Cayman Islands: Winding Up Solvent Funds Loss of Substratum

Last Updated: 14 December 2010
Article by Colette Wilkins, Rupert Bell, Matthew Goucke and Ingrid Pierce

Most Read Contributor in Cayman Islands, September 2018

The Issue

An issue arising with increasing frequency in connection with Cayman Islands domiciled investment funds is the circumstances in which an investor in a solvent fund can bring an informal wind down initiated by management of the fund to an end and have the board replaced by a liquidator appointed by the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands ("the Court"). Recent case law in the Cayman Islands has shed light on the circumstances in which the Court might intervene, and the factors which may militate against such intervention.


It has been approximately two years since the unprecedented economic environment of 2008 began severely impacting investment markets. Due to the tight credit markets and resulting liquidity issues, many open ended investment vehicles took steps to manage liquidity issues and to protect their investors' interests, for example by suspending the ability of investors to redeem shares or interests in order to prevent a fire sale of assets at severely depressed prices and/or maintain the solvency of the investment vehicles.

In the context of taking these steps, some funds determined that their investment strategy was no longer viable and informed investors that they would be conducting an informal wind down of operations by realising their assets and returning the proceeds of realisation to their investors over a particular timeframe, depending upon the profile and liquidity of the portfolio.

An issue arising in a number of recent cases is whether investors unhappy with an informal wind down can ask the Court to appoint a liquidator even though there is no suggestion of lack of probity on the part of the fund's directors or managers or no express need for independent investigation. Circumstances in which investors might wish to have a liquidator appointed include perceived delay in the realisation of assets or return of realisation proceeds, or the continued receipt by managers of a management fee equivalent to that charged when the investment vehicle was actively trading.

Just and Equitable Petitions

There is no doubt that the Court has jurisdiction to wind up an insolvent fund. In the case of a solvent fund, the Court has jurisdiction to make a winding up order on the petition of a shareholder where it is 'just and equitable' to do so.

The circumstances in which it will be just and equitable to wind up a solvent fund are not limited, but they tend to fall within certain well defined categories including lack of probity on the part of directors, the need for an independent investigation of the fund's affairs, deadlock, or the oppression of minority shareholders. It is also well established that it is just and equitable for a fund to be wound up by the Court, and a liquidator appointed, if a shareholder can establish that the purpose for which the fund was established can no longer be achieved, i.e. that the 'substratum' of the fund has been lost. However, the issue of when a fund can be said to have lost its substratum is open to debate.

Substratum – Funds

There are different views as to when a fund has lost its substratum. If the purpose of the fund is only to pursue a particular investment objective, then once the decision is taken by the fund that that objective can no longer be achieved (for example, by suspending all voluntary redemptions and implementing an informal wind down process), one can see that it is arguable that the substratum has been lost. That was the view taken by Jones J in the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands in Re Belmont Asset Based Lending, (January 2010), ICP Strategic Credit Income Fund Ltd (August 2010), and followed in his recent decision in Re Wyser-Pratte Eurovalue Fund Ltd (November 2010). It was the view of Jones J in these three decisions that the mere fact that a fund has ceased to be viable as an open ended mutual fund is sufficient justification to make a winding up order.

On the other hand, there is an alternative view that the purpose of a fund is wider than merely pursuing a particular investment strategy. The purpose of the fund could be said to include realising investments and returning the proceeds to shareholders prior to a formal liquidation and dissolution of the fund. If that view is right, then while the fund is continuing its commercial functions and returning the proceeds of investment to shareholders it would not be accurate to state that the substratum has gone. This somewhat broader view of the fund's substratum seems to have been adopted by Foster J in Re Steel Partners II, (November 2009) another first instance decision of the Court. Also, in the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court (British Virgin Islands) Bannister J seems to have taken a broad view of what constitutes a fund's substratum, holding in Citco Global Custody NV v Y2K Finance Inc (November 2009) that where directors are carrying on the business of the fund (returning proceeds of redemption to shareholders), albeit for the last time, it is not just and equitable to wind the fund up and it is not the proper exercise of a court's discretion to step in and unilaterally shut the fund down.

We think that the alternative view has considerable force, namely that the mere fact that an open ended mutual fund has ceased to be viable should not be regarded, without more, as sufficient justification to make a winding up order. We expect the question of which view is to be preferred will be taken to the Court of Appeal in due course.

Pragmatic Approach

Notwithstanding the divergent views as to when it might be said to be just and equitable to wind up a fund on the basis that its substratum has been lost, the Court has considerable flexibility with regard to the remedies available even where it decides that there is jurisdiction to wind up. It does not necessarily follow that the Court will appoint a liquidator and make a winding up order simply because it takes the view that the substratum has gone. If the informal wind down is proceeding at a reasonable pace and there appears to be no particular advantage in appointing a liquidator, the Court may instead give directions and allow the directors to continue the informal wind down of the fund. In the most recent decision (Wyser-Pratte) the Court took advantage of the flexibility afforded by the Cayman Islands Companies Law (2010 Revision) and allowed the directors to continue the informal wind down of the fund. This pragmatic approach is to be welcomed, and suggests that even if the Court takes what might be regarded as a narrow view as to what constitutes the substratum of a Cayman Islands investment fund, it is alive to the commercial realities and will strive to arrive at a solution which is in the interests of all the shareholders in a solvent fund.

New Funds

With respect to new funds yet to be launched, the argument that the fund has lost its substratum (upon the commencement of a future informal winding down) can be pre-empted to a large extent by careful and considered legal drafting. For example, investment management agreements and offering memoranda can be tailored explicitly to contemplate a winding down process within the ambit of the manager's services and the fund's purposes. In addition, since March 2009 the Cayman Islands' Companies Law requires the Court to dismiss or adjourn a winding up petition brought by an investor who is contractually bound not to present such a petition against the fund. Accordingly, funds should consider including appropriate non petition language in subscription documents or other agreements with investors. These legal tools should provide a solid answer to an allegation of loss of substratum and may be supplemented by regular and clear communication with investors at times when the fund faces liquidity issues.

Petitioning for Winding Up – a High Risk Strategy

In the Cayman Islands the general principle is that a successful party recovers its costs from the other party to the litigation. The Court of Appeal decision in Camulos Partners Offshore Limited (the hearing took place on 2 December 2009, judgment was delivered on 18 March 2010) made it clear that a shareholder in a Cayman Islands fund needs to ensure that it does not have a more suitable alternative remedy before presenting a winding up petition on the just and equitable ground.

Presenting a winding up petition against a solvent fund can be a high risk strategy. Winding up petitions must not be used to put maximum pressure on a fund and, where a winding up petition is used for this purpose, it is liable to be struck out as an abuse of process with the shareholder liable to meet the legal costs of the fund.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions