Canada: Highlights Of Canada’s 2010 Federal Budget

The federal budget tabled on March 4, 2010 contains a number of unexpected proposed amendments to Canada's Income Tax Act (the Tax Act), including welcome amendments to the concept of taxable Canadian property, helpful changes relating to the foreign investment entity and non-resident trust proposals, rules dealing with loss trading in the context of the conversion of SIFTs to corporate form and proposed changes to the stock option rules. Highlights of these proposed amendments are described below.

Proposed Amendments to the Concept of Taxable Canadian Property

The concept of "taxable Canadian property" (TCP) is of importance to non-residents and the 2010 Budget proposes to make significant changes to this concept. Non-residents are subject to Canadian taxation in respect of capital gains on the disposition of property that is TCP. Under the current rules, shares of a private (unlisted) Canadian corporation are TCP regardless of the level of ownership by the non-resident and regardless of the nature of the assets and activities of the corporation. The 2010 Budget proposes to change this by providing an additional requirement – namely, that shares of a private Canadian corporation will be considered to be TCP only if, at any time during a five-year look-back period, more than 50% of the fair market value of the shares was derived directly or indirectly from one or any combination of (i) real or immovable property situated in Canada; (ii) Canadian resource properties; (iii) timber resource properties; and (iv) options or interests in respect of such properties.

A similar change is proposed in respect of interests in partnerships and trusts (other than a unit of a mutual fund trust to which other existing rules are applicable) in that such interests will not be TCP unless this asset test is met by the partnership or trust at any time during a five-year look-back period.

Similar changes are also proposed in respect of shares of public (listed) Canadian corporations. Under the current rules, shares of a listed Canadian corporation are TCP only if the non-resident (together with non-arm's-length persons) owned 25% or more of the shares of any class of the corporation at any time over a five-year look-back period. The 2010 Budget proposes to change this by maintaining the 25% threshold ownership test and adding the additional requirement that the asset test described above must also be met at any time during the five-year look-back period.

Additional changes in the TCP area are proposed in respect of certain "deeming" rules, which in their current form deem "new" property received in substitution for or in exchange for "old" property (as a result of dispositions in the context of certain reorganizations) to be TCP if the "old" property was TCP. These rules are proposed to be changed so that the "new" property will be deemed to be TCP for (only) a five-year period after the event giving rise to the disposition.

Non-residents are also subject to certain requirements to notify the tax authorities and to apply for a certificate under section 116 of the Tax Act in respect of dispositions of certain types of TCP and, in certain cases, to file a Canadian income tax return in respect of the disposition. A very important consequence of the remedial proposed changes to the concept of TCP is that the circumstances in which these requirements will apply will be significantly reduced. The proposed changes will therefore be of particular importance to non-resident investors, including private equity investors and sovereign wealth funds in respect of investments in Canadian corporations.

The proposed changes in the TCP area are generally applicable after March 4, 2010.

Proposed Amendments to the Foreign Investment Entity Proposals

The 2010 Budget proposes to make a sweeping change to the complex set of proposals relating to "foreign investment entities," which have existed in proposed form for over 10 years. The outstanding proposals were intended to replace a fairly simple rule that currently exists in section 94.1 of the Tax Act. The 2010 Budget proposes to overhaul the outstanding proposals and to return to the approach taken in current section 94.1, subject to certain limited enhancements.

The existing rules in section 94.1 deal with an interest in property described as "offshore investment fund property" (OIFP). The types of property covered by these rules include a share or an interest in or a debt of certain non-resident entities, including a non-resident corporation, partnership, fund or entity and certain types of trusts. To be OIFP, it must be reasonable to consider that the property derives its value, directly or indirectly, primarily from assets that are "portfolio investments" of certain described kinds. In addition, it must be reasonable to conclude, having regard to all the circumstances, that one of the main reasons for a person acquiring the property was to derive a benefit from the assets constituting the "portfolio investments" in such a manner that the taxes on income, profit and gains from such assets are significantly less than the taxes that would have been applicable under the Tax Act if such income, profit and gains had been earned directly by the person. The consequence of a property being OIFP is that the holder must include an amount in respect of the "designated cost" of the OIFP in computing the holder's income for the year. The amount is computed by reference to a prescribed rate of interest under the Tax Act.

One of the limited enhancements proposed to the existing rules in section 94.1 is to increase the prescribed rate to the three-month-average treasury bill rate plus two percentage points. A further enhancement is proposed in respect of the rules as they apply to beneficiaries of certain non-resident trusts (that are not deemed to be resident in Canada under the revised non-resident trust rules). It is further proposed to extend the relevant reassessment period for interests in OIFP or in such non-resident trusts by an additional three years. As a supporting change, it is proposed that the existing reporting requirements in respect of "specified foreign property" be expanded so that more detailed information is available for audit use.

Proposed Amendments to the Non-Resident Trust Rules

The non-resident trust (NRT) rules are a complex set of rules dealing with non-resident trusts, which have also existed in proposed form for over 10 years. In general terms, if a non-resident trust has a resident "specified contributor" or a "resident beneficiary," it becomes subject to the NRT rules with the result that, generally, the trust is deemed to be a resident of Canada and becomes subject to Canadian tax. In addition, each entity that is a "resident contributor" or a "resident beneficiary" is made jointly and severally, or solidarily, liable for the tax payable by the trust. The 2010 Budget proposes to make certain changes of a remedial nature to the NRT rules.

The 2010 Budget essentially confirms a change that was previously announced in the form of "comfort letters" issued by the Department of Finance with respect to the outstanding NRT proposals and Canadian tax-exempt entities. Under the outstanding proposals, a Canadian tax-exempt entity (such as a pension fund) that invests in a non-resident trust may cause the trust to be subject to the NRT rules and would make the tax-exempt entity jointly and severally, or solidarily, liable for the trust's income tax liability. The 2010 Budget proposes that an exemption from the resident contributor and resident beneficiary status be provided generally for all tax-exempt entities under the Tax Act (such as pension funds, Crown corporations and registered charities). This is subject to an anti-avoidance rule that applies where it may be considered that the tax-exempt entity is being used as a "conduit" to allow a resident of Canada to make indirect contributions to a non-resident trust.

The outstanding NRT proposals may cause "genuine" non-resident commercial trusts to be caught if they make investments in certain types of defined "restricted property" (such as shares of Canadian corporations). The 2010 Budget proposes to eliminate the provision in the outstanding proposals that would have imposed deemed Canadian residence on a trust only because it acquired or held such "restricted property."

The outstanding NRT proposals are problematic with respect to investments by Canadian residents in "genuine" non-resident commercial trusts. While the outstanding proposals attempt to provide exemptions for such commercial trusts, the exemptions are narrow and restrictive. The 2010 Budget proposes to expand the scope of the exemption for genuine commercial trusts. The newly proposed exemptions will generally apply to trust interests in respect of which

  1. each beneficiary is entitled to both the income and the capital of the trust;
  2. the entitlements to income and capital are not based on the exercise of discretion;
  3. the terms of the trust cannot be varied without the consent of all or a majority of the beneficiaries;
  4. the trust is not a "personal trust";
  5. a transfer of the interest in the trust would be a disposition and interests in the trust cannot cease to exist otherwise than by way of a redemption of the interest for fair market value; and
  6. certain dispersal and ownership tests are met.

The last test relating to dispersal and ownership is proposed to be expanded to cover situations in which (i) the interests in the trust are listed and regularly traded on a designated stock exchange; (ii) the interests in the trust were issued by the trust for fair market value; or (iii) where the trust has at least 150 investors, the interests in the trust are available to the public in an open market.

Proposed Amendments to the SIFT Conversion Rules Relating to Loss Trading

In 2008, rules were introduced to facilitate the "conversion" of "specified investment flow through" (SIFT) entities, such as income trusts, to corporations on a tax-deferred manner to the entity and its unitholders. In general terms, the conversion rules provide for the ultimate "exchange" or "redemption" of a unitholder's units of the SIFT in return for shares of a corporation that acquires the property owned by the SIFT and that continues on following the termination of the SIFT. The result is that the corporation effectively becomes owned by the former unitholders of the SIFT and the corporation owns the property previously owned by the SIFT. The corporation that is used for this purpose can be a new corporation or an existing corporation. In a number of SIFT conversions, an existing corporation was used for the purpose of the conversion – a corporation that had losses from prior activities. The conversion was structured to occur so that, as a technical matter, there was arguably no "acquisition of control" by a person or group of persons of the loss corporation used for the purposes of the conversion so that the prior losses of the corporation may continue to be used, unaffected by the rules in the Tax Act that restrict the use of prior losses of a corporation following an acquisition of control of the corporation.

In general, such "loss trading" transactions in the context of SIFT conversions were technically not caught by the rule in existing paragraph 256(7)(c) of the Tax Act, which applies to a "reverse takeover" of one corporation by another corporation. That rule provides that where corporation A is acquired by corporation B in a transaction whereby the shareholders of corporation A exchange their shares of corporation A in return for shares of corporation B, control of corporation B is deemed to be acquired by a person or group of persons for purposes of the Tax Act unless, viewing the shareholders of corporation A that acquired shares of corporation B as one person, that fictional person would not control corporation B. In other words, there would be an acquisition of control of corporation B for purposes of the Tax Act if the shareholders of corporation A end up owning more shares of corporation B than the former shareholders of corporation B. This existing rule would arguably not, as a technical matter, apply to the SIFT loss trading transactions to result in an acquisition of control of the loss corporation (the acquiring corporation) since the rule deals with the acquisition of shares of corporation B by the shareholders of another corporation, not by unitholders of an income trust.

The 2010 Budget proposes to amend the Tax Act to add a rule similar to that in existing paragraph 256(7)(c) that would apply in "reverse takeover" situations in which unitholders of a SIFT trust (or partners of a publicly traded SIFT partnership) dispose of their units of the SIFT trust (or interests in a SIFT partnership) to a corporation in a SIFT conversion transaction and such former SIFT unitholders essentially control the corporation from then on. The new rule would result in an acquisition of control of the corporation used to facilitate the SIFT conversion transaction. This new rule is proposed to be applicable to SIFT conversion transactions that occur after 4:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time on March 4, 2010, subject to grandfathering rules for transactions that are the subject of an agreement in writing entered into before that time (other than an agreement that provides for an exception from completion as a result of amendments to the Tax Act).

The 2010 Budget conversely proposes to add a helpful rule in the context of SIFT conversions that relates to control of corporations owned in the SIFT structure. Under the SIFT conversion rules, the most common method used to facilitate a conversion is to use a corporation that acquires all of the units of the SIFT trust in exchange for its shares. This "exchangeco" then becomes the sole holder of the SIFT's units (the only beneficiary of the SIFT trust). This is followed by a windup of the SIFT trust (in certain cases this is preceded by the windup of an intermediary trust owned by the SIFT trust), which results in the property of the SIFT, including the shares of corporations owned by the SIFT, being subsequently owned by the exchangeco. Under the relevant jurisprudence, if a corporation is owned by a trust, the trustees of the trust control the corporation. Under the existing rules, on the basis of this jurisprudence, it is possible that the termination of the SIFT trust and the resulting transfer of the shares of corporations owned by the SIFT trust to exchangeco may result in an acquisition of control of such corporations owned by the SIFT trust. Such an acquisition of control would restrict the use of prior losses in the corporations, including the termination of losses derived from property and capital losses. The 2010 Budget proposes to add a helpful rule to the effect that where a corporation (exchangeco) that is used to facilitate a SIFT conversion is the only beneficiary of the SIFT trust and the SIFT trust controls other corporations, on a distribution of the shares of such other corporations on the termination of the SIFT trust, the exchangeco will be deemed not to have acquired control of such other corporations because of that distribution. This helpful rule is proposed to be applicable to transactions undertaken after 4:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time on March 4, 2010, subject to grandfathering rules for transactions that are the subject of an agreement in writing entered into before that time (other than an agreement that provides for an exception from completion as a result of amendments to the Tax Act). However, parties that have implemented or agreed to implement a SIFT conversion prior to March 4, 2010 may elect in writing to have this helpful rule apply in their circumstances.

Proposed Amendments to the Stock Option Rules

The 2010 Budget proposes certain amendments to the stock option rules, many of which were unexpected and "adverse" in nature.

  1. Under the current rules and administrative practice, certain beneficial results arise where an optionholder has the right to elect to receive a cash amount equal to the "in the money" amount on the exercise of stock options in respect of which the employee would otherwise be entitled to the "1/2" treatment on the ordinary exercise of the stock options. In particular, the employee would be entitled to receive the 1/2 treatment on the stock option benefit represented by the cash payment (only one half would be included in income). In addition, the corporate employer would be entitled to a deduction for the cash payment (as an employment expense in effect). The 2010 Budget proposes to change the treatment of the cash payment received on such a cash payment alternative, which is designed to prevent the employer from claiming the deduction. The 2010 Budget proposes to do this by providing that the employee will not be entitled to the 1/2 treatment unless the employer files an election in prescribed form and within the prescribed time that it will not deduct any amount in respect of the cash payment alternative (in respect of all of its stock options issued or to be issued after 4:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time on March 4, 2010) and the employer provides the employee with evidence in writing of such election. This change is proposed to be applicable to stock option dispositions that occur after 4:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time on March 4, 2010.
  2. Under the current rules, a limited deferral is provided in respect of publicly listed securities acquired on the exercise of stock options where the employee would be entitled to the 1/2 treatment. A deferral by means of an election is provided for the "first" $100,000 of value of securities acquired under the options (that vest in a particular year) so that the benefit is not included in the income of the employee at the time the option is exercised to acquire the securities; the inclusion of the benefit is deferred until the employee disposes of such securities. The 2010 Budget proposes to eliminate this deferral rule for rights under an agreement to sell or issue securities exercised after 4:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time on March 4, 2010.
  3. The 2010 Budget proposes to introduce rules to "clarify" that a disposition of rights under a stock option agreement to a non-arm's-length party will be considered to give rise to a stock option benefit at the time of the disposition. This is proposed to apply to dispositions of rights occurring after 4:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time on March 4, 2010.
  4. The 2010 Budget proposes to introduce rules that will strengthen the withholding and remittance obligations of employers in respect of securities acquired on the exercise of stock options by employees after 2010. In particular, employers will be required to remit amounts in respect of stock option benefits of employees (other than amounts relating to stock options in respect of "Canadian-controlled private corporations") in the same way as they are currently required to remit for amounts paid as cash bonuses subject to a one-half reduction if the requirements for the 1/2 treatment are met.
  5. The 2010 Budget proposes to add special rules to assist employees who took advantage of the deferral rule described above in the past and are experiencing financial difficulties as a result of the decline in the value of the optioned securities to the point that the value of the securities is less than the deferred tax liability on the underlying stock option benefit.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions