Canada: Approach RFP, Tender And Procurement Documents With Care

In Tercon Construction Ltd. v. British Columbia (Ministry of Transportation and Highways), 2010 SCC 4, the Supreme Court of Canada provided an analytical framework for the interpretation of a clause excluding liability in the context of a request for proposals, giving owners cause to carefully consider the drafting of RFP, tender or other procurement documents in the future.

The decision concerned a 2001 RFP by the Ministry of Transportation and Highways of British Columbia to build a $35-million highway. Under the terms of the RFP, only six bidders were eligible to submit a proposal. These eligible bidders included Tercon Contractors Ltd., the appellant, and Brentwood Enterprises Ltd., both of which were selected as short-listed proponents.

Lacking expertise in key aspects of construction and facing a limited local bonding capacity, Brentwood entered into an agreement with another construction company to form a joint venture. Although the bid was submitted in Brentwood's name, the Court found it to be, in substance, on behalf of the joint venture. Brentwood's partner was not an eligible bidder under the terms of the RFP and would not have been permitted to submit a bid on its own. Despite the fact that the province was aware of the joint venture arrangement and thought that a bid in the joint venture's name could not be considered, the province awarded the contract to Brentwood.

Tercon sued for breach of the tendering contract it entered into with the province through the RFP process, alleging that the province considered and accepted an ineligible bid. The substance of the dispute between Tercon and the province was the exclusion of liability clause contained in the RFP, which provided in part that:

" Proponent shall have any claim for any compensation of any kind whatsoever, as a result of participating in this RFP, and by submitting a proposal each proponent shall be deemed to have agreed that it has no claim." (emphasis added)

While the Court was unanimous on the analysis of what should be applied when considering the enforceability of an exclusion clause in the context of an RFP or tender, it was split 5-4 in its interpretation of whether the clause in question applied to the circumstances of Tercon's claim for compensation.

Both the majority and minority followed the lead established by the Court in The Queen in Right of Ontario v. Ron Engineering & Construction (Eastern) Ltd., [1981] 1 S.C.R. 111 (Ron Engineering) finding an intent to create a binding contract for the procurement process, the terms of which were the words used in the RFP. The Court took this opportunity to lay out an analytical framework to be used in determining the enforceability of an exclusion clause in a procurement contract.

The applicable analytical framework was laid out as a series of three enquiries by Justice Binnie writing on behalf of the minority. The first issue is whether the exclusion clause is applicable to the circumstances in question. This is a matter of interpretation, and depends on the court's assessment of the parties' intentions as expressed in the contract as a whole. If the exclusion clause does apply, the court must then determine whether it is valid in that it is not unconscionable as between the parties. This requires a consideration of whether factors such as an inequality in bargaining power existed at the time the contract was entered into. Finally, if the exclusion clause is both applicable and valid, the court may consider whether it should refuse to enforce it because of the existence of an overriding, significant, public consideration.

Justice Cromwell's opinion on behalf of the majority adopted the analytical framework but was more mindful of bidders, focusing on the nature of the tendering process and its inherent implied duty of fairness. In allowing the appeal and restoring the trial judge's conclusion that the exclusion clause did not apply to the circumstances of Tercon's claim for compensation, Justice Cromwell posed the essential question as being whether the exclusion clause, properly interpreted, excluded liability for the province having considered a bid from an ineligible bidder who was not supposed to be "participating in this RFP" process at all. According to the majority's interpretation, a key part of "participating in this RFP" was participating in a contest among those eligible to participate. A process involving ineligible bidders was not what was called for by this RFP, and did not in any meaningful sense amount to "participating in this RFP". Acceptance of a bid from an ineligible bidder "attacks the underlying premise of the process", and the majority concluded that the parties could not have intended to waive liability for such an attack.

Justice Binnie for the minority emphasized the "very strong public interest" in upholding and enforcing freely negotiated contracts, and stated that the party seeking to avoid enforcement must point to some "paramount consideration of public policy" in order to override this public interest and defeat the parties' contractual rights. Justice Binnie gave the exclusion clause a more literal interpretation. By submitting a bid, Tercon "participated in" the RFP process, which on its face triggered the application of the exclusion clause. To deny such participation occurred would be, according to Justice Binnie, a "strained and artificial interpretation" to avoid what might be interpreted in hindsight as an unfair clause. There was no relevant imbalance in bargaining power, and the public policy interest in a fair and transparent tendering process was not enough to override the protection afforded the province through the exclusion clause that Tercon freely agreed to. So long as contractors are willing to bid on such terms, Justice Binnie concluded that it is not the court's job "to rescue them from the consequences of their decision to do so."

Both the majority and the minority approached the RFP first with a view to determining whether it was intended to create contractual relations. Concluding that the procurement document was intended to constitute a contract between owner and bidders, following the established line of cases beginning with Ron Engineering, the Court applied principles of contract interpretation to the contract created by the procurement documents without regard to any distinction based upon whether they were an RFP, tender or bid.

The clear message for owners is that they must approach the drafting of procurement documents with the same level of care as the contracts that they plan to enter into with the successful proponent. Procurement documents are binding contracts that will be interpreted by the Courts as commercial contracts. Failure to do so in this case resulted in a multi-million dollar loss for the owner. Exclusions of liability must therefore be carefully drafted to ensure that they are found to be applicable in the intended circumstances. The language of an effective exclusion clause must be clear and unambiguous.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.