Canada: Supreme Court Of Canada Clarifies Scope Of Regulatory Discretion On Environmental Assessments

Copyright 2010, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Originally published in Blakes Bulletin on Environmental Law, January 2010


In a unanimous decision released on January 21, 2010, the Supreme Court of Canada clarified the discretion of a federal responsible authority (RA) to make decisions with respect to the scoping of projects for purposes of the federal environmental assessment (EA) process. In MiningWatch Canada v. Canada (Fisheries and Oceans), the court overturned a Federal Court of Appeal decision that granted RAs discretion to scope a project to determine the type of EA process or "track" that will apply. The track determines the level of the intensity of the EA review.

For over four years, the case has been in litigation, resulting in some confusion around the authority of an RA to decide if proposed projects can be "scoped" as either subject to a screening or a comprehensive study as the EA process that applies. The Supreme Court has definitively stated that the facts about a project as proposed by a project proponent determine whether a project is caught by the comprehensive study rules – there is no discretion under the law. In this case, the project's ore production resulted in a mandatory conclusion under the legislation that it be subject to a comprehensive study. However, the court's remedy was simply to declare this; not to order a comprehensive study at this time.


Red Chris Development Company and BCMetals Corporation (Red Chris) submitted a project description to the BC Environmental Assessment Office (BCEAO) in October 2003 for a copper and a gold mine. The BCEAO determined that the Red Chris project required a provincial EA certificate. The project received approval from the BCEAO in August 2005, after extensive review and comment by a working group, which included provincial and federal agencies, and local First Nations, as well as public consultation. The Supreme Court comments that this process "proceeded smoothly" and at no time did MiningWatch Canada (MiningWatch) object to the provincial EA process or certificate.

In 2004, Red Chris also triggered the federal EA process through applications to Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) related to dams for the proposed tailings impoundment area and for a stream crossing. DFO then posted a Notice of Commencement of an Environmental Assessment, announcing that a comprehensive study would ensue. The Notice of Commencement described the project as proposed by the proponent, and stated that the scope of the project would be added once it became available.

The decision to proceed with the EA by way of a comprehensive study was based on the proposed project production as described by the proponent: ore production capacity of up to 50,000 tonnes per day. This exceeded the allowable 600 tonnes per day provided for under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act's (CEAA) Comprehensive Study List Regulations (the CSL). The CSL outlines the triggers for when a project is subject to a comprehensive study.

DFO then re-scoped the project more narrowly on the basis that it should only consider those aspects of the project that were within its jurisdiction and responsibility flowing from the CEAA. As a result, DFO determined that the project was not within the CSL as originally contemplated and put the project through the screening process.

The trial court held that, based on the fact that the mine's proposed ore production capacity exceeded the threshold set out in the CSL, DFO had a legal responsibility to put the project through a comprehensive study and resulting public consultation. It was not within an RA's discretion to scope a project more narrowly in order to avoid the CSL. The Federal Court of Appeal reversed this decision and held that it is entirely appropriate for an RA to only consider the aspects of the project that are relevant to its jurisdiction and conclude that a project "as scoped" does not fall within the CSL. (See our July 2008 Blakes Bulletin on Environmental Law: Federal Court of Appeal Reaffirms Government Discretion in Scoping of Federal Environmental Assessments.) (

Supreme Court's Analysis

The Supreme Court of Canada held that the CEAA and its regulations require that the EA process or "track" be determined according to the project as proposed and that it is generally not open to the RA to change the level of assessment. The court found this interpretation to be consistent with Parliament's intent as found within the respective roles of the RA and the Minister in conducting EAs under the CEAA. Tracking and scoping are two distinct steps under the EA process. Once a project has been tracked in accordance with its description as proposed, it is then open to the RA to scope the project for purposes of the EA process. However, the minimum scope is how the project was proposed by the proponent.

The Supreme Court looked at the four corners of CEAA only. Its analysis did not consider the provincial/federal constitutional division of jurisdiction over the environment and, as such, the court has left open for another day the constitutional aspects of carrying out EAs in Canada.

Interestingly, while agreeing with the trial decision with respect to an RA's scoping discretion, the court disagreed with its remedy: requiring Red Chris to complete a comprehensive study. There had not been any challenge to the decision to grant a permit for the project, only the process through which this was decided. Thus, although the court found the method of permitting to be out of compliance with the CEAA, Red Chris may proceed with the project nonetheless. This conclusion is influenced by a number of factors. First, the court noted that the RA had re-scoped the project only after the Federal Court decision in Prairie Acid Rain Coalition v. Canada (Minister of Fisheries and Oceans) and found it difficult to fault the RAs for following a Federal Court decision based on the very matter with which they were dealing. Second, MiningWatch clearly stated that this case was purely a test case to determine the federal government's obligations under the CEAA and it had no proprietary or pecuniary interest in the outcome. Third, little would be gained by requiring Red Chris to proceed through the EA process over again. It had already gone through an extensive public consultation process and had, in fact, not done anything wrong to warrant the additional time and expense.


This decision will likely not have a significant impact on the scoping of future proposed projects. By requiring projects to be tracked in accordance with how they are proposed, proponents will have certainty around the regulatory process and, most importantly, provincial-federal harmonization will continue. The court stressed that minimizing duplication through governmental co-ordination was valuable for managing the federal EA requirements. While this decision may appear to be a hollow victory, at its heart it is about requiring governments to adhere to the powers that are set forth within legislation.

The CEAA is currently undergoing a seven-year review period as mandated within that statute. The resulting policy changes that may be on the horizon from this review are likely to have a more profound impact on the nature of the federal EA process and its scope and content than this decision.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
27 Oct 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Please join members of the Blakes Commercial Real Estate group as they discuss five key provisions of a commercial real estate purchase agreement that are often the subject of much negotiation but are sometimes misunderstood.

1 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

What is the emotional culture of your organization?

Every organization and workplace has an emotional culture that can have an impact on everything from employee performance to customer or client satisfaction.

3 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Join leading lawyers from the Blakes Pensions, Benefits & Executive Compensation group as they discuss recent updates and legal developments in pension and employee benefits law as well as strategies to identify and minimize common risks.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.