Cayman Islands: Cayman Islands Segregated Portfolio Companies – A Sensible Alternative For Fund Managers?

Last Updated: 2 July 2012
Article by Jeremy Walton and Jayson Wood

In ABC Company v J & Co Ltd, ABC was an open ended investment fund structured as a segregated portfolio company ("SPC"). Under Cayman Islands law, a company registered as an SPC may create segregated portfolios so as to segregate the assets and liabilities of one portfolio from other portfolios. Assets from one segregated portfolio are not available to meet liabilities of other portfolios.

J & Co was an investor in the 'German Fund' being one of 82 segregated portfolios of ABC. The German Fund undertook real estate investments. Due to a downturn in the property market, a decision was taken by ABC in 2008 to suspend redemptions in the German Fund for a period of 3 years during which time the portfolio's assets would be realised and distributed to creditors and shareholders. This course, it was said by the fund, would enable ABC to wind down the portfolio in an orderly manner (ie: a "soft wind-down").

ABC similarly suspended redemptions in its other portfolios holding investments in real estate, but left the remaining portfolios unaffected. The German Fund represented 0.85% of the real estate portfolios combined NAV, and the real estate portfolios in turn represented 32% of ABC's combined NAV.

J & Co petitioned to wind up ABC on the just and equitable ground on the basis that the SPC was unable to carry on the business for which it was incorporated (ie: it had lost its substratum). The petition was subsequently amended so as to apply in the alternative to wind up just the German Fund on the same grounds. ABC applied to strike out the winding up petition on the grounds that ABC could not possibly be said to have lost its substratum in circumstances where two-thirds of its portfolios were carrying on business as usual. Jones J at first instance declined to strike out. The Court of Appeal disagreed and unanimously held the petition was bound to fail.

In striking out the petition, President Chadwick delivering the judgment of the Court stated that:

  1. the provisions of the Cayman Islands Companies Law did not give the Court jurisdiction to wind up individual segregated portfolios of an SPC. The only remedy afforded by the legislation was the appointment of a receiver, and that was only available if the portfolio was insolvent – not on the just and equitable ground;
  2. in determining whether the substratum of ABC had failed, it was necessary for J & Co to establish that ABC had ceased carrying on business according to the reasonable expectations of its shareholders. Those expectations were to be gauged from the articles of association and relevant offering documents of ABC;
  3. ABC's articles of association permitted the directors in their absolute discretion and for any reason to suspend redemptions and subscriptions. Importantly in the opinion of the Court, the scope of the existing power to suspend redemptions contained in the articles was extended in 2010 by the passing of special resolutions of each class of participating shareholders. These amendments were passed some 2 years after redemptions in the German Fund had been suspended;
  4. ABC's offering memorandum warned that the liquidity of some of the investments held by the segregated portfolios could not be guaranteed. Any illiquidity may prevent, in certain circumstances, redemptions of shares;
  5. it was common ground that the directors of ABC acted in good faith in resolving to suspend redemptions in the real estate portfolios in 2008;
  6. no informed investor reading the articles of association and offering memorandum could fail to appreciate that the right to redeem segregated portfolio shares might be suspended; and
  7. it was therefore impossible for the petitioner to contend that ABC had ceased to carry on business in accordance with the reasonable expectations of its shareholders, or for that matter, in accordance with the reasonable expectations of the holders of shares in the German Fund.

Interestingly, although the Court of Appeal (correctly in our view) focused on the reasonable expectations of all shareholders in the SPC and not just investors in the German Fund, it did not appear to place any significance on the fact that two-thirds of ABC's portfolios continued to trade. Rather, emphasis was placed on ABC's power to suspend redemptions contained in its constituent documents, the bona fide exercise of that power by ABC's directors in 2008, and the effective ratification of the suspension 2 years later by a 75% majority of all classes of shareholders when they resolved to extend and clarify the power to suspend.

Although there was no language in ABC's articles or offering documents pointing to the reasonable expectations of shareholders being for the investment manager to undertake a soft wind-down, it is nonetheless unsurprising that the Court of Appeal decided J & Co's petition to wind up ABC was bound to fail. It would have been remarkable for the Court to have contemplated liquidating ABC in circumstances where the fund itself was not being wound down, and a substantial majority of shareholders were implicitly content with the directors' decision to suspend redemptions and had positively voted in favour of extending the power to suspend after the existing suspension had been in place for 2 years.

The Court of Appeal concluded its judgment by making reference to the topical issue in the Cayman Islands of the extent (if any) to which initiating a soft wind-down of a fund will constitute or indicate a loss of substratum.

The current position in the Cayman Islands with soft wind-downs (per Jones J) is that if there has been an indefinite suspension of redemptions, then it becomes practically impossible for a mutual fund to pursue its investment objective in accordance with its shareholders' reasonable expectations. The reasonable expectations of shareholders are to be gleaned from the fund's constituent documents. However, in considering those documents, the starting point is that there are strong policy considerations in favour of a fund being liquidated by qualified insolvency practitioners rather than on an informal basis by its management: the main consideration being that investment managers are skilled in investing, and for that, they are typically remunerated based on a percentage of NAV plus a performance fee. They are not skilled liquidators, and as a general statement of principle, should not undertake that role or be remunerated as such.

Conversely, in the British Virgin Islands (per Bannister J), the position is that fund managers are entitled to manage the wind-down of a fund and the only purpose for which liquidators should be appointed is to manage the final moments of the fund at the time when it should be put out of existence.

Although the "reasonable expectations of shareholders" approach of the Court of Appeal went some way to endorsing the views of Jones J, President Chadwick considered it unnecessary to decide the correct position because the issue on appeal was not whether it was just and equitable to wind up a fund in soft wind-down mode via an indefinite suspension of redemptions and managed realisation of assets (ie: the appeal related to ABC as a whole and not just the German Fund). Consequently, the difference of opinion between Jones J in the Cayman Islands and Bannister J in the BVI on the implications of a soft wind-down remains to be resolved. Curiously though, after noting that the point would no doubt arise in due course for adjudication at appellate level, the Court of Appeal suggested that the answer may lie somewhere between the two competing approaches.

Based on the process the Court undertook in the ABC case, it would not be surprising if the "middle ground" alluded to by President Chadwick is for the Court require the presence of express soft wind-down language in the fund's constituent documents: so if there are specific powers to suspend redemptions indefinitely and for the manager to realise assets for the benefit of investors over time, which powers are then activated, the Court may determine that there is no ground to wind up the fund based on loss of substratum.

The consequences of the Court of Appeal's judgment for investment managers are telling.

First, individual portfolios of an SPC are immune from being placed into receivership or wound up on the just and equitable ground on application by a disgruntled investor (unlike the position with feeder funds in a typical master/feeder structure). This of course is a positive outcome for managers. Conversely however, the risk is that the only remedy available to any such investor, should circumstances permit, is to petition to wind up the entire SPC rather than just one limb. That risk is mitigated to the point of remoteness if the articles and offering documents of the fund are properly drafted.

Secondly, investment managers must ensure that the terms of the constitution and offering documents of the fund, whether it be an SPC or some other vehicle, are crystal clear on the rights and consequences attaching to a suspension of redemptions. In particular, the inclusion of soft wind-down language will serve as evidence of the reasonable expectations of shareholders that the manager may properly implement an indefinite suspension of redemptions in order carry out a soft wind-down of the fund.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Jeremy Walton
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.