Cayman Islands: Structured Finance In The Cayman Islands

Last Updated: 10 January 2002
Most Read Contributor in Cayman Islands, September 2018

Article by Ian Ashman and Julian Black

Introduction - Overview of the Jurisdiction

The Cayman Islands are one of the world's leading financial centres and are a major provider of services for the purposes of structured finance transactions. The financial services industry in the Cayman Islands has developed over nearly four decades and has in place a framework of commercial legislation which is both modern and flexible to be able to meet the requirements of innovative financing structures. As a jurisdiction, the Cayman Islands offer efficiency, stability and professionalism. They have a constitutional relationship with the United Kingdom (being a British Overseas Territory), as a result of which the Cayman Islands enjoy an AAA sovereign risk rating and have autonomy in respect of domestic matters such as taxation and financial regulation.

Along with stability, the Cayman Islands are committed to maintaining the highest possible business standards. They comply in full with the minimum standards and core principles of banking supervision adopted by the Basle Committee on Banking Supervision. In 1986, the Cayman Islands entered into the Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty with the United States, providing a highly effective form of anti-money laundering legislation. During the course of the last year, substantial amounts of new legislation have been enacted in co-operation with the Financial Action Task Force, to strengthen the jurisdiction further against money laundering, and the Cayman Islands now have one of the tightest anti-money laundering regimes in the world.

The Cayman Islands have a robust judicial system through the Grand Court, which has ultimate appeal to the Privy Counsel of the House of Lords. This results in a level of predictability in relation to Cayman Islands law and inspires confidence. All of the top five accountancy firms are represented in the Cayman Islands. The jurisdiction also boasts top flight SPV Administrators including, amongst others, Walkers SPV Limited, Deutsche Bank (Cayman) Limited, HSBC Financial Services (Cayman) Limited and BNP Paribas Private Bank and Trust (Cayman) Limited who are active in the structured finance arena.

Jersey practitioners, in seeking to pitch for London-based work, are quick to emphasise proximity to London and time zone advantages over the Cayman Islands. However, market participants are increasingly focusing on the benefits of having their offshore lawyers available in the evening/night which is often the time at which large structured finance transactions are closing. During these hours, the Cayman Islands' five hours time lag to the U.K. proves to be a huge value added. This, coupled with the fact that the two leading Cayman Islands law firms have offices in London, enables the Cayman Islands documentation to be worked on around the clock, providing a much more complete time zone coverage than the product offered by Jersey.

Legal Framework

The Cayman Islands have a modern and flexible framework of commercial legislation. While certain statutory provisions may differ from English law providing greater flexibility, the central issues of corporate power, directors' fiduciary duties, corporate personality, limited liability and corporate benefit are, in all substantive respects, the English common law. At the same time, the Cayman Islands' commercial legislation has proved to be less cumbersome in many areas that have caused difficulty under the corresponding English statutes. This flexibility makes it possible for Cayman Islands structures to meet the varying requirements of increasingly innovative Arrangers.

Three aspects of Cayman Islands law of direct application to structured finance transactions deserve specific mention. The Companies Law provides that shares are redeemable not only out of profit but also from the credit balance on the share premium account, enabling an equity instrument to have much of the economic substance of debt.

In certain transactions, particularly where the debtor is bound by a negative pledge, it is helpful to use contractual subordination rather than security upon which to hinge the priority of payments of a transaction. Under English law, the effectiveness of contractual subordination arrangements is not definitively established either in statute or in case law, though the first instance decision in Re: Maxwell Communications Corporation Plc (1993) is helpful. Under the Companies Law, contractual subordination is statutorily enshrined, which means that a priority of payments settled by a Cayman Islands issuer would be enforceable by creditors, even if those creditors lacked the benefit of an associated security interest.

Under English law it is unlawful for a company to directly or indirectly provide finance for the acquisition by a third party of its own shares, pursuant to Section 151 of the English Companies Act 1985. Financial assistance in the Cayman Islands is not unlawful, though the directors must ensure that the transaction is demonstrably for the material benefit of the company, a position that is reinforced by the judgment of Prospect Property Limited (in liquidation) –v- McNeill (1991) (CILR).

Structuring Transactions

The basic off-balance sheet financing structure for an issue of debt securities or repackaging requires a company owned by a charitable trust or a STAR trust (the latter operates such that any residual profit of the company would be held on trust for the benefit of the noteholders). The suitability of Cayman Islands' SPVs for structures such as these is well established. The share capital of a Cayman Islands' company may be denominated in any currency (including Euro) to simplify the accounting requirements, and there are no minimum requirements in respect of issued or paid up capital.

Collateralised Debt Obligations ("CDOs")

The Cayman Islands are the jurisdiction of choice for incorporating the Issuer on a CDO transaction, be it a balance sheet or arbitrage structure, and whether true sale or synthetic. Since the risk associated with a CDO transaction is parcelled into the junior tranche, it is often the requirements of the holders or potential holders of the junior tranche that drive the structuring of the funding side of the transaction. However, in 1999 the U.S. accounting profession indicated that, pursuant to FASB 125, off balance sheet treatment would not be achieved for a U.S. originator where the junior tranche of a CDO is issued as debt. This has led to a general tendency for the junior tranche to be issued as preference shares, and the preference shares are generally listed either on Luxembourg, Dublin or the Cayman Islands Stock Exchange along with the debt tranches and are occasionally rated.

There is no requirement for the register of members of a Cayman Islands company to be held in the Cayman Islands as a matter of Cayman Islands law, and clearly it is more practical for it to reside with the preference share paying agent to most easily facilitate payments on the preference shares. However, there is a risk associated with adopting this approach arising out of the English law decision Macmillan –v- Bishopsgate (No. 3) [HL]. This case, though not technically binding in the Cayman Islands, held that priorities of competing interests in shares of a company are not necessarily determined in accordance with the law of incorporation of that company and the case suggests that, in certain circumstances, the issue of priority may be determined according to the laws of the jurisdiction where the register of members of the company is situated. Accordingly, keeping the register of members in New York or elsewhere with the preference share paying agent would give rise to a complex conflict of law issue on the transaction, and in order to avoid the need to qualify the legal opinion accordingly, a decision was taken on CSFB's SFA CABS II CDO, Ltd. to keep the register of members in the Cayman Islands.

The situation is further complicated where a transaction combines a U.S. originator (who needs to issue equity for U.S. GAAP purposes) and a European investor in the junior tranche who is unable or unwilling to invest in shares. In these circumstances, a compromise needs to be reached. For some transactions, the Preference Shares of a CDO transaction have been separately repackaged through a further Cayman Islands SPV that issues debt. On others, such as UBS Warburg's North Street Referenced Linked Notes, 2000-3 Trust, and various other transactions, the right result for both originator and investor has been reached by adopting an innovative trust structure. This involves a Cayman Islands administrator acting as trustee of the issue and issuing limited recourse trust interests represented by certificates to investors. This is a route that is increasingly finding favour with arrangers, when the situation arises of incompatibility between US GAAP requirements and those of investors.

A recent transaction, structured through a Dutch B.V. to take advantage of its double taxation treaty with the U.K., attracted an Italian investor who unusually was unable to hold the investment in the form of debt. The debt issued by the Dutch B.V. was repackaged through a Cayman Islands company in order to privately place preference shares with the Italian investor. The transaction was structured so that dividends on the preference shares matched debt payments on the notes of the Dutch B.V., and voting rights attached to the Dutch B.V. notes were effectively passed through to the end investor by imposing an obligation upon the custodian to consult the end investor, prior to voting the notes. Costs were kept to a minimum as the Cayman Islands administrator agreed to act as custodian for the Dutch B.V. notes (which were Euroclear traded) and all documents on the transaction were governed by Cayman Islands law.

Other Structures

The ability of a Cayman Islands' SPV to issue shares that are redeemable out of share premium and out of capital enables transactions to be structured whereby an instrument issued that has the legal characteristics of equity can have the economic substance of debt. This is achieved by arranging for shares to be issued with a par value as a very small proportion of their issue price, thereby ensuring that the majority of the proceeds are entered into the share premium account of the Cayman Islands' SPV. The effect is that it is as easy to provide for preference shares to be "repaid" as it is for debt. Thereafter, the terms of the preference shares provide that they will be redeemed at a specific time in the future, and dividends are tailored to match the notional interest payments. Structuring of this nature is not readily achieved in other offshore jurisdictions where redemption of shares is a more cumbersome activity.

The Cayman Islands provides the natural choice of jurisdiction of incorporation of the Issuer for whole business financings, in a large part due to the clean financial assistance opinion that can be given on such a transaction. Over the past six months, Walkers have been instructed in relation to Deutsche Bank's, THPA Finance Limited, JP Morgan's, RHM Finance Limited and Lehman Brothers' Really Useful Theatres Finance Limited.

Tax Analysis of a Structured Financing Taxation

On a structured finance transaction, it is imperative that there is no tax leakage in the deal. With the huge and increasing size of recent transactions only a small number of basis points of tax can amount to a large overall tax charge. Tax leakage can arise in any one of the following ways:

  • Entity level corporation tax in the jurisdiction in which the company is incorporated;
  • Entity level corporation tax in any other jurisdiction in which, by virtue of its activities, it is deemed to be doing business;
  • Withholding taxes due with respect to payments made by the SPV;
  • Withholding taxes with respect to the payments received by the SPV;
  • Other relevant taxes e.g. stamp duty.

In the Cayman Islands, there is no corporation tax on any company carrying out either domestic business or off-shore business, and the fact that there has never been any corporation tax in the Cayman Islands provides the comfort that this will continue to be the case. The professionalism of the Cayman Islands administrators means that Cayman Islands companies are centrally managed and controlled in the Cayman Islands, which helps on-shore tax counsel gain comfort that the SPV will not be taxable in the relevant on-shore jurisdiction (except in certain cases where the Cayman Islands' SPV is purposely tax resident in the United Kingdom or elsewhere). In relation to payments made by a Cayman Islands' SPV, there is no tax withheld by the Cayman Islands government on any payment (of principal, interest or otherwise) made by them.

However, where there would be withholding tax imposed on payments made in relation to the underlying assets of a transaction, it is often prudent for the transaction to be structured to benefit from a double taxation treaty. Accordingly, where U.K. commercial mortgages are being securitised, and U.K. payors would be required to withhold tax on interest payments paid abroad, pursuant to Section 349 of the Taxes Act 1988. The preferred route would be to structure through a Dutch B.V., taking advantage of the UK/Netherlands double tax treaty, even though this would give rise to a corporation tax charge at the level of Dutch B.V.

Stamp duty is not an issue for a carefully structured transaction where the issuer is incorporated in the Cayman Islands. Stamp duty is charged at US$600 on the instrument that creates a security interest, and with that exception the tax is de minimis. Stamp duty only arises in the Cayman Islands where the relevant instrument is physically brought into the Cayman Islands. Usually security documents are executed by power of attorney outside the Cayman Islands. If it is preferred that documents are executed by directors of the relevant Cayman Islands SPV, the documents need to be held in escrow by the directors until the documents have been dispatched out of the jurisdiction.

OECD Forum on Harmful Tax Practices

On 26 June 2000, the OECD published a list of jurisdictions which it perceived had harmful tax practices. The Cayman Islands were not included on the list of over 40 jurisdictions, since it had signed a letter of commitment to eliminate harmful tax practices by 2005.

The Cayman Islands were able to take this robust approach position, since the jurisdiction does not have discriminatory tax treatment between companies carrying out on-shore business and those carrying out off-shore business in the financial sector. All Cayman Islands companies are treated equally with regard to the level of taxation imposed upon them: there is no tax (through direct assessment or withholding) on any type of Cayman Islands company. It was consequently easy for the Cayman Islands to avoid being listed by the OECD as having harmful tax practices.

The Jersey Position

By contrast, the Jersey position is more complex and seemingly more troublesome. Jersey has for over 50 years had a 20% rate of tax on businesses that are resident in Jersey for tax purposes, and has more recently introduced the exempt company with a zero rate of tax for off-shore financial work.

It is principally this discrimination in the tax rate between local and off-shore business that the OECD held to be objectionable. Under pressure from the international community, Jersey has set about seeking to find a tax regime that satisfies both the OECD and the demands of the structured finance industry, which broadly requires no tax leakage on structured finance transactions. One approach that has been pursued by Jersey has been to seek to remodel itself on the Cayman Islands' zero corporation tax position, though this has proven to be politically unacceptable. Currently, a system of having in place trading companies and investment companies is under review, with different rules as to deductibility. On this basis, Jersey's structured finance business going forward would be more akin to that of Ireland and Holland than it would be to that of the Cayman Islands. As Richard Pratt, Director-General of the Jersey Financial Services Commission, was quoted by The Times as saying "It should be that no one pays any tax. That would not be different for non-residents, but then we would have no revenue. A balance must be struck where everybody pays tax somehow". This gives rise to concern for Structured Finance practitioners who are keen not to set up a thirty-year deal where they are unable to quantify the potential tax charge over the life of the deal. International Securitisation Report (May 2001) quotes a senior banker from Jersey as saying: "The OECD review has caused some Investment Banking houses to review whether they want to locate their SPVs in Jersey. Investment Bankers do not want to find themselves in the situation that if withholding tax is applied to SPVs, they need to re-arrange transactions at their own expense". The market response of many market participants has been flight to the stability of the Cayman Islands which does not have these overhanging threats.

Conclusion

In summary, the Cayman Islands continue to offer the structured finance industry a commercial and flexible approach, against a bedrock of stability, especially in relation to the tax analysis of transactions. This, combined with its depth of expertise keeps the Cayman Islands at the head of the field for off-shore jurisdictions for structured finance transactions.

The content of this article does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on in that way. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions