Cayman Islands: Cayman Islands Independent Directors

On January 18, 2013 the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA) issued a consultation document to the local industry, directed at reviewing the regulatory framework surrounding corporate governance and the provision of independent directors in particular.

Over the years, Cayman has grown as the domicile of choice for international funds registration (including private equity and hedge funds) and is home to over 10,000 funds. As such, a wide number of sectors of the industry supporting these funds, including the provision of independent directors, has grown to sizeable proportions.

While there is no regulatory requirement to have a Cayman-based director on the board of Cayman-registered funds, many funds chose to do so for a wide variety of reasons, including tax and regulatory concerns in the home country of the manager or where they intend to distribute the fund.

Much of the recent focus on Cayman directorships has been driven by the Weavering case, in which a number of independent directors to a Cayman fund were accused, and initially found responsible, of the failing of the fund. However, it is worth noting those directors were not based in Cayman; they were nationals of and resident in Sweden, and as such, it is important to evaluate how any proposed new regulation will be implemented for resident and non-resident directors alike.

The robust decision on the Weavering case (it is on appeal at the time of writing in early May) did not create new law or impose new responsibility or liability on directors of Cayman funds. The court applied established law to a specific and extreme set of facts and, not surprisingly in the circumstances, found the two directors had failed to comply with their responsibilities and were liable for very significant losses.

There are two further important points that arise from Weavering when considering the proposals put forward by the regulator:

  1. Had it been a regulatory requirement that CIMA vets and approves the appointment of these directors, this approval would likely have been forthcoming, given the resumes and experience of these individuals.
  2. Had there been a numerical cap on the number of directorships these individuals could hold, it is also very likely they would both have been well within any such cap.

So these two key points, included as part of the consultation initiated by CIMA, would not, by themselves, have prevented this case from happening; the fact is that it is very difficult to stop misfeasance, intentional nonfeasance, or fraud by investment managers and service providers before it happens.

Consultation key points

The following section provides a description of the key issues included in the consultation initiated by CIMA. The Cayman Islands Directors Association (CIDA) has conducted a full survey of its members to gather the support to each of the proposals; included here, when relevant, are some of these results.

Limitation of the number of directorships per person

It has been reported in many media outlets what has been labelled the Jumbo Directors – individuals and companies that have adopted a model in which one person sits on a large number of boards, in some cases as many as multiple hundreds of boards. Many if not all of these directors delegate a significant amount of their day-to-day work supporting structures to allow them to service a large number of customers. However, it is clear that while they may rely on support structures, they cannot delegate many of the responsibilities. Without making a judgement, this model can be called the JD model.

In its consultation documents, CIMA stated: "Imposing a limit would be beneficial in pronouncing what the authority considers acceptable level of responsibility but it is challenging to design a limit that takes account the nature, size and complexity of the regulated entity."

It appears that most of the industry agrees with CIMA's view. A resounding 89 percent of the respondents to the survey conducted by CIDA believe there should not be a numerical limitation imposed. Probably most of the industry does not support the extent to which a few players have taken the JD model but recognise the difficulty in setting a number that regardless of what it is or for how long it is discussed, it will prove to be too big in some cases and too small in others.

As an extreme example, consider the time requirements of a director who sits on 20 boards of private equity funds managed by 20 different fund managers with different service providers versus the time requirements of a director who sits on 20 long-only equity funds managed by the same manager with slightly different strategies or sector focus and the same custodian and auditor. Attempting to create a model that considers all these variables would be a daunting task, and as such, if a number were to be set, it would have to be set at the high end of the spectrum, proving to be only a small part of the solution as it would affect only a limited number of providers.

If a number were to be considered, it would be better to consider imposing it on the number of 'relationships' instead of the number of funds. Even in this case such limit could only be part of the reform and not the main aspect of it.


According to the consultation documents: "The Authority has been considering the development of a public database, operated and controlled by the Authority for access by interested stakeholders. With the international call for heightened disclosure and transparency we believe that a public database will not only complement current due diligence processes but also enhance the reputation of its financial services industry."

The consultation documents go on to explain how the authority would fund this database and ask what other information should be included, plus how the database should be accessible.

Industry seems to be much more divided on this issue. According to the CIDA survey, the majority of respondents (76 percent) believe it is desirable for CIMA to maintain a database of directors. If such a database is maintained, the majority of respondents (83 percent) believe the information should be limited to details of directors of regulated companies only. The respondents are divided about whether the number of directorships a director has should be disclosed – 45 percent in favour and 55 percent against. The majority of respondents (74 percent) believe the names of the companies the director is a director of should not be disclosed. Whether the database should be open to inspection, the respondents are again divided – 47 percent for inspection and 53 percent against. However, if the database is to be open for inspection, the majority of respondents (88 percent) believe it should not be open to the general public but should be restricted to specific interested parties such as investors or shareholders. If the database is to be open for inspection the majority of respondents (78 percent) believe it should be searchable only by reference to individual companies and should not have further search capabilities.

It seems overall industry favours enhanced transparency to allow investors to make better informed decisions in a way that is simpler and that does not expose them to have to directly ask the director. Although this was not part of the consultation, based on informal feedback the industry seems to support some kind of mandate to ensure the director has to disclose the current number of directorships held to the manager and to prospect investors referred by the manager, we believe this is common practice but may not be the case across the industry.

While transparency is supported and industry appreciates the need to facilitate this information to the investors, there are some concerns about the way a completely open database may be used by other parties and, in particular, how that information may be interpreted in conjunction with some of the other proposals discussed below.

To express this in other words, there seems to be support to increase transparency of the industry but a concern about reacting to comments from third-parties that have no real interest in the funds and end up with solutions that may unnecessarily erode the legitimate right to confidentiality between commercial parties.

In the writer's opinion, it would be useful to consider a staged approach where once the other proposals are implemented, including clarification of responsibilities and functions that can and can not be delegated, together with an obligation to disclose directorships held on request to the manager and potential investors, the openness of the database held by CIMA can be reviewed after a predefined period of time.

Statement of Guidance regarding the responsibilities of Independent Directors

CIMA is proposing to extend the Statement of Guidance on Corporate Governance (SOG) application to all registered entities and is proposing amendments to "make the SOG more generic and suitable for cross-sectoral application" and "explicitly outlining in the SOG key management oversight and corporate governance principles and the primary duties of the board of directors".

In response to the questions asked in this section, the results obtained by the survey conducted by CIDA show that 75 percent of respondents favour sectorspecific guidance. It is thought more detail is desirable regarding best practice and the expectations by the regulator.

Registration of directors

In regards to the registration of directors, the results of the survey show that 92 percent of respondents believe all directors of regulated companies should register with CIMA. A total of 75 percent of respondents believe any mandatory registration should apply equally to non-resident directors as well as Cayman resident directors. However, industry seems to be much more divided in regard to the costs associated with this registration. While there is support for a fee to cover the cost of this process, there is resistance to a higher fee imposed in this process as a way for government to collect additional revenue, based mainly on the premise that at least part of that cost will be passed to the company, increasing the overall cost to the end-customer.

So what is the problem and can these proposals resolve it?

The Cayman director class has not helped its cause as some (but by no means all) of its members resist exercising self restrain, do not limit the number of directorships they take on (regardless of the business model they have implemented), and become rather defensive and secretive when asked about the number of directorships they hold. So Cayman is now faced with incredulous comments like: how can a single person be a director of 500 companies and properly meet his obligations to all those companies?

This has put Cayman on the back foot, and a great deal of effort is now required to explain the existing regime that already imposes a 'fit and proper' requirement under the Mutual Funds Law on those who serve as fund directors and to give CIMA the power to require their replacement if it is determined they are not fit and proper. CIMA has issued detailed guidance on the fit and proper requirements together with the Statement of Guidance on Corporate Governance that is now being expanded in its content and application.

Each company and directorship has to be individually assessed to see what is required, how much time it is likely to take, and what support services and functions the director has in place that enable him to perform properly. It is also necessary to restate it is ultimately up to the investors (the great majority of whom are very sophisticated and can find out how many directorships a person holds – they simply have to ask the investment manager/promoter as part of their due diligence) to decide whether to invest in a fund that has directors holding a big number of offices or if this information is denied to them. As stated above, a requirement to the director to regularly disclose this number to the managers would be supported.

The real underlying issue is of the board's performance. A properly performing and effective fund board is not dependent on size or on the nationality or residence of its directors or where they meet. A large and expensive board may fail to perform, and this has been proven during the recent financial crisis. Relatively small boards with well-qualified, experienced and active directors will usually perform well. It is simply not possible to regulate to secure good performance. Again, investors and the market are best placed to drive the composition of the board. And the courts are more than able to decide ex post facto if the performance of the directors or other service providers was below the required legal standard.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.