Canada: Canada-US Tax Treaty: Important CRA Guidance On Scope Of Article IV(7)(b)

Last Updated: December 18 2009
Article by Marc G. Darmo, Jeff R. Oldewening, Gabrielle M.R. Richards and Bradley Thompson

Most Read Contributor in Canada, September 2018

The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) has recently provided administrative guidance on how it intends to apply the so-called "hybrid entity rules" of the Canada-US Tax Convention (Canada-US Treaty). This guidance is timely as these rules will enter into force on January 1, 2010.

This update focuses on the specific administrative guidance relating to the application of Article IV(7)(b). From a Canadian perspective, there has been considerable concern over the potential application of this article to unlimited liability companies (ULCs) organized under the laws of British Columbia, Alberta or Nova Scotia.

In general, Article IV(7)(b) provides that an amount of income, profit or gain will not be considered to be paid to or derived by a person who is a US resident where the person is considered for Canadian tax purposes to have received the amount from an entity that is resident of Canada, but, by reason of the entity being treated as fiscally transparent for US tax purposes, the treatment of the amount for US tax purposes is not the same as its treatment would be if that entity were not treated as fiscally transparent for US tax purposes. In the context of ULCs, if applied literally, this rule has the potential to significantly and adversely alter the tax efficiency of typical cross-border structures.

Recent Administrative Guidance

Some of the specific transactions considered by CRA in its new administrative guidance are as follows.

Two-step distribution: A ULC may effect a distribution of its profits to its US corporate shareholder (US Shareholder) by a two-step transaction that is economically equivalent to paying an actual dividend. As a first step, the ULC would increase the stated capital of its shares by a particular amount. As a second step, the ULC would decrease the stated capital of its shares by the same amount and distribute such amount to US Shareholder as a return of capital.

On the first step, the ULC would be deemed to have paid, and US Shareholder to have received, a dividend equal to the amount of the increase in the paid-up capital of the shares of the ULC. Canadian withholding tax would apply to the deemed dividend. The second step would be treated as a return of capital, and would not be subject to Canadian withholding tax.

On November 24th, at the CRA Roundtable of the Canadian Tax Foundation's annual conference, the CRA took the position that Article IV(7)(b) would not apply to this two-step transaction — provided that the deemed dividend resulting from the increase in the paid-up capital of the shares of the ULC is disregarded for US tax purposes and would be similarly disregarded if the ULC were not fiscally transparent. The CRA indicated that generally it would not apply the general anti-avoidance rule (GAAR) to such an arrangement, but left open the possibility that specific facts and circumstances could result in the application of the GAAR. The CRA officially issued an advance tax ruling a day later that essentially confirmed its conclusion.

Luxembourg intermediary: A Luxembourg resident société à responsabilité limitée (SARL) is interposed between the ULC and US Shareholder. The SARL elects to be disregarded for US tax purposes. The ULC pays a dividend to the SARL.

At the CRA Roundtable, the CRA indicated that the five per cent withholding tax rate under the Canada-Luxembourg Tax Treaty would normally apply to the dividend paid by the ULC if the SARL is the "beneficial owner" of the dividends.1

One important question the CRA did not address in this context is whether interest paid by the ULC in such a scenario could benefit from the nil withholding tax rate under the Canada-US Treaty on the basis that Article IV(6) would apply to deem the interest payment to be derived by US Shareholder for the purposes of the Canada-US Treaty.

We understand that a policy proposal in the US could potentially frustrate any planning consisting of inserting a SARL, or other foreign entity in a third country that is disregarded for US tax purposes, between a ULC and its US shareholder. The proposal would essentially allow a foreign entity to be treated as disregarded for US tax purposes only if the single owner of the entity were organized under the laws of the foreign country in which the foreign eligible entity is organized. Given that the ULC and its single owner, the interposed third-country entity, would be created in different foreign countries, the ULC would be treated as a corporation for US tax purposes under this proposal. Some planning might be available to avoid this rule as proposed, but much will depend on the actual language of the proposal if it is enacted into law.

Payments to US Grandparent: The ULC has an interest-bearing debt with US Shareholder, and the debt is rearranged so that instead of being payable to US Shareholder, it is payable to the corporate parent of US Shareholder (US Grandparent).

At the CRA Roundtable, the CRA indicated that, assuming the interest is subject to the same treatment in the US in the hands of US Grandparent as it would be if the ULC were not fiscally transparent for US tax purposes, the CRA would agree that Article IV(7)(b) does not apply to such a restructuring. However, the CRA indicated that it would consider applying the GAAR where such restructuring is part of a double-dip or debt pushdown financing arrangement.

In its Technical Interpretation released on November 25th, the CRA clarified its general position with respect to the application of the same treatment test under Article IV(7)(b). In general terms, the CRA will look at the timing, character and quantum of an amount to determine whether it meets the "same treatment" test, but will not consider its geographical source to be relevant unless this affects its treatment as an item of income for US tax purposes.

In its Technical Interpretation, the CRA went further in blessing payments to a US grandparent where US Grandparent and US Shareholder file a consolidated tax return. This is an important clarification, because in a case where the ULC is a disregarded entity and its deductible payment is treated as a payment by the Canadian branch of US Shareholder, the net effect under the US consolidated return regulations would be to disregard the payment from a US tax perspective. By contrast, if the ULC were treated as a corporation for US tax purposes, payments from it would not be subject to the intercompany transaction rules, and thus there would be a net inclusion for US Grandparent without a corresponding expense in the consolidated group. The CRA effectively concluded that the "same treatment" test under Article IV(7)(b) is limited to a separate entity analysis, and that taxability of a payment in the US is not a relevant consideration in determining whether the payment receives the "same treatment."

A ULC with more than one shareholder: US Shareholder 1 and US Shareholder 2 own shares of a ULC. The ULC has an interest-bearing debt with US Shareholder 1. The ULC is treated as a partnership rather than as a disregarded entity for US tax purposes.

In its Technical Interpretation, the CRA concluded that Article IV(7)(b) would not apply to the payment of interest by the ULC to US Shareholder 1 on the basis that US Shareholder 1 will be considered to earn interest income from the debt with the ULC regardless of the ULC's status as a fiscally transparent entity for US tax purposes. In determining whether Article IV(7)(b) applies to the interest payment, the CRA's focus is on the tax treatment of the interest as an item of income, without reference to the allocation of expenses from the partnership. In other words, Article IV(7)(b) does not apply to such an arrangement even though the net tax effect for US Shareholder 1 will depend on the ULC's status. If the ULC is a fiscally transparent partnership for US tax purposes, US Shareholder 1 would be able to offset its interest income by its share of the ULC's interest expense, whereas if the ULC were regarded, US Shareholder 1 would not be able to offset any of its gross income inclusion with an allocation of interest expense.

In its Technical Interpretation, the CRA also reiterated its traditional position that Article IV(7)(b) would apply to the base case where the ULC pays interest to US Shareholder as its sole shareholder.

Royalty paid to a Third Party: A Third Party that is a US resident and a "qualifying person" under the Canada-US Treaty grants to a ULC the right to use a patented manufacturing process in exchange for a licensing fee.

In its Technical Interpretation, the CRA confirmed that Article IV(7)(b) would not apply to the payment of the licence fee by the ULC to the Third Party. The CRA has essentially clarified that it considers potential differences in the foreign tax credit implications for the Third Party to be irrelevant for the "same treatment" test under Article IV(7)(b).

Back-to-back dividends: A ULC owns a Canadian subsidiary (Cansub). Cansub pays a dividend to the ULC, which in turn immediately pays a dividend of an identical amount to US Shareholder. From a US tax perspective, US Shareholder is considered to have received a dividend from Cansub.

In its Technical Interpretation, the CRA takes the debatable view that Article IV(7)(b) will apply to the dividend paid by the ULC to US Shareholder. The CRA argues that the dividend paid by Cansub to the ULC is a distinct amount for which US Shareholder is not liable to pay Canadian tax, and that therefore the treatment of this amount is not relevant for the same treatment test under Article IV(7)(b).


The CRA's administrative guidance should provide clarity in most circumstances and will greatly diminish the adverse impact of Article IV(7)(b). In this respect, Article IV(7)(b) now presents itself much more as a trap for the unwary than as a significant obstacle to the use of a ULC in a cross-border arrangement.

As Article IV(7)(b) takes effect on January 1, 2010, we expect that further guidance will develop over time through other advance tax rulings and technical interpretations. Taxpayers should review their cross-border arrangements to determine what, if any, restructuring should be implemented to address this new rule.


1 The most recent CRA view on the meaning of "beneficial owner" in light of the Federal Court of Appeal decision in Prévost Car is set out in CRA document no. 2009-032145.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions