 2009 but was in fact deemed to have been renewed in 2009 due to a failure to serve the necessary notice to the Plaintiff that SIL did not wish to accept a renewal of the lease.  Following the renewal, the Defendant parent company continued to pay the rent on the property as it had done previously until 2013.

In May 2013 the directors of the Defendant recommended that SIL be put into liquidation following a decision to cease providing financial support to SIL and noting that the directors of SIL had made unsuccessful efforts to exit SIL from the lease.  SIL was put into liquidation by a shareholders' resolution.  The liquidators disclaimed the lease as onerous property under section 269 of the New Zealand Companies Act, 1993 leading the Plaintiff to file a proof of debt in SIL's liquidation.  

The Plaintiff and the liquidators claimed that the Defendant company should be ordered to pay to the liquidators the whole of the sum of the Plaintiff's claim in the liquidation.  The Judge, MacKenzie J., noted that Ireland was the only country other than New Zealand in the common law world which had a statutory provision allowing for the making of contribution orders against related companies. 

MacKenzie J. noted that the two competing principles at issue were: 

(a) the separate legal identity of companies and the right of commercial enterprises to run their businesses through subsidiary and related companies as they see fit; and 

(b) the mischief that can result from an unyielding application of separate corporate identity. 

The Judge held that an unyielding application of the principle of separate corporate entity would defy the legislative policy behind the provisions, and the rationale for the principle of separate corporate entity is to enable a business to be carried on by a separate legal entity so as not to expose the shareholders to the liabilities which the business may incur.  It was inherent in this rationale that the company must be not only a separate legal entity but also a "separate commercial entity", and that its business will not be carried on in such a way that this company is not a mere "front" or "façade" for business actually carried on by others. 

The New Zealand Companies Act sets out certain criteria to be considered by the court in considering whether to make a contribution order, which were as follows: 

(a) The extent to which the Defendant took part in the management of the subsidiary

MacKenzie J. held that the Court must consider whether the directors of SIL had acted in that capacity or rather as senior employees of the Defendant.  The two directors of SIL were also the CEO and CFO of the Defendant.  The Judge held that the Defendant carried on the affairs of the business as a single unit "through divisions rather than through subsidiaries".  A number of findings buttressed this opinion: 

(i) The directors did not distinguish between the best interests of SIL and the Defendant.  Their obligation was to oversee the conduct of SIL's business, rather than simply manage it as an integrated part of the business of the Defendant.  The directors were acting in their capacity as CEO and CFO of the Defendant.

(ii) SIL did not have the financial capacity to continue to trade separately.  If it were to be treated as a separate entity, there would have had to have been legal arrangements to ensure its support, but none were put in place. 

(iii) SIL had no employees of its own.  All work on its behalf was done by employees of the Defendant.  Many steps taken on its behalf were done on the Defendant's letterhead and the Defendant oversaw the administration of the lease, the renewal of the lease and the attempts to find a buyer for SIL's leasehold interest.

(iv) The accounting treatments which had been put in place were also relevant.  MacKenzie J. noted that there was a degree of financial intermingling; SIL had no separate bank account; and all payments and receipts for SIL were made through the Defendant.  The rent invoices for the property were addressed to the Defendant at the Defendant's request. 

The Court concluded that there was no evidence of exercise of management functions independent of the Defendant to any material extent. 

(b) The conduct of the Defendant towards the Plaintiff as a creditor of the subsidiary 

The Judge noted that this was not a case where a creditor was confused as to the entity with which it was contracting.  Rather, the Defendant's conduct between 2003 and 2013 indicated that it stood behind SIL.  SIL's directors should have considered whether it was capable of incurring the obligation to pay the rent from its own resources but this was not done.  No special resolution had been passed as would have been necessary under the New Zealand Companies Act. 

(c)  The extent to which the circumstances that gave rise to the liquidation were attributable to the actions of the Defendant

This factor distinguishes the New Zealand legislation from its Irish counterpart.  In New Zealand, the extent to which the circumstances giving rise to the liquidation may be attributed to the defendant is a factor to be taken into account, whereas under the Irish provision, the court is expressly prohibited from making a contribution order unless the court is satisfied that that the circumstances giving rise to the liquidation are attributable to the actions or omission of the related company.   

In this case, the Defendant had ceased funding SIL and then caused the necessary resolution to be passed appointing a liquidator.  SIL could not continue following the withdrawal of funding.  MacKenzie J. held that the liquidation of SIL was entirely attributable to the actions of the Defendant. 

The case is interesting therefore from the Irish perspective, because the circumstances (as determined by MacKenzie J.) met the Irish legislation's criteria for the making of a contribution order. 

(d) Such other matters as the Court thinks fit

Under this heading, MacKenzie J. addressed a number of other factors.  One which is worth noting is that the Judge commented that the Defendant was a publicly listed company which "ought to have known better".  The Judge commented that a failure to observe those requirements cannot readily be ignored or excused where the company concerned is the subsidiary of a publicly listed company.  The implication appears to be that a publicly listed company (or group holding company) may be given less sympathy than a small private corporate group. 

Furthermore, MacKenzie J. held that there should be no "circularity" as regards the making of a contribution order and the receipt of a payment by the same party as a creditor in the liquidation.  Therefore, the Judge ordered that the contribution it was ordering the Defendant to make must be limited solely to the claim being made in the liquidation by the Plaintiff.  This was to prevent any portion of the amount of the contribution being returned to the Defendant in the liquidation. 

Conclusion 

This decision is of some interest to Irish insolvency practitioners because New Zealand is the only other jurisdiction in the common law world with a statutory provision which is comparable to section 140 of the Companies Act 1990.  There has been a dearth of Irish case law on this unusual insolvency provision, but the circumstances of the Lewis Holdings Limited case met the key requirement in the Irish legislation that the circumstances giving rise to the liquidation must be found to be attributable to the actions of the party against which a contribution order is sought.


[2014] NZHC 3311

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions