Canada: U.S. Climate Change Litigation

Last Updated: December 16 2009
Article by John Goetz, Michael T. Kariya and Alex MacWilliam


The United States remains the centre of international focus as many countries, including Canada, adopt a 'wait-and-see' approach to the implementation of domestic climate change legislation based on U.S. developments. In addition to monitoring U.S. legislative developments, large emitters of greenhouse gases in Canada should consider the potential impacts of recent judicial decisions in the U.S. Given recent judicial decisions by three American courts, a comprehensive business strategy for large Canadian emitters should take into account the potential role of the courts as well as the impact of future climate change litigation.

What the U.S. Courts Said Each of these U.S. decisions arose from litigation against large energy and power companies, with the plaintiffs alleging that the companies' activities contributed to climate change, which in turn caused actionable injuries.

In State of Connecticut v. American Electric Power Company (2nd Cir. N.Y. September 21, 2009), eight states, three land trusts and the City of New York sought injunctive relief against five large public utilities in the District Court for the Southern District of New York. The Plaintiffs sought to force the utilities to abate their alleged contributions to climate change by reducing their emissions of greenhouse gases. The trial level court dismissed the Plaintiffs' action on the basis that it was a political question and, accordingly, not an issue that could be determined by a court. Following an appeal to the Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, the District Court's decision was overturned, paving the way for a new trial on the merits, and permitting climate change litigation to proceed in each of the states over which the 2nd Circuit has jurisdiction (New York, Connecticut and Vermont). The Court held that the lower court erred by equating a political case with a political question. In other words, while climate change is presently a politically charged issue, it should not necessarily be held to be a non-justiciable matter. The Court opined that the judiciary is adept at addressing "new and complex problems", concluding that "[w]ell settled principles of tort and public nuisance law provide appropriate guidance to the district court in assessing Plaintiffs' claims and federal courts are competent to deal with these issues". Relying on earlier cases involving air and water pollution, the Court held that contribution to climate change was sufficient to attach liability to the defendants. The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the matter for further proceedings.

Released only nine days after Connecticut v. AEP, the District Court for the Northern District of California reached a very different result in Native Village of Kivalina v. ExxonMobil (N.D. Cal., September 30, 2009). While the District Court is a lower court in the American federal judiciary system, it is not bound by decisions of a Circuit Court of Appeals other than its own (California is in the 9th Circuit, which includes Alaska, Arizona, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington). The Plaintiffs, the Native Village of Kivalina, and the City of Kivalina, sued 24 large energy and power companies, including ExxonMobil, British Petroleum, Chevron, Royal Dutch Shell, and ConocoPhillips. The Plaintiffs sought compensation for injuries allegedly suffered as a result of receding Arctic ice due to climate change, resulting in the erosion of land on which residents lived, forcing them to relocate. While the Court acknowledged the decision in Connecticut v. AEP, it declined to adopt the 2nd Circuit's approach, finding instead that the issues presented raised a political question, which the courts were ill-equipped to address. The Court distinguished the air and water pollution cases relied on by the 2nd Circuit from climate change cases, noting that the former cases could be confined to discrete geographic areas, while the latter could not. Conversely, the Court stated that the "Plaintiffs' global warming claim is based on the emission of greenhouse gases from innumerable sources located throughout the world and affecting the entire planet and its atmosphere". The Court also noted problems with the Plaintiffs' standing, including the problem of causation and the inability to trace the Defendants' conduct to the Plaintiffs' claimed injuries. The Court dismissed the Plaintiffs' action.

The last in the chronology of recently released cases is Comer v. Murphy Oil USA (5th Cir. Miss. October 16, 2009), a decision of the Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit. The Plaintiffs, property owners along the Gulf Coast who suffered property damage as a result of Hurricane Katrina, sued a number of large energy and power companies for compensatory and punitive damages allegedly caused by greenhouse gases emitted from their operations in Mississippi. The Plaintiffs alleged that the Defendants' emission of greenhouse gases contributed to global warming, which caused sea levels to rise and contributed to the magnitude of Hurricane Katrina. Similar to Connecticut v. AEP, the 5th Circuit overturned the lower District Court's holding that the subject matter was nonjusticiable on the basis of it being a political question. The Court found that the matters were justiciable since there was no basis to find that the subject matter was exclusively within the domain of a federal political branch. Following a similar line of reasoning to Connecticut v. AEP, the 5th Circuit held that it was sufficient that the Plaintiffs could demonstrate that the Defendants' emissions of greenhouse gases contribute to climate change. The 5th Circuit noted that while it arrived at its decision independently, it was consistent with what the 2nd Circuit's decision was in Connecticut v. AEP. Accordingly, the 5th Circuit vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the matter for further proceedings.

The thrust of the Connecticut v. AEP and Comer v. Murphy Oil USA decisions is to pave the way for climate change litigation to proceed against emitters of greenhouse gases in the United States. These two cases suggest that alleged contribution to climate change and resulting effects of global warming is sufficient to sustain a claim at the preliminary stage. Furthermore, these two cases did not view the subject matter of climate change to be a non-justiciable political question. This is in contrast to Kivalina, where the District Court held that contribution was insufficient to attach liability to the defendants, and that climate change was more appropriately addressed by political branches of government.

On November 6, 2009 the Plaintiffs in Kivalina appealed the lower court decision to the Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit. If the 9th Circuit decides to hear the case, it will be of great interest whether it will decide the case in a similar fashion to the 2nd and 5th Circuits. If a split occurs among the Circuit Courts, the likelihood of this question reaching United States Supreme Court increases.

Effect of Legislation on Climate Change Litigation

As of the date of this publication, the United States has not enacted comprehensive climate change legislation. While the House of Representatives has passed the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 and the Senate is currently deliberating the Boxer-Kerry Bill, neither piece of legislation can become law until it is passed by the other chamber, following which it must be signed into law by President Obama. Both the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 and the Boxer-Kerry Bill contemplate a cap and trade system. Under a cap and trade system, an overall cap would be established and pursuant to such cap, companies would be permitted to emit under their prescribed allowance. The presence of a comprehensive federal scheme on emissions could prove to be important for greenhouse gas emitting companies. In addition to providing regulatory certainty, such legislation has the potential to preempt climate change litigation based on federal or state common law claims. Under the U.S. constitutional doctrine of preemption, a clear Congressional intent to create a comprehensive scheme addressing greenhouse gas emissions, including penalties and remedies, could prevent would-be plaintiffs from bringing actions based on federal common law, state statutes, or state common law. In contrast, in Canada any federal scheme would have to expressly revoke a common law cause of action.

Application in Canada

While the decisions discussed above involve U.S.- specific claims, owing in large part to the United States Constitution, the cases raise certain legal principles that are universally relevant. While climate change litigation would be novel in Canada, it could ostensibly be based on similar principles of tort law available in the U.S., including the common law claim of nuisance. Although the political question and standing doctrines do not flow from the Constitution in Canada (as they do in the United States) they are the subject of fundamental common law principles. Consequently, any actions brought in Canada would invariably need to address the suitability of the court system to resolve climate change litigation. Additionally, courts would need to grapple with the concept of contribution and whether a defendant's contribution to a worldwide problem is in itself sufficient to result in liability, when the defendant is one of many worldwide emitters of greenhouse gases.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.