Canada: Patentability of Internet Business Methods

It has been more than a year since the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit struck down the "business method" exception to patentability, in State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group Inc., 47 USPQ (2d) 1596 (1998). Since then, Priceline commenced a lawsuit enforcing its reverse-auction e-commerce patent against Microsoft, and Amazon obtained a preliminary injunction preventing Barnes & Noble from using its patented "one click order" web site feature. News of these U.S. cases continues to ripple throughout the e-commerce and internet business communities. Here, we look at the State Street decision and the state of the law in Canada, including two Canadian cases decided since State Street, Re Motorola and Progressive Games v. Commissioner of Patents. We then consider the implications that these developments may have for companies conducting e-commerce and other internet business methods in Canada.

The U.S. State Street Decision

The State Street case involved a patent for a data processing system that manages a hub and spoke mutual fund. Hub and spoke mutual funds are multiple mutual funds with the same investment objectives that form a partnership. Each individual fund is a spoke investing all of its assets in a common portfolio, namely the hub. The data processing system calculates the daily value of the assets held in the common hub portfolio and allocates these assets to each individual spoke fund based upon the spoke's partnership interest at the end of each trading day. Once the assets are allocated among the various spokes, the partnership interest of each spoke can then be recalculated for the next day.

At issue in State Street was whether the patentee's system constituted patentable subject matter. Under U.S. law, the statutory categories of patentable subject matter are limited to a useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or improvements thereof. Over the years, the U.S. courts have identified three categories of unpatentable subject matter: laws of nature, natural phenomenon, and abstract ideas. The courts have also developed a number of exceptions to the categories of patentable subject matter, including the "mathematical algorithm" and "business method" exceptions.

A system such as that of the patentee in State Street, i.e., a method of investing, is arguably nothing more than a way of doing business. Indeed, the patent in State Street had been invalidated by a lower court as falling within the so-called "business method" exception. However, the appeal court took the opportunity to "lay this ill conceived exception to rest." In particular, the appeal court noted that: "Application of this particular exception has always been preceded by a ruling based on some clearer concept [under the U.S. Patent Act] or, more commonly, application of the abstract idea exception based on finding a mathematical algorithm." Accordingly, there is no longer any "business method" exception to patentability, in the United States of America.

The U.S. court also re-defined the "mathematical algorithm" exception, in holding that mathematical algorithms constitute patentable subject matter, if they produce a useful, concrete, and tangible result. Applying this reasoning to the patent in suit, the court held that the transformation of data, representing discrete dollar amounts, by a machine through a series of mathematical calculations into a final share price, constitutes a practical application of a mathematical algorithm and produces a useful, concrete, and tangible result—a final share price momentarily fixed for recording and reporting purposes. Accordingly, under U.S. law, a mathematical algorithm is statutorily acceptable, even if its output is expressed in numbers, such as price, profits, percentage, cost, or loss. It can be noted that this is a remarkably broad interpretation of a "useful, concrete and tangible result."

It is important to note that the State Street court did not decide on whether the patent in suit met all of the requirements for patentability under U.S. law. Indeed, the case has been sent back to the district court to determine whether the subject matter of the patent is novel and unobvious. It nevertheless follows that e–commerce and other computer-implemented business methods are likely to qualify for patent protection in the United States, if they are novel and unobvious, and if they produce a useful, concrete and tangible result.

State of the Law in Canada

Patents are granted under the laws of each country. The Canadian definition of patentable subject matter is similar to the U.S. definition, except that it also includes "arts." In Shell Oil Company v. Commissioner of Patents [1982] 2 S.C.R. 536, the Supreme Court of Canada noted:

"that 'art' is a word of very wide connotation and was not to be confined to new processes or products or manufacturing techniques but extended as well to new and innovative methods of applying skill or knowledge provided they produced effects or results commercially useful to the public."

Canada also has a statutory prohibition against the patenting of a mere scientific principle or abstract theorem. While the Canadian application corresponding to the State Street patent has now been abandoned, Canadian applications corresponding to the Priceline and patents remain pending. This raises the issue of whether applications for these internet business methods and others like them are likely to issue to patent to Canada.

The official position of the Canadian Patent Office is that plans or schemes of doing business are not patentable. The most cited case in Canada in support of this position is Lawson v. The Commissioner of Patents (1970), 62 C.P.R. 101. In Lawson, it was held that a method of describing and laying out parcels of land in a plan of subdivision of a greater tract of land is the skill of a solicitor and conveyancer and that of a planning consultant and a surveyor, and hence an art which belongs to the professional field. It is clear from Lawson that professional skills such as those of a doctor are not proper subject matter for a patent since the point of a process, to fall

within the limits of patentability, must be one that offers some advantage which is material, in the sense that the process belongs to a useful art as distinct from a fine art. However, this decision leaves open as to what is the dividing line between a useful art as opposed to a fine art.

The case of Schlumberger Canada Ltd. v. Commissioner of Patents (1981), 56 C.P.R. (2d) 204 (F.C.A.) is often cited for the proposition that computer programs are not patentable subject matter in Canada. However, since Schlumberger, the Canadian Patent Office has developed the position that computer methods or systems which are directed to a useful end result, and not merely directed to making calculations nor to the presentation of an algorithm and its solution, are patentable subject matter. As a result, some patents directed to computer software inventions, including computer implemented business methods, have already been granted in Canada. For example, Canadian patent No. 1,276,301, entitled "Travel Management System," is directed to a computer program for accessing scheduling and fare databases to create and display alternative travel itineraries in accordance with a preselected travel policy, and Canadian patent No. 2,121,518, entitled "Method and Electronic Apparatus for Performing Bookkeeping," covers a method for electronically performing bookkeeping and a plurality of accounting journal entries.

Two Recent Canadian Cases

Two Canadian cases decided since State Street seem to send mixed messages to the internet business community in Canada. The Canadian Patent Appeal Board (PAB) recently held in Re Motorola (1998), 86 C.P.R. (3d) 71, 76 that a computer system for converting an input value to a logarithmic value was patentable subject matter, because it included at least one piece of hardware (a ROM). While it is disappointing that the PAB did not take this opportunity to pronounce on the state of the law in Canada regarding the patentability of computer algorithms, this case is encouraging in that it demonstrates that patent protection for computer implemented methods is available in Canada, notwithstanding Schlumberger.

Less encouraging at first glance is a recent decision of the Federal Court of Canada, Progressive Games, Inc. v. Commissioner of Patents (Unreported Decision of Denault, J. dated 22 October, 1999). In this case, the court held that a method of playing a poker game did not constitute a "process", or an "art" as defined by the Supreme Court of Canada in Shell Oil v. Commissioner of Patents, even though a corresponding patent had already issued in the United States. However, in coming to this conclusion, the Judge found that the applicant's method was not merely a disembodied idea, in that it involved a practical application, with a commercially useful result. It is thus apparent that the Judge's decision to deny patentability was based on the finding that the applicant's method was not sufficiently innovative to qualify as an invention. It follows that had the applicant's method been more innovative, it would have been patentable. While the approach of the Court in Progressive Games arguably mixes the concepts of statutory subject matter and inventiveness, it should nonetheless give comfort to applicants seeking patent protection for innovative business methods in Canada.

It is clear from the above analysis that the state of the law in Canada provides no basis on which to exclude from patent protection business methods which lie in the field of a "useful art" as opposed to a "fine art," "abstract theorem," or "scientific principle." This is particularly true where the method is innovative, inherently beneficial to the public, reproducible, and controllable to produce the desired result whenever it is worked or used.


Despite the holding in Schlumberger, the trend in Canada has been and continues to be an expansion of the range of patentable subject matter and a more liberal interpretation of what amounts to be a "useful art". This trend will likely result in the Canadian Patent Office adopting the State Street or similar approach regarding the patentability of electronic commerce and other business methods, at some point in time. We therefore expect to see more patents for business methods like those of Priceline and to issue, not only in the United States of America, but also in Canada.

The trend towards increasing the availability of patent protection for business methods poses both opportunities and challenges for companies performing computer-implemented business methods in Canada. E-commerce companies now have a greater opportunity to increase the level of intellectual property protection for their innovative technology. Instead of relying solely on copyright protection, companies should consider filing patent applications for their new internet business methods in both Canada and the United States, before making them available to the public.

However, companies will also have to meet new challenges, including the risk of infringing the patent rights of their competitors. The Priceline and lawsuits indicate that internet companies are no longer using their business method patents merely for defensive purposes, but rather, they are now starting to enforce such patents against competitors. Canadian companies conducting e-commerce over the internet should appreciate that the internet has a world-wide reach. Even if an Internet business method is not yet covered by an issued Canadian patent, it could be protected by a U.S. patent. It is also possible an internet business method may be deemed to be performed in whole or in part in the United States of America, e.g. by U.S. customers using a browser to interact with a website, even if the web site server is located in Canada. If so, the operator of the website in Canada could be exposed to liability for direct or contributory infringement under U.S. patent law. Companies should therefore exercise due diligence, including the conducting of appropriate patent infringement searches in Canada and the United States of America, before adopting or acquiring technology in the field of electronic commerce or other internet business methods.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.